Comments by "" (@johnsch1988) on "Warfronts" channel.

  1. Capitalism and democracy don't mix
    5
  2. They put the US puppy Saakashvili in prison and immediately peace came. If Zelensky had been removed from power in Ukraine, there would have been no war
    3
  3. Well , you 're funny ! For the United States , Ukraine is nothing more than cannon fodder for attacking Russia , so the United States will prolong the war as much as possible in order to inflict as much damage as possible on Russia , and they don 't care about Ukraine
    3
  4. Propaganda 😂
    2
  5. ​ @raitchison Russia has survived the invasion of the Mongols , Napoleon and Hitler , so it is not the first time that Russia has come out of such problems . The Anglo-Saxons will also be defeated
    2
  6.  @raitchison  It is enough to open the map and see from where and where NATO is expanding to understand who the aggressor is .
    2
  7. What is common ? The USSR won in 2 months and Finland requested peace and fulfilled all the conditions of the USSR
    2
  8. Democracy in Ukraine???😂😂😂😂
    2
  9. What is common ? The USSR won in 2 months and Finland requested peace and fulfilled all the conditions of the USSR
    1
  10. Defence from ? Usa?
    1
  11. ​ @dedefazer There is a 9th wave of mobilization in Ukraine! There will be only 2 in Russia this year !
    1
  12.  @andruloni  What kind of aggression are we talking about ? Maybe about the NATO aggression in Libya ? Iraq?
    1
  13. 350 thousand killed and 700 thousand wounded
    1
  14.  @timoterava7108  Obvious to whom?? It's all at the level of guesswork and speculation. By March, the USSR had broken through the line of defense that the Finns had been creating for many years and did it in difficult conditions in winter ! What exactly prevented the occupation of Finland after that?! Nothing. Mannerheim understood this perfectly well and therefore requested peace and accepted the conditions of the USSR. The rest is the inventions of liars
    1
  15.  @timoterava7108  The USSR could have occupied the whole of Finland in 1945 , but did not do so , and moreover did not even include Finland in its influence and did not establish a pro-Soviet government there . Therefore, all the stories about the war lost by the Finns, where they are trying to make her look like a winner, are lies
    1
  16. ​ @raitchison bot😂
    1
  17. Ukraine fight for NATO hahah
    1
  18. What is common ? The USSR won in 2 months and Finland requested peace and fulfilled all the conditions of the USSR
    1
  19. Ukraine usa puppy state 😂😂😂
    1
  20. ​ @dedefazer lower ahhahha
    1
  21.  @raitchison  ahhahha
    1
  22. What is common ? The USSR won in 2 months and Finland requested peace and fulfilled all the conditions of the USSR
    1
  23.  @timoterava7108  Even before the war, the USSR offered to exchange territories, but the Finnish government refused. The war lasted for 2 months during which time the Mannerheim line was taken and the Red army entered the operational space, i.e. the fall of Helsinki was only a pile of time. Taking into account the heavy losses, the Finnish government requested peace and accepted all the conditions of the USSR, giving 2 times more territory and receiving nothing in return.
    1
  24.  @timoterava7108  3 months is the whole war , and active hostilities were only 2 months and Finland 's losses were such that they came to ask for peace ! Is that clear? The rest is your fantasy. The 270 millionth USSR was afraid of losses of 93 thousand ?? For information, in 1939-1940 alone, an additional 2 million people were drafted into the Red Army! What are you talking about here anyway?! Stop talking nonsense
    1
  25.  @timoterava7108  Your fantasies about what the USSR wanted are nothing more than your fantasies. There is no data requirement for Finland except for the official ones anywhere about the entire territory of Finland. The USSR moved the border away from Leningrad and thus prevented the Germans from capturing it in 1941. This is exactly what Stalin wanted, not the annexation of the Finnish marshes))
    1
  26.  @timoterava7108  That is , the Soviet leadership was not afraid of losses , but suddenly they were afraid of them and did not advance further , although the most difficult place of defense was passed and then it was possible to calmly increase Finnish losses at times , because they could no longer hide behind the defense line . Where is the logic !! And she's not here because you're talking nonsense. )))
    1
  27.  @timoterava7108  Another lie . The USSR was never an ally of Hitler! Aren't you tired of it yet?
    1
  28.  @timoterava7108  Oh yes, the Molotov Ribbentrop Pact is just a non-aggression pact. Hitler had exactly the same pact with Poland, France and Britain. They were all Hitler's allies too!?!?
    1
  29.  @timoterava7108  Stalin knew about Hitler's plans to attack the USSR from the moment they were adopted! What are you writing about, stupid?? Stalin only did not know about the date of this attack, because the sweep never received them and therefore the exact dates of the attack were not known
    1
  30.  @timoterava7108  There's no point even sorting out all your Finnish lies
    1
  31.  @timoterava7108  There's no point even sorting out all your Finnish lies
    1
  32.  @timoterava7108  Secret protocols are fake. Everyone who could trade with Hitler. What's the problem here?? The USSR and Germany have never been allies, because in order to do this, it is necessary to conclude an alliance treaty. Can you tell me where and when the Allied treaty was completed?
    1
  33.  @timoterava7108  According to secret protocols, Finland was supposed to be joined by the USSR , and Lithuania by Germany ! So where did it happen?? The lies of the CIA are not interesting to sort out
    1
  34. Bot
    1
  35.  @lucamckenn5932  Under capitalism, power belongs to rich people, the owners of large businesses, and it is they who run the state for their own good. What kind of democracy can we talk about? These are incompatible things, because won't you say that the voice of a worker is equal to the voice of a big businessman
    1
  36.  @WhiteIkiryo-yt2it  Sweden has never tried socialism, big business has always had power there, and those social benefits were a forced measure due to the high popularity of left-wing parties, it was their coming to power and revolution that the oligarchs were afraid of and they had to share with the workers.
    1
  37.  @WhiteIkiryo-yt2it  Sweden, like all other capitalist countries, is dying out, the local population does not have the money to have offspring, and the authorities have not come up with anything better than importing migrants! Well, do you like capitalism where the local population is dying out , and migrants from other countries are taking their place ? This awaits all countries under capitalism and the only way out is socialism! Without the transition from capitalism to socialism, all Western countries and their peoples will die out
    1
  38.  @Styxswimmer  Socialism is the nationalization of all private property and its transfer to the general administration of the people. Where and when did this happen in Sweden?? You're writing nonsense.
    1
  39.  @Styxswimmer  Stop writing nonsense there has never been socialism in Sweden, even the monarchs are still in power there. The parliament under capitalism is completely under the control of the oligarchs and will never decide on the transition to socialism because all these parties and politicians are henchmen of big business
    1
  40.  @Styxswimmer  Under capitalism, only parties completely under the control of capitalists, i.e. big business, are allowed to enter parliament. Therefore, there can be left-wing parties in the parliament of any country under capitalism. Instead, there are pocket politicians like Bernie Sanders in the USA and there are plenty of such politicians to deceive the workers. In the USA and Europe, allegedly leftist parties are not engaged in protecting the interests of workers, but in protecting sex minorities... This is utter nonsense
    1
  41.  @Styxswimmer  Politicians are nothing more than talking dolls, they will say what is beneficial to their owners. Stupid people listen to what others say , and smart people look at what they do . Sweden has always been a capitalist country. It is this capitalism that has brought Sweden to a dead end, when the local population can no longer afford to have children, and the population is increasing at the expense of migrants. Hello Muslim Sweden! Glory to capitalism!
    1
  42.  @aucontraire1986  There are so many defenders of the oligarchs ... The Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Soros and others are very happy that they have people like you to protect their property and power
    1
  43. The Finns lost the war in 2 months . What kind of Finnish success are we talking about ?
    1
  44. Fake news from Jew propaganda
    1
  45. The whole American army is fighting for money , what are you talking about ?
    1
  46. What the hell are you talking about ?😂
    1