Comments by "Michael Kahn" (@michaelkahn8903) on "Себастиан Юнгер: Почему ветераны скучают по войне" video.
-
8
-
7
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
Do you want the bottom line? Why doesnt any actions make sense? Why do some things seem contradictory to a better way of producing greater income? Why do these ideas sometimes fail, and they fail in what appears to be totally stupid calculations? The world power in charge behind it all is the vatican. The Jesuit general, Sosa Abascol, also called the "black pope" because of his garb, is in charge of all banking (in the world), all secret intelligence (in the world), and freemasonry. Freemasons are an organization that descends from the KNights Templar, who were the crusaders that fought as mercenaries for the catholic church. They worship satan. I know this sounds crazy, but my books prove it. go to www.truthforceinternational.org and you can download them for any donation. sound crazy?? Let me spell it out for you. E.V.I.L. I studied the bible 10,000 hours, some in original greek and hebrew, using lexicons. The bible even proves it, as does history. I have documented it. I dont "interpret" the bible, or go back to confusing ancient languages, the bible makes it very clear. even if you only donate $1, give it a try, and see for yourself. here is a sample;
1John 5:19 We know that we are of God, and the whole world lieth in the evil one.
2Corinthians 11:13 For such men are false apostles, deceitful workmen, disguising themselves as apostles of Christ.
2Co 11:14 And no wonder, for even Satan disguises himself as an angel of light.
2Co 11:15 So it is no surprise if his servants, also, disguise themselves as servants of righteousness. Their end will correspond to their deeds.
Eph 6:12 For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers over this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places.
The book I wrote THE UNTOLD NATURE OF CHRISTIANITY goes into hundreds of scriptures, most in context, and proves who wrote the New Testament, Jesus never existed, and it was fabricated to impose a slave and submissive mentality on the people for the roman empire. it shows who the original god really was, who we call jehovah, jesus,and allah. And it proves that we still worship that god here in US and call him jesus! why is there so much evil in a world that is controlled by a supposedly good, all loving, all powerful god? i have the answers.
2
-
2
-
@theaberrantdon In his book, Mr. Baigent gives a description of Lieutenant General William Boykin’s history of service to the United States. At age 29 Boykin joined the special operations group, Delta Force. In 1980 he participated in Delta Force’s unsuccessful attempt to free US embassy hostages in Iran. In 1983 he was wounded invading Grenada. In 1989 he served in Panama in an operation to capture President Noriega. As a colonel in 1993 he chased cocaine kingpin Pablo Escabar, and later that year, was an adviser in the famous confrontation in Waco, Texas. Finally, in October 1993, he commanded the Delta Force group during the battle of Magadisu, the battle that was the subject of the famous book and film “Black Hawk Down.” After recovering from wounds, he was appointed head of special operations divisions at the Pentagon, then he was transferred to be deputy director of Special Activities of the CIA. From 1998-2003, he was first general in charge of United States Army Forces Special Command based in Fort Bragg, North Carolina, the head of the John F Kennedy Special Warfare Center. From 2003-2004 he was assigned to introduce methods of interrogation (torture) as practiced in Guantanamo Bay Prison in Cuba to be used at Abu Ghraib prison in Baghdad.
In early 2003, General Boykin arranged for his close friend Reverend Bobby Welch to send letters inviting church pastors to attend training sessions at Fort Bragg. Take note that Rev. Welch was elected president of the Southern Baptist convention in 2004. The letter included these words: “We must find a group of men who are warriors of faith, pastors who have the guts to lead this nation to Christ and revival.” The author of this book that you are now reading, would like to remind you now that these men have gone to seminary and are aware of the Bible’s deceptions, and that like virtually all pastors, are aware that god is evil, and that they are all lying hypocrites. Boykin is not religiously trained, he is an experienced seasoned killer, who has devised methods of torture.
The training was an intensive two-day session, part of a scheme called the “faith force multiplier.” The department of defense defines the “faith force multiplier” as an addition to any combat force that significantly increases its fighting capacity, and so its chance of success. Lieutenant Tim Carlson, military chaplain for US army corps of engineers, explained: “I suggest that the greatest force multiplier known to the world is faith.” Along with the concept of “faith force multiplier” take into consideration how military forces are indoctrinated to follow their “superiors” orders, and how not doing so is treason, and is punished. Soldiers are indoctrinated to follow orders blindly, to trust that those at “headquarters” are well informed, highly competent, and on the side of righteousness. Christians and soldiers don’t ask questions. They might find out something.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
@Hdizzie00 what poetry, the desert was red, the desert was green..profound.. let us admire the genius, the inspiration, the inane repeating of the obvious- the pursuit of happiness in being perceived, as planned, as the pursuit of money and material possessions, as if they have any relation to each other. in actuality, they are exclusive, but because the media and other forms of propaganda have deemed it so, the bewildered herd follow along, like lemmings following a pied piper.
1
-
@Hdizzie00 maybe he sacrificed and felt purpose, but i do not respect nor pity nor feel he is justified. The soldiers enlist, knowing their leaders are liars, seeing US at war constantly, and clearly 9-11 had no nation responsible, later we learned it was a demolition job. These people dont value life (of anyone other than their buddies) enough to investigate if those that they are killing are actually guilty of any aggression(they werent), that they felt purpose is irregardless, so did the nazis. Brotherhood is fine, but pick your friends, dont buddy up with other murderers. And regarding him being a reporter, they didnt tell the truth about what happened there, why would i listen to a liar, or read a book of somebody pandering to the corporations who entertain us with fabrications, and call it news, and make money lying to us telling us how much purpose the killers are who they deceived into going to the middle east to destroy whole nations. AND YOU RESPECT THIS MOTHERFUCKER??
1
-
FROM MY BOOK:Now regarding the true source of Christianity. Worship of one god appears to have been initiated in Africa, specifically in Egypt, home of the legendary "mystery schools" whose knowledge was recorded and kept in the "Kemmet," temple of the god "Aptah." The twelfth Egyptian dynasty had monotheistic worship of Aten, a solar deity associated with Rah. One basis of the mystery school of moral teaching is that it was taught through the use of symbolism and allegory (parables). Plato is considered to have been an initiate of the Eleusinian Mysteries, as clues to this exist in his works. The students of his academy would have been exposed to the philosophies and ideals that were taught in the mystery schools. One of his students, Aristotle, was the tutor of the Greek conqueror Alexander the Great. Alexander's conquests are legendary, and his interest in conquering lands that have the reputation of having birthed mystery traditions was made apparent. It is not inconceivable that acquiring a storehouse of knowledge by military force was their motivation to conquer Egypt. By the time that the Greeks conquered the Egyptians, they had evolved to worshiping Horus, and his representation of the all-seeing eye. A note: It is interesting that Socrates’ (tutor of Plato) teachings not only led to the initiation of stoicism through his student Zeno, but also developed into opposite values of hedonism through another of his student’s, Aristippus. This is of particular curiosity in light of how the bible teaches the necessity of "taking the straight and narrow path," but whose result is almost always the worldliness of riches, sensual gratification, luxuries, and hypocrisy. That may also be why those who teach others to love their neighbors support military conquest. Ptolemy Soter (367 BC-282 BC) was a general leading Alexander the Great's Greek army in the middle- east. After conquering Egypt, Ptolemy ruled over it from 323BC to 285 BC, fusing Greek and Egyptian religions into the Serapis cult. The Romans conquered the Greek empire in 30BC. It is conceivable that the Romans, who had access to, and were probably influenced by the mystery religions, engaged a certain Josephus to compose what is now known as the New Testament. Born a Hebrew, Josephus was a scholar of the Torah. (May I remind you that the composing of the first five books of the Old Testament, Genesis through Deuteronomy, is attributed to Moses- He wrote that he was raised as an Egyptian prince- possibly the only truism from those books). This is evidence that the origin of the Hebrews may have been with Moses, not Abraham, who was probably a fabrication by Moses. Josephus was involved in the Hebrew rebellion against Roman rule around 70 AD, which resulted in the destruction of the temple. When Josephus perceived the inevitability of a Roman victory, he treacherously abandoned his leadership role of the revolt, and fought on the side of the Romans. Later, he married a Roman aristocrat and gained a degree of status as a Roman citizen. He is the author of the geographically and historically accurate book called “The Antiquity of the Jews”. This included a few words regarding Jesus. That is, curiously, the only reference to Jesus found anywhere by anyone, other than the bible, in the first century (other than other "gospels" which have
134 | P a g e
been discarded for inaccuracy). Why nobody in the time Jesus supposedly lived would mention somebody with as much fame as Jesus supposedly had, in writing, is a profound mystery, unless Jesus never existed, and his teachings were authored by Josephus. That Jesus, who was a revolutionary, would not oppose slavery, and would teach to pay taxes to both a tyrannical oppressive occupying power, and to false teachers, is puzzling. In the rest of scriptures, Jesus is portrayed as being a courageous man of integrity, who did not fear the Romans, so this was placed not as a ruse, but as words encouraging payments. He called the temple "a den of thieves," so why now encourage giving money to thieves?
1
-
@Derna1804 Of all the "original" documents of the New Testament that have survived to this day, the earliest are scientifically established to have been written between 75 and 125 AD. This
135 | P a g e
is forty-five years after Christ's supposed death. If Jesus really existed, and truthfully wanted to establish a path to heaven, would he not have documented his teaching himself, to assure the accuracy of the recording? And if not, why didn't his apostles do so sooner? These documents were composed shortly (about five years onward) after Josephus joined the Romans. Thus we have an explanation for the centralized orderly governance of the Roman Catholic Church. It was not initiated by the apostolic missionaries traveling around the world as claimed in the NT, but was a fabricated intentional misguidance, a scheme by the Romans, deliberately carried out as a plot to destroy humanity. Most people see Christianity as moral, humble, and as do-gooders. For further insight, read the politically and historically accurate description of how Christians have hijacked the planet and created destructive powers and systems (principalities) in ANGRY, LOUD AND CLEAR TRUTH. This chapter has now shown the source of symbolic imagery, parables, and the reason for the direction Christianity has taken over the years.
1
-
@Derna1804
CONCLUSION
We can come to the obvious conclusion that an all-good, all-loving and powerful God did not author the Bible or Quran. If one had, it would not have the lies, contradictions, or faulty teachings promoting wrong values. This leads us to perceive that Jesus never existed. With this book, I think we can state that now as being a proven fact. The implications of that fact are monumental. The laws of nations that are based on religion are therefore negated, and those who rule nations based on the religious standing, no longer carry legitimate authority. All Christian, Jewish, and Muslim nations’ basic tenets are founded on falsehood and intentional deception. We can now rid ourselves of leaders who are supported by religious organizations and institutions and religious leaders. My next book, ANGRY LOUD AND CLEAR TRUTH, will show the error in the Declaration of Independence and of the Constitution, and more. It will explain how we have been brought to the brink of destruction. Further, it will illustrate how every system (principality) was designed to take us down, and keep us there. By promoting the whole world into functioning through the use of money, and by promoting the idea that we need all kinds of material possessions, the evil powers have held us in a vice grip. As I have clearly illustrated and proven with a multitude of scriptures and facts, using logic and reason, the leaders of Christianity are misleading the people intentionally, and the religions are based on lies intended to destroy the planet’s peoples. The God Horus is also known as Satan, and has also used the names Jehovah, Jesus, and Allah. The Vatican is the force creating most of the world’s evils, as I will further illustrate in ANGRY, LOUD AND CLEAR TRUTH. Every establishment leader is corrupt and evil, as the Vatican doles out the influential positions and resources to those who further it’s agenda. The world’s mainstream media, religions, and government, as well as education systems, are based on deceptions, and have deceived the masses. One can only live comfortably by conforming to the system established by evil power. Most people have chosen the easy way, or have been deceived into being a willing cog. While all those who further this evil’s agenda are doing as told to by their master, there are those within every religion who are working for righteousness. Evil and righteousness are not defined by one’s race or religion, it is revealed by one’s character, if one has chosen the right path. A bad start does not always mean a bad finish. While there are consequences to making bad decisions, and many last forever; one can still choose to work for righteousness no matter what evil done earlier. Those who have been deceived can be awakened to truth, and correct themselves. The powers that be deceive us and promote bad values, then when we are fooled, and follow them; should the people be to blame, or those who deceived them? Yet what excuse is there for not ensuring that we don’t commit grievance error? We must be diligent to make sure we are not deceived. The worst enemies of righteousness are the love of money; and the ability to deceive, and to be deceived; as well as the desire for power and to lord over others.
1
-
@Derna1804 WHY DOES THE NEW TESTAMENT PROMOTE BEING A SHEEP? tURN THE OTHER CHEEK? TRUST IN THE LORD, NOT YOUR OWN JUDGMENT, WHEN YOU ARE WEAK YOU ARE STRONG, REJOICE WHEN YOU ARE PUNISHED FOR DOING GOOD, BLESS THOSE WHO CURSE YOU, LOVE THOSE WHO HATE YOU, BLESSED ARE THE MEEK, FORGIVE 70X7, REJOICE IN PERSECUTIONS, BE A MARTYR, SLAVES OBEY YOUR MASTERS NO MATTER HOW WICKED THEY ARE, THE GOVERNOR IS PLACE THERE BY GOD TO DO GOOD, HONOR AND OBEY HIM, RENDER UNTO CAESAR AND UNTO GOD (PASTORS), MUST I GO ON?
1
-
@Derna1804 GET READY FOR A BUNCH OF QUOTES FROM MY BOOK- THAT QUESTION WILL BE ANWERED:Now for some teachings you are not accustomed to. Everywhere we go, we see pictures or statues or stained glass representations of Jesus. They all show a white man with long light hair. The information we are given regarding his original race and culture have been skewed in my opinion. He was a Hebrew, a descendant of the tribe of Judah. May I remind you that Israel is found in the middle east. According to the OT, the original Hebrews, Jacob and Joseph, did not need to travel far to arrive in Egypt. I believe that they had further to go on the trip back than to arrive in Egypt. Egypt, of course is in the north part of Africa. Whereas many Egyptians are light skinned, as are many Israelis, back then, the pure race was likely quite dark. In the likenesses on engravings and art that survived the centuries, Egyptian caricatures and representations of their people looked like they were of the same facial characteristics as Africans of Negro race. Moses was mistaken for an Egyptian by the Midianites (Exodus 2:17-19), so it could very well be that the original Hebrews were dark-skinned. After all, they were slaves. In addition, there is no description of any Hebrew being light-skinned in the Bible, but the Song of Solomon describes a woman (whom many scholars testify represents the nation of Hebrews), as being dark-skinned in chapter one, verses five and six. And in the book Revelation, in chapter one, it is written that Jesus has hair like wool, and in chapters one and two, he has feet like bronze. That all does not sound like a Caucasian to me. When most people see a painting of Jesus that identifies him as being negro, the comment is invariably, that they have painted him to look like African American by a black man, and that it is race-motivated. These paintings are only found in churches whose majority are black, and whites will never concede that Jesus may have been black without all kinds of evidence; but will they ever feel the need to prove his whiteness?
Why
1
-
@Derna1804 Now, more about the nature of the Bible as we know it, with the teachings of Paul. Why is it that there are a few teachings of John the Baptist, Jesus, and James that represent a kind of love-in-action, not just a warm feeling. They name the faults of worldliness, and give a code of ethics; a poor-common-man’s perspective of equality, justice, and fairness that appeals to everyone’s sense of truth and righteousness. They are principles worth living for, and even worth dying for.
But somehow, they are lost in vague parables, pointless miracles, and later with words about faith, the cross, and the blood. Who watered down the gospel, if Jesus and John ever did really exist? The Bible speaks much of them, but of other sources giving accounts of their existence, only one has a work that we can read today, and that only mentions Jesus. He was briefly mentioned by Josephus, a historian who recorded events of Judaism of that time. As important and popular as the Bible claims Jesus to be, Josephus only gave him one or two sentences. Josephus was a Hebrew scholar who was involved in leading the Jewish rebellion against Rome, but switched loyalties when Rome was obviously going to have victory. The Hebrews were slaughtered, and the temple totally destroyed. There are many scholars who question the validity of the few words regarding Jesus in Josephus’ chronicles, believing that they were added later. A Roman senator by the name Tacitus recorded the fire in Rome and the existence of Christians at his time, but he had been born twenty-five years after Christ’s death. The evidence points to the existence of Christians at the time of Paul’s recorded writings, but proof of the Bible’s validity is not unquestionable.
1
-
@Derna1804 According to Paul, everybody is a servant, and: “Therefore I take pleasure in infirmities, in reproaches, in necessities, in persecutions, in distresses; for Christ’s sake: for when I am weak, am I strong” – This leads to acceptance of abuse and slavery. By his teachings, nobody feels wronged. If no man feels wronged, then there is no such thing as wrong, and anything goes. “Hurt me, I don’t’ mind”, becomes “Hurt him, I don’t mind.” Could this be the source of apathy, so rampant in America, and all of our complacency also? Could it be the source of “live and let live” (“live and let die”)?
Paul (or, as I have concluded, Josephus) was not only a philosopher, he was not only a missionary, he was also an organizer. Christianity was the only cult in the empire to grow so speedily and to have such powerful an organization. Paul had ensured that the churches that he founded were not left to organize autonomously, he retained strong leadership through visits and letters distributed widely. He and his contemporaries understood the necessity of central control. There were pastors, elders, and bishops comprising leadership.
Between 217 and 253 A.D., there were twelve Roman emperors, all met their end unnaturally. The Roman empire was lacking strong leadership. When Constantine’s father the emperor died in 306, he had to fight to inherit his father’s title. On October 28th of 312, he defeated his rival for emperor, with “the heavenly sign of God (the cross)” on his soldiers’ shields. He claimed to have seen a vision of a cross in the sky the previous day, inscribed in Greek with the translated Greek words “in hoc signo vinces” = “By this sign, conquer.” He later claimed that Jesus appeared to him that night, ordering
92 | P a g e
him to put the sign on the shields. Perhaps Constantine concluded that the long-lasting myth of Jesus was ripe to impose as the state religion.
A centralized religion, with god-ordained obedience to the ruler, endorsing nonresistance, slave mentality, persecution perceived as a reward for godliness (and to be received with joy), was perhaps custom made for Roman rule; if indeed it had not been conceived by, and initiated by Rome; and the deception of its origins hidden in history, fabricated and lost over time.
Edward Gibbon, an eighteenth century historian of Rome, stated: “The clergy successfully preached the doctrines of patience and pusillanimity, the active virtues of society were discouraged; and the last remains of military spirit were buried in the cloister.”
Nietzsche said: “Christianity was the triumph of a slave morality over the old Roman warrior virtues”
1
-
@Derna1804 Now regarding the true source of Christianity. Worship of one god appears to have been initiated in Africa, specifically in Egypt, home of the legendary "mystery schools" whose knowledge was recorded and kept in the "Kemmet," temple of the god "Aptah." The twelfth Egyptian dynasty had monotheistic worship of Aten, a solar deity associated with Rah. One basis of the mystery school of moral teaching is that it was taught through the use of symbolism and allegory (parables). Plato is considered to have been an initiate of the Eleusinian Mysteries, as clues to this exist in his works. The students of his academy would have been exposed to the philosophies and ideals that were taught in the mystery schools. One of his students, Aristotle, was the tutor of the Greek conqueror Alexander the Great. Alexander's conquests are legendary, and his interest in conquering lands that have the reputation of having birthed mystery traditions was made apparent. It is not inconceivable that acquiring a storehouse of knowledge by military force was their motivation to conquer Egypt. By the time that the Greeks conquered the Egyptians, they had evolved to worshiping Horus, and his representation of the all-seeing eye. A note: It is interesting that Socrates’ (tutor of Plato) teachings not only led to the initiation of stoicism through his student Zeno, but also developed into opposite values of hedonism through another of his student’s, Aristippus. This is of particular curiosity in light of how the bible teaches the necessity of "taking the straight and narrow path," but whose result is almost always the worldliness of riches, sensual gratification, luxuries, and hypocrisy. That may also be why those who teach others to love their neighbors support military conquest. Ptolemy Soter (367 BC-282 BC) was a general leading Alexander the Great's Greek army in the middle- east. After conquering Egypt, Ptolemy ruled over it from 323BC to 285 BC, fusing Greek and Egyptian religions into the Serapis cult. The Romans conquered the Greek empire in 30BC. It is conceivable that the Romans, who had access to, and were probably influenced by the mystery religions, engaged a certain Josephus to compose what is now known as the New Testament. Born a Hebrew, Josephus was a scholar of the Torah. (May I remind you that the composing of the first five books of the Old Testament, Genesis through Deuteronomy, is attributed to Moses- He wrote that he was raised as an Egyptian prince- possibly the only truism from those books). This is evidence that the origin of the Hebrews may have been with Moses, not Abraham, who was probably a fabrication by Moses. Josephus was involved in the Hebrew rebellion against Roman rule around 70 AD, which resulted in the destruction of the temple. When Josephus perceived the inevitability of a Roman victory, he treacherously abandoned his leadership role of the revolt, and fought on the side of the Romans. Later, he married a Roman aristocrat and gained a degree of status as a Roman citizen. He is the author of the geographically and historically accurate book called “The Antiquity of the Jews”. This included a few words regarding Jesus. That is, curiously, the only reference to Jesus found anywhere by anyone, other than the bible, in the first century (other than other "gospels" which have
134 | P a g e
been discarded for inaccuracy). Why nobody in the time Jesus supposedly lived would mention somebody with as much fame as Jesus supposedly had, in writing, is a profound mystery, unless Jesus never existed, and his teachings were authored by Josephus. That Jesus, who was a revolutionary, would not oppose slavery, and would teach to pay taxes to both a tyrannical oppressive occupying power, and to false teachers, is puzzling. In the rest of scriptures, Jesus is portrayed as being a courageous man of integrity, who did not fear the Romans, so this was placed not as a ruse, but as words encouraging payments. He called the temple "a den of thieves," so why now encourage giving money to thieves?
1
-
@Derna1804 Evidently, the Christian right is attempting to not only hijack American culture and politics, but also annihilate people of different religions. The book that I am authoring simultaneously with this one exposes the arm of the RC church called the Jesuits, illustrating ruthless acts of deception and strategies of control, with their attitude that peoples outside the Catholic faith deserve death. My research covers many evidences that this is not only their agenda, but that it is happening now.
Erik Prince is the founder of the private “security contractors” (mercenaries) called “Blackwater.” Because of their bad publicity due to murderous incidents (such as the infamous incident in September 2007 in Nisour Square in Baghdad, where four armored vehicles with mounted machine guns opened fire on civilians, killing seventeen and injuring many others), their name was changed to “Xe,” then to “Acadamie.” Prince’s family is a wealthy pillar of the Reformed Church, and major funders of the Family Research Council, with ties to the Council for National Policy (CNP), which Erik’s sister’s father-in-law DeVos (founder of Amway) was president of the CNP from 1990 to 1993. This sister of Erik Prince, Betsy, served as head of the Michigan Republican Party, and is now Secretary of Education under Donald Trump. Erik Prince has been a faithful donor to the Republican Party for almost three decades, and has been a devout supporter and advisor to Trump, during his campaign, and since.
Now a devout and conservative Catholic, he was an intern at the Family Research Council, and worked in the Bush Sr. white house, which he considered to be too liberal. An article in “The Economist” made these statements: “In an affidavit ledged with a court in Virginia, one of the witnesses said that Mr. Prince “views himself as a Christian crusader tasked with eliminating Muslims and the Islamic faith from the globe. To that end, Mr. Prince intentionally deployed to Iraq men who shared his vision of Christian supremacy, knowing and wanting these men to take every available opportunity to murder Iraqis. Many of these men used call signs based on the Knights of Templar, the warriors who fought the crusades….going to Iraq to shoot and kill Iraqis was viewed as a sport or game.”
According to Chris Hedges’ book “American Fascists,” pages 24-30, there were tens of thousands of “security contractors” in Iraq by 2006, and they are protected from civilian and military law by a 2004 edict passed by American occupation authorities that immunizes all civilian contractors in Iraq from prosecution. Blackwater was awarded a billion dollars in contracts by the US government
1
-
@Derna1804 In the Old Testament, Moses fought against oppressive slave masters, Sampson slew a thousand oppressive Philistines with the jawbone of a donkey, when the spirit came upon him. David killed Goliath. In 1 Kings chapter 18, Elijah called fire down from heaven and slaughtered 450 prophets of Baal. In 2Kings chapters nine and ten, the prophet Elisha anointed Jehu with oil, who killed all the Baal worshippers in Israel. In the OT, the spirit was responsible for enabling prophets, kings, and others to have the incentive, drive, courage, and strength to successfully oppose the powerful evil entities against all odds.
But in the New Testament, while the spirit did oppose the flesh, it was tamed and disarmed. The fruits of the spirit are described in Galatians chapter five as love, peace, forbearance, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control. That scripture is followed by the statement: against those there is no law. So be overcome by evil powers, because you don’t want to break any laws those powers made. Funny (not really, a better word is “suspicious”) how the same book that tells you to be a good slave, to obey your government, to be a sheep, to turn the other cheek, to love your enemies, and bless those who curse you, to rejoice when being persecuted, that weakness is strength, to not trust your own wisdom, to pay taxes and tithes, and to return goodness to evil, has now declared that the spirit of the righteous warrior should be replaced with gentleness, restraint, and patience. It excludes from the list of positive qualities such characteristics as integrity, courage, and wisdom. Does that not raise some red flags??? Is this realization not alarming?? What have we been taught? Why?? What is their motivation?!! Seems to me that they want to strip us of what a man really is, to make sure that nobody attempts to break free of slavery.
1
-
@Derna1804 CONCLUSION
We can come to the obvious conclusion that an all-good, all-loving and powerful God did not author the Bible or Quran. If one had, it would not have the lies, contradictions, or faulty teachings promoting wrong values. This leads us to perceive that Jesus never existed. With this book, I think we can state that now as being a proven fact. The implications of that fact are monumental. The laws of nations that are based on religion are therefore negated, and those who rule nations based on the religious standing, no longer carry legitimate authority. All Christian, Jewish, and Muslim nations’ basic tenets are founded on falsehood and intentional deception. We can now rid ourselves of leaders who are supported by religious organizations and institutions and religious leaders. My next book, ANGRY LOUD AND CLEAR TRUTH, will show the error in the Declaration of Independence and of the Constitution, and more. It will explain how we have been brought to the brink of destruction. Further, it will illustrate how every system (principality) was designed to take us down, and keep us there. By promoting the whole world into functioning through the use of money, and by promoting the idea that we need all kinds of material possessions, the evil powers have held us in a vice grip. As I have clearly illustrated and proven with a multitude of scriptures and facts, using logic and reason, the leaders of Christianity are misleading the people intentionally, and the religions are based on lies intended to destroy the planet’s peoples. The God Horus is also known as Satan, and has also used the names Jehovah, Jesus, and Allah. The Vatican is the force creating most of the world’s evils, as I will further illustrate in ANGRY, LOUD AND CLEAR TRUTH. Every establishment leader is corrupt and evil, as the Vatican doles out the influential positions and resources to those who further it’s agenda. The world’s mainstream media, religions, and government, as well as education systems, are based on deceptions, and have deceived the masses. One can only live comfortably by conforming to the system established by evil power. Most people have chosen the easy way, or have been deceived into being a willing cog. While all those who further this evil’s agenda are doing as told to by their master, there are those within every religion who are working for righteousness. Evil and righteousness are not defined by one’s race or religion, it is revealed by one’s character, if one has chosen the right path. A bad start does not always mean a bad finish. While there are consequences to making bad decisions, and many last forever; one can still choose to work for righteousness no matter what evil done earlier. Those who have been deceived can be awakened to truth, and correct themselves. The powers that be deceive us and promote bad values, then when we are fooled, and follow them; should the people be to blame, or those who deceived them? Yet what excuse is there for not ensuring that we don’t commit grievance error? We must be diligent to make sure we are not deceived. The worst enemies of righteousness are the love of money; and the ability to deceive, and to be deceived; as well as the desire for power and to lord over others. As stated before, we are presently on the precipice of a confrontation between forces of good and evil. Of course it will not be the apocalypse as described in the Bible,
1
-
@Derna1804 Egypt was the second advanced civilization, and Africans are black duh and their ancient sculptures, from the eras that they supposedly had enslaved the Hebrews, showed negro features on the faces of the caricatures Jesus only got violent at the religious areas- and the only ones he cussed were religious leaders- had he existed, funny you brought that up, because he also said "render unto caesar what is caesars, and unto god what is god's. so the same people he called "thieves" and "hypocrites" and "blind guides" he told the poor people to give money to. furthermore, turn your cheek is much easier than fighting someone bigger and stronger- i know, as a christian, i was assaulted about ten times - bullies- i walked away and forgave them - they continued to hit me and others. finally i had enough, and showed them i was ready to fight back- they stopped. so i now see that bullies cease bullying you if you show you will fight back. so why would the roman empire want you to turn the other cheek?? i did not say that josephus wrote the OT to impose submissiveness, i said the NT. they are two different animals, the same god, different doctrines islam is also same god. OT-by serving god, you win wars, get wealth, acquire slaves- NT- be a good slave.
1
-
@Derna1804 I did not say that horus was the first god, i said that monotheism initiated in egypt, the second advanced civilization. sculptures from ancient egypt from the time of Hebrews supposed slavery, showed negro facial features on their sculptures, as well as other signs, in addition, the first chapter of song of solomon portrays the female, which almost all scholars say represents thE Hebrew people as being dark skinned, and in revelation one jesus has hair like wool, and in revelation one and two he has feet like bronze, nowhere are the HEbrews portrayed as white, - and moses' father in law thought he was egyptian .about meekness- blessed are the meek, when you are persecuted for being righteous- rejoice, when i am weak, i am strong, galatians five the fruits of the spirit are all patience, kindness, love, etc.. no integrity, courage, wisdom,= none of them-love those who hate you bless those that cuss you, return good for evil, forgive 70x7, slaves obey your masters no matter how wicked they are= is in the NT six times, the governor is put there by god to do good, honor and obey him, be a sheep, trust in the lord, not your own wisdom, must i go on? turning the cheek may seem like strength to somebody who has never been in fights i was attacked ten times and as a christian, turned the cheek and walked away, finally i learned to stick up for my dignity and fight back - i learned that bullies dont pick on those who stand up to them- now why would an empire that conquered the world in subjugation put that in there? jesus turned the tables calling the rabbis thieves, why then did he say "render unto caesar what is caesars and unto god what is god's =telling poor people to pay taxes to rome, and tithes to rabbis.? he also called rabbis hypocrites, blind guides, serpents, and whitewashed tombs eaten with worms- but he wants you to tithe to them. I did not say that the romans wrote the OT, just the NT- the OT- by following god, you win wars, get wealth, and acquire slaves==NT- be a good slave. WE live in a capitalistic militaristic imperialistic country- money rules, and rich rule.i prove in my two books-THE ;UNTOLD NATURE ;OF CHRISTIANITY and ANGRY LOUD AND CLEAR TRUTH that the vatican rules the world, and has imposed really bad values, mindsets, and worldviews-we are wrongly taught how to live,and yes you are a slave in every way you even like it. i have a very free mind, but have been incarcerated, and i dont work for money or a boss, i work to accomplish things for the people because i choose to do the righteous; things. CAN YOU SAY THAT ==SLAVE?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Derna1804 fagain- i did not say that all egyptians were black, but that the hebrews were and that they spent time in egypt i did not say horus was the first god, but that he is the one who is the first name and origin of the god we now call jehovah, jesus, and allah, but what i have not yet told you is that he has another name- satan. he is said in the bible to be all-loving, all-good, and all-powerful. he sends most people to hell=because he loves us. according to the bible he created the world in foreknowledge and predestination- he made it to happen this way knowing it would turn out this way- and we all know we have wars drugs poverty hate crime evil greed selfishness sickness starvation must i go on?? you may not have mentioned horus, i did, he is the beginning of the evil. people are evil because of gods, and that is my point. they become gods and do evil. i go into this by scripture, and i will not go into it here, you have to read my book. and people in their natural state are not killers, those who think they are, are expressing their own nature, and have influenced good people to become like them, as is gods nature, or should i say, satans
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Hdizzie00 yeh the stupid murderer is full of self-pity, i have a little of my own, but i was not at all responsible for my problems, i hurt nobody, was nothing but a true hero in every sense, have no friends or family, no money, no possessions, because i spoke truth after thousands of hours of research, hard unpaid learning and writing, and told what i found out. I have sustained many injuries due to assaults incarcerated. I have no assistance from anyone, and have done nothing but true (not m;urder or paid) ;public service for thrity years. thanks America, you are not welcome.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Derna1804 FROM MY UPCOMING BOOK =ANGRY LOUD AND CLEAR TRUTH:
CHAPTER TWENTY: THE MAKING OF A SOLDIER
This chapter is placed here to give you a new perception of authority, and to alter your reaction to it. Your survival, all of our survival, depends on the metamorphosis of the people to independent thinking, and on righteous action, in direct opposition to the concepts taught by Christianity, which promotes the “positive aspect” of being sheep led to slaughter.
While our youth are encouraged to do their duty, and to “serve” in the military by the politicians; these same politicians have no authentic sense of duty, loyalty, or patriotism; but promote those values on the citizenry to suit the elite’s purposes (not the people’s).
I have mentioned some of the war crimes perpetrated by the United States in the middle- east. Astute observers, and those old enough to have experienced the Vietnam War era, are aware of America’s propensity for cruelty since the 1960s. In Vietnam, US soldiers burned villages, napalmed huge areas, defoliated thousands of acres of farmland, employed the most advanced technology unfairly against natives equipped only with primitive weapons, slaughtered unarmed citizens indiscriminately, forced the evacuation of the sick and elderly for military expediency, tortured prisoners, and generally engaged in the most inhumane activities at the order of their “superiors.” Of course, these kinds of practices have not been publicized since then. To be fair, much modern warfare has been “sanitized,” yet the United States military is unquestionably a force used to annihilate those who the elite choose to.
Humankind is not born with the nature to commit such atrocities, and if unaltered, would refuse to participate in such behavior. Centuries of experience in the study of, and practice of the implementation of such discoveries of the most effective methods to impose the necessary mindsets on subjects to render them immune to thoughts of morality, compassion, or independent thinking; have been developed to allow them to carry out the senseless acts of violence for the purposes of those in authority. The best trained, best educated, best equipped, best prepared troops (US military), must now become the most aware and most courageous warriors, and be willing to refuse to murder those who they have been ordered to eliminate. This book, and the author’s mission, is to exacerbate and to incapacitate the real enemy; those people who have hijacked the people, power, and resources of the planet to serve evil purposes- the rich and powerful in every nation. Those who are now informed have the responsibility to take action in courageous righteousness to save the people from them.
Much of the following information is found in the book “Obedience to Authority” by Stanley Milgram, mostly from pages 180-189.
1
-
@Derna1804 HERE IS MORE TO THE POINT:
The methods used in basic training for the military, as well as its hierarchy, rules, and attitude, enforces obedience of the soldier in every aspect of the service. The individual’s sense of responsibility for their actions is forcibly removed as he is made into an automaton, a tool of death for the authorities. Basic training transforms a decent person with morals, in a few months, into a soldier killing other men without his conscience ringing alarm bells. The initial step is an oath of allegiance, which strengthens the new recruit’s commitment to his new role.
During basic training, and throughout his wartime service, the soldier is separated from the community, and thus from competing authorities. The soldier is taught obedience, the superiors meeting out rewards and punishments to reinforce such. Under the pretense of giving the recruit military skills, basic training’s real purpose is to break down individuality and self-hood. Many hours are spent on the drill field. Of course they do not need to parade efficiently. The true aim of the parade drills is to submerse the soldier into the organizational mindset. Platoons move as one man, obeying the authority of the drill sergeant. Thusly, the foot soldier becomes an automaton, no ego, no individuality or free thought. Authority uses methods of propaganda to identify the soldiers’ military service and obedience with valued ideals and the “larger purposes of society.” He is said to be serving a “purpose higher than himself” and is “protecting our freedoms” (when in reality he is serving the evil elite’s purposes and being a willing tool in a conspiracy to remove all our freedoms). He is told that those whom he confronts in battle are enemies of his nation, and his country is endangered by them. These concepts are intended to justify the cruel and inhumane actions soldiers are ordered to do.
When entering the war zone, new realities enter, as the soldier faces adversaries who have undergone similar indoctrination and training. The military personnel of the United States face an additional factor that gives their enemy an advantage. It is called the force-multiplier, or as in the case for Muslims, feeling oppressed because of their religion, the faith-force multiplier. A “force-multiplier” is defined by the department of defense as an addition to any combat force that significantly increases its fighting capacity, and so its possibility of success, and includes the factor of having greater incentive to win.
Those military forces of nations that the US attacks are disadvantaged in resources, weapons and technology, but have the advantage of having the force multipliers of the fact that they are defending their lives, those of their families, and their homes from destruction. In addition, their cause is more just, they are the ones who are in truth, on the defensive side. Furthermore, the Us’ enemies fight with more vigor as being encouraged by charismatic Muslim leaders’ rhetoric, employing the most effective force-multiplier, faith.
1
-
@Derna1804 AND SOME MORE, EINSTEIN:
One new reality for the soldier upon entering the battlefield is that any disorganization in the soldiers own ranks creates a danger to his whole unit, rendering it less an effective fighting unit. Maintaining discipline is now not an option, it is now an element of survival. His mission assigned by his “superiors” overrides any moral constraints against wounding, maiming, or killing men, women, or children; it is all justified by this justification: protecting his nation’s freedoms, as illegitimate as the claim may be.
Do any soldiers entertain a thought of disobeying or defecting? During the Vietnam war, some soldiers exposed the evil, and many were grateful for the protesters back home that were determined to end the war. I have seen veterans of middle- eastern wars also expose US war crimes, and one veteran literally tore his medals off of his chest from the front of his uniform as a show of disgust at what he had been ordered to do. There are stringent penalties for defiance, and a powerful, internalized basis for obedience. From being taught to conform and obey from childhood, to a national policy within media and education promoting patriotism, loyalty to America, and the accusation of being cowardly if you refuse to kill. Of course it takes more courage to dissent, especially with these forces in mind. In a way, this author has more balls than the military, having been imprisoned for his writings, which were disseminated, with full comprehension of the consequences. How many soldiers are willing to do what is right, and risk court-martial and prison? Unfortunately, even veterans are silent, the vast majority hiding and sulking over what they were coerced to do, afraid to expose the evil. If only a few of these men had summoned up that same kind of courage and exposed it all visibly, all those kids who sign up for service to see the world and get a free college education could have been warned, and not be recruited to murder and risk their lives for the rich man.
But those in authority make it extremely difficult for military personnel to defect, the stakes are high. Future recruits may not enlist knowing what they are in for. It is interesting that veterans are praised everywhere for what they have done, whereas few are willing to recount their military experience. The soldier is locked into a structure of authority, and those who, like the author of this book, proclaim that they are doing the devil’s work, threaten the psychological factors that make life bearable for the soldiers. But perhaps it would lift a huge burden for them not to have to live a lie, being reminded of their phony appearances of heroic character each time that they are praised. Staying alive is enough of a task for a soldier in action, there is no room to contemplate morality. The few soldiers in whom their conscience strikes, are perceived as potential sources of disruption, and are speedily segregated from the unit. An individual defecting is of no consequence, unless he instigates others to do so also. Therefore, he must be isolated or punished severely to discourage others from imitating him. Furthermore, today’s soldiers are not as exposed to blood and guts as they were in the past. Napalm, fuel-air bombs, and missiles fired from thousands of feet overhead, annihilate many more, with much “collateral damage,” but it has been sanitized, the murderers view less of the carnage that they have wrought.
1
-
@Derna1804 BECAUSE YOU THINK YOU ARE PARTOF DECISION-MAKING AS PART OF YOUR PROPAGANDIZED AND DECEIVED MIND, YOU NEED EDUCATION
Many people work at jobs that are part of the “money machine,” they are part of a corporation or government agency that is destructive to humanity, or is exploitive or oppressive. They justify their work by telling themselves that they are “supporting their family,” that they are “taking orders” or “doing their duty.” They are not fooling me. Their family does not need a big house or new car. They can find a job (even if it provides less income) that is helpful to society. They can dissent.
Our society has placed greater value on being a man of their word (this has nothing to do with integrity, but with the phony values of not breaking oaths), of doing a good job, or earning a living, and excelling at their job (good little slave, seeking approval of massuh) no matter the harm it causes as a result. The book “Obedience to Authority” recounts experiments and research conducted by the author of that book, and his conclusions are disturbing, yet ring true. Here I quote some of his conclusions:
“…normal human behavior….show with particular clarity the danger to human survival inherent in our makeup…men do become angry, they do act hatefully and explode in rage against others….something far more dangerous is revealed: the capacity for man to abandon his humanity, indeed the inevitability that he does so, as he merges his unique personality into larger institutional structures….the virtues of loyalty, discipline, and self-reliance in the individual are the very properties that create destructive organizational engines of war and bind men to malevolent systems of authority….. when he merges his person into an organizational structure, a new creature replaces autonomous man, unhindered by the limitations of individual morality, freed of humane inhibition, mindful only of the sanctions of authority…..human nature, or more specifically- the kind of character produced in American democratic society, cannot be counted on to insulate its citizens from brutality and inhumane treatment at the direction of malevolent authority. A substantial proportion of people do what they are told to do, irrespective of the content of the act, and without limitations of conscience, so long as they perceive that the command comes from a legitimate authority.”
This result has been intentionally and deliberately developed by the elite, and the primary tools to create the desired results are the Christian religion, the media, the education system, and other aspects of the establishment. What is very hopeful is the effect the books that the author wrote have had on America’s citizens, even the military. Before I was imprisoned, a military man wrote that 60,000 men in green were ready to fight for the people, and some military men and women are displaying true patriotism and courage. In 20017, four battleships and aircraft carriers collided with oil tankers in the open seas. People are waking up. Trump’s presidency has in a way been successful. It has made America great again. The USA’s best era (in my opinion), the time that a good portion of America’s citizens perceived the evils in America and took to the streets in protest- the era of the hippies and the black panthers, is again being manifest in many ways –many people do care, and are putting that caring to action.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The media only tells the public
what the powers want them to know or think, using information management. This
includes withholding of information, disseminating misinformation (lies), and
misdirecting people so that none can comprehend the reality of the world events
and the forces that make them happen. This is a major player in the war against
humanity. The information war was made more effective by the Rockefeller
Foundation in the 1930s, when it initiated secret psychological “war” projects
whose purpose was to shape public opinion. According to Christopher Simpson,
author of “Science of Coercion” : “…a tight circle of men and women who shared
several important conceptions of mass communication research. They regarded
mass communication as a tool for social management, and as a weapon in social
conflict, and they expressed common assumptions concerning the usefulness of
quantitative research - particularly
experimental and quasi-experimental effects research, opinion surveys, and
quantitative content analysis as a means of illuminating what communication
“is” and improving its application to social management.”
As this was being implemented and
working in overdrive, the Office of Strategic Services and the Office of War
Information recruited the “best and brightest” from American intelligentsia
into secret “intelligence,” and after training, were placed into powerful
positions of mass media, politics, and universities. In the 1950s,the CIA and
the American mass media began to be interlocked, the agency feeding information
to journalists in exchange for their own intelligence developed at home and
abroad. Many American journalists currently work for the CIA.
Another strategy used by the
large public relations corporations and the government is the use of surveys in
polling. By slanting questions and using outright deception regarding results
in service to whoever is paying them, the public is often misled as to what the
rest of the population thinks. Under the impression that one is alone in his
attitude of perception, one will not voice opinion nor organize to further
one’s cause. To illustrate one way this is engaged, ask how many times the
media has directly addressed the exceedingly important issues of poverty, human
rights, abuses, media control by the elite, racism, or the like; and given
novel results that speak to the poor having the backing of the people in a
substantive way. Any results that are denying help to the poor, I guarantee
you, are either the result of hateful and mean-spirited propaganda and
indoctrination favoring the pro-rich elite, or are deceptively misleading as to
the authentic hearts of the people.
The political struggle of black
Americans for social justice, for example, has been successfully redirected by
the media to “gangsta rap” culture, drugs, and sports, and even towards the
American Dream, resisted for many years by black people who perceive the lie.
Thus, a powerful and intelligent portion of the populace is kept “in their place”
safely by the establishment.
1
-
@jeremymcmains9280 This mindset is one that has been introduced and reinforced by the media. But that is not the worst part of the tool which has so shaped the planet and been so instrumental in bringing us to the point that we are at today.
At the end of “Behold a Pale Horse,” by William Cooper, was enclosed a list of members of the Council of Foreign Relations, as released by F.RE.E.. As I have before mentioned, the CFR was founded by David Rockefeller Jr., who also appointed its members. There are approximately three hundred listed members, well over a hundred of them representing the media. CBS, NBC, ABC, Cable News Network, PBS, Associated Press, Reuters, Boston Globe, Baltimore Sun, Washington Times, NY Times, Time Inc., Newsweek, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, National Review, and others had leadership in membership of the CFR. The Council of Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission are instruments of the illuminati formed to obliterate national boundaries and to establish a new world order. They are doing this by consolidating commercial and banking interests by capturing control of the political government of the United States, and through US covert actions, the political government of all nations.
“Some even believe that we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as “internationalists” and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure- one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”-David Rockefeller, from his book “Memoirs”
The list of members, compiled in 1989, included top brass from all sections of military, several banks, leaders of all the most influential universities, (Barnard, Columbia, Cornell, Notre Dame, Stanford, Yale, John Hopkins, Wellesley, Princeton, Brown, a dozen others); government officials, house and senate members; energy (Shell, Texaco, Exxon, Mobil); international broadcasting,; Ford, Chrysler, and General Motors; General Electric, AT&T, the Federal Reserve, and the Smithsonian Institute. These were the most powerful people in the United States at the time. Together, they have been conspiring how to achieve their goals, and directing the actions that create world events. They compose federal legislation, bribe politicians, arrange coups and invasions, and are the ones who decide which people will be leaders. Remember that the owners of media on these committees control editing policies and content of the entire media.
David Rockefeller himself said this addressing the Trilateral Commission on June of 1991 (according to page 46 of Keith Page’s “Mass Control: Engineering Human Consciousness”):
“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine, and other great publications whose directors have attended meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march toward world government. The supra-natural sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determinism practiced in past centuries.”
1
-
@theaberrantdon There are about a half a dozen conglomerates that own virtually the whole US media. Almost as influential as the owners of media print and broadcasting are the corporate advertisers; the financial sources, who have strong influence (the threat of boycotting media outlets from being used by them to advertise) over what is revealed. Do you need proof of this obviously true statement? It is a fact. But here is evidence. One of the most respected journalists of his time, John Swinton, made this toast at The New York Press Club in 1953(as referenced from “Mass Control” by Jim Keith, pages 41, 42): “There is no such thing at this date of the world’s history, in America, as an independent press. You know it and I know it. There is not one of you who dares to write your honest opinions, and if you did, you know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinion out of the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries for similar things, and any of you who would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the streets looking for another job. If I allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my paper, before twenty-four hours my occupation would be gone.” “The business of journalists is to destroy the truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread. You know it and I know it, and what folly is this toasting an independent press?” “We are the tools of rich men behind the scenes. We are jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes.”
That is quite a testimony back then, and you can be assured that it is even more-so today. Before I continue, let me include an extended definition of a real, true journalist.
We get pieces here and there in the press to give it an illusion of being truth. But you have to spend all your time digging to get those tidbits. Journalists like myself are willing and glad to do that, even unpaid. What is the excuse of mainstream media, who have access to all this information, who have a huge audience who are all totally deceived about the nature of our leaders, and what is happening around the world? Why doesn’t media step forth and expose all the evil that is conspiring and manipulating the destruction that is soon taking us down. They are not ignorant of what is going on. Nobody in that position could be that stupid! They are not ignoramuses! They are bought! Just like politicians, they have sold our well-being to fill their pockets, and have done it for pennies (though they are well paid, treason should not be considered at any cost).
Today’s journalists will not accept the concept that they can change the outcome of events, just by making people aware of what is, or what is planned to transpire. By making people aware of conspiracies and covert actions taken by our rulers, the people can take actions to protect themselves from harm. Unfortunately, the media employees have also fallen into the selfish attitude of “providing for myself and mine” like most Americans.
The original concept was that of a watchman on the wall; but it has transformed into being a painter, as today’s newsman’s job is not more than whitewashing and cover-ups. The media is no longer a watchdog of against crooked politicians or corporate abuse of power; but is a tool of, and enabler of those same evil people.
1
-
@theaberrantdon Soon after 9-11 demolition job, within a few weeks, a “war on terror” was declared. This was not the first time that the United States waged “war on terror.” The Reagan administration also announced a “war on terror” as it assumed office, aimed at South America and the middle-east. Donald Rumsfeld was appointed secretary of defense by Bush Jr., and he had been Reagan’s special envoy to the middle- east. Rumsfeld and Cheney had been closely aligned since working together under President Ford. According to a document prepared for secretary of defense Donald Rumsfeld titled “Special Operations and Joint Forces in Countering Terrorism” by his Defense Science Board, an organization was planned to be created to be a team of 100 covert counter-intelligence agents to be responsible for missions targeting terrorist leaders. These missions’ purpose is to “stimulate reactions” among terrorist groups, inciting them into violent acts that would then make it acceptable to be subject to “counterattack” by US forces. In other words, the United States military planned to use secret operations to provoke murderous terrorist attacks on innocent people. Combating terrorism by causing it. Strategies mentioned included tricking terrorist cells with fake communications. This counter-terror operations group was named “Proactive Preemptive Operations Group (P2OG). Since being mentioned in Los Angeles Times and Counterpunch on 11/12/2002, there has been silence regarding P2OG. That there is no more press interest in such activity is telling. There is no more evidence revealed about its existence.
In September of 2001, the US started to bomb Afghanistan. Bush informed the Afghans that the attacks would continue until they handed over wanted suspects considered to be 9-11 accomplices. The Afghanistan officials requested evidence, which the US dismissed, as well as refusing to consider offering papers of extradition. A front-page story on the 10/28/2001 issue of the NY Times stated the official US-British reaction by Admiral Sir Michael Boyce, chief of British defense staff, informing the citizens of Britain, the United States, and Afghanistan that the two allied powers would continue attacking Afghanistan “until they get their leadership changed.” It was made apparent that this was an “afterthought” brought in a couple of weeks after initiating the bombing. Yes, and the amazing way that the Patriot Act was so quickly composed as a reaction to the 9-11 “surprise.”
According to a French book “Bin Laden, La Verite Interdite” (Bin Laden, the Forbidden Truth), the United States had decided to invade Afghanistan in the interest of profits, long before September 2001. In February 1998, congress discussed ways to deal with Afghanistan to enable a US –held oil pipeline. Jane’s Defense Newsletter dated March 2001 revealed that an invasion of Afghanistan was being planned. July 2001 the planned invasion was reported by George Arney of the BBC. “Times of India” stated in June 2001 that the US government told India that there would be an invasion of Afghanistan in October of that year. But the US media insisted that the 9-11 terrorist attack instigated US invasion of Afghanistan and the Taliban regime. The twin towers had no flag bearing responsibility. The right legitimate thing to do would have been to prove who the culprits were, and to bring them to justice. The US blamed Afghanistan, and attacked innocent people, showed no evidence of anybody’s guilt, and endeavored to install a puppet government. Then they did likewise with Iraq. After much futile and senseless destruction, the death toll of Arabs fanned the flame of Islamic radicalism and anti-imperialism. Bush’s “war on terrorism” and the wars on Iraq and Afghanistan in particular were strategically successful in giving new life to Islamic radicalism and made violent resistance popular among Arabs, playing into the elite’s plan of genocide of Arab peoples. The US, after all, has to defend itself. Whether it was an afterthought that developed over the years, or had been planned previously, I am not sure, but the United States had further devious designs to use Afghanistan for more of its evil purposes. The leaders of Afghanistan; the Taliban, had banned its people from producing opium, and under their rule, Afghanistan produced 3% of the world’s opium. Upon the United States taking power in 2010, it soon leaped to producing 90% of the world’s opium. Perceiving the poverty of the Afghan farmers, being such magnanimous benefactors, the US government loaned those farmers the necessary capital and means to grow poppies. For a fee, US military guard the poppy fields, while the farmers labor to earn a meager income, and the smugglers reap wild profits (as do the dealers), importing most of the opium used by Americans and many other nations. Since 2010, Afghanistan has been steadily exporting 13 million pounds of opium annually.
1
-
@theaberrantdon Number one: The twin towers were exceedingly strong with many steel reinforcements. Many weaker high-rises throughout the planet had worse fires, and none other has collapsed before. One other even had a plane also hit it, and it didn’t collapse. There were pools of melted steel all over ground zero afterwards. Steel melts at about 1700 degrees farenheit. According to calculations, the heat in that building should have been considerably less, especially in lower floors. How did the steel melt? Traces of the compound known as “thermite,” which is produced by our government, was found all over ground zero by scientific research investigators. Thermite is used as a demolition explosive, and heats to very high temperatures. Did you notice how the buildings went down at almost freefall speed, one floor after another exploded in descending order? A perfect example of a professionally executed demolition job.
Number two: According to what the media stated that the government found, near the pools of melted steel was found a paper passport (duh, come on guys- paper survived the inferno that steel didn’t-surely you can come up with a more credible story-who can possibly trust our government or the BS media?), one piece of evidence that helped them to find who the terrorists were in just a couple of days. It is comforting to know that we have competent and efficient authorities who were able to find the identity of the culprits so quickly. It is funny how half of them, six months later, popped up and said “Hey guys, here I am, alive and well!” in Arab nations. But you won’t see that on the news. The government didn’t tell them to show that, their airtime and paper and ink are reserved for sports and gossip.
Number three: Our military includes a defensive air-force that has fighter jets which can respond to that location in minutes to a plane on radar that does not meet communications requirements and proper identification. For some unexplainable (except the “coincidence” of an exercise being done elsewhere) reason, those jets never came to the nation’s defense. If all this has not yet convinced you, the following takes the cake: The military officers in charge of defending us from foreign or domestic attack were PROMOTED after the event.
Number four: The plane that was piloted to collide into the Pentagon had some untold information also. I viewed official government released recorded videos and some unofficial ones. The “plane” that hit it was traveling at too high a speed to see clearly, it was a blur. But no visibly discernible wings were evident. The hole left by the collision in the pentagon was far too narrow to even entertain the idea that an ordinary plane with wings assaulted it. I am convinced that it was a missile. No large pieces of wreckage remained. It was very convenient that the area of the pentagon that the assault happened was evacuated shortly before the impact. I don’t know about you, but the one and only obvious conclusion I can come to, is that our leaders (wardens) devised the event. But if this evidence is not enough, I will give some evidence that either our political leaders are all totally incompetent and unbelievably stupid (at convenient times) or that all were complicit.!
1
-
@theaberrantdon CHAPTER ELEVEN: SOMETHING IS ROTTEN IN D.C.
My previous book, EXPOSING THE MONEY MACHINE proposed the concept that politicians are just actors like WWF wrestlers. Frank Zappa said “politics is the entertainment branch of industry.” He was a talented and prolific musician, and he had lots of brains. Prior to the 9-11 “attack” Republicans and Democrats were always at odds. Republicans called Democrats “liberal snobs” “liberal elite” “unpatriotic” “flag-haters” “politically correct” and the like. Democrats called Republicans “racists” “bigots” “narrow minded” and so on. But on Septmber 20th 2001, Bush gave a speech to congress, and in response, house democrat leader Richard Gephart said “We want America to speak with one voice tonight, and we want enemies and the whole world and all of our citizens to know that America speaks tonight with one voice.” Regarding Bush, he pledged: “We have faith in him and his colleagues in the executive branch to do this in the right way.”
After the president’s address, senate democratic leader Tom Daschle also showed full support: “tonight there is no opposition party. We stand here united not as republicans and democrats, not as southerners and northerners or Midwesterners or easterners, but as Americans.” “We want Bush to know, we want the world to know, that he can depend on us.”
How comforting.
The act of war- the twin towers destruction- which had no country’s flag as responsible, and for a long time it was not clear who was responsible-had a relatively quick response from all our leaders, and a lapse of the usual bickering. Accusations and party antics were set aside, so that we can perceive the real enemies.
When 9-11 had just happened, and there are videos on youtube recording this, Bush had been watching a class of schoolchildren (look it up, it is very telling) participate in their class. We see an aid walk into the classroom and whisper a few words to the president. It was only five or six words, less than ten seconds. This was minutes after the disaster, and was obviously the subject of the brief interruption. The president showed no disturbance, he just nodded, and the class continued. There was not enough time transpired by the aid for him to have explained to him what had happened, all that could have been said was something like: “all happened as planned.” The only response from Bush was a nod, he did not excuse himself from the class to address the crisis. Nothing surprising seemed to have happened.
Then a call to war, to send our youth to kill and to be killed, and no questions, no challenges, no oppositions from politicians; all our leaders were in accord. “GO DESTROY THE ARABS” and if you don’t agree you are unpatriotic. Since when is patriotism associated with associated with attacking foreign nations without good reason to?
1
-
@theaberrantdon You may call me unpatriotic, I know who and what I am. I love human beings. Of all nations. But I know who the enemy is, and it was not Saddam Hussein. It is obvious that Bush knew that the demolition would happen, if he was or wasn’t one of the ones who planned it is the only question. Were all our leaders complicit? Judge for yourself. They all gathered together to attack Iraq, and being somewhat intelligent, they must have known that the little evidence that they had did not justify war. The CIA’s claim that they “might” have weapons of mass destruction does not cut it. China has that, Korea has that, Russia has that, many nations have deadly weapons. Why pick on Iraq? At any time, attacking and annihilating another peoples with such little evidence of justification for war, betrays their evil doings. Do you suppose something is rotten in DC? The answer is …….every one of them is rotten to the core. And there is much more proof. Bush and Cheney convinced Daschle to not commission an independent investigation. “Anything you say, buddy” (not a quote, just an illustration). National security advisor Condoleeza Rice also spoke against an investigation: “In the context of this ongoing war, it is extremely important to protect the sources and the methods and the information so that we can try and disrupt further attacks.” “The problem is that this is an act that is not finished. It is ongoing. We are still fighting a war on terrorism.”(that is a quote).
A joint congressional committee gave inconclusive results.
In September 2002, an independent commission was attached to the bill establishing homeland security. The Bush administration fought to gain control over the naming, staffing, and powers of the commission. Why did they need to control it so closely? Duh! It was not allowed to issue a subpoena without its chairman’s approval- and the chairman was a presidential appointee. Bush appointed former secretary of state Henry Kissinger-alleged war criminal, international corporate fixer, and notorious liar. He was replaced by Thomas Kean after much protest over the appointment of Kissinger. The Bush administration granted the 9/11 commission only $3 million to investigate the attack on the twin towers, while $50 million was allocated to the commission that investigated the space shuttle crash. The same administration refused to release 27 pages of a congressional report that allegedly detailed the Saudi Arabian government’s connections to the “hijackers.” Bush said “You can’t distinguish between Al Queda and Saddam when you talk about the war on terror” before he admitted that Saddam had no role in 9-11.
There were no huge protests. So are all the federal politicians complicit? I have concluded that they are. I will now reveal the events in the white house that transpired immediately after September 11th, events that expose US politician’s deceitfulness.
1
-
@theaberrantdon As I stated in EXPOSING THE MONEY MACHINE, the real motivation for the destruction of the twin towers was to strike fear into the citizens of the United States, enabling the government to establish Homeland Security, the Patriot Act, and the wars on Afghanistan and Iraq. In future chapters of this book, I will expose that our media intentionally stifle the truth from being known, and why; as well as providing evidence that the attacks on Afghanistan and Iraq had been planned well before the twin towers went down, in a chapter titled “International Terroristic Actions” in the second part of this book. The terrorist is the United States.
As you probably know, Homeland Security is like H G Wells’ “big brother”, it conducts surveillance on every internet search and telephone call on the planet, and includes all fields of the military under its auspices. The story of the passing of the Patriot Act, according to Herbert Goerstel, is as follows (I have made a shorter version as I pen here): The morning after the 9-11 attacks, attorney general John Ashcroft had his policy specialist Viet Dinh present Ashcroft’s wish-list of expanded police powers codified and transmitted to congress in a bill. Ashcroft demanded that the proposal be enacted within three days, and suggested publicly that congress would be held responsible for any subsequent attacks if it didn’t meet the deadline. The Patriot Act is a sizable technically worded document. Such speedy work to be composed in one night is unbelievable. Further, no time to study, consider, discuss, and collaborate its validity and merits, is highly questionable policy. This was important legislation, and the more reason to take their time to do a thoroughly complete job legislating it. Why was there such a rush to vote on legislation that would take years to establish? And with all the important laws that have been introduced and passed, why would our legislators be afraid of some blame being put on them by another politician? Who pays attention to politician’s mud-slinging?
On October 11th, the senate convened to vote on it. Since every republican senator had committed to support it, senate majority leader Tom Daschle pressured fellow democrats to vote unanimously for it also. The only dissenting voice was that of Russ Feingold (D- Wisconsin) saying: “if we lived in a country where the police were allowed to search your home at any time for any reason; if we lived in a country where the government was entitled to open your mail, eavesdrop on your phone conversations or intercept your email conversations, if we lived in a country where people could be held in jail indefinitely based on what they write or think, or based on mere suspicion that they were up to no good, the government would probably discover and arrest more terrorists….but they would not be in a country in which we would want to live .... preserving our freedom is the reason we are now engaged in this new war on terrorism. We will lose that war without a shot being fired if we sacrifice the liberties of the American people in the belief that by doing so we will stop the terrorists.”
1
-
@theaberrantdon This may sound like a patriotic speech, but think about it. Could this be an explanation instead of a protest? Could Feingold be telling us that they were attempting to defeat the people without any opposing shots being fired? Just a thought.
Passing the senate with only Feingold against it, the bill was scrapped and altered that night, and the rewritten Patriot Act was passed on the 12th, voted on for fear of being considered unpatriotic (their excuse) if they didn’t. Three republicans dissented, one of them was Ron Paul of Texas, who said “Our forefathers would think it is time for a revolution .… they revolted against much more mild oppression.”
I don’t buy that our “representatives” voted on this legislation out of fear of being considered unpatriotic. That being mentioned publicly is a ruse. Feingold gave a rousing patriotic speech against it. Something is rotten in DC, and it is conspiracy. Freemasonry is serving an evil entity, and the RC church, wealthy and powerful people have been covertly making many decisions and strategic moves. A few pieces about the Patriot Act. Federal agents and police may conduct searches of homes and offices and confiscate personal property without notification.
FBI can go to your employment and question your coworkers
Government has access to medical records, school records, all personal records
Officials may monitor religious and political organizations
Officials may monitor conversations between attorneys and clients
Officials may seize papers and effects with probable cause
You can be arrested, imprisoned indefinitely, exiled, or executed, no proof or evidence needed
Introduced overwhelming government secrecy
Removed checks and balances within government system
Weakened judicial oversight of executive branch
Eroded civil liberties
Allowed for secret arrest
Detention of people on basis of race, religion or ethnicity
The “Lone Wolf” provision allows intelligence gathering on people not suspected of being part of a foreign government or known terrorist organization
Three months after publishing EXPOSING THE MONEY MACHINE, an intelligence agent went through my files and computer. A month later I was in prison. I have evidence that implies that my sister and parole officers colluded to make it appear that it was a parole violation of having a restraining order placed on me. I had already served six months incarcerated for the same incident (a threat- words never meant to be carried through), The first question the guard asked me when I arrived at Northern State Prison was: “Do black lives matter?” I answered: “Very much” I had distributed scores of emails gone viral with videos attached exposing cops killing unarmed blacks, and almost always being awarded a paid vacation (administrative leave with pay) as punishment. I was then told that they were investigating everything about me. They wanted to see how the book sold, who my friends were, my affiliations etc.. I was asked if I was with the PLO. I had a year sentence, but they let me out after 8 ½ months. I am exceedingly clean. In addition, soon after arriving, before the election, I wrote a 35 page letter addressing many subjects, it included a solution to many problems, and a blueprint for an ideal civilization that would eliminate pollution, eliminate unhealthy bodies and minds, corruption, false religion, overbearing rule, injustice, and basically provide an ideal existence to all future generations. Seeing that not only did I bring attention to the faults of the US and other nations, but that I also had viable, do-able solutions that far surpassed any others, I was released.
1
-
@theaberrantdon YOu dont seem to get it. The media doesnt work for the government. There is a lot of disinformation, and we have to cut through it to get through the bullshit and see what really is going on. If you think our leaders love the people, dont lie to us, then you are totally stupid and not worth even writing to. The point is, and if you read my books in entirety, you would see that the world is run by rich people and the vatican, and we have been totally deceived by them. Email me for a digital copy of all three books i wrote, no strings attached. Look at the back of your one dollar bill =the seal of the US is a pyramid- Egypt, biblical land of slavery-why that? above it is an eye- not just any eye, it is the eye of Horus, later known as satan. we are one nation under god.. and under (and above) the pyramid are latin words- language of the RC church, below- novus ordo seclorum-NEW WORLD ORDER. got it? The illuminati were started by the first Rothschild Mayor Amschel Bauer, who, with Adam Weishaupt, a catholic Jesuit, got together and formed it in 1776. A few years later they met with and joined forces with the freemasons- another name for the Knights Templar, who had been the mercenaries hired by the RC CHurch to fight the crusades. When they gave the church a bad reputation, they were dismissed, but continued for centuries in mercenary work, banking, and occult. Now you may see the truth. Almost every one of our presidents, if not all, were freemasons. As were most if not all US founding fathers. I have all this on paper and you can get it. Media is used to disinform us and to divert and subvert the masses. .
1
-
1
-
@theaberrantdon We can glean from a presentation that Boykin gave in a 2003 at a church in Oregon at an annual service to honor church members who were serving, or had served in the military; what his modus operandi was. At that point, Lieutenant general Boykin had recently been appointed deputy under-secretary of defense for intelligence. He presented himself in full uniform (combat gear) as fully official with the authority of his new position. He gave a well-scripted audio-visual presentation including some anecdotes about his military service, some images of the destruction of the twin towers, then a photograph of George W Bush Jr... “Why is this man in the white house?” He asks, then answers his own question: “God put him there to lead not only this nation, but to lead the world.” (Not mentioned was skull and bones).
Then he showed photographs of Sadam Hussein, Osama bin Laden, and others. He then stated as fact, in his authority as senior position in military intelligence- that the enemy that the United States faced was not those people to be focused on. (Yet Sadam was hunted down to his tunnel hiding cave). Boykin stated boldly: “The enemy is a spiritual enemy” “it’s called the principality of darkness” “we…. are in a spiritual battle, not a physical battle…the battle this nation is in is a spiritual battle, it’s a battle for our soul. And the enemy is a guy called Satan….Satan wants to destroy this nation” The United States military is in the process of “recruiting a spiritual army that will draw strength from a greater power to defeat its enemy.” In that church (and others) “to recruit you to be warriors of god’s kingdom.” It is reported that Boykin of US intelligence explained that opponents of the United States would “only be defeated if we come against them in the name of Jesus.”
I have studied the bible deeply, and nowhere and at no time did Jesus ask for anybody to kill in his name. He did say “he who lives by the sword will die by the sword.” Furthermore, at the end of tribulation, neither humans nor angels kill anyone, but Jesus’ tongue destroys the nations. The US military is not involved. This is all bullshit. That is unless Boykin was enlisting some people that he knew were hypocritical liars who manipulated the masses to spread propaganda. He is not a fool. Recall how seasoned Boykin was his field experience, and the responsible positions that he has held. And he is not a lone eccentric fanatic, he is a trained warrior. The sentiments he expressed is widespread in at least some sections of the military. In 2004, Lieutenant Colonel Garth Brandl led his men on an assault on Falluja, in central Iraq. He inspired them by his words: “the enemy has got a face. He’s called Satan. And we’re going to destroy him.” This is a simplicity. Or is it a good way to have your men forget that they are invading a smaller nation without solid evidence of any aggression against the United States, and that the enemy are far less equipped men who have wives and children. The language that the military uses is not spiritual, nor is it inspirational. It is not of a true Christian’s nature, it is meant to be “demonizing,” a “good vs. evil” nature with no strong evidence of reason or logic to support it. It was psychological rhetoric.
1
-
@theaberrantdon . It was psyops.
What is psyops? Psychological Operations was defined by general William Donovan of the OSS in the World War II era as: “Psychological warfare is the coordination of and use of all means, including…psychological exploitation of the recognized military actions- which tend to deprive the will of the enemy to support, assistance, or sympathy of his allies or associates or of neutrals, or to prevent his acquisition of such support, assistance, or sympathy; or which tends to create, maintain, or increase the will to victory of our own people or allies, and to acquire, maintain, or to increase the support assistance, and sympathy of neutrals.”
What methods of Psyops does the United States use? The Soviet Union used this description in 1980: “Unpardonable methods of ideological sabotage, including not just flagrant lies, slander and disinformation, but also political blackmail, provocation, and terror.” May I remind you that the United States is a Christian nation whose foundation is the bible? Psyops go by the premise that wars are fought and won or lost not on battlefields, but in the minds of men. In the US war in Vietnam, the United States huge and powerful military wasn’t defeated in the jungles of Vietnam, but in the streets of American cities and in informed colleges.
Before attacking Iraq, the US citizens were told that the Arabs were jealous of their freedoms, that they had killed three thousand of their people, and that not only were their boys protecting them from terrorism, but that they were liberating Iraqis from Sadam. The Soviet description of American psyops is damn accurate. Iraq had no chance against the wrath of far superior weaponry, drone warfare, and soldiers intent on destroying evil killers who mercilessly decapitate innocent victims. (or so they were told and believed).
1
-
@theaberrantdon Many American people felt that the US government was justified for attacking Iraq, as Saddam had used chemical weapons on his own people. Does that make sense? Should we then murder his people for being his victims? Let us investigate a little further.
Starting in 1983, the US was involved in eighty shipments of biological and chemical components of botulism toxin, anthrax, gangrene bacteria, and West Nile virus to Iraq. A senate investigation in 1994 found that before and after (1986-1990) Saddam used chemical weapons to annihilate the Kurdish town of Halabjah in 1988, the United States licensed companies to export to Iraq $600 million worth of advanced technology and material which was used by Iraq to make vx nerve agent, anthrax, mustard gas, and more.
Iraq willingly submitted a report on their weapons. The Bush administration publicly accused the Iraq weapons report as being incomplete. Iraq is awake and aware of US government tactics. Iraq had made extra copies of the complete report and had unofficially distributed them to journalists throughout Europe – 11,000 pages each. The United States removed 8,000 pages of its copy of the report that implicated 24 US-based corporations and the Reagan and Bush administrations with illegally supplying Saddam Hussein’s government with weapons of mass destruction, and training them how to use them. Eastman Kodak, DuPont, Honeywell, Rockwell, Sperry, Hewlett Packard, and Bechtel were all involved. The missing pages contained information that implicated the Reagan and Bush administrations with war crimes. Most notable was defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld as the liaison for US military during the war between Iraq and Iran, and for collaborating with Saddam. It seems that the White House didn’t think that Iraq would be honest and implicate themselves by exposing US involvement.
After the first gulf war, the United States held sanctions against Iraq, causing shortages of food, medical supplies, and medicine. Under the embargo, the Iraqi people lived on $174 a year per person. In May 1996 the United Nations ambassador Madeleine Albright said a half million Iraqi children under age five had died since the war. Unicef said 150 died each day under sanctions being held until Iraq proved itself being unable to build biological or chemical weapons. I wonder who is going to hold the United States accountable? What the media concealed was that eighteen companies in the US, and 21 of western nations supplied chemicals (information from Simon Weisenthal center in LA).
1
-
1
-
1
-
@donnrogers9276 if you dont care if you die, and they may be willing to die for you, why dont you all shoot yourselves for the truly innocent people, the ones you are attacking in their own land. YOu guys have no real purpose, it is a sham. you are all stupid murderers. WE have to live, those who are not murderers. The only ones in the US who have ever put US citizens in danger (other than WWII)is the US government. WAKE UP YOU IDIOTS, INSTEAD OF GLORIFYING YOURSELVES IN FRONT OF FUTURE WARRIORS, INFORM THE PEOPLE OF YOUR HYPOCRISY AND USELESS KILLING, SO FUTURE GENERATIONS DONT MAKE THAT MISTAKE.!!!!! THAT IS MY JOB AND PURPOSE, AND IT DEFIES YOUR MURDEROUS INTENTIONS- WERE YOU IN IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN TO PREVENT US MILITARY FROM KILLING NATIVE ARABS, OR WERE YOU IN THEIR LAND KILLING THEM??
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The media ensures that we
continue to watch, read, and listen; mostly so that we will buy, but there are
also more devious motives. The Americans are in a nation where more affluent
people are more “equal” than others. Madison Avenue, Wall Street, and Pennsylvania
Avenue (advertising, bankers, and the white house) rule in the United States (and the rest of the world that is influenced by it), and reporters serve as public relations agents for
corporations and government officials; and in doing so, they hide the reality,
leaving most people confused. In “Boxed In”
on page 158, Mark Miller states: “When we watch news on television, we
come to feel, not only that the world is blowing up, but that it does so for no
reason, that its ongoing history is nothing more than a series of eruptions,
each without cause or context.” Like 9-11, with three thousand people dying,
and we are told that it is because “arabs are jealous of our freedoms.” We are
assaulted with all kinds of what appears to be unrelated events with leaders
appearing inept, incompetent, and stupid, all ensuring compliance with status
quo; with a haphazard and incomprehensible understanding of why they happen. On
page 65, Anne Schaef notes in her book “When Society Becomes and Addict”: “keeps us powerless and uncontrollable, no one is more controllable than a confused society. Politicians know this better
than anyone, and that is why they use innuendos, veiled references, and
out-and-out lies instead of speaking clearly and truthfully.”
In July 1989, Walter Karp was published in Harper’s Magazine with this quote: “In the American Republic the
fact of oligarchy is the most dreaded knowledge of all, and our news keeps that knowledge from us. By their subjugation of the press, the political powers in America have conferred on
themselves the greatest of political blessings-Gyges’ ring of invisibility. And
they have left the American people more deeply baffled by their own country’s
politics than any people on earth.”
On June 12th of that
same year, Ben Bagdikian was featured saying this in “The Nation”(a far left
magazine): “Monopolistic power dominates many other industries, and most of
them enjoy special treatment by the government. But media giants have two
enormous advantages: they control the public image of national leaders who, as
a result, fear and favor the media magnates political agendas, and they control
the information and entertainment that help establish the social, political,
and cultural attitudes of increasingly larger populations.” This does more than
merely protect the corporate system. It
robs the public of a chance to understand the real world.”
The United States government,
aligned with the media(and church)has employed a powerful weapon known as “psyops”(psychological
operations).This was defined by general Williams of the OSS in the world war II
era as: The coordination and use of all means, including psychological exploitation, the recognized
military actions-which tend to deprive
the will of the enemy, or of the support, assistance , or the sympathy
of his allies or associates, or of neutrals, or to prevent its acquisition of
such support, the assistance, or the sympathy of his allies or associates or of
neutrals, or to prevent the acquisition of such support, assistance, or
sympathy, or which creates, maintains, or increases the will to victory of
their own people or allies; and to acquire, maintain, or to increase the
support, assistance, and sympathy of neutrals.
The Soviet Union used this description of US psyops in 1980:
“Unpardonable methods and ideologies, sabotage, including not just the most
flagrant lies, slander, and disinformation but also political blackmail,
provocation, and terror.”
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
what i found particularly amusing is that veterans were so angry if somebody didnt feel their pain, the poor booboos. i feel sorry for stupid fucking military idiots who have to justify killing innocent people and get angry if we dont admire them for it. i am no intellectual, i am your intellectual superior who has gone to prison for exposing the evil done by our government- i was assaulted mulititude of times, many fractured bones, contusion nose, injuries, big huge ignorant men who hated someone with ethics and balls to call them out - you joined up to kill without valuing human life enough to investigate what you were doing- suck it up- you are murderers and if we dont like it, move on, dont get angry - you dont have the right to. i know what went on there i have talked to veterans i am aware and i dont feel sorry.i did my patriotic duty in full knowledge of the danger, and went through the punishment for my good deed- now go and do something right for a change, and stop justifying your need to feel needed and crying -do something useful instead of being a sorry looking fool who doesnt have the sense to know he is all wrong and is trying to win sympathy. poor booboo
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Arroobadooba Durkhahakh i get it, you are one of the real smart ones who still believes our politicians and media, and doesnt do research. I am an investigative journalist and author- nobody owns me, nobody pays me. from ANGRY LOUD AND CLEAR TRUTH
Two planes hit two towers, and a couple of hours later, they collapsed from fires that resulted from the impact. Or so the story goes according to all mainstream media. I find there to be so little that I believe anymore, that I investigated this fully. In 1982, I worked in one of the towers, so I know that they existed; and in 2013, I saw that the “Freedom Tower” was there now, and that the twin towers were not. But have you ever heard of building number seven? It was a shorter (47 stories) and wider building that no plane hit, but also caught fire unexplainably that day, and also collapsed. It was not reported because it was too much to be considered as coincidence. I came upon a lot of informative facts concerning 9-11 that can lead to only one conclusion. Decide for yourself if you agree. If you doubt the truth of any statement, I challenge you to prove me wrong, because I know that you can’t.
Number one: The twin towers were exceedingly strong with many steel reinforcements. Many weaker high-rises throughout the planet had worse fires, and none other has collapsed before. One other even had a plane also hit it, and it didn’t collapse. There were pools of melted steel all over ground zero afterwards. Steel melts at about 1700 degrees Fahrenheit. According to calculations, the heat in that building should have been considerably less, especially in lower floors. How did the steel melt? Traces of the compound known as “thermite,” which is produced by our government, was found all over ground zero by scientific research investigators. Thermite is used as a demolition explosive, and heats to very high temperatures. Did you notice how the buildings went down at almost freefall speed, one floor after another exploded in descending order? A perfect example of a professionally executed demolition job.
Number two: According to what the media stated that the government found, near the pools of melted steel was found a paper passport (duh, come on guys- paper survived the inferno that steel didn’t-surely you can come up with a more credible story-who can possibly trust our government or the BS media?), one piece of evidence that helped them to find who the terrorists were in just a couple of days. It is comforting to know that we have competent and efficient authorities who were able to find the identity of the culprits so quickly. It is funny how half of them, six months later, popped up and said “Hey guys, here I am, alive and well!” in Arab nations. But you won’t see that on the news. The government didn’t tell them to show that, their airtime and paper and ink are reserved for sports and gossip.
Number three: Our military includes a defensive air-force that has fighter jets which can respond to that location in minutes to a plane on radar that does not meet communications requirements and proper identification. For some unexplainable (except the “coincidence” of an exercise being done elsewhere) reason, those jets never came to the nation’s defense. If all this has not yet convinced you, the following takes the cake: The military officers in charge of defending us from foreign or domestic attack were PROMOTED after the event.
Number four: The plane that was piloted to collide into the Pentagon had some untold information also. I viewed official government released recorded videos and some unofficial ones. The “plane” that hit it was traveling at too high a speed to see clearly, it was a blur. But no visibly discernible wings were evident. The hole left by the collision in the pentagon was far too narrow to even entertain the idea that an ordinary plane with wings assaulted it. I am convinced that it was a missile. No large pieces of wreckage remained. It was very convenient that the area of the pentagon that the assault happened was evacuated shortly before the impact. I don’t know about you, but the one and only obvious conclusion I can come to, is that our leaders (wardens) devised the event. But if this evidence is not enough, I will give some evidence that either our political leaders are all totally incompetent and unbelievably stupid (at convenient times) or that all were complicit!
1
-
@Arroobadooba Durkhahakh Frank Zappa said “politics is the entertainment branch of the government.” He was a talented and prolific musician, and he had lots of brains. Prior to the 9-11 “attack” Republicans and Democrats were always at odds. Republicans called Democrats “liberal snobs” “liberal elite” “unpatriotic” “flag-haters” “politically correct” and the like. Democrats called Republicans “racists” “bigots” “narrow minded” and so on. But on September 20th 2001, Bush gave a speech to congress, and in response, house democrat leader Richard Gephart said “We want America to speak with one voice tonight, and we want enemies and the whole world and all of our citizens to know that America speaks tonight with one voice.” Regarding Bush, he pledged: “We have faith in him and his colleagues in the executive branch to do this in the right way.”
After the president’s address, senate democratic leader Tom Daschle also showed full support: “tonight there is no opposition party. We stand here united not as republicans and democrats, not as southerners and northerners or Midwesterners or easterners, but as Americans.” “We want Bush to know, we want the world to know, that he can depend on us.”
How comforting.
The act of war- the twin towers destruction- which had no country’s flag as responsible, and for a long time it was not clear who was responsible-had a relatively quick response from all our leaders, and a lapse of the usual bickering. Accusations and party antics were set aside, so that we can perceive the real enemies.
When 9-11 had just happened, and there are videos on youtube recording this, Bush had been watching a class of schoolchildren (look it up, it is very telling) participate in their class. We see an aid walk into the classroom and whisper a few words to the president. It was only five or six words, less than ten seconds. This was minutes after the disaster, and was obviously the subject of the brief interruption. The president showed no disturbance, he just nodded, and the class continued. There was not enough time transpired by the aid for him to have explained to him what had happened, all that could have been said was something like: “all happened as planned.” The only response from Bush was a nod, he did not excuse himself from the class to address the crisis. Nothing surprising seemed to have happened.
Then a call to war, to send our youth to kill and to be killed, and no questions, no challenges, no oppositions from politicians; all our leaders were in accord. “GO DESTROY THE ARABS” and if you don’t agree you are unpatriotic. Since when is patriotism associated with attacking foreign nations without good reason to?
You may call me unpatriotic, I know who and what I am. I love human beings. Of all nations. But I know who the enemy is, and it was not Saddam Hussein. It is obvious that Bush knew that the demolition would happen, if he was or wasn’t one of the ones who planned it is the only question. Were all our leaders complicit? Judge for yourself. They all gathered together to attack Afghanistan and Iraq, and being somewhat intelligent, they must have known that the little evidence that they had did not justify war. The CIA’s claim that they “might” have weapons of mass destruction does not cut it. China has that, Korea has that, Russia has that, many nations have deadly weapons. Why pick on Iraq? At any time, attacking and annihilating another peoples with such little evidence of justification for war, betrays their evil doings. Do you suppose something is rotten in DC? The answer is …….every one of them is rotten to the core. And there is much more proof. Bush and Cheney convinced Daschle to not commission an independent investigation. “Anything you say, buddy” (not a quote, just an illustration). National security advisor Condoleezza Rice also spoke against an investigation: “In the context of this ongoing war, it is extremely important to protect the sources and the methods and the information so that we can try and disrupt further attacks.” “The problem is that this is an act that is not finished. It is ongoing. We are still fighting a war on terrorism.”(That is a quote).
A joint congressional committee gave inconclusive results.
1
-
@Arroobadooba Durkhahakh HAVE YOU EVER READ A BOOK IN YOUR LIFE, EINSTEIN, IF NOT OR IF YOU HAVE, THIS IS THE REAL THING==REAL SCIENCE
In September 2002, an independent commission was attached to the bill establishing homeland security. The Bush administration fought to gain control over the naming, staffing, and powers of the commission. Why did they need to control it so closely? Duh! It was not allowed to issue a subpoena without its chairman’s approval- and the chairman was a presidential appointee. Bush appointed former secretary of state Henry Kissinger-alleged war criminal, international corporate fixer, and notorious liar. He was replaced by Thomas Kean after much protest over the appointment of Kissinger. The Bush administration granted the 9/11 commission only $3 million to investigate the attack on the twin towers, while $50 million was allocated to the commission that investigated the space shuttle crash. The same administration refused to release 27 pages of a congressional report that allegedly detailed the Saudi Arabian government’s connections to the “hijackers.” Bush said “You can’t distinguish between Al Qaeda and Saddam when you talk about the war on terror” before he admitted that Saddam had no role in 9-11.
There were no huge protests. So are all the federal politicians complicit? I have concluded that they are. I will now reveal the events in the white house that transpired immediately after September 11th, events that expose US politician’s deceitfulness.
As I stated in EXPOSING THE MONEY MACHINE, the real motivation for the destruction of the twin towers was to strike fear into the citizens of the United States, enabling the government to establish Homeland Security, the Patriot Act, and the wars on Afghanistan and Iraq. In future chapters of this book, I will expose that our media intentionally stifle the truth from being known, and why; as well as providing evidence that the attacks on Afghanistan and Iraq had been planned well before the twin towers went down, in a chapter titled “International Terroristic Actions” in the second part of this book. The terrorist is the United States.
As you probably know, Homeland Security is like H G Wells’ “big brother”, it conducts surveillance on every internet search and telephone call on the planet, and includes all fields of the military under its auspices. The story of the passing of the Patriot Act, according to Herbert Goerstel, is as follows (I have made a shorter version as I pen here): The morning after the 9-11 attacks, attorney general John Ashcroft had his policy specialist Viet Dinh present Ashcroft’s wish-list of expanded police powers codified and transmitted to congress in a bill. Ashcroft demanded that the proposal be enacted within three days, and suggested publicly that congress would be held responsible for any subsequent attacks if it didn’t meet the deadline. The Patriot Act is a sizable technically worded document. Such speedy work to be composed in one night is unbelievable. Further, no time to study, consider, discuss, and collaborate its validity and merits, is highly questionable policy. This was important legislation, and the more reason to take their time to do a thoroughly complete job legislating it. Why was there such a rush to vote on legislation that would take years to establish? And with all the important laws that have been introduced and passed, why would our legislators be afraid of some blame being put on them by another politician? Who pays attention to politician’s mud-slinging?
1
-
@Arroobadooba Durkhahakh last bit here from ANGRY LOUD AND CLEAR TRUTH
On October 11th, the senate convened to vote on it. Since every republican senator had committed to support it, senate majority leader Tom Daschle pressured fellow democrats to vote unanimously for it also. The only dissenting voice was that of Russ Feingold (D- Wisconsin) saying: “if we lived in a country where the police were allowed to search your home at any time for any reason; if we lived in a country where the government was entitled to open your mail, eavesdrop on your phone conversations or intercept your email conversations, if we lived in a country where people could be held in jail indefinitely based on what they write or think, or based on mere suspicion that they were up to no good, the government would probably discover and arrest more terrorists….but they would not be in a country in which we would want to live .... preserving our freedom is the reason we are now engaged in this new war on terrorism. We will lose that war without a shot being fired if we sacrifice the liberties of the American people in the belief that by doing so we will stop the terrorists.”
This may sound like a patriotic speech, but think about it. Could this be an explanation instead of a protest? Could Feingold be telling us that they were attempting to defeat the people without any opposing shots being fired? Just a thought, but one that I take very seriously.
Passing the senate with only Feingold against it, the bill was scrapped and altered that night, and the rewritten Patriot Act was passed on the 12th, voted on for fear of being considered unpatriotic (their excuse) if they didn’t. Three republicans dissented, one of them was Ron Paul of Texas, who said “Our forefathers would think it is time for a revolution .… they revolted against much more mild oppression.”
I don’t buy that our “representatives” voted on this legislation out of fear of being considered unpatriotic. That being mentioned publicly is a ruse. Feingold gave a rousing patriotic speech against it. Something is rotten in DC, and it is conspiracy. Freemasonry is serving an evil entity, and the RC church and wealthy and powerful people have been covertly making many decisions and strategic moves. A few pieces about the Patriot Act. Federal agents and police may conduct searches of homes and offices and confiscate personal property without notification.
FBI can go to your employment and question your coworkers
Government has access to medical records, school records, all personal records
Officials may monitor religious and political organizations
Officials may monitor conversations between attorneys and clients
Officials may seize papers and effects with probable cause
You can be arrested, imprisoned indefinitely, exiled, or executed, no proof or evidence needed
Introduced overwhelming government secrecy
Removed checks and balances within government system
Weakened judicial oversight of executive branch
Eroded civil liberties
Allowed for secret arrest
Detention of people on basis of race, religion or ethnicity
The “Lone Wolf” provision allows intelligence gathering on people not suspected of being part of a foreign government or known terrorist organization
Three months after publishing EXPOSING THE MONEY MACHINE, an intelligence agent went through my files and computer. A month later I was in prison. I have evidence that implies that my sister and parole officers colluded to make it appear that it was a parole violation of having a restraining order placed on me. I had already served six months incarcerated for the same incident (a threat- words never meant to be carried through). The first question the guard asked me when I arrived at Northern State Prison was: “Do black lives matter?” I answered: “Very much” I had distributed scores of emails gone viral with videos attached exposing cops killing unarmed blacks, and almost always being awarded a paid vacation (administrative leave with pay) as punishment. I was then told that they were investigating everything about me. They wanted to see how the book sold, who my friends were, my affiliations etc.. I was asked if I was with the PLO. I had a year sentence, but they let me out after 8 ½ months. I am exceedingly clean. In addition, soon after arriving, before the election, I wrote a 35 page letter addressing many subjects, it included a solution to many problems, and a blueprint for an ideal civilization that would eliminate pollution, eliminate unhealthy bodies and minds, corruption, false religion, overbearing rule, injustice, and basically provide an ideal existence to all future generations. Seeing that not only did I bring attention to the faults of the US and other nations, but that I also had viable, do-able solutions that far surpassed any others, I was released.
1
-
@Arroobadooba Durkhahakh okay einstein- HERE IS PROOF OF WHO IS AT FAULT AND WHY WE DID IT. from ANGRY LOUD AND CLEAR TRUTH
In September of 2001, the US started to bomb Afghanistan. Bush informed the Afghans that the attacks would continue until they handed over wanted suspects considered to be 9-11 accomplices. The Afghanistan officials requested evidence, which the US dismissed, as well as refusing to consider offering papers of extradition. A front-page story on the 10/28/2001 issue of the NY Times stated the official US-British reaction by Admiral Sir Michael Boyce, chief of British defense staff, informing the citizens of Britain, the United States, and Afghanistan that the two allied powers would continue attacking Afghanistan “until they get their leadership changed.” It was made apparent that this was an “afterthought” brought in a couple of weeks after initiating the bombing. Yes, and the amazing way that the Patriot Act was as quickly composed as a reaction to the 9-11 “surprise.”
According to a French book “Bin Laden, La Verite Interdite” (Bin Laden, the Forbidden Truth), the United States had decided to invade Afghanistan in the interest of profits, long before September 2001. In February 1998, congress discussed ways to deal with Afghanistan to enable a US –held oil pipeline. Jane’s Defense Newsletter dated March 2001 revealed that an invasion of Afghanistan was being planned. July 2001 the planned invasion was reported by George Arney of the BBC. “Times of India” stated in June 2001 that the US government told India that there would be an invasion of Afghanistan in October of that year. But the US media insisted that the 9-11 terrorist attack instigated US invasion of Afghanistan and the Taliban regime. The twin towers had no flag bearing responsibility. The right legitimate thing to do would have been to prove who the culprits were, and to bring them to justice. The US blamed Afghanistan, and attacked innocent people, showed no evidence of anybody’s guilt, and endeavored to install a puppet government. Then they did likewise with Iraq. After much futile and senseless destruction, the death toll of Arabs fanned the flame of Islamic radicalism and anti-imperialism. Bush’s “war on terrorism” and the wars on Iraq and Afghanistan in particular were strategically successful in giving new life to Islamic radicalism and made violent resistance popular among Arabs, playing into the elite’s plan of genocide of Arab peoples. The US, after all, has to defend itself. Whether it was an afterthought that developed over the years, or had been planned previously, I am not sure, but the United States had further devious designs to use Afghanistan for more of its evil purposes. The leaders of Afghanistan; the Taliban, had banned its people from producing opium, and under their rule, Afghanistan produced 3% of the world’s opium. Upon the United States taking power in 2010, it soon leaped to producing 90% of the world’s opium. Perceiving the poverty of the Afghan farmers, being such magnanimous benefactors, the US government loaned those farmers the necessary capital and means to grow poppies. For a fee, US military guard the poppy fields, while the farmers labor to earn a meager income, and the smugglers reap wild profits (as do the dealers), importing most of the opium used by Americans and many other nations. Since 2010, Afghanistan has been steadily exporting 13 million pounds of opium annually
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1