Comments by "michael" (@michaeld4861) on "Macroevolution Cannot Occur - Debunked" video.

@TheMickeymental Your argument makes no sense. Evolution doesn't have anything to do with the start of organic molecules or life. It simply explains how they change over time. Someone literally being able to create a person out of a rock is not necessary. And, yes, fossils do count as evidence. They are Literal evidence. That's like saying a bloody knife cannot be used as evidence in a murder case. And of course scientists will never have a perfectly preserved specimen of every organ of every species ever. How about this. Just provide 1 piece of evidence to the contrary. That's all it would take to dismantle. But of course you can't otherwise every science school book would be rewritten tomorrow.
2
@TheMickeymental You obviously have never had a chemistry class. or biology. If life can only come from life then logically life could not exist. Who's the asinine one again?
2
@TheMickeymental Lies can't be backed by evidence. lol
2
@TheMickeymental There has literally been documented proof of evolution happening with certain bird species, many insects mice, farm animals, any common pet such as dogs and cats. You can't argue against that. What do you think selective breeding is? So you're not erudite, you're just willfully ignorant.
2
@TheMickeymental Besides the definition of rational is using evidence to form you view, not random "god must have done it" nonsense. You fuckers are literally so backwards it painful. If nothing evolves explain how we have literally created new species. I'll wait.
2
@TheMickeymental Evolution happens in two stages. First is DNA mutations. Second is natural selection. If you can disprove just one of those I'll bow down and become your slave. First DNA mutations happen all the time. That how cancer occurs. This is indisputable. Plus if you have any idea how reproduction works you will surely know that offspring contain different DNA combinations than either parent. (It's a mix of both) So I just proved that. Second is natural selection. We bred tiny dogs that don't exist in nature by selective breeding. There I proved that too.
2
@luisfilipe6253 Yes, I refuse to believe a computer could create a new program due to glitches too. The watchmaker analogy is really a poor analogy. First the universe is run by chemistry. Every atom has a binding affinity or attraction to every other atom via electrons (or lack thereof). (Really learning a little chemistry would clear a lot of this up honestly). There's no god adding new info lol that would not make us able to selectively breed things because then we wouldn't get what we are aiming to. So DNA doesn't always copy 100% and things like viruses can actually insert new chains of letters into your DNA and when those extremely tiny changes occur it can sometimes cause accidental changes to the organism such as a different eye color. Sickle Cell is a good example of a simple DNA mutation that can cause a noticeable change. Sometimes these changes are bad, most of the time they do nothing at all, and sometimes they are advantageous. Now, that advantageous one has a better change of surviving and passing on that advantage to its offspring. Those offspring have offspring of their own and somewhere down the line one of them has another mutation that causes another advantage. Over a super long period of time the mutations add up along the way. That is evolution. This is commonly seen in birds that develop different beaks due to only the birds with specific beaks having an advantage in getting a food source. We have also created different species like mice, dogs, cats etc by selective breeding which takes advantage of their different DNA profiles to create a new offspring that does not look like the "original" (this in not done in 1 generation btw but many just like with Gregor Mendel). I hope I explained that somewhat okay. See the watchmaker analogy doesn't work because it claims that the watch just came together all at once which is impossible. Things have to change subtly and slowly over time. No wave is going to make a watch. No human parents are going to have an alien baby that's another species. That's just not how it works.
2
@luisfilipe6253 yes we both agree glitches don't create new computer games. You are clearly not getting it. You are just willfully ignoring and strawmaning what I'm saying.
2
@luisfilipe6253 Computer glitches don't create NEW data. Whereas mutations can be added. Theres a mutation humans get all the time where people inherit too many genes from their parents. Cells divide to create new cells and sometimes errors in cell division and errors in chromosome duplication happen. Down syndrome is having a third copy (or part of a third copy) of chromosome 21. That would be more info than either parent had. New info, longer DNA, more room for mutations. Computer glitches don't create new info, they just break down old info. Since computers are not alive and don't go through cell division on a daily basis there is no way for them to acquire new or longer programs.
2
@luisfilipe6253 Proof? Chemistry has proof. Can you say the same about a god? Or are you denying the existence of water?
2
@AveChristusRex Nature doesn't have intent. therefore nothing with your definition is natural.
2
@AveChristusRex "He shall not be punished" literally means it's ok. You need to go back to school and learn to read man. They can at least teach you that.
2
"but they could originally interbreed" No, they cannot interbreed, that was their ancestors that could. Which by definition is not them. That's what not being able to produce offspring means. Either that or yes they could "originally" interbreed, (if they were their ancestors and not themselves) in which case evolution did occur and so either way he states it he just contradicted himself.
1
@luisfilipe6253 I've already stated the difference. Computers do not make errors. Their circuits bread down. It's all based on electricity running smoothly through the it's circuitry. Computers do not undergo cell division or DNA replication or viral DNA changes and therefore cannot create new or longer info accidentally.
1
@luisfilipe6253 chemistry isn't a material thing and therefore doesn't have to come from nothing. Second, I don't think everything came from nothing either. Besides, that's not proof. You do know what proof is right? Just because you don't know something doesn't mean it came from nothing or that a god must have created it. Your feeble human mind is not omniscient. lol
1
@AveChristusRex Considering that species could just keep adding chromosomes or making them longer.... yeah change is unlimited.
1
@AveChristusRex So "Hindus revering lying scriptures is irrational" but believing lying scriptures of Christianity is not? That's not good reasoning. Oh, also known as irrational.
1