Comments by "Craxin01" (@Craxin01) on "Putting Harriet Tubman On The $20 Is 'Racist' u0026 'Sexist'" video.

  1. The entire reason we're putting Harriet Tubman on the $20 bill is because people are demanding we have a woman on the bill.  Not because they want someone who wasn't either a president or founding father, not because they think Andrew Jackson committed atrocities (most people who were arguing for a change didn't know about Jackson's atrocities), it's because our currency is a sausage fest.  They want a woman on a bill because vagina.  Now, I'm actually not opposed to having her on a bill.  But I'm not under illusion that it's for anything but sexist reasons.  Once they get one woman on, there are still 5 bills with males on them.  They'll soon ask for two more women.  They'll come up with a lot of horse-shit reasons why one male needs to go (probably Grant next, then Hamilton), suggest some women with a very tangential link to American history, and then that'll be it, right?  Fuck no, the SJWs who are pushing this aren't going to be happy unless all the bills and coins are female.  I wouldn't have made the change, because I don't fucking pander to idiots.  Who really looks at the bills and understands who these men are?  Maybe Washington, Lincoln, and Franklin.  Most people can't say anything about Jackson, Hamilton, or Grant.  I think if we need anything it's to honor two of the men on the bills (Washington and Franklin), but taking all people off the bills.  These men didn't want people on the bills because they felt that was what European empires did, and that wasn't was America was going to be.  A nation of laws and not of men.  So, lets go with something we can all appreciate, landmarks or historical settings on our bills.
    2