Comments by "Michael Kahn" (@michaelkahn8903) on "Ingraham: The 'experts' strike again" video.
-
1
-
Steven Sweeden I wont pretend to know any percentage. But our rulers are clearly not only spreading misinformation, disinformation, propaganda, smoke and mirrors, and have subverted our minds intentionally, and we need to fact-check anything that we are informed about that is important to us, as we may have been lied to regarding it.
I do not watch television, and only go to sites like this to comment and to try to inform readers of blogs to not believe what they are told by these people.
All establishment media are tools of the globalists, not just fox and cnn.
As I relate in my book ANGRY LOUD AND CLEAR TRUTH the CIA, a descendent of the OSS, which was formed by Himmler, a Jesuit, to be a direct copy of the Jesuit hierarchy, the CIA has infiltrated our media and that of many nations, and has used psyops (propaganda) and other tools to control what we think, as he who controls the media controls the minds of the masses.
Even our universities teach us disinformation and to memorize and obey, rather than critical and analytical thinking. IT is a carefully developed deliberate subversion and method of oppressive rule by limiting our ability to figure it out and rebel. Our leaders and those in power and with wealth are freemasonry-Luciferians.
1
-
Steven Sweeden globalists, since you are ignorant, i will have to inform you, refers to the wealthy people who have planned such concepts as agenda 21, now known as agenda 30. If you like you can look it up. However, you probably don't know how-google it. a little from ANGRY LOUD AND CLEAR TRUTH
David Rockefeller himself said this addressing the Trilateral Commission on June of 1991 (according to page 46 of Jim Keith’s “Mass Control: Engineering Human Consciousness”):
“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine, and other great publications whose directors have attended meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march toward world government. The supra-natural sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determinism practiced in past centuries.”
There are about a half a dozen conglomerates that own virtually the whole US media. Almost as influential as the owners of media print and broadcasting are the corporate advertisers; the financial sources, who have strong influence (the threat of boycotting media outlets from being used by them to advertise) over what is revealed. Do you need proof of this obviously true statement? It is a fact. But here is evidence. On June 27th, 2017, Andrew Beauton reported in “The Washingtonian” that the “Washington Post” put a policy in effect on the previous May 1st that prohibited the Post’s employees from conduct on social media “that adversely affects the Post’s customers, advertisers, subscribers, vendors, suppliers, or partners.” Management reserved the right to fire employees who disobey the policy. It applies to the entire company. That same day, Whitney Webb reported on Mintpress News that becoming a sponsor of the paper puts an end to the Post criticizing your corporation. She also addressed that four months after Jeff Bezo (CEO of Amazon) purchased the Post, Amazon Web services signed a $600 million contract with the CIA for web hosting services, and was serving “the entire US intelligence community.” This started affecting the Post going back a ways. In 2018, the Post openly called for the prosecution of Edward Snowden, when they had previously won the Pullitzer Prize for their report on illegal NSA spying, using Snowden’s leaks.
1
-
Steven Sweeden some more from ANGRY LOUD AND CLEAR TRUTH
Corporate propaganda, which aligns itself with government propaganda, stifles troublesome journalistic enterprise. Their natural enemy is the investigative journalist who serves the public interest, while propaganda works against it.
The first government propaganda operation in the United States was initiated by Woodrow Wilson’s administration, and was called the Creel Commission. This was during World War I, and it employed propaganda to turn a pacifist population into a hysterical blood-thirsty citizenship ready to annihilate Germany. It adopted the tactics used by the British Propaganda Ministry, whose mission was to “direct the thought of most of the world.”
That was not a new concept, nor a new undertaking, but another facet of the modus operandi of the world’s ruling powers. In the middle of the nineteenth century, skull and bones member Daniel Gilman, first president of John Hopkins University and of the Carnegie Institute, put into motion in America an educational revolution that subverted the entire education system, targeting it towards their goal of a new world order. He also was instrumental in founding the General Education Board, later to be called the Rockefeller Foundation. Gilman was the one who initiated the education system’s philosophy as we know it to be in today’s United States. He adopted the Prussian three tier school system, which is constructed as follows: One half of one percent of the population is taught to think, and they are the policy makers, who come from upper-crust families, accustomed to wealth and privilege, except for a few excelling underclass students who are indoctrinated into the ruler’s mindsets, and who are “bought.” Five and a half percent of the population go to universities where they are taught to partially think, but not completely. They become the doctors, lawyers, engineers, architects, etc.. The remaining lower ninety-four percent learn harmony, obedience, how to follow orders, freedom from stressful thinking, and other attitudes for the masses to conform to, so as to render them unable to resist.
I have a question. What would result if one of the lower ninety-four percent learned to think independently and helped distribute the real knowledge freely?
1
-
Steven Sweeden YOU WOULD DO WELL TO RESEARCH- CRITICAL ANALYTICAL READING IS MUCH MORE INFORMATIVE THAN SPOON-FED NEWS
The media only tells the public what the powers want them to know or think, using information management. This includes withholding of information, disseminating misinformation (lies), and misdirecting people so that none can comprehend the reality of the world events and the forces that make them happen. This is a major player in war against humanity. The information war was made more effective by the Rockefeller Foundation in the 1930s, when it initiated secret psychological “war” projects whose purpose was to shape public opinion. According to Christopher Simpson, author of “Science of Coercion”: “…a tight circle of men and women who shared several important conceptions of mass research. They regarded mass communication as a tool for social management, and as a weapon in social conflict, and they expressed common assumptions concerning the usefulness of quantitative research - particularly experimental and quasi-experimental effects research, opinion surveys, and quantitative content analysis as a means of illuminating what communication “is” and improving its application to social management.”
As this was being implemented and working in overdrive, the Office of Strategic Services and the Office of War Information recruited the “best and brightest” from American intelligentsia into secret “intelligence,” and after training, were placed into powerful positions of mass media, politics, and universities. In the 1950s, the CIA and the American mass media began to be interlocked, the agency feeding information to journalists in exchange for their own intelligence developed at home and abroad. Many American journalists currently work for the CIA. That is the explanation for the “fake news” in the media. Intentional fake news is very real, and manipulatively deceptive.
Another strategy used by the large public relations corporations and the government is the use of surveys in polling. By slanting questions and using outright deception regarding results in service to whoever is paying them, the public is often misled as to what the rest of the population thinks. Under the impression that one is alone in his attitude of perception, one will not voice opinion nor organize to further one’s cause. To illustrate one way this is engaged, ask how many times the media has directly addressed the exceedingly important issues of poverty, human rights, abuses, media control by the elite, racism, or the like; and given novel results that speak to the poor having the backing of the people in a substantive way. Any results that are denying help to the poor, I guarantee you, are either the result of hateful and mean-spirited propaganda and indoctrination favoring the pro-rich elite, or are deceptively misleading as to the authentic hearts of the people.
1
-
Steven Sweeden A REAL JOURNALIST TELLS THE WHOLE STORY IN ITS ENTIRETY IF IT HAS RELEVANCE AND IMPORTANCE-EVEN IF UNPOPULAR
When we discuss the media, there are a few things to keep in mind. Primary to a clear perception and understanding, you need to remember that those on top-the most wealthy and powerful players- are in the Council of Foreign Relations, of which the members are appointed by oligarch David Rockefeller Jr., a kingpin in world affairs. Let me quote him from his book “Memoirs”-
“some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as internationalists and conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure, one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”
Do you think that the most powerful and wealthy people on the planet who are meeting in secrecy are planning how to benefit us? With that in remembrance, consider that media, including the news, is a business, more specifically an entertainment industry. Entertainment is defined in the Webster dictionary as amusement and diversion. That is why commercials often seem to attempt to be funny, as do sitcoms. That also explains the videos that focus on superheroes, aliens, monsters, and all kinds of fantasies. I cannot recall the last time I saw an accurate documentary on television. The history channel puts on an appearance of truth, but always falls short of it. TV and radio receive virtually 100% of their income from advertisers, newspapers 75%, and magazines about 50%. It is very concerning that the NY Times has so little visible advertising. How are they funded? The media are under great pressure to shape their product to accommodate their advertisers. Advertisers influence the media by restricting and whitewashing media content by removing, or threatening to remove, financial support if their demands are not met. Since media are funded by advertising, their economic survival depends on delivering an audience for advertisers. To them, people exist as potential consumers whose most desirable qualities are gullibility and compliance to media advice- watch, believe, obey, and buy. Corporate owners, aligned with the CFR, also have an interest in furthering their agenda. Media news chains have ordered their papers, radio shows, and television programs to adopt a uniform editorial position on certain issues and political candidates, even to support specific worldviews. Management is replaced if it doesn’t perform to the ideals of ownership, and they control which ideas and which version of the facts reach the public. The news that we read is what editors and owners decide to publish, it is not dependent on reporters.
Otis Chandler, past publisher of the Los Angeles Times, said “I’m the chief executive. I set policy and I’m not going to surround myself with people who disagree with me… I surround myself with people who see the way I do.” Other publishers do likewise.
Sponsors influence not only the news, but partner with Hollywood, and every aspect of the media, to shape our mindsets and worldviews. “Unreliable Sources” makes this quote and statement on page 61:- “Proctor and Gamble,” which spends over a billion dollars a year in advertising, once decreed in a memo on broadcast policy: “There will be no material that gives offense, either directly or indirectly to any commercial organization of any sort.” Ditto for Prudential Insurance: “A positive image of business and finance is important to sustain on the air.” If a business is cast as the bad guy, it must be clear that it is an exception, and the script must also include benevolent business folks, so as not to leave “the wrong impression.” Corporate sponsors are unlikely to underwrite programs that engage in serious criticism of environmental pollution, occupational hazards, or other problems attributable to corporate malfeasance.”
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1