Comments by "Fred Bloggs" (@fredbloggs5902) on "" video.

  1. Whenever I get unwanted email, I mark it as ‘junk’, then I never see any further emails from them. Problem solved. Similarly, unwanted attention on social media can be blocked. Being ‘harassed’ is largely subjective and easily remedied.
    47
  2. All emails are permanently archived and easily obtainable by court order. I guess we’ll find out eventually.
    6
  3. Nobody cares
    5
  4. Non renewal of contract isn’t unfair dismissal. And a criminal trial isn’t the correct venue. If he thought he had a claim, industrial tribunals are available.
    4
  5. I agree, but I’m not sure that justifies what the police appear to have been doing.
    3
  6.  @ConstantiaVerted  How would he know? There’s no feedback to the sender if an email is put in the junk folder. Oh wait... could they be lying?
    3
  7. Or no money. Or a misguided belief in their own abilities. Or love the grandstanding and attention.
    3
  8. While I agree they appear to be ‘gunning for him’. The raid was allegedly for a terrorist threat and was therefore covered under terrorism legislation. The rules covering the police under those circumstances are very different.
    2
  9. What happened to the 5,000 ?
    2
  10. Simon very obviously hasn’t claimed it was. His claim that it should be is correct.
    2
  11.  @HistoryDebunkedsimonwebb  I believe this was a central plot point in a Jeffrey Archer story.
    2
  12.  @jasoncdebussy  That word doesn’t mean what you think it means 🤣
    1
  13.  @jasoncdebussy  you’re the one using the wrong word. Pointing out biased reporting isn’t being naive. It might be your favourite word but you don’t need to use is quite so often.
    1