Comments by "jim james" (@jimijamesjowitt) on "Big Think" channel.

  1. Its so sad all the adults taxes that go towards propagating this blatant lie. Is fraud on that scale a hangable offence?
    8
  2. MiniCreeper Parkour Nope didnt work. How come a lense can see around that curve buddy? Maybe because you don't understand the scientific method and go with scientific theory. Those guys telling you this nonsense are theorists. They sit in a room talk shit. Real scientists go prove or disprove this theory. I can say what ever I want then if you are a theorist and just say you arent real anyway this is just my observation of a simulation. In theory it works but you cant prove it. But you cant prove its wrong hence the holographic universe theory.
    7
  3. jigmu They think you are crazy till they try it then they start a flat earth channel.
    5
  4. No its not. It is a blatant fraud like a 90 year old man in a wedding dress. Not passable what so ever as a globe. Hasn't lived a day of its life as a globe. People in general do not recognize it as a globe. It doesnt refer to itself as a globe. It therefore isnt a globe.
    3
  5. Does a clock still tick if no one's there to hear it lol
    2
  6. Meaning does it stay the same until observed.
    2
  7. Only something that thinks it is intelligent, instead of thinking about the answer, would say something proving so blatantly obvious to everyone they have little to no intelligence. The vanishing point will always be at a circular radius from you. So when you get a telescope you dont make the world bigger reducing the curve you increase your range and field of vision. Which, funny thing is, pushing the horizon out further bringing the occult into view.
    1
  8. Allan Patterson There are no sides unless you are some communists or fascists. The observable portion of earth is flat. The problem is we cant seem to find a way to observe something so massive at the same time without time travel or wormholes. We cant leave this place. We dont get a second option. It isnt a wet ball that is just plain silly. No ocean can go around a curve. If it was like a golf ball will small oceans that sat in craters then that could make sense. But to say water can do a 180° turn and be like a bow shape is outrageous. I told my teachers in school it doesnt matter what you say, you need to use the scientific method not theory or facts. If it isnt repeatable or easily observable just pointing out random scraps of observation does not make an argument.
    1