Comments by "" (@orboakin8074) on "The Future of Ideology." video.

  1. 202
  2. 2
  3. 2
  4. 1
  5.  @colinfrederick2603  Saying starting a "family=women's interest" is not sexist despite what current year progressive culture asserts. By that logic, you might as well say "men=providers and protectors" is misandrist. Not all men and women want to be, or should be, parents but how exactly is me pointing out a general trend and fact regarding most women sexist exactly? Don't women generally tend to have more nurturing and motherly instincts? Doesn't this also reflect in their choices of careers which focus more on people than things, unlike men? Your point about men needing to take part in raising of kids is also valid and I agree. I just don't agree that men should work less and women spend less time away from their kids because whether either of us likes it or not, the optimal way to raise a family is with a more involved mother being present for the child's formative years and a father being available but ensuring resources and means are provided. That's why even career women take time off or refuse higher demanding career advances because it cuts into their time with their children. As to my point that having kids later is causally linked to mental health issues, I am referring to the proven fact that the older a woman gets (usually past 25) the greater the difficulty in having successful pregnancies and the increased risk of cognitive issues developing in the baby like down syndrome. This is due to her eggs not being as viable and chromosomal issues developing. It also happens with males and sperm but ours is delayed because biologically, we are more viral for a longer period than women. Regarding your "Pareto Optimal setup" and build back better, what makes you so sure that will work, especially when the USA already has a lot welfare funding, family funding, nd increased public spending that has not really solved any of their intended problems that reducing poverty, reducing illiteracy and has even contributed to further destabilization of family units, especially black communities like mine? As for your mentioning of WW2, that was an extreme situation so it made sense to involve women in the war economy. But do you really think all women wanted to continue with that state of affairs? war, possible forced conscriptions, rationing? Finally, where am I saying women should be trapped in the home? No one is saying that. But more so, how is that notion different from you demonising women at home while glorifying women only working behind cubicles and nothing else?
    1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1