Comments by "FishE" (@fishe9863) on "Shooting Cats: Australia's War On Feral Cats" video.
-
24
-
18
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@jadkiss827 yes, I agree that TNR is a blessing in certain areas. But Australia's ecosystem is unique, it hasn't touched any other continent besides Antarctica since Gondwana started to break apart (Gondwana was after Pangea) North America, South America, Asia, Africa, all those major continents had cats. But Australia never has.
Another thing with the hunting, a lot of cat owners actually don't know how often their cats actually kill things, as they won't always being things home. Cats will still kill, as long as they are physically able to. Heck, I once saw a cat with a neurological disorder flop around trying to chase a squirrel (I'll admit it was cute) but point is, cats will still kill.
Disease is also a major factor, although admittedly strays also have the same problem with diseases. Two major ones in Australia are Sarcocystis and Toxoplasmosis
Yes I do think TNR is a good solution, but it doesn't work over THOUSANDS of kilometers of rough terrain. I do believe it's actually better to use TNR practices in urban and suburban areas because it gets rid of the risk of affecting non-targeted species. But out on farmlands and forests, it's far easier, humane, less time consuming and less costly to simply hunt the cat.
Sorry for any spelling errors/grammatical errors, I'm on mobile.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I do like your kind of mindset of trying to help and find different solutions to the situation. The problem is though, is that it won't stop them from killing. Yes, the tnr works like a dream in places. But in this situation there is millions of cats. Irresponsible cat owners may not sterilize their cat and let it out to breed like the European rabbits that once covered Australia (pun intended) yes, it's effective and humane. Yes, it keeps the cat inside it territory so other cats wont move in once it's killed.
But, the cost? The millions of feral cats? The amount the cats will continue to kill? How long and effecient will this be?
Those questions, I simply do not know the answer too. People don't like killing because they don't like it. Poisoning, people don't like because it painfully kills the animal. TNR, keeps the animal alive, but it won't stop it from killing, and spreading it's diseases that are transmittable to humans, livestock. Putting the cats in shelters is too expensive, and feral cats are almost impossible to tame.
1
-
@nicoinformatics the government plans to airbomb poisoned sausages, which I think is completely stupid.
1. poisoning means a slow painful death
2. It could affect non targeted species.
I could see Tnr working in areas that have a larger population of them, and with smaller populations hunting them could work, with frequent monitoring. We could also, make certain areas with food plots with said sterilization. The cats will stick near the food plot because it's free food, why not! Already in areas in Australia they have fenced off areas from the cats. So once gathering a colony of feral cats, close them in. Once closing them in we do whatever the community decides to do with said trapped cats.
If we wait a few years for said trapped cats to die from natural causes, or hunt them. We could then use the cleared area to reintroduce native species in a feral free area.
This way, either solution could work
But like any proposed solution it could be incredibly expensive. The government has already used $3-ish million to the cause in "ineffective ways". Plus, many new sources are starting to doubt how scientific the process they are using.
Now I'm not sure how expensive setting up those special areas that are already established cost overall, but if it's low enough that kind of strategy could work as long as people have the dedication and the money.
1