Comments by "Michael Kahn" (@michaelkahn8903) on "JRE Clips"
channel.
-
@seanpetrash7263 The media only tells the public what the powers want them to know or think, using information management. This includes withholding of information, disseminating misinformation (lies), and misdirecting people so that none can comprehend the reality of the world events and the forces that make them happen. This is a major player in war against humanity.
The information war was made more effective by the Rockefeller Foundation in the 1930s, when it initiated secret psychological “war” projects whose purpose was to shape public opinion.
According to Christopher Simpson, author of “Science of Coercion”: “…a tight circle of men and women who shared several important conceptions of mass research. They regarded mass communication as a tool for social management, and as a weapon in social conflict, and they expressed common assumptions concerning the usefulness of quantitative research - particularly experimental and quasi-experimental effects research, opinion surveys, and quantitative content analysis as a means of illuminating what communication “is” and improving its application to social management.”
As this was being implemented and working in overdrive, the Office of Strategic Services and the Office of War Information recruited the “best and brightest” from American intelligentsia into secret “intelligence,” and after training, were placed into powerful positions of mass media, politics, and universities.
In the 1950s, the CIA and the American mass media began to be interlocked, the agency feeding information to journalists in exchange for their own intelligence developed at home and abroad. Many American journalists currently work for the CIA. That is the explanation for the “fake news” in the media. Intentional fake news is very real, and manipulatively deceptive.
Another strategy used by the large public relations corporations and the government is the use of surveys in polling. By slanting questions and using outright deception regarding results in service to whoever is paying them, the public is often misled as to what the rest of the population thinks.
Under the impression that one is alone in his attitude of perception, one will not voice opinion nor organize to further one’s cause. To illustrate one way this is engaged, ask how many times the media has directly addressed the exceedingly important issues of poverty, human rights, abuses, media control by the elite, racism, or the like; and given novel results that speak to the poor having the backing of the people in a substantive way.
Any results that are denying help to the poor, I guarantee you, are either the result of hateful and mean-spirited propaganda and indoctrination favoring the pro-rich elite, or are deceptively misleading as to the authentic hearts of the people.
The political struggle of black Americans for social justice, for example, has been successfully redirected by the media to “gangsta rap” culture, drugs, and sports, and even towards the American Dream, resisted for many years by black people who perceive the lie. Thus, a powerful and intelligent portion of the populace is kept “in their place” safely by the establishment.
White Christian suburban America does not have a clear perception of urban blacks, due to the media. There is no correct representation of poor black culture on television, where they have been shown in programs from “Sanford and Son” to “Movin on Up,” blacks are shown as buffoons, perpetuated by the likes of Eddie Murphy in Hollywood and more for decades.
Most suburban people have never stepped foot into a poor urban neighborhood. The television news on every station reports every day an assault, murders, or fires in poor urban neighborhoods. They instill the impression that black people are stupid, lazy, violent, and drug-crazed. The impression is that they live in a decrepit unbearable housing because they are drug addicts, not because of slumlords. If they are on opioids, it is because (the media implies) they want a buzz, not because doctors are prescribing harmful drugs, nor pharmaceuticals for willingly promoting harmful substances.
1
-
@seanpetrash7263 The media ensures that we continue to watch, read, and listen; mostly so that we will buy, but there are also more devious motives. The Americans are in a nation where affluent people are more “equal” than others.
Madison Avenue, Wall Street, and Pennsylvania Avenue (advertising, bankers, and the white house) rule in the United States (and the rest of the world that is influenced by it), and reporters serve as public relations agents for corporations and government officials; and in doing so, they hide the reality, leaving most people confused.
In “Boxed In” on page 158, Mark Miller states: “When we watch news on television, we come to feel, not only that the world is blowing up, but that it does so for no reason, that its ongoing history is nothing more than a series of eruptions, each without cause or context.”
Like 9-11, with three thousand people dying, and we are told that it is because “arabs are jealous of our freedoms.” We are assaulted with all kinds of what appears to be unrelated events with leaders appearing inept, incompetent, and stupid, all ensuring compliance with status quo; with a haphazard and incomprehensible understanding of why they happen.
On page 65, Anne Schaef notes in her book “When Society Becomes an Addict”: “keeps us powerless and uncontrollable, no one is more controllable than a confused society. Politicians know this better than anyone, and that is why they use innuendos, veiled references, and out-and-out lies instead of speaking clearly and truthfully.”
In July 1989, Walter Karp was published in Harper’s Magazine with this quote: “In the American Republic the fact of oligarchy is the most dreaded knowledge of all, and our news keeps that knowledge from us. By their subjugation of the press, the political powers in America have conferred on themselves the greatest of political blessings-Gyges’ ring of invisibility. And they have left the American people more deeply baffled by their own country’s politics than any people on earth.”
On June 12th of that same year, Ben Bagdikian was featured saying this in “The Nation” (a far left magazine): “Monopolistic power dominates many other industries, and most of them enjoy special treatment by the government. But media giants have two enormous advantages: they control the public image of national leaders who, as a result, fear and favor the media magnates political agendas, and they control the information and entertainment that help establish the social, political, and cultural attitudes of increasingly larger populations.” This does more than merely protect the corporate system. It robs the public of a chance to understand the real world.”
The United States government, aligned with the media (and church) has employed a powerful weapon known as “psyops”(psychological operations).This was defined by general Williams of the OSS in the world war II era as: The coordination and use of all means, including psychological exploitation, the recognized military actions-which tend to deprive the will of the enemy, or of the support, assistance , or the sympathy of his allies or associates, or of neutrals, or to prevent its acquisition of such support, the assistance, or the sympathy of his allies or associates or of neutrals, or to prevent the acquisition of such support, assistance, or sympathy, or which creates, maintains, or increases the will to victory of their own people or allies; and to acquire, maintain, or to increase the support, assistance, and sympathy of neutrals.
The Soviet Union used this description of US psyops in 1980: “Unpardonable methods and ideologies, sabotage, including not just the most flagrant lies, slander, and disinformation but also political blackmail, provocation, and terror.”
1
-
@seanpetrash7263 So, believing in hard work being a. path to wealth is a way to feel self-entitled to riches for doing nothing? Somewhere there is a misunderstanding. And to think that riches coming from ease is smart? So, I guess that being privileged and lazy is smart? That capitalism and love of money makes you smart? Furthermore, the key to it all, is as you allude, is the idea of who are our priorities, as well as what, are our prioirities. If providing for me and mine is all that concerns us, then certainly there will not be justice. We need to be concerned for one another, to be willing to take a stand for one another, to love our neighbor in reality, not just in words or feelings. Love should be considered as a verb- it should be practiced in action. I thank you for your observations.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@seanpetrash7263 I am not a socialist, dont go by what others teach, not WEst, nobody>I am a free thinker and come up with ideas that are workable and have potential for great benefit for mankind. I exposed how global warming really was made to happen, and an easy and costless and totally doable solution to it.
I showed how politicians are just high-profile pawns for the real ruling people and entities, and who they are. I made it clear who deceives us all, and how and why. Right now we are all being divided to fight amongst ourselves to divert our attention away from the real enemies.
Read my posts, they show a little.
I am aware we live in an oligarchy, or plutocracy. I dont believe in useless work. My goal is to initiate a new civilization- a multitude of self-sustaining agricultural communities without any technology(not even electricity), with some resemblance to the Amish, who have been successful for centuries.
At this point we are headed towards the new world order the ;powers have planned- a world fascist police state of surviving 500 million slaves
1
-
It is obvious that you are a fan of the biggest liar to hold executive office, and watch the most deceptive and volatile news station that was judged to be deceptive and intentionally deceive by the highest court.
In NYC, one in ten children in school is homeless, but you say we have the best economy-believe whatever bs you want to, but for mankind's sake, get out of the way.
I am trying to reverse all the harm done by oligarchs and plutocrats for centuries, to install a new civilization that is not going to have pollution, poverty, hate, crime, temptations, oppression, laziness, or any other ills of our civilization that has gods rule-
we will make a way of life, not the promise of equality promised from slave owners, but real righteous society initiated by a man who lives by his principles, and is uniquely unselfish and principled and clean as can be, full of integrity can you say any of that about your leader trump?
1
-
1
-
T @6foot8jesuspilledpureblood82 First of all, i am not socialist.
Second, name one.
Third -communism is not socialism.
Fourth, lording over- think about it- dr. pastor, employer- all lord over. .... president, policeman, all lord over.
I agree that big government is dangerous, and often leads to oppression, but there are some socialist states in Europe and places like Canada, Sweden, Norway which do very well. They may not be totally socialist, but do have socialist qualities.
The socialists do have a good argument and if it were not for global warming and the planned annihilation of humanity by those in power, I might consider socialism. do not assume the planners of destruction are socialists-the ones in power are rich bankers and the Vatican. the Vatican is involved in much banking as well.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TheBINIBALL from my book EXPOSING THE MONEY MACHINE, subtitled TYRANNY TROUGH GOVERNMENT, RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS, AND MEDIA DECEPTION
Surely you are aware that the so-called Federal Reserve is not run by the government of the United States. It was set up by Woodrow Wilson in 1913. It is reported that his campaign for office was funded by bankers. I have also found much evidence that he was a racial bigot. I will quote a statement he made in 1919:
“I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is now controlled by its system of credit. We are no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.”
Now here is a quote from Josiah Stamp, who lived from 1880 to 1941:
“If you want to remain slaves of the bankers and pay for the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create money and control the nation’s credit.”
Now for another quote from Solomon, wisest king of Israel:
(Proverbs 22:7 KJV) The rich ruleth over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender.
Congressman Louis McFadden brought charges of conspiracy, unlawful conversion, fraud, and treason to the governance of the Federal Reserve Board on May 23, 1933. You may also want to research his comments in a speech to congress as recorded in the Federal Reserve Corporation Remarks to Congress in 1934. Before the time that he was assassinated, he also wrote the following:
“A world banking system was being set up here. A super-state controlled by international bankers, acting together to enslave the world for their own pleasure. The fed has usurped the government.”
You may think that: Yes, it looks like the bankers control the economic system, but that doesn’t mean that they are evil, or that they want to control everything. WAKE UP!!! There is much more. First, let me identify the family “trees” of the illuminati by their names:
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@edwardreadletter2182 anarchist is basically somebody who doesnt have to do anything he doesnt want to- everything is done through mutually beneficial agreement- nobody is forced to do anything. no masters -no slaves.
I have the idea of a new type of civilization= self-sustaining agricultural communities, no technology, getting rid of the nuclear family- no husband and wife and children- no religion, but farming and carpentry, and blacksmith, glassblowing- no private property but clothing and hygiene, and no currency but all shared. there are many other facets, such as a way to rid ourselves of crime-
you should see how we would have better health and better character. no media corruption (selling sex), no temptations no bad food or drugs, healthy food no pollution no poverty or reason to steal, all a different mindset and values.
2 books to download for free
http://truthforceinternational.org
go to donation page scroll down.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@PaladinPoppie if the earth is rotating, and everything with it, (and it is by necessity of earth's thousands of miles of circumference) going at a high speed, then why do we feel wind blowing at ten, twenty, thirty and more miles an hour, in different directions, changing direction and force at any time and with few seconds of time between changes?
THINK, MAN-- WE HAVE BEEN LIED TO! I thoroughly have debunked evolution-if you want to see it, it is a few pages long, but with your request, i will copy and paste it here.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
continues
Many pictures and models of “transitional apemen” have been created from evidence of a single tooth, or no evidence at all,- including their hair color, skin tones, and even facial expressions. Remember Nebraska man? It was discovered to be a tooth from an extinct ape. Java man (also known as homo erectus)-the “discoverer” admitted before he died that it was an ape’s skull with human legs and other bones- a fraud. Another fraud had legs of a human, jaw of a pig, and chemicals made it appear, old- at first it was thought to be 500,000 years old. Years later they found out it was fifty years old. Do you remember the famous discovery named Lucy? Discovering scientist Johanson said he saw a piece of bone laying on the ground, that and other bits- it was most of a skeleton, but the knee joint was found a mile away, two hundred feet deeper under the ground. This was said to be an ape which stood. It turns out that it was an extinct ape with legs of a human. So why is the missing link still missing? Because it obviously doesn’t exist.
According to different theories, (notice the word “theory”-it’s not been proven despite the past 150 years of attempts. Why? Because it’s not not true, actually it’s more scientifically accurate to call it a hypothesis) there is an evolutionary tree leading to present day homo sapien from a chimpanzee type creature. Illustrations have used fictional ideas to create facial expressions, color and type of hair, protruding foreheads, and other features made up in their own imaginations, from a tooth or joint. You can see these in school textbooks which do not state the difference between the fact and imagination. That is based on 19th century science- comparative anatomy-which suggests that you can know what you look like and your favorite flavor ice cream(an exaggerated analogy) by looking at your fingernail clippings. Every absolute theory is only as good as the outcome of the next experiment, discovery, or observation, and there are no guarantees of the results. These theories, which by definition are dependent on proof by experimentation and observation, coming up as predicted by a certain percent of the time, are very fragile.
The findings of the evolution-chasing scientists come up with new information every month, some “proving” their theories, some disproving. When a theory is disproved, they simply change the length of time the evolutionary process needed for their theory to appear legitimate. In other words, they do everything but admit mistakenness.
Scientists use several methods of dating fossils and other artifacts. The most reputable and most used is carbon dating. According to Dr. Kent Hovind: “at least six different radiometric dating methods are available. The assumed age of the sample will dictate which dating method is used because each will give a different result. For example, when dinosaur bones containing carbon are found, they are not carbon dated because the result would be only a few thousand years. Because this would not match the assumed age based on the geologic column (the stated information in our books), scientists use another method of dating to give an age closer to the desired results. All radiometric results that do not match the pre-assigned ages of the geologic column are discarded.”
1
-
more
This is a perfect example of the outcome of the observation based on and controlled by the assumed, desired, or expected outcome. Also remember that in the academic world, if you don’t come up with the conclusion consistent with the people giving grants to the academy, you had better find a way of changing and justifying the change in your results in accordance with their economic, political, and philosophical views, it is all about achieving conformity.
Evolution is not good science. It is a pagan religion to explain our origins with a fictionalized account-similar to Genesis. I don’t have enough blind faith to believe in evolution. It is believed despite there being no proof of it. Here are a few questions to ask evolutionary scientists:
Where did matter come from?
Where, when, why, and how did life come from lifeless matter?
When where and how did life learn to reproduce itself? How did a new form of life reproduce itself without the reproduction system fully evolved?
How can mutations (recombining of the genetic code) create any new, improved varieties? (recombining English letters will not produce Chinese books)
How did eyes, ears, and organs evolve? (the eye has half a dozen functions that would necessarily evolve simultaneously to be able to function)
Which evolved first?
This world has so many types of species that are interdependent and can live only with the existence of the others. Each of most organisms has many different organs with different functions and interactive features such as the eye, which was created with six different features that could not function without each other. How could they have been created without an intelligent being there to do it? It could not have been done except simultaneously and interactively. The eye could not function without all six components in their complete and finished form. They would not provide vision in an incomplete and evolutionary progressive form, so the new species would be blind for thousands, or millions, of years. But people who wanted to provide another option to the bible’s version came up with the “green slime” theory, which talks of a “primordial soup” of elements which magically came to life, and then magically formed into complex thinking beings with souls. Simply look at nature –you can’t get perfect order out of chaos- but that is what evolutionists claim happened. Out of void and dust there was suddenly a big bang and PRESTO!- planets and stars were formed. They ignore the scientific fact that every reaction (like an explosion) comes from an action (there was none).
1
-
and more
Dr. Colin Paterson, senior paleontologist of the British Museum of Natural History in New York City, gave a keynote address at the American Museum of Natural History in NY City in 1981. He explained his "anti-evolutionary” view: “One morning I woke up and it struck me that I had been working on this stuff for twenty years and there was not one thing that I knew about it. That’s quite a shock to learn that one can be so misled for so long…. I’ve tried putting a simple question to various people: “Can you tell me anything you know about evolution, one thing, that is true?” I tried that question on the geology staff at the Field Museum of Natural History, and the only answer I got was silence. I tried it on members of the evolutionary morphology seminar in the University of Chicago, a very prestigious body of evolutionists, and all I got there was silence for a long time and eventually one person said: “I do know one thing- in ought not be taught in high school.”
Sir Alfred Hoyle, professor of anatomy, Cambridge University, said this in “Evolution From Space” – “The likelihood of the formation of life from inanimate matter is one out of 10, with 40,000 zeros behind it. It is big enough to bury Darwin and the whole theory of evolution. There was no primordial soup on this planet or any other planet, and if the beginnings of life were not random, they must therefore have been the product of purposeful intelligence.”
Why is there so much confidence put on a theory with so many holes in it? If it is false, why do so many people believe it? How could so many people be wrong? A partial answer can be found in a forward to the 100th edition of “The Origin of Species,” the book by Darwin. The forward by Sir Arthur Keith says “Evolution is unproved and unprovable. We believe it only because the only alternative is special creation, and that is unthinkable.”
One of the points that I have been making in my books is that we have been intentionally and deliberately deceived. If one deception is not believed, another one will be fabricated to replace it. And even more disturbing is the knowledge that the purposes behind these lies are devious and malicious. The mystery of evil, the concept of the depth of evil, is a concept difficult to comprehend by people who are foundationally good. But unfortunately, malicious evil is very real. While it does use money and power as tools, those are not always its motivation. You will be aware of why (as I have concluded) the theory of evolution has been promoted. Another falsehood had to replace the bible, and evolution has provided whole new avenues of entertainment, but the motivation for its fabrication is more devious.
Surely you may think that all those scientists cannot be wrong. A title of doctor or professor does not make you infallible. And many of those scientists don’t buy those theories, but are silenced by the powerful authorities. See the documentary “Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed.” It was produced by, and featured, Ben Stein, and it showed many highly intelligent and qualified scientists who questioned and refuted evolution, who were vilified and condemned by the education system, because they did not conform to conventional belief. These men and women believed in intelligent design (not necessarily the bible’s version) by questioning formerly held beliefs (which is basically the definition of true science- a search for truth) and were fired, withdrawn from being eligible for funding from all sources, and were ostracized; not for any falsehood in what they presented (there was none), but because of the stubbornness of the institutions. Why do these institutions refuse to acknowledge the possibility that they are mistaken? One reason (other than embarrassment) could be that they have an agenda. Darwin’s theory of evolution promoted the idea of “survival of the fittest.” The Nazis needed some “proof” of the superiority of the Aryan race, and to justify their slaughter of “inferior” peoples. The Roman Empire, and it’s subjugation of, and slaughter of the American natives, it’s slavery of Africans, and it’s rule over other populations, needed justification. Soon, and it has already been initiated in the middle east, the Vatican will annihilate billions of people using its tool, the United States and its military. Because the European caucasian race is better (and more fit to live) than the Negro, Hispanic, Semitic, and Asian peoples, or so they want us to believe (and maybe they think so themselves). According to the “science”, the annihilation of all other humans by the white man is just a matter of weeding out inferior races from existence.
1
-
here is why you beleive the bs- and why i dont-so-called scientists are evil
Dr. Colin Paterson, senior paleontologist of the British Museum of Natural History in New York City, gave a keynote address at the American Museum of Natural History in NY City in 1981. He explained his "anti-evolutionary” view: “One morning I woke up and it struck me that I had been working on this stuff for twenty years and there was not one thing that I knew about it. That’s quite a shock to learn that one can be so misled for so long…. I’ve tried putting a simple question to various people: “Can you tell me anything you know about evolution, one thing, that is true?” I tried that question on the geology staff at the Field Museum of Natural History, and the only answer I got was silence. I tried it on members of the evolutionary morphology seminar in the University of Chicago, a very prestigious body of evolutionists, and all I got there was silence for a long time and eventually one person said: “I do know one thing- in ought not be taught in high school.”
Sir Alfred Hoyle, professor of anatomy, Cambridge University, said this in “Evolution From Space” – “The likelihood of the formation of life from inanimate matter is one out of 10, with 40,000 zeros behind it. It is big enough to bury Darwin and the whole theory of evolution. There was no primordial soup on this planet or any other planet, and if the beginnings of life were not random, they must therefore have been the product of purposeful intelligence.”
Why is there so much confidence put on a theory with so many holes in it? If it is false, why do so many people believe it? How could so many people be wrong? A partial answer can be found in a forward to the 100th edition of “The Origin of Species,” the book by Darwin. The forward by Sir Arthur Keith says “Evolution is unproved and unprovable. We believe it only because the only alternative is special creation, and that is unthinkable.”
One of the points that I have been making in my books is that we have been intentionally and deliberately deceived. If one deception is not believed, another one will be fabricated to replace it. And even more disturbing is the knowledge that the purposes behind these lies are devious and malicious. The mystery of evil, the concept of the depth of evil, is a concept difficult to comprehend by people who are foundationally good. But unfortunately, malicious evil is very real. While it does use money and power as tools, those are not always its motivation. You will be aware of why (as I have concluded) the theory of evolution has been promoted. Another falsehood had to replace the bible, and evolution has provided whole new avenues of entertainment, but the motivation for its fabrication is more devious.
Surely you may think that all those scientists cannot be wrong. A title of doctor or professor does not make you infallible. And many of those scientists don’t buy those theories, but are silenced by the powerful authorities. See the documentary “Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed.” It was produced by, and featured, Ben Stein, and it showed many highly intelligent and qualified scientists who questioned and refuted evolution, who were vilified and condemned by the education system, because they did not conform to conventional belief. These men and women believed in intelligent design (not necessarily the bible’s version) by questioning formerly held beliefs (which is basically the definition of true science- a search for truth) and were fired, withdrawn from being eligible for funding from all sources, and were ostracized; not for any falsehood in what they presented (there was none), but because of the stubbornness of the institutions. Why do these institutions refuse to acknowledge the possibility that they are mistaken? One reason (other than embarrassment) could be that they have an agenda. Darwin’s theory of evolution promoted the idea of “survival of the fittest.” The Nazis needed some “proof” of the superiority of the Aryan race, and to justify their slaughter of “inferior” peoples. The Roman Empire, and it’s subjugation of, and slaughter of the American natives, it’s slavery of Africans, and it’s rule over other populations, needed justification. Soon, and it has already been initiated in the middle east, the Vatican will annihilate billions of people using its tool, the United States and its military. Because the European caucasian race is better (and more fit to live) than the Negro, Hispanic, Semitic, and Asian peoples, or so they want us to believe (and maybe they think so themselves). According to the “science”, the annihilation of all other humans by the white man is just a matter of weeding out inferior races from existence.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1