Michael Kahn
The Sun
comments
Comments by "Michael Kahn" (@michaelkahn8903) on "Rita Panahi on the left's 'cultural revolution', media bias u0026 'coward' conservatives - BQ #21" video.
3
3
2
2
2
2
1
@yetidh9 more from ANGRY LOUD AND CLEAR TRUTH
Why is it that all those rappers and rockers who come from poverty do nothing to contribute to the community they came from? They are multimillionaires, and the money goes to mansions, autos, furs, diamonds, and the very rich even buy islands. Is this not an indication that something is very wrong?
Furthermore, look at the lyrics that they compose, none are politically powerful or socially revelatory regarding civil rights or class warfare. “Immortal Technique,” who is self-published and distributed, is a lone voice in a quagmire of bland conformity. “Bad Religion” is another band speaking rare truth. The music industry has bought artists to ensure that no voice of original authentic dissent is heard.
Take a close observation of rulers and the exceedingly wealthy. Not as media (or Hollywood) portrays them, but using factual information and scientific analyzation. They horde millions and billions of dollars, far beyond what they could possibly need for a hundred generations. Some donate one or two million. Very generous, but almost always done with publicity. But when you look closer, you see that they donated one percent of their vast fortunes.
Trump, for instance, made public that he had established a charitable foundation, neglecting to inform us that it had not donated an iota for eight years; and in addition, he had used it for personal profit. After you investigate their level of generosity, look at how they acquired their wealth.
With few exceptions, wealthy people “earn” it through inheritances, wheeling and dealing, or by exploiting others. Trump’s claim to be a self-made man was shattered when the NY Times exposed his tax fraudulence, illustrating how his father had endowed him with half a billion dollars. Very few worked their way up as laborers, and just about zilch have improved civilization, except to make life easier, but never contribute anything wholesome.
Now inspect their motivations. Find their values, how they counsel people, their modus operandi. Do they exude integrity (no), and what kind of people do they surround themselves with? Do they value wealth, appearances, positions, and prestige? Most certainly they do. Those that donate a portion of their wealth give to museums, equestrian societies, and universities. Do they show concern for others?
The vast majority of rich people are most concerned about their reputation when it comes to charitable giving. Very few, if any, roll up their sleeves and spend time with those in need. It must be “sanitary.
1
@yetidh9 When you want to judge a product or doctrine, it is necessary to view its source, its integrity and validity, by comparing specifics and the big picture. In addition, it is wise to inspect how it has affected civilization and why. Research those who promote it, and their character. Do not be fooled by appearances.
If a package is wrapped in glitter and ribbons, it is promoting something that may not be wholesome, it is trying too hard to be attractive to entice the buyer. Substance is what matters, not appearances. I have come to the conclusion that religious leaders, wealthy people, and rulers, are all evil; they are deceivers who have no true inclination to benefit others in any substantial way.
They have hijacked the planet and are facilitating our destruction willingly. In the public’s ignorance and naivety, they have found sheep to be easily led to slaughter. Your trust in them and their guile and manipulative deception has made you vulnerable to be open to be misled to adopt wrong values and concepts, to be forced to conform to a wicked system.
The “money machine” is a malicious monster that has enslaved the planet. Keep reading, there is more.
I am unfolding a malevolent conspiracy. Though you may not have seen this before, and it may be novel to you, I beseech that you continue to read this book, as not only your future, but also the future of the entire planet earths’ people, depends on the defense that we can muster together united against the evil powers. I will later outline a skeletal plan of action to initiate, specifics can be elaborated upon further collaborative development.
Politicians deceive and make promises that they don’t keep. Do they really intend to do them, but were impeded by other politicians? We are so accustomed to broken promises and voting for the lesser of two evils, that we don’t react with strong responses. Are they incapable of creating solutions to society’s problems?
Look at op-eds in the newspapers. Some of them, especially in the NY Times, present accurate summations and good solutions that are viable. I have also. But our policy makers in Washington cannot originate, nor can they implement correction to the problems? Or perhaps they have no intention to do so.
1
1
1
1
1
1
@nealorr5086 from ANGRY LOUD AND CLEAR TRUTH
CHAPTER FIVE: THE WHITE ESTABLISHMENT: SLAVEMASTERS
We are all aware that America embraced slavery until the civil war. Abraham Lincoln has been recorded in our school history textbooks as the slave’s emancipator. I suggest that you not think too highly of him. Much of his words, like all politicians, were empty rhetoric.
It is authentically documented that when campaigning for presidency in southern states, Lincoln guaranteed the populace that he would uphold the institution of slavery.
While his inaugural address included his expression of his morals against slavery, he declared that he had no intention to abolish it, and that neither did he have the “lawful right to”. The “Civil Rights Act of 1866,” giving sweeping rights as citizens to blacks, was vetoed by the president.
The first several months of the Civil War had nothing to do with abolishing slavery, it was an attempt by the southern states to secede from the union. The northern soldiers did not fight with gusto, as they were not sure of the righteousness of their cause.
It was an act of brilliant calculated victory-promoting strategy to infuse purpose to the north’s motivational energy by changing the reason for fighting to be the liberation of the slaves. However, of the two million union soldiers, though willing to kill for them, most northerner soldiers did not back up their commitment to treating blacks well. Even most of the two hundred thousand black soldiers were treated poorly, despite their proven exemplary soldiering performance.
The Civil war was illegitimately glamorized by both sides. I have never heard anyone express this disturbing reality, as clear and obvious as it is: The extent of some of the Christian white man’s evil has not been addressed.
The southern “gentlemen” were more willing to kill hundreds of thousands of whites and blacks, have their own property decimated, and even die themselves, than to relinquish their dominance over the African peoples.
The reconstruction era was depicted by the southern journalists as an unjust oppression by northern carpetbaggers, black politicians, and “scalawags” taking control because of their deep hatred of the south; and exploiting the southern whites in “political slavery.” This was another myth by pathological liars. Many intellectuals, including those who debunked that myth, refuse to admit to the nature of the Christian white man. They appear so polite and gentle.
Abraham Lincoln put it gently. Here are his words: “There is an unwillingness on the part of our people, as harsh as it may be, for you free colored people to remain with us. But even when you cease to be slaves, you are yet removed from being placed on an equality with the white race…. The aspiration of men is to enjoy equality with the best when free. But on this broad continent not a single man of your race is made the equal of a single man of ours…..I cannot alter it if I would. It is a fact….It is better for us both, therefore, to be separated.”
Notice how Abraham Lincoln identified with “superior” whites. And further, take note that not only couldn’t he change the white man’s attitude, he wouldn’t
1
1
@nealorr5086 funny how i write respectfully, and am glad to hear other people's opinions. but people like you (and most who don't agree with me) always seem unable to show respect to me, but resort to calling me names and insulting me. now, who is the childish one?
I have come to my opinions after thousands of hours of research, and am the author of five books. At least one of them has potential to change civilization. But you assume that I am childish and ignorant as I dont agree with your viewpoint.
it would do you well to research what I have written, and be informed. I am no communist, nor a democrat. I dont fall into the boxes, I am self-educated, and very well read. IN further conversations, I request that you address me correctly, with respect, if you are capable of such.
1
1
1
1
@amyjoyce2301 from my book ANGRY LOUD AND CLEAR TRUTH
The United States has evolved, most certainly intentionally, into the militaristic and imperialistic bully of the world, an instrument of power for Christian elite, the Vatican ruling and directing all. The founders of the nation, the colonists who rebelled against King George III, the men who produced the Declaration of Independence and initiated the revolution, were all wealthy landowners. Most of them were lawyers, and they put on an appearance to be refined gentlemen of reason.
I consider them to have been deceiving hypocrites of ambition. In appearance, they seemed to employ eloquent words of rational principles, but time and skeptical scrutiny reveal a different assessment. First of all, the wording of the Declaration of Independence: “in the year of our Lord” and “endowed by our creator” displays an assumption that it’s constituents are Christians.
Throughout the history of the United States of America, that particular religion has dominated, despite the nation being considered to be an inclusive “melting pot” of immigrants from every land. Contrary to what our schoolbooks have so boldly and repeatedly claimed, the founders of the United States were not freedom fighters struggling for independence from an oppressive regime.
In actuality, they were all wealthy, and some were slave-masters, who not only led revolution, but also hired, or forced into conscription, mercenaries and slaves to expel the British. To be free of overbearing taxes was not the real motivation.
The truth is that these wealthy and ambitious men sought to expel the British, the old wealth and power, to enable the founding fathers access to control the vast and potentially incredible mass of power and wealth of the new land. The words employed in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution were empty rhetoric, their integrity no more pure than that displayed by the president in power as I pen these words, Donald Trump, or any other of those corrupt hypocrites occupying the district of Columbia.
Thomas Jefferson wrote: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”
This man of “equality” and “liberty” owned 180 slaves. If you were told that he freed those slaves, or intended to, those were lies. Everybody is aware of that opening statement-“We hold these truths….But how many people know the wording that immediately follows it, and why not?
1
@amyjoyce2301 The appearance and revelation of the founding document displays its relevance to today’s situation, which is a result of centuries of rule by evil people whose governing has selfish motives, rather than the welfare of the masses in its concern.
This book will expose covert and malicious actions by the rich and powerful leaders and hidden movers who pull the strings that dictate the legislation and precepts which influence worldwide happenings which have been detrimental to humanity. It is at this time necessary to abolish the ruling powers to facilitate not only the people’s happiness, but even our very survival. I will commence to prove that.
“A popular government without popular information, or the means of acquiring it, is but a prologue to farce, or a tragedy, or both. Knowledge will forever govern ignorance, and a people who mean to be their own governors, must arm themselves with the power that knowledge gives.”
James Madison
....The founding fathers of the United States were intelligent and they took great care in the wording of the Declaration of Independence and of the Constitution. Remember that they were lawyers, and that they were Christians. Many were known to be freemasons.
According to the cofounder of the KKK and pioneer of freemasonry in the United States, Albert Pike, the masons started worshiping the god Basphomet, another name for Lucifer, when they were still going by the name “the Knights Templar.” This information, which can be found in Pike’s book “Morals and Dogma” may outrage those who are aware that the “Knights Templar were the mercenaries who fought the crusades for the Vatican.
In “The Untold Nature of Christianity,” I prove with a simple and clear exposition using multitude of scriptures, and employing logic and common sense, that the god described in the bible is in reality, the same entity called Satan. As offensive as this statement may be to the true Christian, I urge you to investigate for yourself.
For a quick introduction to that concept, look up these scriptures: 2 Corinthians 4:4, 2 Corinthians 11:14,15, 1Timothy 4:1,2, 2Thessalonians 2:9-11, 1 John 5:19, Ephesians 6:12, John 8:44. These scriptures, combined with an analytical logical common sense, lead one to question if God and Satan are one and the same. Read the book for overwhelming proof.
Although you are probably not convinced now, the previous book of mine illustrated how freemasonry is a branch of Christianity. Albert Pike said this on July 14th, 1889, to the 23 Supreme Councils of the world: ”That which we must say to the crowd is: We worship a god, but it is the god one adores without superstition. To you, Sovereign Grand Instructors General, we say this that you may repeat it to the brethren of the 32nd, 31st, and 30th degrees: the masonic religion should be, by all of us initiates of the high degrees, maintained in the purity of the Luciferian doctrine”
George Washington was called the “Father of the Nation” not because he cared about its citizens as a father would be for his children. He was put in presidency because he was the wealthiest man in the land at that time. In addition, he was a man of blood, acquiring power by being involved in several wars. History has been rewritten to accommodate the conforming of the citizens to the values and agendas of our leaders, using propaganda as its modus operandi. The truth of the history of the United States is told by historian and author Howard Zinn and a few others who have researched authentic historic documents.
1
@amyjoyce2301 you asked for it, now here is more from ANGRY LOUD AND CLEAR TRUTH
The leaders of the United States, past and present, and the rulers of every land have established a hierarchy that enables them to wield not only overwhelming power, but in their evil scheming manipulations, have imposed skewed values and priorities into the character of virtually all peoples, primarily via the media.
As a result, most people’s top priorities are monetary and material plenty, security and safety, respectability, as well as access to entertainment. The people have been influenced by the media to value the security of their property above their freedoms, and above the freedom and lives of others.
That is why there is little protest over metal detectors, police brutality, homeland security, video cameras, and invasion of privacy and surveillance of phone and internet use. But of primary result, military intervention and annihilation of foreign peoples. All in the name of protecting their way of life.
The joke is that no foreigner ever put their way of life in danger, the only enemy they need fear is the establishment currently in power. The brave pioneers of America would turn in their graves if they saw the cowardly selfishness of those people who inhabit the land that they courageously ventured to explore.
I do not agree with the concept of birth privilege, especially not for those who are born of “pure holy white lineage.” No god who sends people to hell has any relationship with rights or equality. Furthermore, the words that we have a “right” to “pursue happiness” have been hijacked by a class of parasites who use these words to justify their gain by means of oppression, deception, exploitation, and murder.
Here in America, the “American Dream,” a goal that has transformed from being the prospect of enjoying the freedom to practice the religion of one’s own preference into achieving that wonderful illusion of success- a “respectable” employment earning enough money to purchase one’s own “castle” and “chariot” and the inevitable trappings- stocks, investments, security alarm systems, plenty of toys, and a trophy wife.
The more employees you hire (slaves you own) the more wealth you acquire; and this can only be achieved by oppressing your employees with meager pay, deceiving your customers and the IRS, and cheating those who purchase your product or service. God bless America.
.......... He was willing to send thousands of men to their death to procure some denied freedoms for the colonies, but he did not have the fortitude to take a stand against slavery and death of Africans. He just wrote a few words which he quickly recanted. The British were no better, willing to send slaves to their death to win their liberty, when the British had been instrumental in taking it away.
The colonists, British, and Christian leaders in general are more than willing to employ oppression, deception, manipulation, and murder to achieve their agenda. And the practice of these methods continues today. And they seem so refined and gentlemanly with their words, the serpents.
History has been rewritten to accommodate the conforming of the citizens to the values and agenda of our leaders, using propaganda as its modus operandi. It is interesting that the first amendment allows for free speech. Anyone is permitted to deceive whosoever he wants to, and there is a free press (or so we are led to believe) to mislead multitudes.
This would be beneficial if curbed with prohibition of deception. It is telling to note that it is the FIRST amendment, the primary addition of the founders, included free speech (permitting deception), and even more influential, the freedom of religion. They insured the right to be deceived and to practice deception.
1
1
1