Comments by "Michael Kahn" (@michaelkahn8903) on "Cop Who Saved 200 Lives on the Golden Gate Bridge Opens Up" video.
-
@dimarie8537 the allopathic medical system was set up to addict and cause dependence on freemasonic doctors and pharmaceutical owners. Rockefeller created it.
Are you angry at all the deceptions and subversions that I have laid bare? Get ready for rage. Let me introduce the concept that our “benefactors” in the medical field are less than legitimately beneficial. Take, for instance, the opioid epidemic. For many years now, opioids have been prescribed. Doctors see the patients, who relate to them their conditions and pains. Doctors are highly educated with eight years of higher education, internships, updating themselves in conferences and journals, and life experiences observing illnesses and the level of the validity of the pharmaceuticals.
Opioids in such painkillers as OxyContin, have been around for about three decades. It has been well-known for many years (I will get to this in a little while) that these opium-derived chemicals are addictive. The doctors have not perceived the harm that they do?
I was diagnosed with schizophrenia back in 1976, and hospitalized in the private institution Carrier Clinic. At first I took my meds, but after relating with some patients, I was not so willing. I saw a man who was being treated for anxieties, and he was shaking like a leaf, with terrible tremors. He wanted more meds, as what he took was not enough for him; and the more he took, the more he wanted. I did not like the idea that the meds that were prescribed to me caused me to sleep at least eleven hours a night, increased my appetite, and I gained weight. In addition, these meds caused panic attacks for me every week for thirty-five years, which led to three suicide attempts in the first eight years. Now, the meds I take are better, but who knows how I will pay for it in the future. If I could see the harm of these chemicals after only a few days with patients, the doctors don’t see this? I have tolerated thirty years of medication-induced panic attacks, and that patient couldn’t handle a little anxiety? Why is it that the meds are addictive, and useless and/or harmful, and the doctors know it, and are still prescribing them? Let us investigate this disturbing picture.
Kahn, Michael. ANGRY LOUD AND CLEAR TRUTH: THE GROWTH AND MECHANISMS OF THE ROMERICAN EMPIRE . Kindle Edition.
5
-
4
-
@dimarie8537 The Rockefellers were the largest source of capital for the development of medical science in the United States, and was instrumental in the conversion of medical education to a scientific research basis, and the development of public health programs in the US and abroad.(from Rockefeller’s Medicine Men, page 104). That this was funded towards orthodox medicine while Rockefeller himself made sure that he himself was treated with herbs and homeopathic methods is not a coincidence.
Would a man who paid his workers as little as possible, who used ruthless strategies to create monopolies, who said God gave him the right to make limitless money, who used all kinds of unethical methods to amass huge wealth for himself; really want to benefit mankind out of an altruistic heart? Or were there selfish ambition and motivations? The leaders of corporate capitalism decided that government-funded health insurance and worker’s compensation would pacify the public dissent and reduce the popularity of radical labor socialist movements. So they publicly backed moderate reforms. After all, it cost a lot of money to train a worker, and if he dies, that money has gone to waste. Later you will see what Nixon did, and why, when he introduced Medicare for the nation; basically removing the corporations’ responsibility (in the employees’ eyes) to supply health insurance, and placing the burden on the tax-payers.
Kahn, Michael. ANGRY LOUD AND CLEAR TRUTH: THE GROWTH AND MECHANISMS OF THE ROMERICAN EMPIRE . Kindle Edition.
3
-
3
-
2
-
@AngelMGordon In my book EXPOSING THE MONEY MACHINE I DEBUNK THE WHOLE PREMISE
DEBUNKING PSYCHOLOGY
These are some weak points of psychology. Most is the history and character of the fathers of psychology. Their lifestyles and reputations were less than admirable.
Sigmund Freud-(a cocaine addict), claimed that all men desire their mothers sexually. Come on and confess, guys, I know you have. (Just because Freud said something doesn’t make it true- I never wanted any such thing). He also taught that anything that is taller than it is wide is a phallic symbol. This guy was a pervert big time.
Carl Jung: This man was into Hinduism, yoga, transcendental meditation, spells, mediums, all kinds of occult. He said he learned everything that he knew from a “spirit guide” (a demon), having a Greek name resembling “Apollyon”
B F Skinner: He studied human behavior by placing his own infant in a large glass case for extremely long and extended periods of time. If that is how the leaders behave, what kind of treatment can you expect from people who learned from them?
Maslow: was the designer of “the hierarchy of needs”, a statement of the levels of value and importance of the elements of our life. According to him, most important were the physical needs of food, clothing, and shelter. Later came emotional and mental needs. It just so happens that spiritual needs come later. It is funny that people are seen as entities having needs. The field of psychology is to treat people who often love drama, are steeped in self-pity, and who are needy. The service providers also have an overwhelming need. The need to be needed.
Psychology is by definition, the study of the mind. Now you can’t study everybody’s mind without the ability to know another man’s heart. I don’t know about you, but I don’t even know myself very well at all times. I have introspected my motivations correctly, and at times, they can change a day later. A psychology researcher, if they could, might after years of self-analyzation, know themselves. Are we clones? Of course not. He can project, but not know what, how, and why we are. Man’s inclinations are not always logical, and we are individually unique. Now, the fathers of psychology all practiced introspection to see how their own minds worked, as they could not infiltrate the minds and behaviors of others. They figured out their motivations and inner workings, and developed theories on how the mind functions. Then they claimed to understand how others think and process thoughts. The practice of many people of thinking that other people act and behave and react to situations like they do, is called in teachings of psychology: “projecting” and is a cognitive distortion; in layman’s’ terms, a thinking error. By the definition of psychology and its discoveries, all of psychology is based on thinking errors.
Kahn, Michael Lewis. EXPOSING THE MONEY MACHINE: TYRANNY THROUGH GOVERNMENT, RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS, AND MEDIA DECEPTION (pp. 39-41). Kindle Edition.
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@StambeccoAllaFragola sal- as I said, I may have misconstrued, I mentioned that, if you had read my comment at all. You had contradicting comments, the first one was perhaps believing in god, then later it appeared not to = I am a former christian, have studied the bible 10,000 hours, wrote THE UNTOLD NATURE OF CHRISTIANITY, and am very aware of the faith and the god and his character. I do not know yours, did not judge you, I made comments regarding god and belief therein. There is a hell on earth, another realm that many people are in, and I am not one of them, escaping it and Christianity by means of mental and physical anguish. I had commented after reading only the first of your blogs, then commented again seeing that I had maybe been mistaken, as I certainly was. My bad.
"Must be some God existing. One very good man saving 200 of them? Must be some God existing."+-- this comment is misleading
1
-
1
-
@sonicpoot5692 Virtually all United States presidents were freemasons, as are most, if not all, world leaders. Let me bring it all down home. In EXPOSING THE MONEY MACHINE, I show how the US legislation is not formed in the congress or senate, but just passes through them after being mandated by the trilateral commission; and that the Council of Foreign Relations decides on the laws for the planet as a whole. Both were founded and their members appointed by David Rockefeller Jr., the immensely wealthy owner of Standard Oil, which is the pinnacle of US mergers and conglomerates. Rockefeller is the top US illuminati. Allan Greenspan, past head of the Federal Reserve board, was a CFR mason. The director of the NY Federal Reserve Bank is the Jesuit-trained economist and Papal Knight William McDonough. Fox News, the Christian propaganda tool, has as its director, Knight of Malta Robert Murdoch, and Fox is affiliated with the CFR as well. This can go on and on. It is just the tip of the iceberg. Without connection to freemasonry, without clearly showing that you are bought, you cannot obtain a position of power. This holds true of every nation. We are close to the world powers’ execution of mass annihilation, leading to the world fascist police state that they have planned, with 500 million slaves surviving to serve the freemasonry elite. 9-11 not only served to create the atmosphere for homeland security and the patriot act, it gave the United States an excuse to annihilate Arabs, the
Kahn, Michael. ANGRY LOUD AND CLEAR TRUTH: THE GROWTH AND MECHANISMS OF THE ROMERICAN EMPIRE . Kindle Edition.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@AngelMGordon Much psychology is valid however, but only works dependent on the recipient. We are products not only on choices we are given, but also on those taken, and the decisions we make. Reverse psychology and other modalities are successful when wise choices are made. Many counselors of the mentally ill bounce any question back to the patient. “What do you think?” That would be fine for a normal person, but for somebody with serious mental illness, just maybe. A serious mental illness means you have faulty cognitive abilities. It is kinda stupid to bounce back questions to a person who has difficulty using their brains correctly. I am now quite capable of making decisions wisely. Yet for me, and it would be a wise idea for everyone, is this response to questions; “What is the most righteous choice, for the general good of all parties, and considered carefully and with counsel and introspection and insight.”
My very first class of a college course in psychology defined the care of mentally ill people to the development of humans. Child- parent- adult. Playing the role of a parent usually tends to enable a child to remain a child. I was caught in the trap of being a psychiatric patient for many years. It gratified me to no end to be a service provider also. I loved the feeling of helping those whom I thought were less capable than I by doing things for them. It gave me a sense of worth. I did not consider how much harm I was doing. Both parties- those whom I “helped,” and myself. By doing things for them, I inhibited their growth, and by doing so, I had a false feeling of doing something good. Really I was sustaining their childhood, thus preventing them from healthy lives of greater independence and satisfaction of being more of an adult. In addition, I took responsibility for any failure or success on their part. That is supposed to be God’s job. It promoted insecurity and pride, both harmful.
Many college psychology students don’t realize that the vast majority of their patients will be children their whole lives. Like Peter Pan, they choose to have fun joking and whining all their lives, collecting their social security checks and displaying bad behavior, with lots of “drama.” If the students fall into the trap of being parents to all, all will be children. Many will “play” the system on and on and on and on. A healthy person is an adult.
Kahn, Michael Lewis. EXPOSING THE MONEY MACHINE: TYRANNY THROUGH GOVERNMENT, RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS, AND MEDIA DECEPTION (pp. 41-42). Kindle Edition.
1
-
@AngelMGordon Another thing we need to keep in mind is that many people who practice psychology are of the mindset that people are inherently good, that by delving deep into self, we find happiness, self-fulfillment, self-realization, self-actualization, and most practitioners do their very best to bolster self-esteem. Do you notice a trend in that last sentence? Could it be that human beings, as guided by the psychological system and teachings, have a tendency towards being overly involved with themselves? Everything is about self. We have self-help, we tend to want to please self above all else.
Being a people-pleaser is considered wrong, not because you are pleasing them in wrong ways, but it is considered a fault to want to help others sacrificially. At this point, we need to take a look at where psychology has taken us as a nation, and as individuals. Has it been truly helpful? When we spend so much time on introspection, and on knowing and centering our attention on ourselves, is being so self-involved a productive activity? I think this deserves a little investigation, to see if possibly a reversal to return back to the good hard day’s work and diligent occupation at labor or learning.
We have become progressively sicker and increasingly more depraved perhaps as a result of among other things, an unhealthy lifestyle. Proper morals and diligent application of righteous life-habits are a preventive cure that has been lacking in the more “civilized” nations. We need to start a new “religion”, but it must be necessarily a religion of truth, free of any supernatural or fantasy or cryptic symbolism. A more perfect and complete and true teaching and way of life that addresses every facet of life. It should not be a cookie- cutter mold that has strict rules to conform to, but an ethical code to live by and adhere to principles, not the letter of the law of petty rules and regulations. Let me qualify: Something like the teachings of Jesus: treating others as you want to be treated. Loving your enemies. Walking the straight and narrow path. Keeping undefiled by the temptations of the world, and avoiding sensual pleasures and avoiding chasing after money. Sharing with those who have less than you. Having a heart of compassion and love. Using wisdom and exercising towards strength in body, stretching your capacity to love expressed by doing for others, and in mental exercise of understanding and comprehending deeper truths and studying for improving the community. A regular practice of keeping excellent work habits. Perfecting your ability to not be affected by the affirmations or criticisms of others towards you, but having a quiet confidence that comes with achievement of the aforementioned practices. These are the precepts that should be followed by the adherents to a new way of life.
Kahn, Michael Lewis. EXPOSING THE MONEY MACHINE: TYRANNY THROUGH GOVERNMENT, RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS, AND MEDIA DECEPTION (pp. 42-43). Kindle Edition.
1
-
@AngelMGordon FROM MY BOOK ON RELIGION- THE UNTOLD NATURE OF CHRISTIANITY
IT IS ALL ABOUT CONTROL AND OPPRESSION
Does it not make sense that a book that talks of rewards for blind obedience, the representatives of which constantly tells you that you are to worship and give money to its leaders, and get in return great rewards (after you die), could be seen as manipulative? A god that ensures military victories and wealth for obedience to, and worship and honor given to its leaders, who follow blindly the guidance of a spiritual being. In the OT, kings were lifted up by prophets and warriors who obeyed and listened to God’s directions. The welfare of kingdoms and whole nations rested on the obedience of the leaders to this controlling God. Listen to me, and you have victory and wealth.
Could this not be a way to wield evil plans? Does it not wreak of manipulation and exploitation? Could not some teachings in the New Testament be taken as directions to make a faith of people who are following it to be good slaves, a people who obey as a result of following a prophet who they are told is god, and who it is shown to have teachings that lead towards a people who are easily controlled and oppressed? Just entertain the possibility as I make the concept more visible and unfold as you read the pages. First, let me show some scriptures that were possibly inserted to make a population manageable. POSSIBLY??!!??!!??
➢ Rom 13:1 ISV Every person must be subject to the governing authorities, for no authority exists except by God's permission. The existing authorities have been established by God, 13:2 so that whoever resists the authorities opposes what God has established, and those who resist will bring judgment on themselves. 13:3 For the authorities are not a terror to good conduct, but to bad. Would you like to live without being afraid of the authorities? Then do what is right, and you will receive their approval. 13:4 For they are God's servants, working for your good. But if you do what is wrong, you should be afraid, for it is not without reason that they bear the sword. Indeed, they are God's servants to administer punishment to anyone who does wrong. 13:5 Therefore, it is necessary for you to be acquiescent to the authorities, not only for the sake of God's punishment, but also for the sake of your own conscience. 13:6 This is also why you pay taxes. For rulers are God's servants faithfully devoting themselves to their work. 13:7 Pay everyone whatever you owe them—taxes to whom taxes are due, tolls to whom tolls are due, fear to whom fear is due, honor to whom honor is due.
There are some very suspicious characteristics here that need to be addressed. The Apostle Paul supposedly wrote this. He spent literally years incarcerated by the Romans. Yes, they did protect him from the Jews to some extent. But if his god was so powerful, why did he need the protection of unbelievers? The truth of the matter is that the ruling powers are not good, are not out for the good of people, and do indeed enforce evil laws, and don’t often enforce the good laws. Powers and rulers in this world are put in place for the sole purpose of protecting the interests of those who are really in power and who are wealthy. If the law was really so good, why was Jesus executed? Why does the New Testament recall for us the beheading of John the baptizer and the execution of James? Why then, was Peter put in chains? The Bible records that they were all imprisoned for their faith. In the Old Testament, Daniel, Joseph, and Jeremiah were all imprisoned unjustly. Since when have rulers been good? Should we really think it to be a positive thing that we are forced to pay taxes for an evil government to be able to exercise evil doings? If these government employees serve God, I don’t want to be associated with that god.
Kahn, Michael Lewis . THE UNTOLD NATURE OF CHRISTIANITY: ON AMERICA, ROME, DOCTRINE, SEMINARY, AND PRINCIPALITIES (pp. 28-30). Kindle Edition.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1