Comments by "voteZDLR" (@voteZDLR) on "Bloomberg Television"
channel.
-
41
-
11
-
10
-
8
-
What are they gonna do? Use their best Zerg strats against us? That's literally the only advantage they have, meanwhile there's a strategic reason that the US has taken such an interest in Hong Kong. It is definitely primarily rooted in the humanitarian crisis, for sure, but just like we are using Israel and Saudi Arabia as hubs in the Middle East, Hong Kong will give us a hub in China that we can use as these relations get potentially colder and colder and colder. What we lack in the numbers China has, we make up for it in quality. We have the best, most well equipped military in the entire world, and if a trade war is contentious I think an actual WAR war would go much differently, especially when they see four or five of our eleven (compared to China's one) aircraft carriers. And we can put them just outside of Hong Kong, each one a literal base in and of itself that can sail around as needed strategically while launching fighter jets and bombers.
It won't get to this point, in my opinion, but yeah we're going to see a lot of feet stomping and temper tantrums from China. A lot of threats, a lot of gesturing and beating the war drums.
Make no mistake, though, if it did come to bloodshed, that would be nothing short of the beginning of World War 3.
7
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
@henrymcbark7337 Some people in China have it really, really good. But more people in China have it really, really bad. And I mean it's not like there's not poor people in America, there IS poverty here as well, but the idea that we're censoring people on the level China is is preposterous.
These guys are only able to argue with us because they're using a VPN, YouTube is banned in China for the average citizen. And they have their own special version of Google, as well, with all censored material removed. What you're talking about is their proposed social credit score, where yeah they're basically going to decide how good or bad of a citizen you are based on a variety of superfluous factors.
And yes, they absolutely are using North Korea as something they can point to and be like "See? We're not THAT bad." No China, you're pretty goddamn bad. North Korea is just worse.
Our version of poverty is guaranteed minimum wage at even the worst of jobs like McDonald's. Their version of poverty is working in a sweatshop on iPhones that Americans can buy (and frankly they're more affordable, and in a way we're guilty because of it, because we are profiting from China's slave labor). It's not technically slavery, they're making a few cents an hour, but it might as well be slavery. But yeah I think this conversation with China has been needed to be had for a while now.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@teamtwiistz It's hard to say if they really wanted to beat them or not, I think there's a strategic advantage to having something like them around if you really think about it, but our main interests were simply to occupy at the time. Period. Not to defeat the Taliban, even if that's what they were saying was the goal. Meanwhile, it just wasn't being put in the faces of the people, otherwise if the news was covering the war like they were back during Vietnam it'd probably have had to end a lot sooner. They learned their lesson back then, and yeah the state of our own news is not that great either. It's just not censored news, so still better, but yeah like they're not gonna be talking about wars that have been going on for over a decade you know, let alone wars that would be won. But make no mistake, if another Adolf Hitler came around, they'd formulate a strategy to actually defeat you.
Go ask ISIS. They're a shadow of what they were before, but again, it's easier to fight an enemy in uniform than it is to fight "sheep herders in Afghanistan". We took that threat as seriously as you make it sound. Don't act shocked.
Second comment, TL;DR. Whine on, commy-capitalist boy. Whine on.
1
-
@teamtwiistz Again, we're not trying to take over China. I don't know why you keep harping on that. As far as an enemy in uniform vs. an enemy not in uniform, we're talking the difference between the PLA and "sheep herders in Afghanistan". We take one a bit more seriously than the other, obviously. We're talking hypotheticals here anyway. As in, "China vows to respond to the US's new laws" -- ok. Do what, exactly? Blah blah blah, you're a good little Zergling. I am sure they will factor that comment into your social credit rating. LOL
It's less of a war and more of an occupation, when it comes to Afghanistan. You act like that's the only one we were involved in, too. SMH.
Yes, I'd rather have the state of my country's news than yours. You get only state run news, unless you use a VPN and hop onto all the different options I have as far as informing myself. I get access to all the news in the world without the need to use fucking TOR to get it, including news from your own country, but I don't bother because it's about as propagandistic as North Korea's own media which is fucking hilarious when you have the time and want to watch it on your VPN version of YouTube.
China's got a bigger economy on paper than the US does. IT IS more capitalistic than us. Jesus Christ, you're brainwashed. LOL how are you going to do that and still have class systems, like there's rich people and poor people, but we're communist? No you're not. You're divided into haves and have nots, just like the fucking United States of America, when it comes to money and resources. And actually the dark side of Communism enters the equation when we realize that the have nots in your country are nothing better than glorified slaves. Which we've not had for nearly 180 years.
China is the most hypocritical country in the entire world. And I come from America, so that's saying something. But at the end of the day, I'd still rather be from here than from fucking totalitarian dictatorship communist Red fucking China.
So, yeah, you have a slave economy with rich people and poor people BUT is not the spirit of communism to SHARE the wealth? Of course it is! But it doesn't work, has never worked, and never will work. China is as capitalistic if not more than America is, the only difference is we'll tell you straight to your face and everyone else in the world that we are capitalistic. As long as there is a class system with rich and poor people, then at the very least it's not really a communist country, is it? Jesus Christ, stay brainwashed you fucking tool LOL I'll be sure to report that you were a good little commie to your overlords though.
1
-
@teamtwiistz I am very sure that the literature has been re-written many times to bastardize the meaning of what communism is meant to be. Here I am talking to someone who believes that they have what was the best economy in the world but they're not a capitalistic country. They're in fact communistic, even though it completely doesn't resemble what a communist country is meant to look like. I am very sure the rules have been re-written to trick the gullible and the powerless in your country to thinking it's equitable. But I've made no qualms about the kind of person I am talking to. My only compliment is your English is better than my Chinese, but that's because you've been forced to learn my language and not the other way around.
Mine is the language of capitalism and of business. Something your country has realized it's far more fruitful to be a part of than to keep chasing a false communistic ideal.
So now all you have is a country where they've kept the controlling aspects of communism with the complete lack of emphasis on human rights, but they're also now using people in their factories essentially as slaves to make products for people like me in the West and you've made a fortune doing this. Off the backs of slaves in the "lower class" aspect, the Hellish part of this completely equitable and communistic society where we're all supposed to share everything. What a joke.
Do me a favor before you fuck off, enlighten us all here then if your country is still communist in the sense that everyone understood communism to be in it's original inception and controls more GDP than the Godfather of capitalism itself, the USA, while off of it's lowest class citizens like slaves to do said enriching of themselves, explain to me how it's communist then when resources are clearly not being shared in such a way that people in Hong Kong are desperate not to join your shithole of a situation? Explain it, then, how China has completely changed the definition of what communism actually is, because it's not a communist country in actuality, not by definition. But like every other instance of communism they DO change the rules, they do write new literature that makes it sound like it's a fair deal to all the uneducated people that are victimized by it. Who wouldn't know any better because they aren't ALLOWED to? You tell me, commie boy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@videosdinder4870 Yeah well that was also different, there was mass looting and people were literally killing each other. Also, yeah, we actually have guns here, some of the protesters were engaging in firefights with cops. It's within the rights of law enforcement to shoot back if being shot at. Also yeah like Waco that's considered a sour note in history, besides those riots were racially motivated. You don't have the slightest idea of what racially motivated conflict is in China, when everyone in China is fucking Chinese. But yeah, riots are riots. Most of the deaths during that particularly awful riot were at the hands of the rioters themselves, another reason the police stepped in with deadly force. Do understand the difference between peaceful protest and the fucking LA riots. Apples and oranges.
As far as Ferguson itself, though, one person died during the protests IIRC but it wasn't due to law enforcement. At any rate it's never state sponsored killing, if cops use force unjustly in this country they will be charged and prosecuted for it. If they're deemed to have used force justly, they're not prosecuted.
It's far from what they're mulling in China right now where Beijing will give the OK to use lethal force and there will be no due process as a result whatsoever. THAT is the difference. We've never had a case of peaceful protest where the government has authorized lethal force.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@crystalb4694 Molotov cocktails and bricks are commonplace during US riots. The only difference is bow and arrows, but honestly, I think there's a huge tonal difference in what's underlying what's happening in Hong Kong right now vs. the mood in any other riot that you could conjure up, from Ferguson to the LA Riots of the 90's. The people in Hong Kong essentially are sick of being Chinese and they're a few organizational steps away from beginning the process of seceding, or they'd like to anyway, it's just they don't have anything they can reasonably fight back with EXCEPT for bows and arrows. We've not had any Civil War-esque riots in the US since the mid 1800s but I mean one day we'll likely get that pissed (maybe when Trump loses and/or wins 2020, God forbid though) that we'll be bringing legitimate weapons to the riot like guns of which we have no shortage of. At that point it's more the beginning of a Civil War than a riot, though. Also yeah if the government was actively floating (publicly, mind you) they were about to begin using live ammunition, that wouldn't make me more likely to put my bow and arrow away. To the contrary. If it's all I have to defend myself, it's going nowhere. So yeah, it'll get worse before it gets better, sadly.
1
-
1
-
1