Comments by "Michael Kahn" (@michaelkahn8903) on "Tucker: Calif. is challenging integrity of the union" video.
-
Regarding the Patriot Act: It was created under the pretext of an emergency in direct opposition to scores of constitutional laws which protect US citizens’ rights. Of course I have shown overwhelming evidence that the “emergency” was concocted by the ones who employed the Patriot Act. However, I have found that an emergency is NOT a valid permission to dismiss constitutional law. The following constitutional amendments and decisions provide a very serious iron-clad case to overturn the Patriot Act. I have no confidence in the integrity of the Supreme Court of the United States to make any righteous decision regarding this, or I would go there myself to take down the illegal Patriot Act. Here are the laws supporting this concept:
The US Constitution, Article six, Clause 2:
This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the Supreme Law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby any Thing in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.
US Constitution, Bill of Rights, Article Four:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated; and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things seized.
US Constitution, Bill of Rights, Article Six:
IN all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law; and to be informed of the nature of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor; and to have the assistance of counsel for his defence.
Marbury v. Madison 5 US 137 (1803):
No provision of the Constitution is designed to be without effect, “anything that is in conflict is null and void of law, “Clearly, for a secondary law to come in conflict with the Supreme Law was illogical, for certainly, the Supreme Law would prevail over all other laws and certainly our forefathers had intended that the Supreme Law would be the bases of all law and for any law to come in conflict would be null and void of law, it would bare no power to enforce, it would bare no obligation to obey, it would purport to settle as if it had never existed, for unconstitutionality would date from the enactment of such a law, not from the date so branded in an open court of law, no courts are bound to uphold it, and no citizens are bound to obey it. It operates as a near nullity or a fiction of law.”
Shephard’s Citations:
A group of reporters that go through and keep track of all court cases that have come before the courts, especially of the Supreme Court and they clarify, before the court, all the cases. All cases which have cited Marbury v. Madison case, to the Supreme Court has not ever been overturned. See Shephard’s Citation of Marbury v. Madison.
That proves that the Patriot Act is unlawful. No law can legally contradict the constitution. Now for punishment of the courts who do not obey the constitution:
Title 5, US Code Sec. 556(d), Sec. 557, Sec. 706:
Courts lose jurisdiction if they do not follow Due Process Law.
Title 18, US Code Sec. 2381:
In the presence of two or more witnesses of the same overt act, or in an open court of law, if you fail to timely move to protect and defend the constitution of the United States and honor your oath of office, you are subject to the charge of capital felony treason.
3
-
One more item for this chapter. In “THE PSYCHOLOGICAL COVERT WAR ON HIP HOP” book 2, Professor Griff exposes that the government totally endorses fake news legally. Page 157-“In February 2004, Fox news won a legal appeal that declared that Fox news had no legal obligation to be truthful in its reporting. The court agreed that Fox had indeed been untruthful but ultimately agreed with Fox’s argument that the FCC’s policy against the intentional falsification of the news is not a legal mandate, requirement, or regulation; and that Fox may falsify news reports. Fl. 13th district New World Communications of Tampa Inc. vs. Jane Akre, case no. 2001-529.”
Fox News, in collaboration with the government, participates in fake news distribution, and the government works together with them in deceiving us all, not only fox, but all establishment news
1
-
The media only tells the public what the powers want them to know or think, using information management. This includes withholding of information, disseminating misinformation (lies), and misdirecting people so that none can comprehend the reality of the world events and the forces that make them happen. This is a major player in war against humanity. The information war was made more effective by the Rockefeller Foundation in the 1930s, when it initiated secret psychological “war” projects whose purpose was to shape public opinion. According to Christopher Simpson, author of “Science of Coercion”: “…a tight circle of men and women who shared several important conceptions of mass research. They regarded mass communication as a tool for social management, and as a weapon in social conflict, and they expressed common assumptions concerning the usefulness of quantitative research - particularly experimental and quasi-experimental effects research, opinion surveys, and quantitative content analysis as a means of illuminating what communication “is” and improving its application to social management.”
As this was being implemented and working in overdrive, the Office of Strategic Services and the Office of War Information recruited the “best and brightest” from American intelligentsia into secret “intelligence,” and after training, were placed into powerful positions of mass media, politics, and universities. In the 1950s, the CIA and the American mass media began to be interlocked, the agency feeding information to journalists in exchange for their own intelligence developed at home and abroad. Many American journalists currently work for the CIA. That is the explanation for the “fake news” in the media. Intentional fake news is very real, and manipulatively deceptive.
Another strategy used by the large public relations corporations and the government is the use of surveys in polling. By slanting questions and using outright deception regarding results in service to whoever is paying them, the public is often misled as to what the rest of the population thinks. Under the impression that one is alone in his attitude of perception, one will not voice opinion nor organize to further one’s cause. To illustrate one way this is engaged, ask how many times the media has directly addressed the exceedingly important issues of poverty, human rights, abuses, media control by the elite, racism, or the like; and given novel results that speak to the poor having the backing of the people in a substantive way. Any results that are denying help to the poor, I guarantee you, are either the result of hateful and mean-spirited propaganda and indoctrination favoring the pro-rich elite, or are deceptively misleading as to the authentic hearts of the people.
1
-
How the CIA makes the fake news:
CHAPTER TWENTY TWO: MASTERS OF MANIPULATIVE DECEPTION
In “Unreliable Sources” I found how media and government are wed. Like the military industrial complex, and like pharmaceuticals, and other corporate capitalistic (do not assume that this is the only form of government that does this) ventures, the media has incorporated itself in the rule of this nation (and others), and vice versa. Let me present you here with a list of some revolving doors within media and government. These are found on pages 110-120.
Under Lyndon Johnson’s state department (in high office) were Jack Rosenthal and Leslie Gelb, who became editors of the NY Times. Gelb’s former boss, ex-Secretary of State Cyrus Vance, was on the Times’ board of directors. Gelb left the Times to serve under Carter as director of the Bureau of Politico-Military Affairs. In 1978, he had initiated a covert CIA program involved in working with the European press to write approvingly of the neutron bomb. He had worked for the Department of Defense as a press officer. That makes for a free and unbiased press. Not.
John Hughes was a PR man for Reagan’s State Department who later was employed as an editorial columnist for the Christian Science Monitor, whose diatribes on Central America and the State Department’s positions sounded very similar. NBC Nightly News reporter John Chancellor had no trouble on his conscience to become a propagandist for the state by becoming Voice of America (ran radio programs in Vietnam attempting to discourage and dismay Vietnamese via propaganda) director under the Johnson administration. Another Voice of America program director (under Reagan and Bush) was Sid Davis, who had been the white house correspondent and Washington Bureau chief for NBC news. The United States Information Agency (USIA) is a blatant propaganda promoter, as is VOA, and Edward Murrow of CBS News and columnist Carl Rowan took turns as USIA director under John Kennedy. Kennedy’s press secretary, Pierre Salinger, became chief foreign correspondent of ABC World News Tonight. The famous Bill Moyers was press secretary for Lyndon Johnson and later was made a household name as commentator and reporter for CBS and PBS.
I am not giving you the full list, but here are some more. Reagan’s communications director, David Gergen, became editor of US News and World Report in 1983, and his deputy, Joanna Bistany became a top executive at ABC News that same year. Peggy Noonan who had been a script writer for CBS radio commentary for Dan Rather later composed speeches for Reagan and Bush. George Will helped prepare Reagan for his debate against Carter, then praised Reagan as he covered the debate on ABC News, “forgetting” to mention his association with Reagan. Instead of hurting his career, when this was uncovered, it enhanced his reputation among media mavens. Page 113-“Both journalists and elected officials tend to view the world in ways that conform to the national security establishment
1
-
from the book i am writing ANGRY LOUD AND CLEAR TRUTH:
The media only tells the public what the powers want them to know or think, using information management. This includes withholding of information, disseminating misinformation (lies), and misdirecting people so that none can comprehend the reality of the world events and the forces that make them happen. This is a major player in war against humanity. The information war was made more effective by the Rockefeller Foundation in the 1930s, when it initiated secret psychological “war” projects whose purpose was to shape public opinion. According to Christopher Simpson, author of “Science of Coercion”: “…a tight circle of men and women who shared several important conceptions of mass research. They regarded mass communication as a tool for social management, and as a weapon in social conflict, and they expressed common assumptions concerning the usefulness of quantitative research - particularly experimental and quasi-experimental effects research, opinion surveys, and quantitative content analysis as a means of illuminating what communication “is” and improving its application to social management.”
As this was being implemented and working in overdrive, the Office of Strategic Services and the Office of War Information recruited the “best and brightest” from American intelligentsia into secret “intelligence,” and after training, were placed into powerful positions of mass media, politics, and universities. In the 1950s, the CIA and the American mass media began to be interlocked, the agency feeding information to journalists in exchange for their own intelligence developed at home and abroad. Many American journalists currently work for the CIA. That is the explanation for the “fake news” in the media. Intentional fake news is very real, and manipulatively deceptive.
1
-
1
-
The human race is a naïve, gullible, trusting one, and are naturally suspicious and quick to discredit anyone who introduces disturbing criticisms and who invite us to open our minds to a new lens with which to view our world, and to transform our means of existence. As much as most people are discontented with their plight, most are unwilling to exercise critical questioning of their general situation and leave their comfort zone, as uncomfortable as it really may be.
Our environment (parents, tv, nation, peers, teachers, etc.) impose on us our values, religion, entertainment preferences, political views, and mindsets. Our religious indoctrination, economic class, and preference of political party usually resembles that which we were born into. Yet few people reflect on the origins of their values and convictions, believing what we have been accustomed to accept as true for decades, without reflecting on how we originated these concepts; most of which have been embraced with little or no challenging of their worthiness, as they were assumed to be correct because they were introduced to us by trusted individuals.
This book will challenge some, if not all, of your most cherished ideals, concepts, and worldviews. Many readers will feel as if their very inmost being is being attacked, their self-esteem being threatened, and become defensive, so prepare yourself. Let me assure you that I also embraced many of the perceptions as you do, until just recently. The fault lies on those who have intentionally deceived us all for many lifetimes. The companionship of those harmful beliefs is not worth clinging to, so I urge you to resist the temptation to rationalize (a type of thinking error) defenses in support of long-held beliefs by grasping onto unreasonable arguments. Instead, I invite you to be willing to consider the possibility of the validity of what this book claims, and not immediately reject and condemn the views as extremism, wild theories, or radical rabble-rousing. I beseech that you carefully reflect on the valid evidence, scientific research, exploratory reasoning, and perceive for yourself that not only are they possible, but are indeed fact. Furthermore, I encourage you to challenge them fairly, as I have, with the pure motivation being to understand what is ultimate truth and knowledge
1
-
1
-
1
-
Now let us see what action the people can take to defend their rights:
Owen v. Independence, 100 Vol. Supreme court Reports. 1398: (1982)
Main v. Thiboutot, 100 Vol. Supreme Court Reports. 2502: (1982)
“The right of action created by statute relating to deprivation under color of law, of a right secured by the constitution and the laws of the United States and comes claims which are based solely on statutory violations of Federal Law and applied to the claim that claimants had been deprived of their rights, in some capacity, to which they were entitled.”
“Officers of the court have no immunity when violating constitutional right, from liability” (when any public servant violates your rights, they do so at their own peril)
Once you have established the breaking of the law by a “public servant” (they are not really servants of US citizens, but of the powerful entities that bought them), you are entitled by law to prosecute and to sue them. Here is the punishment as stated by law:
Title 18 US Code Sec. 241 and Sec. 242:
“If upon conviction, you are subject to a $10,000 fine, ten years in jail, or both, and if theft results, life in prison.”
Title 42 US Code Sec. 1983, Sec. 1985, and Sec. 1986:
Clearly established the right to sue anyone who violates your constitutional rights. The Constitution guarantees: he who would unlawfully jeopardize your property loses property to you, and that’s what justice is all about. “Judge, you are deemed to know the law and are sworn to uphold it. You can hardly claim that you acted in good faith for willful deformation of a law and you certainly cannot plead ignorance of the law, for that would make the law look stupid for a knowledgeable judge to claim ignorance of a law, when a citizen on the street cannot claim ignorance of the law. Therefore, there is no judicial immunity.”
If you are brought before a court, and do not trust a judge (it is wise not to), I suggest that you request a trial by jury, your right as a US citizen; and that you choose people that are sympathetic to your cause. Here are laws that claim that a jury does not have to rule as the law prescribes, but are able to judge on their conscience, and to rule according to righteousness, rather than on the letter of the law. Many laws in the United States are oppressive, and the minimal sentences are often cruel. Lawyers practice the art of using the wording of laws, and in manipulations and legal calisthenics of definitions and insinuations, rather than on what is clearly right or wrong. A jury is more likely to judge according to a person’s guilt or innocence, and on the justice of freeing or imprisoning the defendant. Not so with lawyers and judges, who rule according to letter and to prejudice (despite any appearances or protests claiming otherwise) or for reasons which are less than ethical.
1