Comments by "Clown Life" (@Clownlife432) on "TheQuartering"
channel.
-
503
-
314
-
299
-
296
-
145
-
135
-
113
-
53
-
52
-
31
-
29
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
18
-
16
-
14
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
If you watched Matt Walsh’s comments about video games, you would see he is 100% on target. He said they are fine in moderation, but with children, volume, and the level of graphic content matters. There is nothing wrong in that statement. Video games and violent content in general do desensitize us to violence. Does that mean everyone becomes a school shooter? No, of course not. But is it good. It’s probably not great, but can be enjoyed in moderation. Considering 2/3 people in this country are overweight or obese, the volume component is an even broader issue. Kids miss nothing by not playing video games. But they potentially pay a lot of costs. You can’t buy your health back once it’s gone. You also can’t buy back your mental health when you can’t function or sit in a sit without a virtual pacifier. Do you think that there is a link between the number of young kids getting diagnosed with adhd and the fact that they get put on screens like pacifiers. Further, more adults are having cognitive issues. I suspect in the future they will discover that the overuse of screen based entertainment is melting peoples brains. Tik tok is the final example of that. Books to documentaries, to YouTube videos, to 10 second flashes. We’ve become monkeys pulling levers for pellets. Games do have some pros. You can develop skill set development for handling external items by remote control, some of the story lines are good, you can bond with friends. But Matt’s argument holds, gratuitous amounts of violence for young kids viewing isn’t good, and a high volume also not good. Wasted video Jeremy. Now comment on something I want to hear you talk about. I want to hear you talk about Steven Crowders leaked footage of how he treats his wife. You already waded into this one. Finish the job, don’t be squimish now that Steven is seen in a bad light.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Tim brought this on himself. First, he tried to obfuscate responsibility about the story becuase you weren’t there. Second, he had her on twice, lending her credibility. It was duty, as someone trying to propagate truth to address the issue. He could have merely said, controversial things are happening now with a figure who was on the show, and I currently do not know what is real. But we will have people look into it. Then come back after a period of time, with whatever you find, even if it’s nothing. But you can not call yourself a seeker of truth, and then run away with after someone you lended a platform to is involved in a scandal. That’s why people are upset with him. It’s almost like he thought to admit he was fooled by her, would make him a total failure. I don’t think that was the case, but why not just address it. He went off the edge. It kind of seems like he has such a large platform now, that he doesn’t think he should address his audience anymore, which from my understanding is the point of super chats. I think if your audience is ants to see something about a guest you had on, you should address it. He acted like he had no idea who she was, and that she was only relevant because people in the chat were talking about it. That’s a total distortion of facts. The reason she was relevant to people in his chats is because she was on his show. The whole thing turned me off from him. Not being able to admit you were wrong, and address an issue is a huge character flaw.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@brandonjohnson191 PV is doing investigative journalism. My point was Steven was acting under the guise of friendship for that call. That was wrong. If I have known you for over ten years, you call me up, and we talk about our wives, and kids. Then you decide to set me up, I’d be pissed. Steven did exactly that, he recorded a call knowing he would use
It in public, so he made sure edit himself. He didn’t even catch Jeremy on anything he wouldn’t have said anyways. Using the term a wage slave amongst a friend can just be considered tongue in cheek. These are well paid pundits. Steven makes it out as if they are taking advantage of child coal miners. Steven misused his friends trust. Everyone that knows him now will second guess how much they can trust him. The quartering already said that’s in the back of his mind now. Mark Dice told Steven to lose his number. You don’t do that to friends. Did you watch Jermeys response, Matt Walsh’s, and Lauren Chen’s. No one thinks he is right for recording this call. I understand his position about the contract, but in the end, that’s
Not how you solve an issue you have had with a friend for ten years.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Wrong move. The goal is for them to bend to our will. With companies, no permanent friends, and no permanent enemies. The left does this well, and we must adopt it. If you meet our demands, we return at full strength. Outside of that they have no incentive to change. Further, no other company has an incentive to apologize in the future. Also, we should free up are ability to focus on other brands, which means we need to finish with one first. People do not have unlimited attention. Finally, there are not a lot of conservative leaning companies out there, if bud denounces trans, that makes them less woke then all the other major beer brands, and we should go to them. Let’s not lose the forest for the trees. We want to win, not feel righteous. If we start teaching companies one by one where we can to get out of culture war issues we can have a much bigger effect then just stopping forever with one company. Let’s win.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Two things:
This would be worthwhile if he changes twitters policies around banning, shadow banning, and demonetization. For someone like crowder, this would be huge, because he would know his content wouldn’t be demonetized and he has a huge audience.
I’m a paying member for ad free YouTube. I hate ads, and I hate the silencing of other opinion. I don’t use social media. I only have YouTube, and watch it, mostly for news, sports highlights, and a lot of educational content. Whatever app allows the most free expression, and has ad free, I’m in.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Please look up Thomas Sowells writings about Jews in foreign lands. In general, human beings are tribal, and when things aren’t going well, typically leaders need scape goats. Enter the Jews, who are typically a minority in most places, meaning there a few of them and the mass can target them. They have also typically been successful at merging into other societies, and building wealth in those societies, because of their culture around education, and work ethic. Because they are low in number, and have tended to perform well, they have made great scape goats in the past. In order to other them, they have historically been othered as a race even though they could be any nationality or race. This has been fairly easy for leaders to do because of how historically tight their communities were, and that they marched to the beat of their own drum any where they go. Typical human behavior, point something out different, and attack.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The left:
sexual revolution, free the nipple, free love, hook up culture, showing my body is empowerment, sex work is work, no one should have a problem with a woman “marketing” herself on only fans.
Also, how dare you look at us, or even pay us for looking good, even though we wanted to. How dare you (Greta voice).
The left got what they wanted and now they don’t want it but still kind of want it. They only don’t want when it ruins things we like.
I am not for objectifying women in ads, be I see I wouldn’t want a female relative of mine to do it.
Jeremy, you’re wrong. Hot chick with a gun is whatever. A hot chick that knows how to handle it is next level attractive.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I don’t see a problem with this. YouTube has the best video player, has a huge content base, and you should pay for products you use. If you believe in capitalism, then you pay for service. YouTube isn’t a charity. Pay for premium or watch the ads. It seems fair to me.
Adblocking is nothing like password sharing. But if Netflix wants to do that, sure, it’s their company. If more people tune out it’s fine. But the reason this is nothing like password sharing is that if you don’t allow ads to run or you don’t pay for premium, you just want content for free. That’s all you’re saying.
7:52 Jeremy, it’s not just about you selling coffee, or hats, or $5 subscriptions. Doesn’t YouTube get to make any money for hosting you, driving people to you, housing all your videos on clouds and servers, having the most advanced video features?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1