Comments by "jim james" (@jimijamesjowitt) on "LegalEagle" channel.

Like those 8 foot fascii behind Pelosi when she complianed about patriots.
21
@kiraina25 So if I do anything based on this statement and you're wrong you are saying you will pay damages? Thats a fools bet. But I asume you are being facetious. No man can be held acountable for anothers will or opinion. Whats the point in even having laws. Why you rob this guy house. Ummm cause he told me too. Ok so you had no choice. Well yeah but he said that guy was rich so.. Wait he didnt tell you to rob them just that they were rich? Well he said all signs point to them being rich. Whats that go to do with the buglary? Well I would never robbed them if he hadnt said they were rich..... See how crazy your argument sounds to everyone else?
3
Lots of titles and names are banned in many countries.
3
Places both feet in mouth. The war starts today. Get you attitudes out the gutter. South China sea. 7 nations of navies on route
1
Well if they can show actual loss. It seems rather that they have been kept relevant and offered extra support due to his claims. If anything they should be offering him an advertising deal.
1
They went after SandyHook and the Lanza family estate??
1
The only defamation was trying to go after someone with no evidence to back their claim. They have to prove he didnt make up his claim. So they have to prove its real. Which they didnt.
1
@narcopsy Haha yeah. I switched out my last name when had to do gov contracts get clearance. But unlike some. I made sure I kept my nose clean. Didny take files home or keep a secret server 😅😅 But straight up. I am yet to see one shred of evidence come out that one. As soon as I seen a headline that incident at sandyhook elementary I punched that in the google got their website saying sorry school is closed indefinitely and no admin staff are monitoring this website. No future plans had been sorted other than all pupils transfered to the listed local schools. Basically go away we got shut down and now there is no sandyhook as the building beyond repair. Then later that day website gone and the whole net is full of sandyhook spam comments or theories. Then the next day this is the story set in stone no questions end of. Then I said whats to bet they bulldoze the school before anyone ever gets to go in. Then not one photo or claim of going there until its gone. Now we see they only say it happened. With only negative proof. Like where's my kid. I never met your kid. What about the shooter. Never met him either. What about what about. None of those are evidence or proof or even reasonable doubt proven. Just nothing. So when someone proves the event happened we can say yes we know it happened. Otherwise you cant claim that in court. Its hearsay.
1
Yeah my family had hereditary titles in the 1800s One the cousins had one but no sons. Lord Jowitt. Wouldn't mind that title myself 😂
1
He was found guilty for not providing a defence. Which was say anything you have to give everything. He cant say he was told something and he doesnt have an original copy of the script he was reading. So what evidence or defense other than have you eveb watched alex jones or cnn or msnbc or foxnews? They claim crazy stuff all the time. But they only get in trouble when they actually cause harm. What harm was caused? You think anyone believed the sandyhook story? They had no trial no public inquiry. Just gone down in stone benchmarked unmovable. Can they show what actuallu happened or are they as confused as the rest of us still how someone whom was basically scared of their own shadow goes from dance dance revolution to super serial in a day? No record of anyone come out like thats that guy from school or the park. Just the arcade and the gunrange and hangs out with his mom. Then infamous anf forgotten in kne headline. Why? How? We cant ask anything or we are denying anything happened? What if someone hacked his world of war craft account and said he has do things to get it back? What if there was someone with him that ran away?
1
How can they even ask about a 3rd parties motives or meanings? That crazy talk when you are under oath and mocks any known court process!!
1