Comments by "Sheila Smith" (@SheilaSmith-z8g) on "Explosive Emhoff Assault Allegations, and MSNBC Producer Caught Telling Truth, w/ Maureen Callahan" video.

@octoman511 Whether your statement is directed at me or someone else, my equally childish response is, "Get a brain."
5
@Mst1959: Oh please...the "nanny needs to come forward for " the sake of the country? If our survival as a country depends on the nanny's report, we have much bigger problems than we think. If the stories on Doug E. are true, that's terrible, but should not determine our vote.
2
Anyone can forget the date of an event, hut no one forgets whether they were present during an event. My "thoughts and prayers," go out to all the poor souls who accept Walz's explanation/excuse for his statements on his visit to China. Walz with his stories, must be Biden's brother.
1
Its no wonder humans drive off a cliff. Just look at what we pay attention to and discuss. Maybe we could have a discussion about what truths are significant and require revelation. Is anyone sick of food fights? I have always been a conservative. I hope that conservatives would behave better than those we oppose. Lowery has a right to defend his character, but we should examine our behavior.
1
Not a Domocrat, veteran will be; never voted Democrat.....however...... Discussions of this type seem to me to be the same "muck raking," that Democrats do. How relevant is the past behavior of a Presidential candidate's spouse, to our lives under that candidate should she be elected President? God help us if votes are based on this sort of information on the spouse of a candidate. What should matter is the candidate's policies, and how will those policies affect Americans? Megyn, said, "I don't know what is true, but...." Then should you be making public statements about anyone? To make public negative statements about another person's character is, at the most slander, and at the least, gossip. Can we promote raising standards of reporting? All that being said, I appreciate Megyn's podcast.
1
@barb2793 NOT relevant to my comment, Barb. Doug, as the spouse of candidate, poses no threat to our government system, or democracy simply because he was violent to a partner in the past. It's awful but irrelevant. Doug poses no threat to my life style, while illegals,inflation etc do. Stick to the terrible Harris policies of the past, and her awful current policy proposals. These are the issues of importance in making a sound voting decision.
1