Comments by "Michael Kahn" (@michaelkahn8903) on "Fox News" channel.

  1. 9
  2. 7
  3. 7
  4. 7
  5. 5
  6. 4
  7. 4
  8. 3
  9. Regarding the Patriot Act: It was created under the pretext of an emergency in direct opposition to scores of constitutional laws which protect US citizens’ rights. Of course I have shown overwhelming evidence that the “emergency” was concocted by the ones who employed the Patriot Act. However, I have found that an emergency is NOT a valid permission to dismiss constitutional law. The following constitutional amendments and decisions provide a very serious iron-clad case to overturn the Patriot Act. I have no confidence in the integrity of the Supreme Court of the United States to make any righteous decision regarding this, or I would go there myself to take down the illegal Patriot Act. Here are the laws supporting this concept: The US Constitution, Article six, Clause 2: This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the Supreme Law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby any Thing in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding. US Constitution, Bill of Rights, Article Four: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated; and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things seized. US Constitution, Bill of Rights, Article Six: IN all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law; and to be informed of the nature of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor; and to have the assistance of counsel for his defence. Marbury v. Madison 5 US 137 (1803): No provision of the Constitution is designed to be without effect, “anything that is in conflict is null and void of law, “Clearly, for a secondary law to come in conflict with the Supreme Law was illogical, for certainly, the Supreme Law would prevail over all other laws and certainly our forefathers had intended that the Supreme Law would be the bases of all law and for any law to come in conflict would be null and void of law, it would bare no power to enforce, it would bare no obligation to obey, it would purport to settle as if it had never existed, for unconstitutionality would date from the enactment of such a law, not from the date so branded in an open court of law, no courts are bound to uphold it, and no citizens are bound to obey it. It operates as a near nullity or a fiction of law.” Shephard’s Citations: A group of reporters that go through and keep track of all court cases that have come before the courts, especially of the Supreme Court and they clarify, before the court, all the cases. All cases which have cited Marbury v. Madison case, to the Supreme Court has not ever been overturned. See Shephard’s Citation of Marbury v. Madison. That proves that the Patriot Act is unlawful. No law can legally contradict the constitution. Now for punishment of the courts who do not obey the constitution: Title 5, US Code Sec. 556(d), Sec. 557, Sec. 706: Courts lose jurisdiction if they do not follow Due Process Law. Title 18, US Code Sec. 2381: In the presence of two or more witnesses of the same overt act, or in an open court of law, if you fail to timely move to protect and defend the constitution of the United States and honor your oath of office, you are subject to the charge of capital felony treason.
    3
  10. 3
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14. 2
  15. 2
  16.  @dcisme5594  CHAPTER TWENTY ONE: MEDIA’S PROPAGANDA TACTICS When we discuss the media, there are a few things to keep in mind. Primary to a clear perception and understanding, you need to remember that those on top-the most wealthy and powerful players- are in the Council of Foreign Relations, of which the members are appointed by oligarch David Rockefeller Jr., a kingpin in world affairs. Let me quote him from his book “Memoirs”- “some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as internationalists and conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure, one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.” Do you think that the most powerful and wealthy people on the planet who are meeting in secrecy are planning how to benefit us? With that in remembrance, consider that media, including the news, is a business, more specifically an entertainment industry. Entertainment is defined in the Webster dictionary as amusement and diversion. That is why commercials often seem to attempt to be funny, as do sitcoms. That also explains the videos that focus on superheroes, aliens, monsters, and all kinds of fantasies. I cannot recall the last time I saw an accurate documentary on television. The history channel puts on an appearance of truth, but always falls short of it. TV and radio receive virtually 100% of their income from advertisers, newspapers 75%, and magazines about 50%. It is very concerning that the NY Times has so little visible advertising. How are they funded? The media are under great pressure to shape their product to accommodate their advertisers. Advertisers influence the media by restricting and whitewashing media content by removing, or threatening to remove, financial support if their demands are not met. Since media are funded by advertising, their economic survival depends on delivering an audience for advertisers. To them, people exist as potential consumers whose most desirable qualities are gullibility and compliance to media advice- watch, believe, obey, and buy. Corporate owners, aligned with the CFR, also have an interest in furthering their agenda. Media news chains have ordered their papers, radio shows, and television programs to adopt a uniform editorial position on certain issues and political candidates, even to support specific worldviews. Management is replaced if it doesn’t perform to the ideals of ownership, and they control which ideas and which version of the facts reach the public. The news that we read is what editors and owners decide to publish, it is not dependent on reporters.
    2
  17. 2
  18. 2
  19. 2
  20. 2
  21. 2
  22. 2
  23. 2
  24. 2
  25. 2
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33.  Steven Sweeden  globalists, since you are ignorant, i will have to inform you, refers to the wealthy people who have planned such concepts as agenda 21, now known as agenda 30. If you like you can look it up. However, you probably don't know how-google it. a little from ANGRY LOUD AND CLEAR TRUTH David Rockefeller himself said this addressing the Trilateral Commission on June of 1991 (according to page 46 of Jim Keith’s “Mass Control: Engineering Human Consciousness”): “We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine, and other great publications whose directors have attended meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march toward world government. The supra-natural sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determinism practiced in past centuries.” There are about a half a dozen conglomerates that own virtually the whole US media. Almost as influential as the owners of media print and broadcasting are the corporate advertisers; the financial sources, who have strong influence (the threat of boycotting media outlets from being used by them to advertise) over what is revealed. Do you need proof of this obviously true statement? It is a fact. But here is evidence. On June 27th, 2017, Andrew Beauton reported in “The Washingtonian” that the “Washington Post” put a policy in effect on the previous May 1st that prohibited the Post’s employees from conduct on social media “that adversely affects the Post’s customers, advertisers, subscribers, vendors, suppliers, or partners.” Management reserved the right to fire employees who disobey the policy. It applies to the entire company. That same day, Whitney Webb reported on Mintpress News that becoming a sponsor of the paper puts an end to the Post criticizing your corporation. She also addressed that four months after Jeff Bezo (CEO of Amazon) purchased the Post, Amazon Web services signed a $600 million contract with the CIA for web hosting services, and was serving “the entire US intelligence community.” This started affecting the Post going back a ways. In 2018, the Post openly called for the prosecution of Edward Snowden, when they had previously won the Pullitzer Prize for their report on illegal NSA spying, using Snowden’s leaks.
    1
  34.  Steven Sweeden  some more from ANGRY LOUD AND CLEAR TRUTH Corporate propaganda, which aligns itself with government propaganda, stifles troublesome journalistic enterprise. Their natural enemy is the investigative journalist who serves the public interest, while propaganda works against it. The first government propaganda operation in the United States was initiated by Woodrow Wilson’s administration, and was called the Creel Commission. This was during World War I, and it employed propaganda to turn a pacifist population into a hysterical blood-thirsty citizenship ready to annihilate Germany. It adopted the tactics used by the British Propaganda Ministry, whose mission was to “direct the thought of most of the world.” That was not a new concept, nor a new undertaking, but another facet of the modus operandi of the world’s ruling powers. In the middle of the nineteenth century, skull and bones member Daniel Gilman, first president of John Hopkins University and of the Carnegie Institute, put into motion in America an educational revolution that subverted the entire education system, targeting it towards their goal of a new world order. He also was instrumental in founding the General Education Board, later to be called the Rockefeller Foundation. Gilman was the one who initiated the education system’s philosophy as we know it to be in today’s United States. He adopted the Prussian three tier school system, which is constructed as follows: One half of one percent of the population is taught to think, and they are the policy makers, who come from upper-crust families, accustomed to wealth and privilege, except for a few excelling underclass students who are indoctrinated into the ruler’s mindsets, and who are “bought.” Five and a half percent of the population go to universities where they are taught to partially think, but not completely. They become the doctors, lawyers, engineers, architects, etc.. The remaining lower ninety-four percent learn harmony, obedience, how to follow orders, freedom from stressful thinking, and other attitudes for the masses to conform to, so as to render them unable to resist. I have a question. What would result if one of the lower ninety-four percent learned to think independently and helped distribute the real knowledge freely?
    1
  35.  Steven Sweeden  YOU WOULD DO WELL TO RESEARCH- CRITICAL ANALYTICAL READING IS MUCH MORE INFORMATIVE THAN SPOON-FED NEWS The media only tells the public what the powers want them to know or think, using information management. This includes withholding of information, disseminating misinformation (lies), and misdirecting people so that none can comprehend the reality of the world events and the forces that make them happen. This is a major player in war against humanity. The information war was made more effective by the Rockefeller Foundation in the 1930s, when it initiated secret psychological “war” projects whose purpose was to shape public opinion. According to Christopher Simpson, author of “Science of Coercion”: “…a tight circle of men and women who shared several important conceptions of mass research. They regarded mass communication as a tool for social management, and as a weapon in social conflict, and they expressed common assumptions concerning the usefulness of quantitative research - particularly experimental and quasi-experimental effects research, opinion surveys, and quantitative content analysis as a means of illuminating what communication “is” and improving its application to social management.” As this was being implemented and working in overdrive, the Office of Strategic Services and the Office of War Information recruited the “best and brightest” from American intelligentsia into secret “intelligence,” and after training, were placed into powerful positions of mass media, politics, and universities. In the 1950s, the CIA and the American mass media began to be interlocked, the agency feeding information to journalists in exchange for their own intelligence developed at home and abroad. Many American journalists currently work for the CIA. That is the explanation for the “fake news” in the media. Intentional fake news is very real, and manipulatively deceptive. Another strategy used by the large public relations corporations and the government is the use of surveys in polling. By slanting questions and using outright deception regarding results in service to whoever is paying them, the public is often misled as to what the rest of the population thinks. Under the impression that one is alone in his attitude of perception, one will not voice opinion nor organize to further one’s cause. To illustrate one way this is engaged, ask how many times the media has directly addressed the exceedingly important issues of poverty, human rights, abuses, media control by the elite, racism, or the like; and given novel results that speak to the poor having the backing of the people in a substantive way. Any results that are denying help to the poor, I guarantee you, are either the result of hateful and mean-spirited propaganda and indoctrination favoring the pro-rich elite, or are deceptively misleading as to the authentic hearts of the people.
    1
  36.  Steven Sweeden  A REAL JOURNALIST TELLS THE WHOLE STORY IN ITS ENTIRETY IF IT HAS RELEVANCE AND IMPORTANCE-EVEN IF UNPOPULAR When we discuss the media, there are a few things to keep in mind. Primary to a clear perception and understanding, you need to remember that those on top-the most wealthy and powerful players- are in the Council of Foreign Relations, of which the members are appointed by oligarch David Rockefeller Jr., a kingpin in world affairs. Let me quote him from his book “Memoirs”- “some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as internationalists and conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure, one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.” Do you think that the most powerful and wealthy people on the planet who are meeting in secrecy are planning how to benefit us? With that in remembrance, consider that media, including the news, is a business, more specifically an entertainment industry. Entertainment is defined in the Webster dictionary as amusement and diversion. That is why commercials often seem to attempt to be funny, as do sitcoms. That also explains the videos that focus on superheroes, aliens, monsters, and all kinds of fantasies. I cannot recall the last time I saw an accurate documentary on television. The history channel puts on an appearance of truth, but always falls short of it. TV and radio receive virtually 100% of their income from advertisers, newspapers 75%, and magazines about 50%. It is very concerning that the NY Times has so little visible advertising. How are they funded? The media are under great pressure to shape their product to accommodate their advertisers. Advertisers influence the media by restricting and whitewashing media content by removing, or threatening to remove, financial support if their demands are not met. Since media are funded by advertising, their economic survival depends on delivering an audience for advertisers. To them, people exist as potential consumers whose most desirable qualities are gullibility and compliance to media advice- watch, believe, obey, and buy. Corporate owners, aligned with the CFR, also have an interest in furthering their agenda. Media news chains have ordered their papers, radio shows, and television programs to adopt a uniform editorial position on certain issues and political candidates, even to support specific worldviews. Management is replaced if it doesn’t perform to the ideals of ownership, and they control which ideas and which version of the facts reach the public. The news that we read is what editors and owners decide to publish, it is not dependent on reporters. Otis Chandler, past publisher of the Los Angeles Times, said “I’m the chief executive. I set policy and I’m not going to surround myself with people who disagree with me… I surround myself with people who see the way I do.” Other publishers do likewise. Sponsors influence not only the news, but partner with Hollywood, and every aspect of the media, to shape our mindsets and worldviews. “Unreliable Sources” makes this quote and statement on page 61:- “Proctor and Gamble,” which spends over a billion dollars a year in advertising, once decreed in a memo on broadcast policy: “There will be no material that gives offense, either directly or indirectly to any commercial organization of any sort.” Ditto for Prudential Insurance: “A positive image of business and finance is important to sustain on the air.” If a business is cast as the bad guy, it must be clear that it is an exception, and the script must also include benevolent business folks, so as not to leave “the wrong impression.” Corporate sponsors are unlikely to underwrite programs that engage in serious criticism of environmental pollution, occupational hazards, or other problems attributable to corporate malfeasance.”
    1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43.  Yo-yos Tenbucks  We live in a world of deception. You read earlier of a prison. Part of the prison’s walls is the illusion of freedom and power that the inmates think that they have. You think that you elect your governing leaders. Some guys are appointed to get up there and entertain you like WWF wrestlers. You pull my leg a little, and then I will pull yours. You twist my arm a little, and then I will twist yours. Then you can win, and we go to the bar for a few drinks, count our money, and go home rich. But the politicians don’t decide, they are just puppets. The puppeteers, the illuminati, they are the ones who choose decades ahead, who will be president, and everything else. What about voting and elections? Who owns the ballot machines, and who counts them? I did a quick little search and found that the Bush family is involved in ownership, and also their affiliates with the CIA and other “intelligence agencies” here in good old USA. You should know of Bush’s wealth and corruption, but even more so the ways of our agencies which somehow were a target of President Kennedy, who in his attempts to expose them, was assassinated, by some coincidence. Accidently on purpose. But that doesn’t matter, though, because our votes hold absolutely no significance whatsoever. Our politicians are puppets that are made and selected by the puppeteers. They recite rhetoric to look good, while collecting bribes and gifts, and they constantly go in and out of office in revolving doors with executive positions paying millions of dollars in salaries in pharmaceuticals, companies like Monsanto, and other powerful corporations and conglomerates. So how do you introduce a stronger set of prison bars and strongholds to inmates who are feisty, and who like the idea of freedom? By having them believe that you are protecting them from an evil enemy.
    1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1
  51. 1
  52. 1
  53. 1
  54. 1
  55. 1
  56. 1
  57. 1
  58. 1
  59. 1
  60. 1
  61. 1
  62. 1
  63. 1
  64. 1
  65. 1
  66. 1
  67. 1
  68. 1
  69. 1
  70. 1
  71. 1
  72. 1
  73. 1
  74. 1
  75. 1
  76. 1
  77. 1
  78. 1
  79. 1
  80. 1
  81. 1
  82. 1
  83. 1
  84. 1
  85. 1
  86. 1
  87. The media only tells the public what the powers want them to know or think, using information management. This includes withholding of information, disseminating misinformation (lies), and misdirecting people so that none can comprehend the reality of the world events and the forces that make them happen. This is a major player in war against humanity. The information war was made more effective by the Rockefeller Foundation in the 1930s, when it initiated secret psychological “war” projects whose purpose was to shape public opinion. According to Christopher Simpson, author of “Science of Coercion”: “…a tight circle of men and women who shared several important conceptions of mass research. They regarded mass communication as a tool for social management, and as a weapon in social conflict, and they expressed common assumptions concerning the usefulness of quantitative research -  particularly experimental and quasi-experimental effects research, opinion surveys, and quantitative content analysis as a means of illuminating what communication “is” and improving its application to social management.” As this was being implemented and working in overdrive, the Office of Strategic Services and the Office of War Information recruited the “best and brightest” from American intelligentsia into secret “intelligence,” and after training, were placed into powerful positions of mass media, politics, and universities. In the 1950s, the CIA and the American mass media began to be interlocked, the agency feeding information to journalists in exchange for their own intelligence developed at home and abroad. Many American journalists currently work for the CIA. That is the explanation for the “fake news” in the media. Intentional fake news is very real, and manipulatively deceptive.   Another strategy used Kahn, Michael. ANGRY LOUD AND CLEAR TRUTH: THE GROWTH AND MECHANISMS OF THE ROMERICAN EMPIRE . Kindle Edition.
    1
  88. 1
  89. 1
  90. 1
  91. 1
  92. 1
  93. from chapter 18 of ANGRY LOUD AND CLEAR TRUTH At the end of “Behold a Pale Horse,” by William Cooper, was enclosed a list of members of the Council of Foreign Relations, as released by F.RE.E.. As I have before mentioned, the CFR was founded by David Rockefeller Jr., who also appointed its members. There are approximately three hundred listed members, well over a hundred of them representing the media. CBS, NBC, ABC, Cable News Network, PBS, Associated Press, Reuters, Boston Globe, Baltimore Sun, Washington Times, NY Times, Time Inc., Newsweek, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, National Review, and others had leadership in membership of the CFR. The Council of Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission are instruments of the illuminati formed to obliterate national boundaries and to establish a new world order. They are doing this by consolidating commercial and banking interests by capturing control of the political government of the United States, and through US covert actions, the political government of all nations. “Some even believe that we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as “internationalists” and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure- one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”-David Rockefeller, from his book “Memoirs” The list of members, compiled in 1989, included top brass from all sections of military, several banks, leaders of all the most influential universities, (Barnard, Columbia, Cornell, Notre Dame, Stanford, Yale, John Hopkins, Wellesley, Princeton, Brown, a dozen others); government officials, house and senate members; energy (Shell, Texaco, Exxon, Mobil); international broadcasting,; Ford, Chrysler, and General Motors; General Electric, AT&T, the Federal Reserve, and the Smithsonian Institute. These were the most powerful people in the United States at the time. Together, they have been conspiring how to achieve their goals, and directing the actions that create world events. They compose federal legislation, bribe politicians, arrange coups and invasions, and are the ones who decide which people will be leaders. Remember that the owners of media on these committees control editing policies and content of the entire media.
    1
  94. 1
  95. 1
  96. The media only tells the public what the powers want them to know or think, using information management. This includes withholding of information, disseminating misinformation (lies), and misdirecting people so that none can comprehend the reality of the world events and the forces that make them happen. This is a major player in war against humanity. The information war was made more effective by the Rockefeller Foundation in the 1930s, when it initiated secret psychological “war” projects whose purpose was to shape public opinion. According to Christopher Simpson, author of “Science of Coercion”: “…a tight circle of men and women who shared several important conceptions of mass research. They regarded mass communication as a tool for social management, and as a weapon in social conflict, and they expressed common assumptions concerning the usefulness of quantitative research - particularly experimental and quasi-experimental effects research, opinion surveys, and quantitative content analysis as a means of illuminating what communication “is” and improving its application to social management.” As this was being implemented and working in overdrive, the Office of Strategic Services and the Office of War Information recruited the “best and brightest” from American intelligentsia into secret “intelligence,” and after training, were placed into powerful positions of mass media, politics, and universities. In the 1950s, the CIA and the American mass media began to be interlocked, the agency feeding information to journalists in exchange for their own intelligence developed at home and abroad. Many American journalists currently work for the CIA. That is the explanation for the “fake news” in the media. Intentional fake news is very real, and manipulatively deceptive. Another strategy used by the large public relations corporations and the government is the use of surveys in polling. By slanting questions and using outright deception regarding results in service to whoever is paying them, the public is often misled as to what the rest of the population thinks. Under the impression that one is alone in his attitude of perception, one will not voice opinion nor organize to further one’s cause. To illustrate one way this is engaged, ask how many times the media has directly addressed the exceedingly important issues of poverty, human rights, abuses, media control by the elite, racism, or the like; and given novel results that speak to the poor having the backing of the people in a substantive way. Any results that are denying help to the poor, I guarantee you, are either the result of hateful and mean-spirited propaganda and indoctrination favoring the pro-rich elite, or are deceptively misleading as to the authentic hearts of the people.
    1
  97. 1
  98. 1
  99. from my book ANGRY LOUD AND CLEAR TRUTH CHAPTER TWENTY TWO: MASTERS OF MANIPULATIVE DECEPTION In “Unreliable Sources” I found how media and government are wed. Like the military industrial complex, and like pharmaceuticals, and other corporate capitalistic (do not assume that this is the only form of government that does this) ventures, the media has incorporated itself in the rule of this nation (and others), and vice versa. Let me present you here with a list of some revolving doors within media and government. These are found on pages 110-120. Under Lyndon Johnson’s state department (in high office) were Jack Rosenthal and Leslie Gelb, who became editors of the NY Times. Gelb’s former boss, ex-Secretary of State Cyrus Vance, was on the Times’ board of directors. Gelb left the Times to serve under Carter as director of the Bureau of Politico-Military Affairs. In 1978, he had initiated a covert CIA program involved in working with the European press to write approvingly of the neutron bomb. He had worked for the Department of Defense as a press officer. That makes for a free and unbiased press. Not. SKIP MUCH...Kennedy’s press secretary, Pierre Salinger, became chief foreign correspondent of ABC World News Tonight. The famous Bill Moyers was press secretary for Lyndon Johnson and later was made a household name as commentator and reporter for CBS and PBS. I am not giving you the full list, but here are some more. Reagan’s communications director, David Gergen, became editor of US News and World Report in 1983, and his deputy, Joanna Bistany became a top executive at ABC News that same year. Peggy Noonan who had been a script writer for CBS radio commentary for Dan Rather later composed speeches for Reagan and Bush.
    1
  100. 1
  101. 1
  102. 1
  103. 1
  104. 1
  105. 1
  106. 1
  107. In school, i was taught lies- that America is great. You are liars. i am self-educated. Here is from my book ANGRY LOUD AND CLEAR TRUTH rich people in power always support fellow dictators. The banker Morgan funded Woodrow Wilson’s campaign for president. On December 23, 1913, The Federal Reserve Act was hastily passed by our representatives just before the Christmas break. It was planned at a secret meeting in 1910 on Jekyl Island, Georgia, by a group of bankers and politicians. The Federal Reserve is neither federal, nor a reserve- it basically puts the funding by and for the United States into the hands of a private group of bankers. Congressman Lindbergh Sr. (father of the famed aviator) warned: “This act establishes the most gigantic trust on earth. When the president signs this act, the invisible government by the money power, proven to exist by the Money Trust Investigation, will be legalized. The new law will create inflation whenever the trusts want inflation. From now on, depressions will be scientifically created.” Three years after signing the Federal Reserve Act into law, Wilson observed: “I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by a system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all its activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the civilized world. No longer a government of free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote by the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.”
    1
  108. How the CIA makes the fake news: CHAPTER TWENTY TWO: MASTERS OF MANIPULATIVE DECEPTION In “Unreliable Sources” I found how media and government are wed. Like the military industrial complex, and like pharmaceuticals, and other corporate capitalistic (do not assume that this is the only form of government that does this) ventures, the media has incorporated itself in the rule of this nation (and others), and vice versa. Let me present you here with a list of some revolving doors within media and government. These are found on pages 110-120. Under Lyndon Johnson’s state department (in high office) were Jack Rosenthal and Leslie Gelb, who became editors of the NY Times. Gelb’s former boss, ex-Secretary of State Cyrus Vance, was on the Times’ board of directors. Gelb left the Times to serve under Carter as director of the Bureau of Politico-Military Affairs. In 1978, he had initiated a covert CIA program involved in working with the European press to write approvingly of the neutron bomb. He had worked for the Department of Defense as a press officer. That makes for a free and unbiased press. Not. John Hughes was a PR man for Reagan’s State Department who later was employed as an editorial columnist for the Christian Science Monitor, whose diatribes on Central America and the State Department’s positions sounded very similar. NBC Nightly News reporter John Chancellor had no trouble on his conscience to become a propagandist for the state by becoming Voice of America (ran radio programs in Vietnam attempting to discourage and dismay Vietnamese via propaganda) director under the Johnson administration. Another Voice of America program director (under Reagan and Bush) was Sid Davis, who had been the white house correspondent and Washington Bureau chief for NBC news. The United States Information Agency (USIA) is a blatant propaganda promoter, as is VOA, and Edward Murrow of CBS News and columnist Carl Rowan took turns as USIA director under John Kennedy. Kennedy’s press secretary, Pierre Salinger, became chief foreign correspondent of ABC World News Tonight. The famous Bill Moyers was press secretary for Lyndon Johnson and later was made a household name as commentator and reporter for CBS and PBS. I am not giving you the full list, but here are some more. Reagan’s communications director, David Gergen, became editor of US News and World Report in 1983, and his deputy, Joanna Bistany became a top executive at ABC News that same year. Peggy Noonan who had been a script writer for CBS radio commentary for Dan Rather later composed speeches for Reagan and Bush. George Will helped prepare Reagan for his debate against Carter, then praised Reagan as he covered the debate on ABC News, “forgetting” to mention his association with Reagan. Instead of hurting his career, when this was uncovered, it enhanced his reputation among media mavens. Page 113-“Both journalists and elected officials tend to view the world in ways that conform to the national security establishment
    1
  109. 1
  110. 1
  111. notice how Tucker mentions Carnegie, so do I, more completely in ANGRY LOUD AND CLEAR TRUTH The two wealthy people who first funded universities were Carnegie and Rockefeller. Carnegie related his capitalist accumulation of riches to be beneficial to society by associating it with “survival of the fittest” and by accumulating wealth, he was thus enabling the “fittest,” himself, to be furthering the welfare of the human race. He, being “fittest” was best suited to dispose of his fortune most wisely. He justified his distribution of wealth as “doing better for them than they would or could do for themselves.”-“due to my superior wisdom, experience, and ability to administer”. Carnegie bought 7,689 church organs to benefit the poor (costing over six million dollars). His philanthropy included giving to universities ($20 million), and he contributed 2,811 libraries (if he supplied the books, that would control the thinking) which were constructed with $60 million. He also supported medical institutions, beautification of parks, concert halls, public swimming pools, and church buildings. Such wisdom, and such a benefit to the poor (there is such a desperate need for church organs and the poor benefit so much from nice parks). The one most influential person in the growth of the medical system was Rockefeller, who declared: “God gave me my money.” Rockefeller said this regarding his purpose, whether he believed it himself or not: “I believe the power to make money is a gift from God…. to be developed and used to the best of my ability for the good of mankind. I believe it is my duty to make money and still more money and to use the money I make for the good of my fellow man according to the dictates of my conscience.” This man was, in my opinion, a sociopath (had no conscience). He had the Baptist Church and its charities missions held foremost in consideration for giving. Hospitals came next. For those readers who don’t know, Rockefeller built his empire on ruthless strategies that bankrupted his competition, using underhanded and sometimes illegal methods, creating monopolies in railroads and oil, then branching into other areas, including medicine. Some books I have read have related how Rockefeller hired “militias’ to convince striking workers to return to work, which was usually effective, especially at the times it was documented that strikers were murdered.
    1
  112. 1
  113. 1
  114. 1
  115. 1
  116. 1
  117. 1
  118.  @chriscarter9264  from my book ANGRY LOUD AND CLEAR TRUTH CHAPTER SEVENTEEN: MALEVOLENT GREED AND PRIVATIZATION OF SERVICES We are all told repeatedly how wonderful the United States is to other countries. What a heavy burden they bear in their assistance to other nations. As of 2005, the US gross income was eleven trillion dollars, and it shared sixteen cents of every hundred dollars, or one seventh of one percent. You can be assured that this generosity has diminished over the years. All donations from foundations and other sources added another six cents per hundred dollars. Half of the total goes to Israel alone, who is by no means needy. In a 2002 Monterey conference, President Bush announced a Millennial Challenge fund of five billion dollars for development of aid, but less than 1% had been distributed by 2005. Washington often reports giving to poor countries, often fabricating aid which never materializes. Other times, the money allocated goes to consultants and American employees serving the US government in foreign nations helping themselves rather than the needy. Jeffrey Sachs, director of the UN Millennium Project, estimated that the funds needed to fulfill commitments to needy people would amount to 44 cents per one hundred dollars of the gross national income in 2006, increasing to seventy cents by 2015. The increase in US defense spending from 2001 to 2005 was $1.70 per hundred dollars in the GNI (over what it had been before), while tax cuts for the wealthy have amounted to $3.30 per $100 of GNI. This information was also from “Our Endangered Values”
    1
  119. 1
  120. from the book i am writing ANGRY LOUD AND CLEAR TRUTH: The media only tells the public what the powers want them to know or think, using information management. This includes withholding of information, disseminating misinformation (lies), and misdirecting people so that none can comprehend the reality of the world events and the forces that make them happen. This is a major player in war against humanity. The information war was made more effective by the Rockefeller Foundation in the 1930s, when it initiated secret psychological “war” projects whose purpose was to shape public opinion. According to Christopher Simpson, author of “Science of Coercion”: “…a tight circle of men and women who shared several important conceptions of mass research. They regarded mass communication as a tool for social management, and as a weapon in social conflict, and they expressed common assumptions concerning the usefulness of quantitative research - particularly experimental and quasi-experimental effects research, opinion surveys, and quantitative content analysis as a means of illuminating what communication “is” and improving its application to social management.” As this was being implemented and working in overdrive, the Office of Strategic Services and the Office of War Information recruited the “best and brightest” from American intelligentsia into secret “intelligence,” and after training, were placed into powerful positions of mass media, politics, and universities. In the 1950s, the CIA and the American mass media began to be interlocked, the agency feeding information to journalists in exchange for their own intelligence developed at home and abroad. Many American journalists currently work for the CIA. That is the explanation for the “fake news” in the media. Intentional fake news is very real, and manipulatively deceptive.
    1
  121. 1
  122. 1
  123. 1
  124. 1
  125. 1
  126. 1
  127. 1
  128. 1
  129. 1
  130. 1
  131. 1
  132. 1
  133. 1
  134. 1
  135. 1
  136. 1
  137. 1
  138. 1
  139. 1
  140. 1
  141. 1
  142. 1
  143. THis is from my first book, first published in May 2016, and which earned me time in prison. so much for freedom of the press. Rump has nothing on me. I exposed what he talked about later, after my parole officer gave him information regarding my emails which were going viral and exposing much. >>>>>> In short, they seek total and quiet control of the entire world. Their membership, tightly controlled, and secretly governed, consists of government officials, leaders of academic institutions, tax exempt foundation leaders, tycoons, and media moguls. The members are all handpicked by David Rockefeller, and all have full knowledge of their actions and motivations. As I described the formation of the CFR, I want to tell you that I did a little research as to what media is controlled by them. I found a reliable source which revealed that the great majority of the news and events that are reported are filtered by their controlling policies and administrations. I found that every recognizable newspaper, magazine, television station, radio transmission, and the vast majority of media are controlled by CFR and its affiliates. I will name just a very few: CBS, FOX, NBC, ABC, PBS, ASSOCIATED PRESS, REUTERS, BOSTON GLOBE, BALTIMORE SUN, NY TIMES, TIME INC., WALL STREET JOURNAL, NATIONAL REVIEW, WASHINGTON TIMES, WASHINGTON POST, NEWSWEEK, LA TIMES SYNDICATE, BOSTON POST, MINNEAPOLIS STAR TRIBUNE, BUSINESS WEEK, US NEWS AND WORLD REPORT, READERS DIGEST, LOOK, TIME WARNER, AOL, the list goes on and on. There was also a list of many publishers. Mr. Rockefeller also founded the Trilateral Commission, which is basically, the United States chapter of the illuminati. That is the true source of US policies; they are the ones “calling the shots” of all legislation passed involving our government. I once heard Hillary Clinton state how glad she was that the Trilateral Commission had its location close to the white house. She said that it was accommodating that she didn’t have to go far to find out what to do. Incredible but true, right out in public. Kahn, Michael Lewis. EXPOSING THE MONEY MACHINE: TYRANNY THROUGH GOVERNMENT, RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS, AND MEDIA DECEPTION (p. 20). Kindle Edition.
    1
  144. 1
  145. 1
  146. 1
  147. 1
  148. 1
  149. 1
  150. 1
  151. 1
  152. 1
  153. 1
  154. 1
  155. 1
  156. 1
  157. The human race is a naïve, gullible, trusting one, and are naturally suspicious and quick to discredit anyone who introduces disturbing criticisms and who invite us to open our minds to a new lens with which to view our world, and to transform our means of existence. As much as most people are discontented with their plight, most are unwilling to exercise critical questioning of their general situation and leave their comfort zone, as uncomfortable as it really may be. Our environment (parents, tv, nation, peers, teachers, etc.) impose on us our values, religion, entertainment preferences, political views, and mindsets. Our religious indoctrination, economic class, and preference of political party usually resembles that which we were born into. Yet few people reflect on the origins of their values and convictions, believing what we have been accustomed to accept as true for decades, without reflecting on how we originated these concepts; most of which have been embraced with little or no challenging of their worthiness, as they were assumed to be correct because they were introduced to us by trusted individuals. This book will challenge some, if not all, of your most cherished ideals, concepts, and worldviews. Many readers will feel as if their very inmost being is being attacked, their self-esteem being threatened, and become defensive, so prepare yourself. Let me assure you that I also embraced many of the perceptions as you do, until just recently. The fault lies on those who have intentionally deceived us all for many lifetimes. The companionship of those harmful beliefs is not worth clinging to, so I urge you to resist the temptation to rationalize (a type of thinking error) defenses in support of long-held beliefs by grasping onto unreasonable arguments. Instead, I invite you to be willing to consider the possibility of the validity of what this book claims, and not immediately reject and condemn the views as extremism, wild theories, or radical rabble-rousing. I beseech that you carefully reflect on the valid evidence, scientific research, exploratory reasoning, and perceive for yourself that not only are they possible, but are indeed fact. Furthermore, I encourage you to challenge them fairly, as I have, with the pure motivation being to understand what is ultimate truth and knowledge
    1
  158. 1
  159. 1
  160. 1
  161. 1
  162. 1
  163. 1
  164. 1
  165. 1
  166. 1
  167. 1
  168. 1
  169. 1
  170. 1
  171. 1
  172. 1
  173. 1
  174. 1
  175. 1
  176. 1
  177. 1
  178. 1
  179. 1
  180. 1
  181. 1
  182. 1
  183. 1
  184. 1
  185. 1
  186. 1
  187. HAVE YOU EVER HEARD OF THE MEDIA BEING CALLED THE FOURTH BRANCH OF THE GOVERNMENT- THIS IS WHY The CIA and the press appear to have an attitude in common. That it is okay to deceive the public. Philip Geyelin, a CIA agent who became an editor for the Washington Post, said: “We will get nowhere without first stipulating that while circumstances alter almost any case you can think of, the President has an inherent right- perhaps an obligation in particular concerns-to deceive.” This pretty much explains the deceptions that pervade all over the world in every aspect of society, and I think you can now very clearly perceive how we have all been misled, and some methods that were used. This is helpful to learn how to immunize yourself from false concepts and doctrines, to discern truth from fabrication, and to learn to distrust authority and the establishment, as I have learned to do. END OF QUOTES FROM ANGRY LOUD AND CLEAR TRUTH Of course every news station in the world has its source of information at the CIA and all other secret intelligence. What is the ultimate source? The Jesuits were formed centuries ago to participate in spying, assassinations, coups, and the like, and Himmler was a Jesuit who created the OSS in direct copy of the Jesuit hierarchy. When the Nazis were defeated, we hung some generals, but imported OSS leadership and by it, created the NSA, and later the CIA. The secret intelligence of every nation is supervised at its top level by the jesuit general, also known as the "black pope" (because of the black garb he wears, not his race), the current ones name is Sosa Abascal. He runs all nations' banking, Freemasonry, and secret intelligence. The famous pope is a figure head who does little more than recite platitudes. the jesuit general holds HUGE power.
    1
  188. 1
  189. 1
  190. 1
  191. 1
  192. 1
  193. 1
  194. 1
  195. 1
  196. Now let us see what action the people can take to defend their rights: Owen v. Independence, 100 Vol. Supreme court Reports. 1398: (1982) Main v. Thiboutot, 100 Vol. Supreme Court Reports. 2502: (1982) “The right of action created by statute relating to deprivation under color of law, of a right secured by the constitution and the laws of the United States and comes claims which are based solely on statutory violations of Federal Law and applied to the claim that claimants had been deprived of their rights, in some capacity, to which they were entitled.” “Officers of the court have no immunity when violating constitutional right, from liability” (when any public servant violates your rights, they do so at their own peril) Once you have established the breaking of the law by a “public servant” (they are not really servants of US citizens, but of the powerful entities that bought them), you are entitled by law to prosecute and to sue them. Here is the punishment as stated by law: Title 18 US Code Sec. 241 and Sec. 242: “If upon conviction, you are subject to a $10,000 fine, ten years in jail, or both, and if theft results, life in prison.” Title 42 US Code Sec. 1983, Sec. 1985, and Sec. 1986: Clearly established the right to sue anyone who violates your constitutional rights. The Constitution guarantees: he who would unlawfully jeopardize your property loses property to you, and that’s what justice is all about. “Judge, you are deemed to know the law and are sworn to uphold it. You can hardly claim that you acted in good faith for willful deformation of a law and you certainly cannot plead ignorance of the law, for that would make the law look stupid for a knowledgeable judge to claim ignorance of a law, when a citizen on the street cannot claim ignorance of the law. Therefore, there is no judicial immunity.” If you are brought before a court, and do not trust a judge (it is wise not to), I suggest that you request a trial by jury, your right as a US citizen; and that you choose people that are sympathetic to your cause. Here are laws that claim that a jury does not have to rule as the law prescribes, but are able to judge on their conscience, and to rule according to righteousness, rather than on the letter of the law. Many laws in the United States are oppressive, and the minimal sentences are often cruel. Lawyers practice the art of using the wording of laws, and in manipulations and legal calisthenics of definitions and insinuations, rather than on what is clearly right or wrong. A jury is more likely to judge according to a person’s guilt or innocence, and on the justice of freeing or imprisoning the defendant. Not so with lawyers and judges, who rule according to letter and to prejudice (despite any appearances or protests claiming otherwise) or for reasons which are less than ethical.
    1
  197. 1
  198. 1
  199. 1
  200. 1
  201. 1
  202.  @AnEmerald  from THE UNTOLD NATURE OF CHRISTIANITY on sale on Amazon Proof of just one faulty scripture proves the Bible, and thus god, to be a liar. Now regarding the fact that the Bible promotes obedient slavery, I will give you the sad truth. But first the good news. When the Bible refers to slavery, when compared to modern times, you can call them “unskilled labor” employees, people who work with great exhaustion in factories, or in warehouses for minimum wage, or in other such positions, compensated with pennies while their slave-masters (oops, I mean employers) sit in offices earning millions, with their mansions, luxury cars, executive suites, catered luncheons and business affairs. So, do not be angry, it doesn’t really mean slaves when it mentions slave or servant. It ain’t really so bad (unless of course, you are one of those laborers).  Luk 17:10 KJV So likewise ye, when ye shall have done all those things which are commanded you, say, We are unprofitable servants: we have done that which was our duty to do. I love that scripture, it shows us the proper attitude. Be grateful that you are allowed to live, have an attitude of gratitude for your slavery, because you are unworthy. Funny how the Bible has no similar instructions for their masters. The masters are not considered unworthy to that God, I guess. Some people are more favored by the God that claims to be extremely fair and “shows no partiality” (Acts 10:34) in another scripture. Is the Bible full of hypocrisy? No, that is impossible, the Bible is the word of a perfect God.  Eph 6:5 ISV Slaves, obey your earthly masters with fear, trembling, and sincerity, as when you obey the Messiah. 6:6 Do not do this only while you're being watched in order to please them, but be like slaves of the Messiah, who are determined to obey God's will. 6:7 Serve willingly, as if you were serving the Lord and not merely people, 6:8 because you know that everyone will receive a reward from the Lord for whatever good he has done, whether he is a slave or free. Hmmm. Is your boss perfect like God is supposed to be? Well, as much as there may be no resemblance to goodness, you must obey in every way, and do it cheerfully no matter how terribly you are treated, because God is watching. Consider your boss as the Lord. He is to be your God to be obedient to. I hope we are not supposed to worship him. Now I will give credit to the Apostle Paul, who supposedly wrote this, that he included the following verse, the only one in the Bible that I recall addressing wrong treatment of the slaves:  Ephesians 6:9 Masters, do the same to them, and stop your threatening, knowing that he who is both their Master and yours is in heaven, and that there is no partiality with him. Okay, there it is, the iron hand of God, making his ruling onto all the injustice of slavery. Stop threatening. And you will take this commandment very seriously, I am sure (sarcasm, as is much of this book, as I am angry at the deceptions and oppression). After all, you are created to be masters, and they were predestined to be slaves. There is much scripture addressing them to be obedient in every way. I am sure that masters endorse the faith, and probably put Bibles where they can be found easily, it would be in their own self-interest. Well, they would have if they had bothered reading it for themselves
    1
  203.  @AnEmerald  Finally I will submit a last portion for now. THE UNTOLD NATURE OF CHRISTIANITY Whoever would think for a moment that those bloodsucking, deceiving, exploiters of the law are serving God, is a complete fool, unless that God is evil. We can, I think, see that our politicians all lie and collect bribes. They are placed there by God? What does that say about the character of God? These verses have no connection with truth, and stink of deception used to promote cowardly ignorant obedience to evil, using the name of God to enforce it. May they rot in hell for promoting a book that billions of people have regarded as the word of God into a means of controlling people into blind obedient servitude to evil. Here is another scripture:  1Pe 2:13 Be subject for the Lord's sake to every human institution, whether it be to the emperor as supreme, 2:14 or to governors as sent by him to punish those who do evil and to praise those who do good. 2:15 For this is the will of God, that by doing good you should put to silence the ignorance of foolish people. 2:16 Live as people who are free, not using your freedom as a cover-up for evil, but living as servants of God. 2:17 Honor everyone. Love the brotherhood. Fear God. Honor the emperor. 2:18 Servants, be subject to your masters with all respect, not only to the good and gentle but also to the unjust. 2:19 For this is a gracious thing, when, mindful of God, one endures sorrows while suffering unjustly. 2:20 For what credit is it if, when you sin and are beaten for it, you endure? But if when you do good and suffer for it you endure, this is a gracious thing in the sight of God. Well, I will be blessed for being punished and for enduring suffering when I have done right. Why couldn’t God have just protected me from punishment? Just a rebellious thought. Another thought is that recently, I read of a man who spent forty-eight years in prison, and then they found that he was innocent. Sorry, you can go home now. The ex-con thanked the government and was not vengeful. I don’t know about you, but there would have to be some kind of totally huge blessing to make me satisfied with that situation, were it me. I have too much to contribute to society to let all that valuable time wasted be a trifling matter. My life is important. I feel sorry for that man that he did not value his life enough to protest more. Honor those masters who are harsh and evil? Should I promote praise of evil people? Is this not ridiculous?
    1
  204. 1
  205. 1
  206. 1
  207. 1
  208. 1