Comments by "" (@orboakin8074) on "Wall Street Millennial"
channel.
-
8
-
4
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@reggie69. Friend, it's funny after reading all this. First, you say natural gas and nuclear are not cheap or efficient compared to solar and wind? How, exactly? In terms of initial costs both are expensive but very cheap in terms of energy production, distribution, and maintenance compared to solar and wind or coal and they yield more return on investment. Not to mention the reduced environmental impact both have since nuclear waste is easily stored and not in high amounts and natural gas usage and fracking leads to less dependence on heavier and dirtiest hydrocarbons like crude oil. The inputs used in creating natural gas plants and nuclear reactors is also more easily recyclable and less environmentally harmful compared to the mining and pollution used to gather rare earth minerals for batteries and solar panels and the high amount of fuel burned to transport, manufacture, and maintain them Again, compared to wind and solar which affect animals and geographic areas overtime and are also less efficient in terms of maintenance, transportation, distribution, and also due to geographic and climate location issues that limit them. Can you put a solar farm in Alaska or a wind farm in the Congo with thick jungles and Mountain ranges?
Another strange thing you mention is how despite India and China being the current highest emitters compared to the west, it is still the fault of the west because both countries produce stuff for the west? This is really strange🤔 So by this logic, Russia and Ukraine are not the highest green house gas emitters even though they are the largest food producers and exporters on earth. It is actually us in Africa because we import so much grain and fertilizer from them😕 Very strange arguments all around.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1