Comments by "Fred Bloggs" (@fredbloggs5902) on "Inadvertant intravenous injections" video.

  1. I politely requested them to aspirate and they refused, saying I could have it without or not have it at all.
    11
  2. It’s rare, but it DOES happen.
    5
  3. Please provide your evidence that he’s lying. Aspiration used to be standard practice, the dangers are well documented.
    4
  4. You don’t need to hit a large blood vessel, a small vein is perfectly capable of causing the problem.
    3
  5. Wow! You’re everywhere, maybe you can explain why Denmark now insist on aspiration?
    3
  6. You just won’t give up will you. The entire country of Denmark now insist on aspiration- why aren’t you mentioning that fact that’s so inconvenient to your narrative?
    3
  7. Yes, I’ve noticed in several videos that the injection has been given much too low on the arm.
    2
  8. He’s been raising the issue for the past year. This video is different because there’s now a study proving the danger.
    2
  9. Then they should use syringes that can. Denmark seem to have managed.
    2
  10. He’s simply reporting from a new study. The study is public information available to anyone interested. How is his reporting it being a shill?
    2
  11. You welcome to tell us your ‘extremely important medical discovery’. If it’s rubbish I’m sure someone here will tell you.
    2
  12. It only wastes the jab if they hit a vein. Hitting a vein is provenly dangerous. Their argument is ridiculous.
    2
  13. Wow! He’s not a very nice chap!
    2
  14. There are small veins throughout the deltoid muscle, pretending otherwise is delusional.
    2
  15.  @walterego6584  The dangers of accidental IVs are well documented and have been known for decades, go look for yourself.
    2
  16. Please explain further
    2
  17. Injecting air could have killed you with what is called an ‘air embolism’. You must report him to the authorities immediately.
    2
  18. Glutes have a higher risk of IV and nerve damage.
    2
  19. The risk is low. The point is that by aspirating the risk can be removed entirely.
    2
  20.  @bidentity69  Ok, thanks for that. If we assume from laziness that a human is around 3,000 times the mass of a mouse then a 30 mcg dose in a human would be equivalent to 0.01 mcg in a mouse. So if the mouse was given 5 mcg then the dose was the equivalent of 500x larger than the dose used in humans? So it looks like your calculation is correct. I’m no expert. Maybe they use relatively larger doses in mice to allow for humans living much longer and the that death in the mouse could indicate a potential long-term partial disability in the human?
    2
  21. The risk is low.
    1
  22. Nonsense
    1
  23. All the main manufacturers specify both the dosage and IM. Have Thailand produced their own vaccine?
    1
  24. Yes
    1
  25. Sure, if you don’t die first.
    1
  26.  @jonhylow1239  Your delusions are dangerous, I suggest you seek professional psychiatric counselling immediately.
    1
  27.  @jonhylow1239  Dude, you’re talking about digging imaginary foreign bodies out of your eyes with your finger nails! You need professional help before you hurt yourself, it’s not something I can help you with.
    1
  28.  @jonhylow1239  1) Get help 2) You’re blocked
    1
  29. Probably saline so there’s no danger.
    1
  30. The dangers of accidental IV instead of IM have been known for decades.
    1
  31. 1) The risk of accidental IV is low. 2) They might have given him saline.
    1
  32. From general feedback here, they are likely to refuse to aspirate. Many don’t even know how because it’s no longer in their training.
    1
  33. Denmark
    1
  34. The standard training protocol for deltoid IM was changed around 2010.
    1
  35. No, the training was changed around 2010. They’re now told it isn’t necessary for deltoid IM.
    1
  36. Grow up
    1
  37. They aren’t taught it these days
    1
  38. Yes
    1
  39. Not true, it depends how long ago they were trained. Most flatly refuse to aspirate.
    1
  40.  @marcinwaach7639  You claimed that nurses don’t have an issue. That claim is false. Why are you lying?
    1
  41. Campbell isn’t saying the problem happens all the time, but the risk exists and is well documented, pretending otherwise is delusional. The entire country of Denmark consider the risk to be enough for them to have changed national policy and they now require aspiration to be performed for all covid vaccinations. If you bothered to read the comments you’d see multiple people reporting bleeding after their vaccination... ...but no, you’re not interested in facts, only grandstanding and virtue signalling.
    1
  42.  @RalphsDeadBunny2  They should be scared, not aspirating is killing people.
    1
  43. If you read the comments, many have tried and been refused (including myself).
    1
  44. 1) The risk is low 2) He may have been given saline
    1
  45. The risk is low.
    1
  46. Except all he’s done is told people how many comments you’ve posted, and appears to have done so only once. How is that harassment? And why are you posting the same thing over and over again?
    1
  47. The 30 minutes observation is to check for anaphylaxis. Myocarditis takes longer.
    1
  48. Covid vaccines are all supposed to be IM. Some injections are IV, but not these.
    1
  49. The training changed around 2010.
    1
  50. The training was changed around 2010.
    1
  51. To be fair the staff are just following their training, it seems to have changed around ten years ago, probably to save money!
    1
  52. Grow up
    1
  53. They aren’t numerous, they’re rare, they cause myocarditis as explained in the video.
    1
  54. Tell that to Denmark... ...the entire country is wrong according to you.
    1
  55.  @peterking5016  Yes they are, get a life.
    1
  56. Yes, the training was changed around 2010.
    1
  57.  @nicolebacon3230  Plus in the setting of a mass public vaccination program there are probably privacy/modesty issues.
    1
  58. The manufacturers specify IM.
    1
  59. You can ask, they’ll probably refuse, many won’t even know what it is.
    1
  60. Wow! You’re everywhere, maybe you can explain why Denmark now insist on aspiration?
    1
  61. That’s a separate issue
    1
  62. The training seems to have changed around 2010. The excuse given is that the injection is quicker and less painful. They claim that accidental IVs are rare, but that’s not very helpful when you end up dead.
    1
  63. Maybe they’re more likely to get accidental IVs?
    1
  64. That’s a separate issue.
    1
  65. That just the terminology, they use real mice.
    1
  66. Maybe they’re at a higher risk of accidental IVs?
    1
  67. Humans are given 0.5ml. The mice were given 0.005ml which is 1/100th as much. The confusion is that the mice were given 50 microlitres. There are 1,000 microlitres in a millilitre.
    1
  68.  @bidentity69  Please provide a source for your claim that the dose in humans is 30 micrograms.
    1
  69. Wow! You’re everywhere, maybe you can explain why Denmark now insist on aspiration?
    1
  70. The mice were given a dosage proportional to their size, but keep going you’re giving us all a laugh.
    1
  71. Raising perfectly valid concerns isn’t being irresponsible. Keeping quiet is.
    1
  72. They were following their training.
    1
  73. Yes, aspiration for deltoid IM is mostly no longer practiced in the US.
    1
  74.  @debrastrayer8600  The risk of accidental IV is low, but nobody knows what the numbers are, so who knows? Given that the danger is known, it seems sensible to prevent it.
    1
  75. Yes, it doesn’t happen often and it’s better than killing people.
    1
  76. It’s no longer in the training.
    1
  77. That raises privacy/modesty issues for mass vaccination programs, and the risk still exists anyway.
    1
  78. Not true, correct aspiration for IMs used to be in the standard training. It was removed around ten years ago. This is a training issue, not a quality issue.
    1
  79. Not true, the study indicates accidental IVs may be responsible for the known occurrences of myocarditis. Other side effects could be more general and not associated with IVs.
    1
  80.  @dancroitoru364  What part of ‘may be responsible’ do you not understand?
    1
  81.  @dancroitoru364  1) I have assumed nothing. 2) I’m not interested in anything else you have to say. 3) You’re blocked.
    1
  82. No, that’s a separate issue.
    1
  83. The dangers of accidental IV are well documented and been known for decades. The training was changed around 2010 so the injection would be quicker and less painful (but more dangerous), go look for yourself.
    1
  84. What year were you trained to aspirate?
    1
  85. Go read an article on the structure of the heart before you embarrass yourself any further.
    1
  86. He’s just publicising a recent study and explaining the risks. Perhaps you can tell us why you are so opposed to aspiration?
    1
  87.  @Korwin_Mikke23  The fact remains that this video is useful. Many people will be getting the jab regardless of whether it actually works or not, and if this video helps them reduce the risk of a life threatening condition then that is a good thing. The issues you raise might be correct, but they’re not relevant to this video. Get a life.
    1
  88. Please provide a source for your claim
    1
  89. Denmark now requires all covid jabs to be aspirated. Go look for yourself, the policy change is public information.
    1
  90. Instead of the vaccine slowly permeating the deltoid muscle, it gets immediately taken directly to the heart.
    1
  91. The flu vaccine works differently, so probably not, but who knows?
    1
  92. Maybe young males are more prone to accidental IVs?
    1