Comments by "Janie Swanson" (@janieswanson2549) on "VICE"
channel.
-
10
-
6
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@RJGMorris "It's takes more plants to feed over 50 billion land animals than it does to feed 8 billion humans"
And livestock feed is waste product from industry and grass.
The fields that grow the grass usually can't grow much else.
I guess you would rather we just dump all of that waste into thousands of dumps so the gas buildup is worse than a few cow farts.
"How do you we justify needlessly killing a sentient being with the capacity to suffer and who does not want to die?"
Because we like entertainment, convenience, and food.
"But you will still be robbing them of there life needlessly and how do we justify that."
Because we like entertainment, convenience, and food.
"I'm sure if I killed someone in there sleep you would not be okay with it because it was painless."
their*
someone - an unknown or unspecified person; some person.
Livestock aren't a person.
You're conflating humans with animals to appeal to emotions.
"r@pe"
Another appeal to emotions.
You're using words that only apply to humans.
Livestock breed or are bred.
"Domesticated animals are not going to overpopulate."
Of course they won't because humans will continue to control their breeding instead of the wannabe vegan alternative of genocide.
"We are artificially breading them into existence so if we stop breading them there numbers will go down not up."
Are you okay?
I know I have told you in the past to get a parent to help you.
breading - a coating of breadcrumbs, typically on fried food.
How does a coating of breadcrumbs make livestock exist?
"Human and non human animal suffering are not mutually exclusive, you can care about them both."
You can. And you can stop conflating the two while using appeals to emotions, lies, and hypocrisy.
Why do you use animal products needlessly for entertainment while whining about how others use animal products?
I know you won't answer this question directly and truthfully, I just want anyone reading to see your moral hypocrisy.
I predict you will ignore the question, go into denial, ask me which animal products proving you don't do your own research, and/or use a doctrine as justification for using animal products needlessly for entertainment.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1