Comments by "" (@orboakin8074) on "World History" channel.

  1. The book burnings were absolutely deplorable. But i akso give you massive credit for being objective and describing what sort of books tgey burned i.e. marxist, communist, radical leftist, Christian, Jewish books. Many folks just pretend that all the books were without flaw but at least you point out how some of them were sketchy while others weren't. This is another example of how objective you are, like the previous video you did about the concentration camp survivor who ended an innocent German family. History should be objective and cover all sides.
    7
  2. @stevejette2329  yes, it is not comparable but where exactly was I saying both were comparable? Objectivity means covering all sides, not equating all sides😕
    2
  3. @warrenstrugatch5662  that's nice. Now please tell me how my comment was breaking this German law😕
    1
  4.  @FrogLegs313  you are right on that.
    1
  5.  @warrenstrugatch5662  thanks. Now, can you tell me how my comment breaks German law?
    1
  6. Yes, some of the books they burned were, indeed valuable and their destruction is sad. That being said, most of them were communist and radical leftist drivel, especially those centered on gender identity (basically the same stuff we see from the radical left of today that upsets moderate folks of the LGBT)
    1