Comments by "voteZDLR" (@voteZDLR) on "Bloomberg Television" channel.

  1. 41
  2. 11
  3. 10
  4. 8
  5. 7
  6. 6
  7. 5
  8. 5
  9. 5
  10.  @teamtwiistz  It's only a coup if we are trying to take over your country. We're not. We do have interests there, though, just as we've had interests every other place we've entered warfare. You're operating under the idea that we somehow "lost" all those campaigns just because we lost the war. We pick our enemies just as much for things they give us to hate them for as much as we pick them based on ulterior interests we have. When it came to the situation in Afghanistan, you have to realize we didn't get into that expecting to actually beat the Taliban. We just wanted to occupy the territory long enough that we could protect our oil interests as well as the poppy fields (the opium crisis has been fueled almost entirely by Afghanistan, and that's one of the jobs of soldiers there -- protect the crops from the Taliban who wished to burn them all down). "Capitalism and liberal democracy are failed systems" yeah so failed that you and your oppressive communist dictatorship regime have taken all of the bits and pieces that convenience them from them with China on an economic level being arguably more capitalistic than America, even, but when it comes to human rights and rights in general among other things like censorship, etc... China's communist insofar as it likes that it can stomp on it's own people and control every aspect of their lives, but when it comes time to buy the SUVs that have completely ruined the atmosphere and overall breathability in the most industrious regions, you're more about making a fucking dollar than the US is.
    3
  11. 3
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14. 2
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. 2
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. ​ @teamtwiistz  Again, we're not trying to take over China. I don't know why you keep harping on that. As far as an enemy in uniform vs. an enemy not in uniform, we're talking the difference between the PLA and "sheep herders in Afghanistan". We take one a bit more seriously than the other, obviously. We're talking hypotheticals here anyway. As in, "China vows to respond to the US's new laws" -- ok. Do what, exactly? Blah blah blah, you're a good little Zergling. I am sure they will factor that comment into your social credit rating. LOL It's less of a war and more of an occupation, when it comes to Afghanistan. You act like that's the only one we were involved in, too. SMH. Yes, I'd rather have the state of my country's news than yours. You get only state run news, unless you use a VPN and hop onto all the different options I have as far as informing myself. I get access to all the news in the world without the need to use fucking TOR to get it, including news from your own country, but I don't bother because it's about as propagandistic as North Korea's own media which is fucking hilarious when you have the time and want to watch it on your VPN version of YouTube. China's got a bigger economy on paper than the US does. IT IS more capitalistic than us. Jesus Christ, you're brainwashed. LOL how are you going to do that and still have class systems, like there's rich people and poor people, but we're communist? No you're not. You're divided into haves and have nots, just like the fucking United States of America, when it comes to money and resources. And actually the dark side of Communism enters the equation when we realize that the have nots in your country are nothing better than glorified slaves. Which we've not had for nearly 180 years. China is the most hypocritical country in the entire world. And I come from America, so that's saying something. But at the end of the day, I'd still rather be from here than from fucking totalitarian dictatorship communist Red fucking China. So, yeah, you have a slave economy with rich people and poor people BUT is not the spirit of communism to SHARE the wealth? Of course it is! But it doesn't work, has never worked, and never will work. China is as capitalistic if not more than America is, the only difference is we'll tell you straight to your face and everyone else in the world that we are capitalistic. As long as there is a class system with rich and poor people, then at the very least it's not really a communist country, is it? Jesus Christ, stay brainwashed you fucking tool LOL I'll be sure to report that you were a good little commie to your overlords though.
    1
  25.  @teamtwiistz  I am very sure that the literature has been re-written many times to bastardize the meaning of what communism is meant to be. Here I am talking to someone who believes that they have what was the best economy in the world but they're not a capitalistic country. They're in fact communistic, even though it completely doesn't resemble what a communist country is meant to look like. I am very sure the rules have been re-written to trick the gullible and the powerless in your country to thinking it's equitable. But I've made no qualms about the kind of person I am talking to. My only compliment is your English is better than my Chinese, but that's because you've been forced to learn my language and not the other way around. Mine is the language of capitalism and of business. Something your country has realized it's far more fruitful to be a part of than to keep chasing a false communistic ideal. So now all you have is a country where they've kept the controlling aspects of communism with the complete lack of emphasis on human rights, but they're also now using people in their factories essentially as slaves to make products for people like me in the West and you've made a fortune doing this. Off the backs of slaves in the "lower class" aspect, the Hellish part of this completely equitable and communistic society where we're all supposed to share everything. What a joke. Do me a favor before you fuck off, enlighten us all here then if your country is still communist in the sense that everyone understood communism to be in it's original inception and controls more GDP than the Godfather of capitalism itself, the USA, while off of it's lowest class citizens like slaves to do said enriching of themselves, explain to me how it's communist then when resources are clearly not being shared in such a way that people in Hong Kong are desperate not to join your shithole of a situation? Explain it, then, how China has completely changed the definition of what communism actually is, because it's not a communist country in actuality, not by definition. But like every other instance of communism they DO change the rules, they do write new literature that makes it sound like it's a fair deal to all the uneducated people that are victimized by it. Who wouldn't know any better because they aren't ALLOWED to? You tell me, commie boy.
    1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1