Comments by "Clown Life" (@Clownlife432) on "Kombat Capital" channel.

Dana is absolutely right about that. Look at the nba and how guys sit out games. Players have made careers at this point of sitting out and not playing. That doesn’t mean ufc fighters should or shouldn’t get paid more. There is however a loss of hunger as players get paid more.
5
The federalist society judges aren’t pro corporate, they’re pro constitution and pro freedom. That means the right to enter into contracts of your own choosing. Quite a miss characterization.
4
@ “maybe so”. That negates the prior point. Further, how do you know Dana does or doesn’t deserve that amount of money? Do you know their financials? The reason this is an important question is that Dana took this over as CEO when it was essentially bankrupt and under his watch it has become what it has. The only way Dana wouldn’t deserve that money would be that if you could find someone else to create the same, brand, image, and business that costs less. Do you think you could pay a CEO less to run the ufc and do a better job? No one ever asks that question and it’s quite important.
2
@nicholasvallas9802 how do you know that? How is that an easy question? Are you a high performing corporate individual? I work directly for high ranking CEOs, and I can tell you the level of work they do, and the quality is insane. I find it unlikely that they could pay someone less to do as good a job or better. The reasoning is quite simple, if they would they could. Much the same way Dana does with fighters.
2
You do realize that they/them is being peddled to make you fundamentally reject reality so you’ll be more inclined to absorb any other psychological operation?
1
@ that being said there should be laws that protect an individual that are in alignment with our constitution and natural law. Non-compete clauses, the right to sue, those are not rules of a free society just like one can not sell themselves into slavery.
1