Comments by "Michael Kahn" (@michaelkahn8903) on "Dr. Cornel West on Socialism | Joe Rogan" video.

  1. 21
  2. 5
  3. 4
  4. 3
  5. 3
  6.  @bane3991  i am stupid and cant think- i have never had a debate before and am a widely respected author because i am naive. I need you to point out the obvious arguments every fox person has. First of all, it is okay for billionaires to make lots of money but not everybody else? Second of all, I have put all into consideration. Small business owners have a good income of say $80k, and have three employees (just an example) that they pay minimum wage-$8 here (a studio apartment here costs $1000 a month- a room $750)), now you see that a 40 hour week does not pay enough for basics, while mr boss is doing fine, probably not working as hard as his employees. Now, mr boss cries that he cannot live with less than say $70k=$35 an hour. Poverty is okay for his workers, but not him. He needs a big house and new car- but screw the employees-they dont matter. Now most small businesses make much more, and if mr boss man would decrease his earnings to $70, he would be able to pay his employees $15-but he is not willing, he would rather go out of business. I am proposing a paradigm shift- from materialism, and from respecting people according to their position and wealth and degrees in traditional schooling, to respecting those most who show greater intellectual strength, physical strength, and most of all, the capacity to help humanity and the community in sacrificial beneficial service. i propose that we change from living to get as many toys, trinkets, gloss and glitter to a spartan (living with basics)to become stronger- to eat healthy, not tasty, to strive to better ourselves in character, not to improve our money-making ability. We have been fed propaganda that makes us love money and material goods more than other people. I have more ideas that all fit together to make the big picture a new ideal civilization. it is not JUST preferable, it is our ONLY hope for survival.
    3
  7. 3
  8. 3
  9. 3
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13.  @TheSlideshowtube  One of the most respected journalists of his time, John Swinton, made this toast at The New York Press Club in 1953(as referenced from “Mass Control” by Jim Keith, pages 41, 42): “There is no such thing at this date of the world’s history, in America, as an independent press. You know it and I know it. There is not one of you who dares to write your honest opinions, and if you did, you know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinion out of the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries for similar things, and any of you who would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the streets looking for another job. If I allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my paper, before twenty-four hours my occupation would be gone.” “The business of journalists is to destroy the truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread. You know it and I know it, and what folly is this toasting an independent press?” “We are the tools of rich men behind the scenes. We are jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes.” That is quite a testimony back then, and you can be assured that it is even more-so today. Before I continue, let me include an extended definition of a real, true journalist. We get pieces here and there of scientific fact in the press to give it an illusion of being truth. But you have to spend all your time digging to get those tidbits. Journalists like myself are willing and glad to do that, even unpaid. What is the excuse of establishment media, who have access to all this information, who have a huge audience who are all totally deceived about the nature of our leaders, and what is happening around the world? Why doesn’t media step forth and expose all the evil that is conspiring and manipulating the destruction that is soon taking us down? They are not ignorant of what is going on. Nobody in that position could be that stupid! They are not ignoramuses! They are bought! Just like politicians, they have sold our well-being to fill their pockets, and have done it for pennies (though they are well paid, treason should not be considered at any cost). Today’s journalists will not accept the concept that they can change the outcome of events, just by making people aware of what is, or what is planned to transpire. By making people aware of conspiracies and covert actions taken by our rulers, the people can take actions to protect themselves from harm. Unfortunately, the media employees have also fallen into the selfish attitude of “providing for myself and mine” like most Americans. The original concept was that of a watchman on the wall; but it has transformed into being a painter, as today’s newsman’s job is not more than whitewashing and cover-ups. The media is no longer a watchdog alerting us of crooked politicians or corporate abuse of power; but is a tool of, and enabler of those same evil people. Ideally, a journalist would have a religious zeal to perform this necessary and highly important calling. A true journalist does not perform his duties to provide himself with a house and comforts for himself, nor for security or fame. A true journalist has made a personal oath (consciously or not) in his heart to risk his freedom, and even his life, in pursuit of uncovering disturbing happenings that need to be broadcast to the public. He needs to consider his job and himself as heroic, a herculean character dedicated to truth, justice, and the righteous way (notice the replacement of a traditional word from this famous phrase). His mission has to be all-consuming, not a means to a good living. Today’s newsmen are not journalists. They won’t even accept any responsibility for their transgressions and shortcomings. A true journalist is not out there to make money, to
    2
  14.  @TheSlideshowtube  REGARDING MORE ON FOX AND THE REST OF MEDIA With the newly established radio, the Radio Act of 1927 became the Federal Radio Commission which basically mandated that radio served the public interest. The name was changed to the Federal Communications Commission in 1934, and the 1949 Fairness Doctrine ruled that public broadcasting license-holders have a duty to present important issues to the public, and give multiple perspectives doing so. Basically, it was supposed to make sure that we hear all sides of issues. This was de-activated in 1987 under president Reagan. Note that the fifty major media companies were reduced to six since then. Congress attempted to revive it in 1991, but was suppressed by Bush Sr., then again unsuccessfully attempted to reinstate it in 2005 and 2006, as Fairness and Accountability Act and the Media Ownership Reform Act respectively. Under Obama it was formally revoked in 2011. I remember in 2005, when the Fairness and Accountability Act was being considered, the Christian media was all out to stop it from being instated. They were telling all the people in the churches to call their representatives to request they vote against it, with the reasoning that their favorite Christian radio and television would be forced to have Jewish and Muslim perspectives and music. What they didn’t mention is that the conservative news propaganda would have to give liberal views also (and vice versa). I remember how Christian and conservative media always touted how liberals control the media. If that were so, would they not be encouraging equal time on the air? Think, people. A great amount of the following information was taken from the book “Unreliable Sources” subtitled “A Guide to Detecting Bias in the Media,” an understatement of a description. This book by Martin Lee and Norman Solomon is a real eye opener, and is one of the most informative and revelatory pieces of work I have come across, and I recommend it highly. It exposes US crimes as well as media collaboration in the deception of the public. If the book has any fault, it is that it is an example of over-kill, it provides overbearing and excessive evidence to ensure that you are convinced. That just served to fan the flames of my anger at the US government and media. I loved the book.
    2
  15.  @TheSlideshowtube  The media only tells the public what the powers want them to know or think, using information management. This includes withholding of information, disseminating misinformation (lies), and misdirecting people so that none can comprehend the reality of the world events and the forces that make them happen. This is a major player in war against humanity. The information war was made more effective by the Rockefeller Foundation in the 1930s, when it initiated secret psychological “war” projects whose purpose was to shape public opinion. According to Christopher Simpson, author of “Science of Coercion”: “…a tight circle of men and women who shared several important conceptions of mass research. They regarded mass communication as a tool for social management, and as a weapon in social conflict, and they expressed common assumptions concerning the usefulness of quantitative research - particularly experimental and quasi-experimental effects research, opinion surveys, and quantitative content analysis as a means of illuminating what communication “is” and improving its application to social management.” As this was being implemented and working in overdrive, the Office of Strategic Services and the Office of War Information recruited the “best and brightest” from American intelligentsia into secret “intelligence,” and after training, were placed into powerful positions of mass media, politics, and universities. In the 1950s, the CIA and the American mass media began to be interlocked, the agency feeding information to journalists in exchange for their own intelligence developed at home and abroad. Many American journalists currently work for the CIA. That is the explanation for the “fake news” in the media. Intentional fake news is very real, and manipulatively deceptive. Another strategy used by the large public relations corporations and the government is the use of surveys in polling. By slanting questions and using outright deception regarding results in service to whoever is paying them, the public is often misled as to what the rest of the population thinks. Under the impression that one is alone in his attitude of perception, one will not voice opinion nor organize to further one’s cause. To illustrate one way this is engaged, ask how many times the media has directly addressed the exceedingly important issues of poverty, human rights, abuses, media control by the elite, racism, or the like; and given novel results that speak to the poor having the backing of the people in a substantive way. Any results that are denying help to the poor, I guarantee you, are either the result of hateful and mean-spirited propaganda and indoctrination favoring the pro-rich elite, or are deceptively misleading as to the authentic hearts of the people.
    2
  16. 2
  17. 2
  18. 2
  19.  @bane3991  regarding propaganda When Reagan took office, the taxes on the rich were reduced, a practice that was continued by his successors. The corporate heads were expected (according to media- released policies- BS) to employ more people with the extra moneys. Of course, in reality, it doesn’t work that way. Think about it. In the movies- Gotham’s wealthiest elite takes on evil criminals, risking his life for the city’s citizens. The filthy rich military industrialist genius enables him to build a suit to save America (iron man), and a surgeon uses his genius in a spiritual endeavor to save humanity. This is bullshit propaganda to confuse the minds of the people. There is not one rich man on the planet who works sacrificially for the welfare of the people. Military industry ends millions of lives oppressively, they are far from being heroes. Likewise, corporate heads keep moneys, employing as few people as possible to maximize profits. The only criminals that you will see on the news are the poor folk- gangstas, rapists, and thieves who each hurt one or two people. What you will not see (which means that to the public, they don’t exist), are the military strategists who plan the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocents, the covert planners of illegal acquisitions of governments, the corporate heads of pharmaceuticals who intentionally hide the harmful, addictive, and sometime deadly aspects of medicines, politicians who accept bribes and the oil magnates who offer those bribes to have them deny global warming. When have you seen head-lines exposing Rockefeller, DuPont, etc..? If you wear a suit, which is the uniform of the dominant class, you are immune and sanitized. The wealthy businessman is portrayed as the good guy, while union members working in the warehouse that are exploited by the “suits” are selfish for asking for living wages. Such is the propaganda of the mainstream media puppets. There has been a totally fictionalized mindset of the people due to media deception. This works in many ways. How many times do we see reports of cops killing unarmed blacks on tv or in the news? Is it truly reported? When there is a riot as a result of this kind of police behavior, we are sure to see the destruction of property, the devastation, the rioters are portrayed as wildly out of control, attacking anybody. Ever hear of propaganda? Very few of the murders by cops makes the news. A diligent ally in exposing the evils of our oppressors referred me to the website: http://killedbypolice.net It reported that 372 people had been killed by police in 2019 at its last updated report of 5/30/2019. This was incomplete, as it listed its sources as newspapers and tv stations, those unreported ones are not counted. The media does not represent certain peoples in truth and full disclosure. Urban blacks and Latinos are portrayed as criminals and welfare recipients;, and many people have the opinion that they are lazy, not intelligent, and resort to violence, with crime and murder in the streets, movies showing blacks and rappers in a totally warped view to propagandize the public. Of course not all blacks are good, some lie and cheat, and there are drug users. But the ones that do, are not doing it on the grand scale that the establishment does, and the victims are invariably others in the neighborhood, as targeting an establishment “victim” will result in multiple years in prison, while doing it to others of your own race will lead to few, if any, consequences. The result is usually assignment to a rehabilitation center or parole, either one enrolling you into an inescapable system of vulnerability to arrest, “treatment” and other forms of control and supervision for the rest of your life.
    2
  20.  @bane3991  THIS IS HIGHLY IMPORTANT TO PERCEIVE= HOW WE HAVE BEEN BAMBOOZLED Now, let us see where class warfare fits in, organized by the elite, to avoid any governmental oversight and/or public resistance. This has all been accomplished with deliberate methodological intent through the media, and enabled with the assistance of religious leaders and an education system fractured into specializations and earnings-orientation. We will delve into the media’s participation in this chapter. First, let us explore materialistic orientation. This is done so extensively, with such a minute variation from the norm, that the materialistic orientation has not been noticed> Every habitat on television, and the vast majority on film, has been at the least middle class, with more upper class. Think about it. Watch as everybody’s home that we view on media is large, clean, and bright; with new looking appliances and furniture; even on commercials of every sort. Why is this done? First of all, it is seen as the norm, with no alternatives. It is a “taken” by the middle and upper classes that youth go to college to acquire a diploma, the ticket to an income that allows for that big house and new car. Failing to do so is not an option, renting an apartment is not even considered, except in the transformation stage between parent’s home and your own house. Furthermore, the absence of poor people on view leads people to have no exposure to, and thus no concern for, the poor, due to the lack of truth in the media. In addition, it has prevented the white middle class to be able to learn from urban poor folks of the oppression and deception of the establishment, as only victims would. Few people are aware that in 2019, one in ten students in New York City schools is homeless. Trump tells America that the economy is the best ever. Rich people have no idea that they are rich, in their own eyes, everybody lives like they do. They think that those in poverty are lazy, drug-crazed, stupid, or criminal. My sister, whose mother bought her a mansion complete with attached two-car garage, and in-ground swimming pool made this comment: “I know that there are some people richer, and some people poorer than we are.” She is a millionaire, despite not having worked for over fifteen years. Another purpose, and again, this is intentional=If these viewers see the average person (those on tv) having a higher standard of living, they want the material possessions also. If everybody else has it, why don’t I? Why do you think you see Cadillac and BMW commercials so often on tv, when few people can afford them? Those companies belong to a cabal instilling materialistic desires in you. Diamonds are constantly advertised. They are valued at thousands of dollars, but look like glass, which is worth about two cents. If only people would step outside their world, and view it objectively, and see the forest from outside the trees, and perceive how they have been duped. But they go to college and become mid-management (house negroes [or caucasians]) with lots of employees (slaves) to supervise. Many of those who work, but whose earnings remain in lower-middle class and below, working blue collar jobs in warehouses and the like, are perpetually envious, frustrated, and resentful of the rich, and of those on welfare are as well. Many of them desire the lifestyle of those on television, and perceive themselves as being oppressed and poor. Divide and conquer. Furthermore, the media tells them that the taxes exacted from their incomes supports those on welfare. What they aren’t told is that the forty wealthiest people in the US are taxed at a lower rate than they are, and few are aware that 57% of taxes go to the US military. This illusion of them paying for welfare of “lazy” minorities redirects their anger to be focused at those lower on the ladder’s rungs, rather than at those who exploit them. Tell somebody that a pick-pocket is after their wallet, and you can steal their home.
    2
  21.  @bane3991  from ANGRY LOUD AND CLEAR TRUTH Take a close observation of rulers and the exceedingly wealthy. Not as media (or Hollywood) portrays them, but using factual information and scientific analyzation. They horde millions and billions of dollars, far beyond what they could possibly need for a hundred generations. Some donate one or two million. Very generous, but almost always done with publicity. But when you look closer, you see that they donated one percent of their vast fortunes. Trump, for instance, made public that he had established a charitable foundation, neglecting to inform us that it had not donated an iota for eight years; and in addition, he had used it for personal profit. After you investigate their level of generosity, look at how they acquired their wealth. With few exceptions, wealthy people “earn” it through inheritances, wheeling and dealing, or by exploiting others. Trump’s claim to be a self-made man was shattered when the NY Times exposed his tax fraudulence, illustrating how his father had endowed him with half a billion dollars. Very few worked their way up as laborers, and just about zilch have improved civilization, except to make life easier, but never contribute anything wholesome. Now inspect their motivations. Find their values, how they counsel people, their modus operandi. Do they exude integrity (no), and what kind of people do they surround themselves with? Do they value wealth, appearances, positions, and prestige? Most certainly they do. Those that donate a portion of their wealth give to museums, equestrian societies, and universities. Do they show concern for others? The vast majority of rich people are most concerned about their reputation when it comes to charitable giving. Very few, if any, roll up their sleeves and spend time with those in need. It must be “sanitary. When you want to judge a product or doctrine, it is necessary to view its source, its integrity and validity, by comparing specifics and the big picture. In addition, it is wise to inspect how it has affected civilization and why. Research those who promote it, and their character. Do not be fooled by appearances. If a package is wrapped in glitter and ribbons, it is promoting something that may not be wholesome, it is trying too hard to be attractive to entice the buyer. Substance is what matters, not appearances. I have come to the conclusion that religious leaders, wealthy people, and rulers, are all evil; they are deceivers who have no true inclination to benefit others in any substantial way. They have hijacked the planet and are facilitating our destruction willingly. In the public’s ignorance and naivety, they have found sheep to be easily led to slaughter. Your trust in them and their guile and manipulative deception has made you vulnerable to be open to be misled to adopt wrong values and concepts, to be forced to conform to a wicked system. The “money machine” is a malicious monster that has enslaved the planet. Keep reading, there is more. I am unfolding a malevolent conspiracy. Though you may not have seen this before, and it may be novel to you, I beseech that you continue to read this book, as not only your future, but also the future of the entire planet earths’ people, depends on the defense that we can muster together united against the evil powers. I will later outline a skeletal plan of action to initiate, specifics can be elaborated upon further collaborative development. Politicians deceive and make promises that they don’t keep. Do they really intend to do them, but were impeded by other politicians? We are so accustomed to broken promises and voting for the lesser of two evils, that we don’t react with strong responses. Are they incapable of creating solutions to society’s problems? Look at op-eds in the newspapers. Some of them, especially in the NY Times, present accurate summations and good solutions that are viable. I have also. But our policy makers in Washington cannot originate, nor can they implement correction to the problems? Or perhaps they have no intention to do so.
    2
  22. 2
  23. 2
  24.  @bane3991  it is obvious you went to college. here is some from a book by a partiallly -college educated, yet not doctrinated author and free-thinker-me-note it refers to the initiation of compulsory schooling. Among the wealthy, the concept of educating what was already a discontent masses was a frightening idea; and brought fears of it loosening habits of industriousness, that they would forcefully confiscate property if educated and aware of the truth. This was a valid concern, but Mann confronted it well. He told them that universal education would channel ambition away from seizing other’s property, to workers he emphasized that universal education would give their children a way to rise in the world. Instead of taking things from others, they would earn them for themselves. Remember this, because later you will see how this myth was built upon and how it has served as a carrot and deceptive tool to make the poor appear to be inferior and lazy or stupid as the reason for their poverty. We will explore the reason for that myth and prove its falsehood later. Mann said schooling was “the most effectual way of making insurance on their property would be to contribute from it enough to sustain an efficient system of common-school education, thereby educating the whole mass of the mind, and constituting it a police more effective than peace-officers or prisons.” This was learned from “Class Dismissed” by John Marsh, pages 105-106. Mann is the one who made sure that the Prussian system was employed, and for those of you who are unaware, Prussia was a Germanic totalitarian police state. It was not enstated to promote knowledge and better income for all, but to enforce class difference and to perpetuate wealth for the rich, and to delude the common people that they had access to prosperity, thus quieting them. Other pioneers were Gilman, Dewey, and Rockefeller. They were all wealthy and were connected to psychology and/or secret societies. Dewey said that the purpose of public school was: “to take an active part in determining the social order of the future …according as the teachers align themselves with the newer forces making for social control of economic forces.” John Rockefeller said: “I don’t want a nation of thinkers, I want a nation of workers." He created the General Education Board (later named The Rockefeller Foundation) in 1903 to dispense Rockefeller funds to education. We are all aware that to qualify for funding, you have to fulfill certain requirements. Rockefeller’s influence must not be underestimated. What is the benefit of “higher education?” Modern education creates people who are smart enough to accurately repeat what they are told and follow orders; and dumb enough to think this makes them smarter than everyone else. “Governments don’t want well-informed, well-educated people capable of critical thinking. That is against their interests. They want obedient workers, people who are just smart enough to run the machines and do the paperwork, and just dumb enough to passively accept it.”-George Carlin. That same comedian, George Carlin, also said: “Here’s a bumper sticker I’d like to see…We are the proud parents of a child who has resisted his teacher’s attempts to break his spirit and bend him to the will of his corporate masters.” Back years ago, before the advent of popular higher education, the belief was popularized that the wealthiest people were those who were most industrious and who had best ethics. They put on that appearance easily, as many were not schooled, and at that time people were not yet aware of all the corruption in politics and industry. Many of their lives of leisure was not known either. Later the schools were built and filled, and the politicians exposed, and anybody with half a brain could see the absence of the existence of ethics in rich people, so now the myth changed to being that people were not poor due to lack of ethics, but due to lack of education. Higher education costs a pretty penny, and a college loan takes decades to repay, and many are unable to repay it, placing them deep in debt. Occupy Wall Street was a protest of college students and graduates who saw that their college degrees would not guarantee them the employment at high wages as had been promised them. The way that the leaders of our country see it, when you trap people in a system of debt, they are going to be unlikely to change the system, they won’t be able to afford the time to think. The way I see it, they should have thought before they bought the lies of the system.
    2
  25. 2
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 2
  29. 2
  30. 2
  31. 2
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34.  @bane3991  Later, this book will cover the deceptions and malevolent faults in the education, legal, and health systems. That will convince you to support the following concept that I will now introduce. Here it is: instead of valuing positions of power, monetary wealth, and other trappings of worldly success that promotes fame, and that has misled billions of people; why not place the measuring rod of greatness in integrity, physical strength, and intellectual capability, and in the employment of those qualities in service to the community or to humanity as a whole. And just as importantly, placing value in the ability to live simply, that is, having less possessions, that is, fewer toys. Why not admire those who have put great effort in self-improvement to improve the quality of life for others, instead of acquiring material possessions for self. Turn around the evil, and put value on sacrificial poverty. Instead of promoting people who have followed others in chasing their own desires, let us celebrate authentically original and selfless individuals who strive for the common good. This is in direct contradiction to the “American Dream,” which has destroyed the planet’s people. Do you not perceive that evil people have made others follow their evil agenda by bribing them with worthless trinkets like jewelry and eye-candy (that is, tv and expensive but useless commodities), and make them feel superior for their foolishness. Later in this book you will perceive the folly of “higher education” as it exists in today’s civilization. The people need to put their priorities in strength and wisdom, which is not acquired through college and material excess. You will see how the media portrays blacks. Often they are shown as middle or upper class. The message intended is: “See? Some blacks are able to succeed here. They just need to work hard and they can succeed. America is not prejudiced.” Funny, because they are just dark-skinned people who act like whites. Those depicting rich blacks who are not “being white” look like buffoons or of unethical character. Other times, it is the poor misguided black youth or homeless man who is helped by the kind white person to find direction and to be able to succeed. I remember one movie portraying a homeless black teen who is adopted by a white family. He is totally clueless, and being so stupid that he has no idea how to play football, so the mother of the household teaches him. Where would these helpless ignorant negroes be without whites to guide them? Do you really think that these messages are unintentional and innocent? But don’t think that blacks, while definitely oppressed, do not fight back. All those hip hop videos on mtv and youtube are another type of warfare against white domination under the label of “just keepin’ it real.” These videos basically depict black men in suits wearing lots of gold and diamonds, and driving expensive cars, carrying (and sometimes using) weapons, dealing drugs, and abusing women. Other videos depict women in sexy clothing engaging in promiscuous behavior. This is performed for the benefit of young viewers. Is this immoral? Not in the least. Then what is immoral? How about being rich, living in luxury, wearing expensive clothing and jewelry, exploiting your employees, deceiving your customers, having young girlfriends (even when married), promoting like behaviors in your children, refusing to pay taxes and/or to donate to good causes, and parading this behavior as a role model. The “keepin’” videos are produced with the concept that such behavior, while prevalent in less obvious venues by whites, is not acceptable, these examples are not to be imitated by the brothers who perceive the bad examples intended to repulse youth. There, it is spelled out for you in simple language. I love this stuff, and I love the metoo movement in the US where women are taking a stand and are exposing the perversions and depravity of rich and powerful men. The promotion of materialism, deception, and wrong mindsets is all encouraged by the elite. Why? Having the rich modeled, the middle class envious and jealous of them, and at the same time being told that the poor are stupid, lazy, and “criminal,” eating up their taxes; and the urban poor population harboring contempt at those “above” them in the economic ladder; the elite laugh as the bickering and division keeps them all from perceiving the real enemy.
    1
  35.  @bane3991  I thought what I wrote made sense and was clear, but it apparently doesn't to people who have been heavily indoctrinated to the establishment agenda in the banker-run media. I am not Cornell West. I am not a socialist nor do I follow anybody's teachings, i am self-educated and a very free thinker, so I have original ideas. That I said that "poverty is okay..." I never said you said that-the point i was making, and this should be clear, is..minimum wage is poverty level, and small business owners have no problem keeping their workers there, and insist on earning for themselves a bountiful income as they do it on the backs of those who work for them. They would rather go bankrupt and lose their business than to raise worker's salaries and take less profit. Furthermore, why make billions, while paying workers poverty wages? You really don't see anything wrong with having more money than you can spend in a hundred generations earned by exploiting and paying those who made you your money poverty wages? It is called slavery. And you haven't heard my plans for an anarchist system, so you don't know that there will be evil. My safeguards put in place will prevent it. I know that you have been told by the media that those working for minimum wage are stupid or lazy or have wrong priorities. Most minimum wage earners are NOT kids. That is a myth put out by deceiving bankers. There are immigrants, people who had to work as a youth to support family and never had time or money for education. There are people in the cities who were raised in poverty, no opportunity to get a car to get to good wage jobs, there are disabled people like me. YOu have been so lied to, that you can't think straight, and have no idea on how to challenge what you have been taught. Do you really think that everybody has a real choice? Did I choose to go to jail with trumped charges? People choose crummy jobs with little pay? ? I can't believe you are sincerely saying these things and think that they are true. There is a whole big world out there and people who say that there is no white privilege have no concept of how hard others have it. That you make those statements proves that white privilege is very real. When did I say anything about regulations? YOu are so indoctrinated that you cannot think outside the boxes. In the proposed self-sustaining agricultural communities (this is the civilization I want to initiate) there will be no technology, (no energy like electricity-no pollution), no currency so as to avoid greed. There will be rotating jobs except for highly skilled ones like carpentry and blacksmithing, and glass blowing. Everything will be shared except for clothing and hygiene. A whole new way of life, somewhat resembling Amish ways, minus rules and religion. There are many other facets to it. Yes, I have a computer and need it to change the world. My income is $1469 a month, and I find it adequate. I don't need or desire riches. we could avoid inflation if the rich would only be fair. The average CEO makes 475 times the salary of his average worker-not of minimum wage worker, but of the AVERAGE worker. So, if he would lower it down to 240 times the worker;s salary, the CEO of 100 workers would give double pay to his workers.-no inflation at that point. Do you not perceive that all the arguments you make have been taught to you to promote the wealth of the few, and to brainwash gullible people to believe that the rich are smart, are helping you, are doing a service by employing people? The rich are crafty and clever at deception and subversion. And gullible stooges will fight against their own best interest to defend the rich, thinking it makes sense- you cant perceive how evil they are. If the devil came dressed in red and with horns and a pitchfork, you would run. But what if he wore a nice suit, had a big smile, shook your hand and looked in your eyes and smiled, and said he wanted to help you? The devil is a liar.
    1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1
  51.  Raptor Jet  from my book ANGRY LOUD AND CLEAR TRUTH CHAPTER 24- THE EDUCATION SYSTEM’S ROLE IN OUR DESTRUCTION Why has all this been done without anybody perceiving what I have made very clear, with much evidence? One reason is the media. Another is the education system. This system has been designed to create obedient, conforming youth who do not challenge the status quo, unable to analyze or think critically. There is a reason that the school system is called compulsory, as the whole populace should (according to the masters) be forced to be indoctrinated to the lies and wrong values to allow the destruction of humanity. Youth are told that they go to school to learn, but a professional award-winning teacher and author, John Gatto, says this: “There is abundant evidence that less than a hundred hours is sufficient for a person to become totally literate and a self-teacher. Don’t be panicked by scare tactics into surrendering your children to experts…that certified teaching experts like me are deemed necessary to make learning happen is a fraud and a scam.” ........... Here in the United States, the public education system was initiated by Horace Mann, who took it upon himself to convince the public of the benefits that such a system would be. Remember that back then, the middle of the 1800s, there was much more publicized dissent. Today there is still dissent, but it is not publicized, as people would join any rebelling going on if it was given a voice. It is not well-known, but on the day of Trump’s inauguration, hundreds of protestors were arrested and jailed, despite what yarn Trump will contrive about it being the biggest turnout of any inaugural parade-the bigger the lie, the more it will be believed. The United States has been a nation of protest and independent thinkers; despite the schools and media, and Howard Zinn’s THE PEOPLE’S HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES records the nation’s history of rebellion. Mann addressed his letters promoting schooling to employers, the wealthy, and to workers. His “sell” was carefully contrived and convincing. To the employers, he promised that workers who are educated would be able to perform better than unschooled would. That made sense to them, but I don’t know why they agreed without knowing what would be taught, or how. Among the wealthy, the concept of educating what was already a discontent masses was a frightening idea; and brought fears of it loosening habits of industriousness, that they would forcefully confiscate property if educated and aware of the truth. This was a valid concern, but Mann confronted it well. He told them that universal education would channel ambition away from seizing other’s property, to workers he emphasized that universal education would give their children a way to rise in the world. Instead of taking things from others, they would earn them for themselves. Remember this, because later you will see how this myth was built upon and how it has served as a carrot and deceptive tool to make the poor appear to be inferior and lazy or stupid as the reason for their poverty. We will explore the reason for that myth and prove its falsehood later. Mann said schooling was “the most effectual way of making insurance on their property would be to contribute from it enough to sustain an efficient system of common-school education, thereby educating the whole mass of the mind, and constituting it a police more effective than peace-officers or prisons.” This was learned from “Class Dismissed” by John Marsh, pages 105-106. Mann is the one who made sure that the Prussian system was employed, and for those of you who are unaware, Prussia was a Germanic totalitarian police state. It was not instated to promote knowledge and better income for all, but to enforce class difference and to perpetuate wealth for the rich, and to delude the common people that they had access to prosperity, thus quieting them.
    1
  52.  Raptor Jet  more from my book Other pioneers were Gilman, Dewey, and Rockefeller. They were all wealthy and were connected to psychology and/or secret societies. Dewey said that the purpose of public school was: “to take an active part in determining the social order of the future …according as the teachers align themselves with the newer forces making for social control of economic forces.” John Rockefeller said: “I don’t want a nation of thinkers, I want a nation of workers." He created the General Education Board (later named The Rockefeller Foundation) in 1903 to dispense Rockefeller funds to education. We are all aware that to qualify for funding, you have to fulfill certain requirements. Rockefeller’s influence must not be underestimated. What is the benefit of “higher education?” Modern education creates people who are smart enough to accurately repeat what they are told and follow orders; and dumb enough to think this makes them smarter than everyone else. “Governments don’t want well-informed, well-educated people capable of critical thinking. That is against their interests. They want obedient workers, people who are just smart enough to run the machines and do the paperwork, and just dumb enough to passively accept it.”-George Carlin. That same comedian, George Carlin, also said: “Here’s a bumper sticker I’d like to see…We are the proud parents of a child who has resisted his teacher’s attempts to break his spirit and bend him to the will of his corporate masters.” ........ ......Higher education costs a pretty penny, and a college loan takes decades to repay, and many are unable to repay it, placing them deep in debt. Occupy Wall Street was a protest of college students and graduates who saw that their college degrees would not guarantee them the employment at high wages as had been promised them. The way that the leaders of our country see it, when you trap people in a system of debt, they are going to be unlikely to change the system, they won’t be able to afford the time to think. The way I see it, they should have thought before they bought the lies of the system. We are taught the values that we are expected to embrace, in fact, none but the ones desired to be, are made so blatantly infused with every part of our environment. Money, prestige, sex-appeal, and appearances. There is little promoting the concept of altruistic community-service, as such positions as police, social workers, and politicians are called public servants, and we all are aware that the public that they serve are the powerful and wealthy. The values of independent-thinking, non-conformity, integrity, courage, and strength are not enforced nor encouraged anywhere. Schools teach from early childhood to not question authority, to accept what you are told without challenging, no matter what your intelligence or knowledge says otherwise. You are to perform for excelling grades, for a star, for an “honor” button, for a good report card. You seek for teacher’s approval, to be a favorite, and you do as told to acquire that. They do not teach to be internally motivated, to be independent of other’s opinions of you, to have a secure self-esteem in your own worth. You are always afraid of the “permanent record” they have of you, which does indeed exist. Teachers are taught to use psychology of control, and do as trained to, to collect their pay and pension.
    1
  53.  Raptor Jet  some people, like me, think outside the boxes- here is a solution to schooling disadvantages The students are not all stupid, some see through the bullshit. Not all believe evolution, not because they believe in the Bible’s creation story, but because it is such an easy hypothesis to debunk. To many, it is a joke. But they have to memorize the “facts,” write down the “correct” answers on the tests to graduate, and thus prove that they are harmless and will not grow into rebelling adults who refuse to conform. Non-conformists are dangerous; indeed, I am one of the most dangerous people on the planet. (To the established order). The children see through the law-and-order agenda and rebel and carry on. White suburbia not so much, they go to school to learn and to be good students, as they want to grow up in a respectable community. They have bought the lie, but urban youth are not so fooled. They scream and laugh and cuss and the teachers can’t do anything about it, and the kids know it. The children don’t mind if the teacher gets in trouble, why respect an establishment order-enforcer parading as a concerned educator? These teachers are not stupid, they know what lies they are teaching, and the psychology of control that they are using, and why. If not, their only excuse is ignorance. Just what we need, ignorant educators. Instead of spoon-feeding misinformation to unsuspecting children to be regurgitated to pass tests so that they have a diploma to get a better-paying job, I have a better idea. Why not have the best trainers in the community spend some year or so with a few children-maybe seven at a time- teaching them to value having excelling physical and intellectual strength. Why not have the most ethical and intelligent teachers spend 24/7 with just a few children to instill on them integrity, courage, hard work, community-service, confidence, and like qualities; and give them the incentive to continue all their lives improving themselves in every area? After enabling them to think critically, and giving them a few lessons on research and giving them some facts, have them find information on their own, challenge what they were told, and come to their own conclusions? This would dismiss the entire schooling system, the entire media, and the economic system as we know it; and if successful, would be a motivating factor towards the elimination of our governing powers, that is why not. It would not be in the establishment’s interests. The education system as we have it, is established to enforce the subjugation of the people to be trapped in their imposed way of thinking, and to cripple their minds into mind-slavery. That is why the freed slaves were immediately schooled and taught bible upon emancipation. Church and schooling, (and the media) if done correctly, can be the most imprisoning mind-fuckers imagined by men.
    1
  54.  Raptor Jet  more from my book The rich always seem to love their money, and justify keeping it only for themselves and as a means to enslave other populations under them. In the 1960s, youth, civil rights activists, radicals and liberals, were taking to the streets in protests. President Johnson activated the war on poverty. Yet despite the protests of a few of his advisors, he decided to take the usual unsuccessful stance- instead of providing jobs for the poor, he pretended to help the poor by preparing them for jobs=more education. If you are educated, what good is it, if there are no jobs? As always, the concept being promoted was that their poverty was the poor people’s fault- they weren’t educated. Occupy Wall Street makes my point as to the faultiness of that idea. Capitalism thrives on the idea of there having to be low-paying jobs to provide more profit for the wealthy- that is why they don’t want to raise the minimum wage. Small business owners don’t want to raise minimum wage. Eight dollars an hour is okay for their employees, but if it was raised, their forty or fifty dollars an hour would be reduced, and that is unthinkable. So say it is the poor people’s fault for being uneducated, for being lazy, for being greedy, when all of those wrong concepts fall into the middle class who buy all that spin. If all poor people went to college to learn business management, who would do the manual labor, who would they supervise? College for everybody is not the answer; and to be honest, college for anybody is not the answer..... ......In conclusion: In the colleges they lecture, spoon-feeding (mis)information to be memorized and regurgitated to pass tests, then you think that you are smart. There is no room for students to challenge the professor and to debate what he teaches, to promote real scientific thinking (the search for ultimate truth and knowledge). In truth, you have been indoctrinated to a "reality" that is deception and oppression. To be accepted in the establishment and to get wealthy, they need evidence that you will keep alignment with the establishment, not make waves, and perpetuate the deception. “Higher” education discourages, actually stifles critical thinking, or original minds. The professor lectures, students listen. Where is the freedom of thought and teaching to be able to analyze and to challenge accepted concepts? Where is the dissent, so necessary to today's situation, facilitated? Conforming is enforced and is the rule and role of education. “If you want to get laid, go to college. If you want an education, go to the library.” ― Frank Zappa
    1
  55. 1
  56. 1
  57. 1
  58. 1
  59. 1
  60. 1
  61.  Jetstom Ferrari  Hitler studied Nietzsche- i am only a socialist if you give it this definition First of all, most people do NOT view “socialism” as “ … equal treatment for all.” That’s a FEATURE of a just and loving society. Socialism is an economic system in which control of the means of production resides in the workers and decisions are made democratically and for the benefit of society (and the natural world) as a whole. IF you are not for that, then there is something wrong with you. As I have seen enough quotes out of context and as blatantly deceiving, as elements of socialism have lasted many decades. On the other hand, tyranny and monarchy, feudalism, and kings and empires have lasted much longer, and if you want to tell me that longevity means something is necessarily good, you are wrong, it just means that overbearing control has won and the people have been forced into submission. In the older and "less civilized' societies of tribalism, which lasted thousands of years, there was fairness far beyond your beloved capitalism. My ideal society is not socialist. Being a truly free thinker, I am not confined to ideals as set by others, but have developed my own. It is self-sustaining agricultural communities of 150 people each, living without government, basically democratic socialist anarchy. Everything except clothing and hygiene is shared, no technology, (no pollution and restore the weather) farming rotating responsibilities, mentors take care of children instead of schooling, I have it all planned, a blueprint is in the conclusion of my book ANGRY LOUD AND CLEAR TRUTH
    1
  62.  @TheSlideshowtube  Many presidents pretend to be against establishment media- that is a game, not reality. IT doesnt affect the truth or lies of the news media to be aware that they lie. I am stupid, i did not know media was owned by corporations. from my book ANGRY LOUD AND CLEAR TRUTH First, let me make it very clear: As I explained very clearly in EXPOSING THE MONEY MACHINE, the powers work through the motto: Divide and conquer. Here is a quote from author Edward Herman: “The national security state is an instrument of class warfare organized and designed to permit an elite, local and multinational, to operate without any restraint from democratic processes.” While you see that this was managed to bypass what appears and passes to be democratic legislation, the key word here is class warfare. The powers have, without question, manipulated the planet using money as a tool. And what better way to keep the people in line, than to hold power through currency, and to restrict passage to comfort, luxury, and power only to those who conform to your agenda? Furthermore, a formal education is almost always necessary to acquire comforts; and that education, holding the key to advancement, passes along the doctrines and concepts of those in power, who employ those who have been indoctrinated, to further their agenda; the only method to repay the debt incurred by having the “opportunity” to be thus indoctrinated. Later you will see how the education system has furthered the people’s obedience and inability to think analytically; as well as having misinformed the public. Within all sources of knowledge regarding how secret intelligence works, I have come across the method used to ensure the perpetuation of the secrecy; how this has been hidden for centuries. It is called “compartmentalization.” Most likely you have heard of terrorist “cells,” small groups of terrorists who work together in a covert network of a larger organization. That is also how parts of the government, especially secret intelligence, works. Smaller sections are assigned different tasks focused on different targets, and work independently of one another, with the agents (spooks) having no knowledge of how other cells work, what they are doing, nor the big picture of what is going on as a whole. This is called the “need-to-know” basis, where they are told that they will only know what is necessary for them to have knowledge of, for the protection of the agency and its employees. In reality, it is a tool to keep the average “spook” or agent in ignorance of his employers real agenda, and thus to prevent the public from the possibility of coming to knowledge via an informant (like I am).
    1
  63.  @TheSlideshowtube  One more item for this chapter. In “THE PSYCHOLOGICAL COVERT WAR ON HIP HOP” book 2, Professor Griff exposes that the government totally endorses fake news legally. Page 157-“In February 2004, Fox news won a legal appeal that declared that Fox news had no legal obligation to be truthful in its reporting. The court agreed that Fox had indeed been untruthful but ultimately agreed with Fox’s argument that the FCC’s policy against the intentional falsification of the news is not a legal mandate, requirement, or regulation; and that Fox may falsify news reports. Fl. 13th district New World Communications of Tampa Inc. vs. Jane Akre, case no. 2001-529.” CHAPTER TWENTY TWO: MASTERS OF MANIPULATIVE DECEPTION In “Unreliable Sources” I found how media and government are wed. Like the military industrial complex, and like pharmaceuticals, and other corporate capitalistic (do not assume that this is the only form of government that does this) ventures, the media has incorporated itself in the rule of this nation (and others), and vice versa. Let me present you here with a list of some revolving doors within media and government. These are found on pages 110-120. Under Lyndon Johnson’s state department (in high office) were Jack Rosenthal and Leslie Gelb, who became editors of the NY Times. Gelb’s former boss, ex-Secretary of State Cyrus Vance, was on the Times’ board of directors. Gelb left the Times to serve under Carter as director of the Bureau of Politico-Military Affairs. In 1978, he had initiated a covert CIA program involved in working with the European press to write approvingly of the neutron bomb. He had worked for the Department of Defense as a press officer. That makes for a free and unbiased press. Not... ...... The famous Bill Moyers was press secretary for Lyndon Johnson and later was made a household name as commentator and reporter for CBS and PBS. I am not giving you the full list, but here are some more. Reagan’s communications director, David Gergen, became editor of US News and World Report in 1983, and his deputy, Joanna Bistany became a top executive at ABC News that same year. Peggy Noonan who had been a script writer for CBS radio commentary for Dan Rather later composed speeches for Reagan and Bush. George Will helped prepare Reagan for his debate against Carter, then praised Reagan as he covered the debate on ABC News, “forgetting” to mention his association with Reagan. Instead of hurting his career, when this was uncovered, it enhanced his reputation among media mavens. Page 113-“Both journalists and elected officials tend to view the world in ways that conform to the national security establishment
    1
  64.  @TheSlideshowtube  these are excerpts from my book ANGRY LOUD AND CLEAR TRUTH Casey had also been Securities and Exchange Commissioner under Nixon, and owned much CapCities stock until his death in 1987. He advocated covert operations, and was part of a network of spooks who used American companies, especially mass media, as tools of espionage. GE, owner of NBC, had a contract with the CIA to estimate Soviet military strength-while GE accumulated huge profits as a key player in the military industrial complex. Now, they wouldn’t lie, would they? Ever since the CIA was formed in 1947, publishers and executive management of the media have volunteered their services for the agency- page 114. On page 115, we find some revealing quotes: “One journalist is worth 20 agents” a high-level CIA agent told investigative reporter Carl Bernstein. Former CIA Deputy Director Ray S Cline called the American news media: “the only unfettered espionage agencies in the country.” In exchange for career-enhancing scoops and leaks, reporters alter stories and disseminate propaganda at the request of the CIA. For decades, hundreds of journalists have maintained covert associations with the CIA, and are paid for their services to it. Former CIA director William Colby stated: “Let’s not pick on some poor reporters. Let’s go to the managements. They were witting.” Tom Braden headed the CIA’s Global Propaganda Operation; after leaving it, he worked as a syndicated columnist and co-host of CNN Crossfire. He once wrote an article in the Saturday Evening Post, called: “Why I’m Glad the CIA is Immoral.” Embarrassing revelations by Carl Bernstein in Rolling Stone magazine in 1977 included the following statement: “There is ample evidence that America’s leading publishers allowed themselves and their news organizations to become handmaids to the intelligence services.” The NY Times ran a three- part series on the CIA and media shortly later, disclosing that at various times, the CIA owned or subsidized over fifty newspapers, news services, radio stations, periodicals, book publishers and news entities, most of which were overseas. A CIA official told the Times: “We had at least one newspaper in every foreign capital at any given time.” Page 117. CIA documents display that the US public was targeted by CIA propaganda. A July 13th, 1951 memo stated the CIA’s beginnings of mind control operations: “broad and comprehensive, involving both domestic and overseas activities.” Another CIA document of that time explained that CIA officers met regularly to exchange ideas regarding “the broader aspects of psychology as it pertains to the control of groups or masses rather than the mind of an individual.” The CIA and the press appear to have an attitude in common. That it is okay to deceive the public. Philip Geyelin, a CIA agent who became an editor for the Washington Post, said: “We will get nowhere without first stipulating that while circumstances alter almost any case you can think of, the President has an inherent right- perhaps an obligation in particular concerns-to deceive.” This pretty much explains the deceptions that pervade all over the world in every aspect of society, and I think you can now very clearly perceive how we have all been misled, and some methods that were used. This is helpful to learn how to immunize
    1
  65. 1
  66. 1
  67. 1
  68. 1
  69. 1
  70. 1
  71. 1
  72. 1
  73. 1
  74. 1
  75. 1
  76. 1
  77. 1
  78. 1
  79. 1
  80. 1
  81. 1
  82. 1
  83. 1
  84. 1
  85. 1
  86. 1
  87. 1
  88. 1
  89. 1
  90. from ANGRY LOUD AND CLEAR TRUTH CHAPTER TWENTY ONE: MEDIA’S PROPAGANDA TACTICS When we discuss the media, there are a few things to keep in mind. Primary to a clear perception and understanding, you need to remember that those on top-the most wealthy and powerful players- are in the Council of Foreign Relations, of which the members are appointed by oligarch David Rockefeller Jr., a kingpin in world affairs. Let me quote him from his book “Memoirs”- “some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as internationalists and conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure, one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.” Do you think that the most powerful and wealthy people on the planet who are meeting in secrecy are planning how to benefit us? With that in remembrance, consider that media, including the news, is a business, more specifically an entertainment industry. Entertainment is defined in the Webster dictionary as amusement and diversion. That is why commercials often seem to attempt to be funny, as do sitcoms. That also explains the videos that focus on superheroes, aliens, monsters, and all kinds of fantasies. I cannot recall the last time I saw an accurate documentary on television. The history channel puts on an appearance of truth, but always falls short of it. TV and radio receive virtually 100% of their income from advertisers, newspapers 75%, and magazines about 50%. It is very concerning that the NY Times has so little visible advertising. How are they funded? The media are under great pressure to shape their product to accommodate their advertisers. Advertisers influence the media by restricting and whitewashing media content by removing, or threatening to remove, financial support if their demands are not met. Since media are funded by advertising, their economic survival depends on delivering an audience for advertisers. To them, people exist as potential consumers whose most desirable qualities are gullibility and compliance to media advice- watch, believe, obey, buy. Corporate owners, aligned with the CFR, also have an interest in furthering their agenda. Media news chains have ordered their papers, radio shows, and television programs to adopt a uniform editorial position on certain issues and political candidates, even to support specific worldviews. Management is replaced if it doesn’t perform to the ideals of ownership, and they control which ideas and which version of the facts reach the public. The news that we read is what editors and owners decide to publish, it is not dependent on reporters. Otis Chandler, past publisher of the Los Angeles Times, said “I’m the chief executive. I set policy and I’m not going to surround myself with people who disagree with me… I surround myself with people who see the way I do.” Other publishers do likewise. Sponsors influence not only the news, but partner with Hollywood, and every aspect of the media, to shape our mindsets and worldviews. “Unreliable Sources” makes this quote and statement on page 61:- “Proctor and Gamble,” which spends over a billion dollars a year in advertising, once decreed in a memo on broadcast policy: “There will be no material that gives offense, either directly or indirectly to any commercial organization of any sort.” Ditto for Prudential Insurance: “A positive image of business and finance is important to sustain on the air.” If a business is cast as the bad guy, it must be clear that it is an exception, and the script must also include benevolent business folks, so as not to leave “the wrong impression.” Corporate sponsors are unlikely to underwrite programs that engage in serious criticism of environmental pollution, occupational hazards, or other problems attributable to corporate malfeasance.”
    1
  91. The book was published in 1992, a later year would have resulted in scores of more familiar names and news personalities you would recognize. Let me move on to name a few higher level inter-locks. Robert McNamara, who was Defense Secretary for Kennedy and Johnson retired from the board of directors of the Washington Post Company, and Nicholas Katzenbach, who was Attorney General, also sat on the Post board. Much more influential than journalists are the high-placed top executives who decide policy and editorial practices to be followed meticulously. Other former cabinet-ranking officials also sat on boards of major print media, including NY Times, Los Angeles Times, and Reader’s Digest Association. Corporate boards of the three major television networks are infiltrated with government power-brokers. Carter’s Defense Secretary Harold Brown, Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, and General David Jones, Reagans’ Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of staff; were all on the board of GE/NBC, as was former Attorney General William French Smith. William Casey had been chief counsel and original board member of CapCities, and became CIA director in 1981, later CapCities acquired ABC during Reagan’s second term. Casey had also been Securities and Exchange Commissioner under Nixon, and owned much CapCities stock until his death in 1987. He advocated covert operations, and was part of a network of spooks who used American companies, especially mass media, as tools of espionage. GE, owner of NBC, had a contract with the CIA to estimate Soviet military strength-while GE accumulated huge profits as a key player in the military industrial complex. Now, they wouldn’t lie, would they? Ever since the CIA was formed in 1947, publishers and executive management of the media have volunteered their services for the agency- page 114. On page 115, we find some revealing quotes: “One journalist is worth 20 agents” a high-level CIA agent told investigative reporter Carl Bernstein. Former CIA Deputy Director Ray S Cline called the American news media: “the only unfettered espionage agencies in the country.” In exchange for career-enhancing scoops and leaks, reporters alter stories and disseminate propaganda at the request of the CIA. For decades, hundreds of journalists have maintained covert associations with the CIA, and are paid for their services to it. Former CIA director William Colby stated: “Let’s not pick on some poor reporters. Let’s go to the managements. They were witting.” Tom Braden headed the CIA’s Global Propaganda Operation; after leaving it, he worked as a syndicated columnist and co-host of CNN Crossfire. He once wrote an article in the Saturday Evening Post, called: “Why I’m Glad the CIA is Immoral.” Embarrassing revelations by Carl Bernstein in Rolling Stone magazine in 1977 included the following statement: “There is ample evidence that America’s leading publishers allowed themselves and their news organizations to become handmaids to the intelligence services.” The NY Times ran a three- part series on the CIA and media shortly later, disclosing that at various times, the CIA owned or subsidized over fifty newspapers, news services, radio stations, periodicals, book publishers and news entities, most of which were overseas. A CIA official told the Times: “We had at least one newspaper in every foreign capital at any given time.” Page 117. CIA documents display that the US public was targeted by CIA propaganda. A July 13th, 1951 memo stated the CIA’s beginnings of mind control operations: “broad and comprehensive, involving both domestic and overseas activities.” Another CIA document of that time explained that CIA officers met regularly to exchange ideas regarding “the broader aspects of psychology as it pertains to the control of groups or masses rather than the mind of an individual.” The CIA and the press appear to have an attitude in common. That it is okay to deceive the public. Philip Geyelin, a CIA agent who became an editor for the Washington Post, said: “We will get nowhere without first stipulating that while circumstances alter almost any case you can think of, the President has an inherent right- perhaps an obligation in particular concerns-to deceive.” This pretty much explains the deceptions that pervade all over the world in every aspect of society, and I think you can now very clearly perceive how we have all been misled, and some methods that were used. This is helpful to learn how to immunize yourself from false concepts and doctrines, to discern truth from fabrication, and to learn to distrust authority and the establishment, as I have learned to do.
    1
  92. 1
  93. 1
  94.  @seanpetrash7263  Corporate propaganda, which aligns itself with government propaganda, stifles troublesome journalistic enterprise. Their natural enemy is the investigative journalist who serves the public interest, while propaganda works against it. The first government propaganda operation in the United States was initiated by Woodrow Wilson’s administration, and was called the Creel Commission. This was during World War I, and it employed propaganda to turn a pacifist population into a hysterical blood-thirsty citizenship ready to annihilate Germany. It adopted the tactics used by the British Propaganda Ministry, whose mission was to “direct the thought of most of the world.” That was not a new concept, nor a new undertaking, but another facet of the modus operandi of the world’s ruling powers. In the middle of the nineteenth century, skull and bones member Daniel Gilman, first president of John Hopkins University and of the Carnegie Institute, put into motion in America an educational revolution that subverted the entire education system, targeting it towards their goal of a new world order. He also was instrumental in founding the General Education Board, later to be called the Rockefeller Foundation. Gilman was the one who initiated the education system’s philosophy as we know it to be in today’s United States. He adopted the Prussian three tier school system, which is constructed as follows: One half of one percent of the population is taught to think, and they are the policy makers, who come from upper-crust families, accustomed to wealth and privilege, except for a few excelling underclass students who are indoctrinated into the ruler’s mindsets, and who are “bought.” Five and a half percent of the population go to universities where they are taught to partially think, but not completely. They become the doctors, lawyers, engineers, architects, etc.. The remaining lower ninety-four percent learn harmony, obedience, how to follow orders, freedom from stressful thinking, and other attitudes for the masses to conform to, so as to render them unable to resist. I have a question. What would result if one of the lower ninety-four percent learned to think independently and helped distribute the real knowledge freely? One of my favorite authors, Noam Chomsky, who is another angry American who speaks truth regarding United States’ evils, describes in his short book “Media Control” the character of this country’s ruling powers very sarcastically. A man after my own heart. Basically, people get into positions where they have authority to make decisions by serving people with the real power, those who own society. If members of the specialized class acquiesce to serving those interests, they can be part of the executive group. That is achieved by instilling in them the beliefs and doctrines that serve private power, deeply indoctrinating them into the values and interests of those powers, and the state-corporate nexus that represents it. The following quote is from “The Dance of Deception” by Harriet Lerner Phd. “It is good to remind ourselves that those who get high titles and acclaim are not the best and brightest. They have simply been best at being able to unquestioningly follow other’s footsteps, have tickled ears, have been bought. They have been most compromising in bed, have not protested injustices, have turned a blind eye, have shown to be most servile, and to be the ones most willing to relinquish principles in favor of money, fame, and prestige.” End Quote. The best way to undermine hierarchies is to expose them, to show that the emperor has no clothes, he will then not only be embarrassed but also be deposed by his “subjects.” The rest of the “bewildered herd” have to be distracted. As a democratic state, you cannot use brute force to keep the masses in line, so you employ the techniques of propaganda.
    1
  95.  @seanpetrash7263  The media only tells the public what the powers want them to know or think, using information management. This includes withholding of information, disseminating misinformation (lies), and misdirecting people so that none can comprehend the reality of the world events and the forces that make them happen. This is a major player in war against humanity. The information war was made more effective by the Rockefeller Foundation in the 1930s, when it initiated secret psychological “war” projects whose purpose was to shape public opinion. According to Christopher Simpson, author of “Science of Coercion”: “…a tight circle of men and women who shared several important conceptions of mass research. They regarded mass communication as a tool for social management, and as a weapon in social conflict, and they expressed common assumptions concerning the usefulness of quantitative research - particularly experimental and quasi-experimental effects research, opinion surveys, and quantitative content analysis as a means of illuminating what communication “is” and improving its application to social management.” As this was being implemented and working in overdrive, the Office of Strategic Services and the Office of War Information recruited the “best and brightest” from American intelligentsia into secret “intelligence,” and after training, were placed into powerful positions of mass media, politics, and universities. In the 1950s, the CIA and the American mass media began to be interlocked, the agency feeding information to journalists in exchange for their own intelligence developed at home and abroad. Many American journalists currently work for the CIA. That is the explanation for the “fake news” in the media. Intentional fake news is very real, and manipulatively deceptive. Another strategy used by the large public relations corporations and the government is the use of surveys in polling. By slanting questions and using outright deception regarding results in service to whoever is paying them, the public is often misled as to what the rest of the population thinks. Under the impression that one is alone in his attitude of perception, one will not voice opinion nor organize to further one’s cause. To illustrate one way this is engaged, ask how many times the media has directly addressed the exceedingly important issues of poverty, human rights, abuses, media control by the elite, racism, or the like; and given novel results that speak to the poor having the backing of the people in a substantive way. Any results that are denying help to the poor, I guarantee you, are either the result of hateful and mean-spirited propaganda and indoctrination favoring the pro-rich elite, or are deceptively misleading as to the authentic hearts of the people. The political struggle of black Americans for social justice, for example, has been successfully redirected by the media to “gangsta rap” culture, drugs, and sports, and even towards the American Dream, resisted for many years by black people who perceive the lie. Thus, a powerful and intelligent portion of the populace is kept “in their place” safely by the establishment. White Christian suburban America does not have a clear perception of urban blacks, due to the media. There is no correct representation of poor black culture on television, where they have been shown in programs from “Sanford and Son” to “Movin on Up,” blacks are shown as buffoons, perpetuated by the likes of Eddie Murphy in Hollywood and more for decades. Most suburban people have never stepped foot into a poor urban neighborhood. The television news on every station reports every day an assault, murders, or fires in poor urban neighborhoods. They instill the impression that black people are stupid, lazy, violent, and drug-crazed. The impression is that they live in a decrepit unbearable housing because they are drug addicts, not because of slumlords. If they are on opioids, it is because (the media implies) they want a buzz, not because doctors are prescribing harmful drugs, nor pharmaceuticals for willingly promoting harmful substances.
    1
  96.  @seanpetrash7263  The media ensures that we continue to watch, read, and listen; mostly so that we will buy, but there are also more devious motives. The Americans are in a nation where affluent people are more “equal” than others. Madison Avenue, Wall Street, and Pennsylvania Avenue (advertising, bankers, and the white house) rule in the United States (and the rest of the world that is influenced by it), and reporters serve as public relations agents for corporations and government officials; and in doing so, they hide the reality, leaving most people confused. In “Boxed In” on page 158, Mark Miller states: “When we watch news on television, we come to feel, not only that the world is blowing up, but that it does so for no reason, that its ongoing history is nothing more than a series of eruptions, each without cause or context.” Like 9-11, with three thousand people dying, and we are told that it is because “arabs are jealous of our freedoms.” We are assaulted with all kinds of what appears to be unrelated events with leaders appearing inept, incompetent, and stupid, all ensuring compliance with status quo; with a haphazard and incomprehensible understanding of why they happen. On page 65, Anne Schaef notes in her book “When Society Becomes an Addict”: “keeps us powerless and uncontrollable, no one is more controllable than a confused society. Politicians know this better than anyone, and that is why they use innuendos, veiled references, and out-and-out lies instead of speaking clearly and truthfully.” In July 1989, Walter Karp was published in Harper’s Magazine with this quote: “In the American Republic the fact of oligarchy is the most dreaded knowledge of all, and our news keeps that knowledge from us. By their subjugation of the press, the political powers in America have conferred on themselves the greatest of political blessings-Gyges’ ring of invisibility. And they have left the American people more deeply baffled by their own country’s politics than any people on earth.” On June 12th of that same year, Ben Bagdikian was featured saying this in “The Nation” (a far left magazine): “Monopolistic power dominates many other industries, and most of them enjoy special treatment by the government. But media giants have two enormous advantages: they control the public image of national leaders who, as a result, fear and favor the media magnates political agendas, and they control the information and entertainment that help establish the social, political, and cultural attitudes of increasingly larger populations.” This does more than merely protect the corporate system. It robs the public of a chance to understand the real world.” The United States government, aligned with the media (and church) has employed a powerful weapon known as “psyops”(psychological operations).This was defined by general Williams of the OSS in the world war II era as: The coordination and use of all means, including psychological exploitation, the recognized military actions-which tend to deprive the will of the enemy, or of the support, assistance , or the sympathy of his allies or associates, or of neutrals, or to prevent its acquisition of such support, the assistance, or the sympathy of his allies or associates or of neutrals, or to prevent the acquisition of such support, assistance, or sympathy, or which creates, maintains, or increases the will to victory of their own people or allies; and to acquire, maintain, or to increase the support, assistance, and sympathy of neutrals. The Soviet Union used this description of US psyops in 1980: “Unpardonable methods and ideologies, sabotage, including not just the most flagrant lies, slander, and disinformation but also political blackmail, provocation, and terror.”
    1
  97. 1
  98. 1
  99. 1
  100. 1
  101. 1
  102. 1
  103. 1
  104. 1
  105. 1
  106. 1
  107.  @TheBINIBALL  from my book EXPOSING THE MONEY MACHINE, subtitled TYRANNY TROUGH GOVERNMENT, RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS, AND MEDIA DECEPTION Surely you are aware that the so-called Federal Reserve is not run by the government of the United States. It was set up by Woodrow Wilson in 1913. It is reported that his campaign for office was funded by bankers. I have also found much evidence that he was a racial bigot. I will quote a statement he made in 1919: “I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is now controlled by its system of credit. We are no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.” Now here is a quote from Josiah Stamp, who lived from 1880 to 1941: “If you want to remain slaves of the bankers and pay for the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create money and control the nation’s credit.” Now for another quote from Solomon, wisest king of Israel: (Proverbs 22:7 KJV) The rich ruleth over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender. Congressman Louis McFadden brought charges of conspiracy, unlawful conversion, fraud, and treason to the governance of the Federal Reserve Board on May 23, 1933. You may also want to research his comments in a speech to congress as recorded in the Federal Reserve Corporation Remarks to Congress in 1934. Before the time that he was assassinated, he also wrote the following: “A world banking system was being set up here. A super-state controlled by international bankers, acting together to enslave the world for their own pleasure. The fed has usurped the government.” You may think that: Yes, it looks like the bankers control the economic system, but that doesn’t mean that they are evil, or that they want to control everything. WAKE UP!!! There is much more. First, let me identify the family “trees” of the illuminati by their names:
    1
  108. 1
  109. 1
  110. 1
  111. 1
  112. 1