Comments by "Vale Tudo" (@valetudo1569) on "CNBC Television" channel.

  1. He stole classified documents. What are you talking about
    2
  2. Goodjob Biden!
    2
  3. He absolutely does not. He was, himself, trying to make open AI a for profit company... look it up, its all documented. He wanted full control and to make it for profit and they said he couldn't have full control - so he left. Read about this before you make strong opinions
    2
  4.  @Charles-qe7kc  The way that Japan and China were able to fund the massive investments in infrastructure and manufacturing is by suppressing wages and driving up savings (hence the low consumption). Its a tried and true model for rapid development (Vietnam is also doing this now). Professor Michael Pettis in Peking University does the best job at explaining this and I recommend you look him up. He's a respected economist even within China. I cannot agree China is on the best path because we are not seeing a strengthening social safety net, on the contrary, many provinces are struggling with debt so much that they are cutting back on the social safety net. I have not seen any indication there are significant efforts to stimulate the demand side, only the supply side... and that is exactly the issue of how this problem happened in the first place. Countries know they need to eventually shift to consumption for economic growth to continue - but very few ever do it, and theory is that groups of people get very powerful from the old model and use that power to obstruct its change. Right now we are seeing a ton of supply side investment switching from real estate over to manufacturing... so its the same old supply side playbook, and why consumption will continue to lag until the entire model changes.
    2
  5.  @后宫后  Lol wow so clever, did you think of that all by yourself?
    2
  6. Tom looks like he has a glass eye
    2
  7. Elon and Vivek didn't understand the heavy anti-immigrant/nationalist movement of the people they got in bed with. They don't like immigrants or foreigners, and they will turn on you if you don't fall in line.
    2
  8. Not in half.. you're crazy
    1
  9.  @Seven.Heavenly.Sins.666  Not gonna happen
    1
  10.  @Seven.Heavenly.Sins.666  But it hasn't lol. I live in China and Iphones are not half price or even close to it. You're talking nonsense
    1
  11.  @Seven.Heavenly.Sins.666  Umm well yeah, I know what country I live in
    1
  12.  @Seven.Heavenly.Sins.666  Lol I don't know what else to tell you. Why would I make that up
    1
  13.  @Seven.Heavenly.Sins.666  Lol alright can you push that to see that I'm not lying then? The reason I replied to you in the first place is bc I live in China and wanted to dispute what you were saying
    1
  14.  @Seven.Heavenly.Sins.666  你也是
    1
  15.  @mariajiao4855 stop with the racist bs
    1
  16. They are right about full employment. Stop believing the right wing hype that the sky is falling as long as Biden is in the WH
    1
  17. Hmm I see both sides of it. In situations where the employer has a lot of leverage and worker does not... ie you really need a job, or you simply don't understand what a non-compete is (many young people do not) - then its not that simple and could deny future work opportunities once you leave. At the same time - if you work for a media company (such as a youtube podcast) you want to make sure you aren't hiring people just so they can learn from you, then turn right around and use that to copy and compete with you and poach your staff/guests. I knew of a specific case where this happened
    1
  18. I agree is diversifying from China and I also believe Taiwan is it's own country...but why does TSMC hosting an event in Arizona and Tim Cook being there have to do with anything? They already get chips from TSMC, as does China. This is a non-issue thrown into the video for nothing other than fluff
    1
  19.  @rakeshmaskare5050  Yeah I'm aware and agree with all you are saying. I just don't get how Tim Cook being at the event is relevant. It's common knowledge that both Apple and China get chips from them, is all I'm saying. It's not relevant he is at the TSMC event
    1
  20. Compared to China? Pretty well... especially since China has printed more money than anybody
    1
  21. Only idiots do
    1
  22.  @thetangieman3426  Lol like where. Recessions have a specifically defined, and the numbers simply haven't reflected that. If 2+2 is 4, you can't say 2+1 is 4 just because "it's been that way for months. It says so everywhere".
    1
  23.  @davidolusola1248  Well for 1 - that was last year. You said we've been "in recession for months.". In addition - if you call that a recession then that was the weakest recession ever and I'll take it. It was barely negative the second quarter and it was because of inventory carryover. So it may have just barely been a recession on paper, but a lot of economists don't actually consider it a recession. As of now - the economy is actually doing well and has held up exceptionally well in the face of all of these interest rate hikes.
    1
  24. Because every incumbent party globally lost in elections this year. Inflation was a global phenomenon, despite Americans thinking it was only a US problem. Whatever party was in office during the last 4 years likely would've lost
    1
  25. It's not a Lehman moment, it's a Japan-esque multi decade saga
    1
  26.  @bobcharles7716 So the opposite of the picture you are painting is true. PPP is a metric China uses to claim it's the biggest economy in some respect. Its actually not a good representation of the overall economic power. Japan was wealthy before it got old and stagnated, China is old before it got wealthy... and thats exactly why it could be much worse situation than what Japan experienced.
    1
  27.  @bobcharles7716  Bob 你的真名是什么？Anyways, you can believe what you want to believe about China's economy, but what will happen - will happen...and you can still be here on youtube trying to downplay everything
    1
  28.  @bobcharles7716  Gordon Chang is a nut, no need to even reference him. Look man, I don't want to get into it because I can tell your one of those guys that will go on forever. You're inaccurate to act like the PPP is "the way" to value an economy and the IMF does it - because it's one of the methods the IMF uses, it's not "the" method. I also don't care what the CIA does because they're the CIA, not a relevant economic body. Also this is youtube, don't expect people to be "polite". You can argue all you want to, but lets see what happens with China's economy. I am predicting a much slower growth for the rest of the decade and then even slower growth in the 2030's. Meaning China will never reach the overall size of the US economy. We'll see if I'm right
    1
  29.  @bobcharles7716 Whatever you say buddy, have a good day
    1
  30.  @bobcharles7716 If you say so bud. I say China's economic model is dying or is done. Time will tell who is right
    1
  31.  @bobcharles7716  What planet do you live on man. You must only look at tanky, pro authoritarian videos on Youtube, and have your head under a rock on objective facts that are happening in the Chinese economy right now. You're insane if you think that China is in somekind of strong position and the G7 is now somehow scared. I don't know what planet you live on, but it ain't earth
    1
  32.  @bobcharles7716  Let me explain something else to you - your PPP measure of economics is just a theory - it relies on the thinking that the yuan was grossly undervalued, that it would appreciate against the dollar and that will carry it to being a bigger nominal economy. Not only is it a theory based on future projections - the exact opposite has happened in China. The currency has depreciated, the population is shrinking faster and sooner than expected, the property bubble is bursting - with 70% of household wealth in property. Not only is there no sign that China isn't changing it's model in the foreseeable future - it would still have to undergo an extremely painful rebalancing period that would take many many years, similar to Japan. Lastly - I live in China and have for many years, I speak Chinese, and I see it first hand. Nobody here feels like they are winning - since Zero Covid, all of my friends who had the money to leave, have left or will be leaving in the next year. Others want to leave but cannot. They aren't buying homes, and many are seeing the value of the homes they own - fall. You are doing yourself a disservice by believing all of this fake news about how great things are going here, because its all propaganda
    1
  33. It feels like he's running defense for OPEC. Super odd
    1
  34.  @secularapple  They did try to issue new shares and it set the whole thing off
    1
  35.  @secularapple  I'm sayin if you look at the sequence of events - they did decide to sell shares... I think like 2.5 million shares. Thats when word got out about their troubles and the bank run started.
    1
  36. "The market is eager and hoping " to go up is right. They're still in denial that Trump isn't the pro-growth guy they thought
    1
  37. To compartmentalize one issue - I think Xi is very politically and ideologically focused, less economically focused, and was overconfident in China's dominant position in supply chains. Zero Covid is big example of when he drove a major policy on politics instead of balancing economics, and saw that companies were not married to China's service as a supply chain provider. It's becoming more competitive and companies are/were more willing to diversify than expected
    1
  38. except when they are promising massive tax cuts for corporations
    1
  39. The market(giant institutional investors and fund managers) is hoping rate hikes are coming at the end of the year because 1. to keep their clients happy. and 2. because they have been conditioned for the last 16 years to think low interest rates are the norm. Knock it off.... you're either lying, letting your desires and bias influence your judgement, or all of the above.
    1
  40. Instead of trying to scare Taiwan, China should ask itself why they increasingly have moved to not be a part of them. Actions in Hon kong killed the idea of a two country one system option, aggressiveness in Taiwan straight has also pushed them farther away. You can't scare, coerce, and use threat of force to make people want to be with you. You catch more bees with honey than vinegar... maybe they should stop throwing so much vinegar
    1
  41. Lol what are you on about. Pure nonsense...
    1
  42. I'm just always skeptical with the herd mentality in the market. It seems to always go the opposite way...
    1
  43. You do realize that China has about 2.5 the total as US right? It's in their local government financing vehicles, so it does not show up if you simply google China's debt to GDP (which uses national government debt). Google "China's real debt to GDP" and you'll find much more
    1
  44. Because the economy is objectively good
    1
  45. Lol yeah and they can't find jobs
    1
  46. Right and everybody was saying the first half would be really tough and the market would bottom/re-test October lows. Basically: "Nobody knows anything."
    1
  47. Yup it's called recency bias
    1
  48. Right... this guy sounds more like an index/market guy and not somebody who understands the structural problems of the economy.... or at least pretends not to to promote Kraneshares
    1
  49. It barely went down... stop it
    1
  50. There is a major, widespread misunderstanding of "free speech". Free speech only protects you against the government, it does not apply to private platforms.
    1