Comments by "Fred Bloggs" (@fredbloggs5902) on "Dr. John Campbell" channel.

  1. They will deliberately corrupt the trial just like they did with hcq.
    1
  2. Mainly modesty concerns
    1
  3.  @Noclaf555  It’s historical fact, but you’re too ignorant to know, better stick to gaming.
    1
  4. I agree, there’s been virtually no deaths.
    1
  5. Discussing it gets your YouTube channel deleted.
    1
  6. In winter at high latitudes you still won’t get enough.
    1
  7.  @vthomas375  you can’t get 4,000 IU from diet, go do the calculation for mushrooms and you’ll see for yourself.
    1
  8.  @LH85242  No the group is only more vulnerable once a disease has mutated to their vulnerability, in all others ways they are less vulnerable. It’s a probability that has nothing to do with transmission to humans. I didn’t say humans didn’t catch animal diseases, obviously they do, but that’s more associated with humans living in close proximity which is an entirely different problem.
    1
  9.  @michelbisson6645  Those are deaths per MILLION NOT per hundred
    1
  10. 1912
    1
  11. Campbell openly states that at the start of the video.
    1
  12. 1) The risk of accidental IV is low. 2) They might have given him saline.
    1
  13. Warning: Overdosing on vitamin A is highly toxic.
    1
  14. The U.K. study of hcq massively overdosed the patients leading to the possible deaths of 42 people, because the guy in charge confused (?) the dosage with a completely different pharmaceutical.
    1
  15. There are 1,000 mcg (microgrammes) in 1 mg (milligram).
    1
  16. I don’t have one, what’s the answer?
    1
  17. Guess again, the BBC is even further left than the Guardian.
    1
  18.  @markmirche7760  I agree, but the fact remains that the BBC is extreme Globalist Marxist while the U.K. government is currently around where Blair was when he was in power.
    1
  19. I doubt the data exists yet
    1
  20.  @rpmillam  in Israel 50% of the population have JUST received their 2nd shot, it’s simply too soon to know the resulting efficacy, any claims would be speculative.
    1
  21. 1) Stop shouting 2) Your comment is total word salad with no clear meaning, please express yourself more clearly
    1
  22. Those numbers were gibberish. The vocal descriptions did not match the printed numbers. Totally meaningless
    1
  23. Source?
    1
  24. From general feedback here, they are likely to refuse to aspirate. Many don’t even know how because it’s no longer in their training.
    1
  25. Denmark
    1
  26. I guess you’ll have to judge for yourself based on the evidence presented.
    1
  27. It should be mentioned that some medical conditions (eg. Sarcoidosis) make taking large quantities of vitamin D dangerous to your health. If you have a health issue you should consult your doctor before exceeding 2,000 IU/day.
    1
  28. Putting on a seatbelt doesn’t have a 1 in 50,000 chance of instantly ending you - that’s the official U.K. figure for the vaccine. . .
    1
  29. Nope, it was because Obama banned all such experiments in the US that Fauci funded China.
    1
  30. Sold out
    1
  31. The UK committed contractually to paying for the treatments, the EU delayed committing. How is that the fault of the UK?
    1
  32.  @anttilindberg8679  source?
    1
  33.  @anttilindberg8679  1) It’s Ursula von der Leyen 2) She did not say that, she said that the US and UK have less transparent export controls than the EU. 3) She made no statements about actual exports other than to say Pfizer are following their contractual agreements and AZ possibly less so.
    1
  34.  @anttilindberg8679  the EU has behaved appallingly to the UK over their democratic decision to leave the EU. The EU can get f...ed as far as I’m concerned. And so can you and your imbecilic opinions.
    1
  35.  @steveoxocube  what part of ‘avoided if possible’ did you not understand.
    1
  36.  @steveoxocube  General anaesthesia has been banned from general use by dentists in the U.K. for decades, but keep going, your ignorance is hilarious.
    1
  37.  @steveoxocube  I’ve told you it’s now avoided whenever possible. You are beyond reason. The risks have been known for decades. Blocked.
    1
  38. Why are you an anti-vax bot?
    1
  39. Yet strangely you are unable to cite these studies 🤔
    1
  40. It’s cheap and safe, it’s easier just to take it than worry about it.
    1
  41. It’s called democracy, if you don’t like it then vote in somebody else or move.
    1
  42. How would you know? 🤣
    1
  43.  @truth.speaker  there’s not much point producing a video to tell people we don’t know.
    1
  44.  @truth.speaker  - if you have a source for the herd immunity level for COVID you’re welcome to cite it.
    1
  45. The obvious problem is that the money involved means that the ‘representatives’ can be compromised (as arguably we’ve seen already with covid).
    1
  46. By definition, N95 masks only filter 95% of particles. Viruses being the smallest will still get through.
    1
  47.  @edropper2732  Ok, out of curiosity, how were we supposed to react to your self professed laziness?
    1
  48. Not true, there was no increase of those during Covid.
    1
  49. To be fair, we don’t know if there’s a danger with the flu shot.
    1
  50. Such stories were planted by the CCP
    1