General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

jim doe
Fox News
comments

Comments by "jim doe" (@jimdoe1694) on "Jeanine Pirro: I'm tired of fighting this nonsense" video.

Now here come all the Trolls and sheep crying about Trump rather than make a comment on topic.
21
@studebakerhoch4397 You think slaveowners were right wing libertarians.
10
@davidcraft4644 Tell that to Studebaker... and just Democrats, no southern label needed.
9
@cellardoor1122 <--- Denies Christ existed, now he postures as an Authority of Christ's Teachings.
8
@davidcraft4644 James Buchanan supported Slavery, Democrat of Pennsylvania; Franklin Pierce, NH; Martin Van Buren, NY; Lewis Cass, Michigan, Stephen Douglas - Illinois
6
@davidcraft4644 Why did the "northern democrats" support the fugitive slave act if they were against slavery? Why were they okay with "popular sovereignty" if they were against slavery? And as the minority to Federalist, Democratic Republicans, Whigs, and other parties in the north well prior to their formation and slavery being abolished prior to their existence.
5
@studebakerhoch4397 Like you need to conserve your meaningless existence and go through life with a hand out and no contribution?
5
@davidcraft4644 Please name ONE Democrat that did not Support the Fugitive Slave Act, or Popular Sovereignty. ONE. And not "I am morally against Slavery but the South has a Right" or "I am morally against killing unborn children but women have the right"
5
@davidcraft4644 Here, I will help you on the FSA James Bradbury of ME, and Isaac Walker of Wisconsin (Born in Virginia), Henry Dodge of Wisconsin.; the first two were single term and replaced Walker was replaced by the DEMOCRATS in Wisconsin because he opposed Slavery. Henry Dodge owned Slaves! 11 Democrats Did not Vote, as good as a yes, including Hannibal Hamlin, he was later Lincoln's running mate.
3
@davidcraft4644 I love it, I need to learn history and you think Northern Democrats supporting Popular Sovereignty and the FSA were not supporting slavery 🤣🤣 The best part is, the policies of the Democrats haven't changed, they just needed more votes.
3
@cellardoor1122 Why can't you get a job?
3
@lordbread2083 Less than 1/2 of American pay taxes or have an honest job, that is correct.
3
@jackderipper2233 Is that it, you are mad because you went to Trump U?
2
Ned Stevens What is a woman?
2
@johnmichaels4172 I love when you jobless degenerates living off the government can't form your own opinions then use your own adjectives and insults that you don't know the meaning. You are jobless, live with your mom, and inferior...but yeah I need to project onto you when I paid for you food and computer and internet and house.
1
@johnmichaels4172 you are so devoid of individualism and have to come comment after 3 weeks; you have such a pointless life.
1
@johnmichaels4172 I bet if you died, no one would care or be impacted negatively.... you are nothing, that is why you are here crying and have no argument. You don't even know who your real dad is. If I was as meaningless as you, I would be a corpse, at least THEN you would have something to contribute to the world, or a conversation.
1
@cellardoor1122 When you eat your own feces, is it easier when you have diarrhea? Is that harder for your mom to clean up but easier to wipe your face?
1
Trump supporters are FILTH <--- can't define woman or get a job, but he sure knows how to criticize a typo
1
@jackderipper2233 You have an education but are jobless and codependent on government to eat, sleep, wipe, so how is that education doing?
1
@cellardoor1122 You are jobless, so how is that education working out for you?
1
@jackderipper2233 Ha, that is cute you think I have to project to someone inferior to me, you are so lame you have to project projection. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
1
Trump supporters are FILTH You live with you mom. Does she participate when you bring little boys home?
1
@studebakerhoch4397 Just as you are, you want to conserve your welfare, food stamps, housing, and no taxes and conserve the ability to go through life with NOTHING to show for it. PS, they were left wing populist for the "people" in case you and your DEMOCRAT education struggle.
1
@davidcraft4644 No, you are romanticizing and labeling to deflect. Founded by Jackson in the South anyone agreeing was just as populist, just as racist, and just as okay with the institution as the Democrats are today where less than 30% of the country pay any income tax. Stephen Douglas was in Illinois and he was "popular sovereignty" i.e. let the majority decide if the minority are less than full citizens.
1
@studebakerhoch4397 <---- too stupid to realize the Democrats have always occupied the left side of the Chamber.
1
@davidcraft4644 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 By your logic you are claiming because ONE did not support Slavery or the Spending Bill called Build Back Better that the Democrats didn't support Slavery or Build Back Better.
1
@fuquboobandpedotrolls Not at all, I don't think you understand my comments.
1
@fuquboobandpedotrolls No, your lack of comprehension doesn't assist; are you really a Democrat but claim to be a Republican simply because you are racist as the Democrats but the Democrats desire to marginalize you to cover up their racism?
1
@willardtomer2058 Do you need an education and literacy lessons? The whole point of the comment is people claiming Democrats were NOT the party of slavery.
1
@davidcraft4644 That is cute, you can't even respond but call facts straw man and false, I guess because there is one Democrat that doesn't support Abortion, Abortion isn't the stance of Democrats. Whomever gave you your education needs to give me my money back. Whatever helps you justify yourself, Democrats have no change in policy since their founding; you will always sacrifice liberty of an individual over collectivism and mob rule.
1
@davidcraft4644 So being okay with an Abortion before 20 weeks so more developed children don't die is the same as being pro life?
1
@davidcraft4644 What law was already on the books prior to 1850? Tolerating slavery to preserve the Union when the very creation of the party was Slavery is pretty ignorant. They did NOT believe in individual rights regardless of the narrative provided although more so than they do today, 100% of the Democrat platform was directed and the preservation of slavery. So you can re-write the narrative anyway you choose to justify the fact that it's sole purpose was slavery.
1
@davidcraft4644 It is cute that you think anyone supports based on their morals and not their own power and ego, particularly in todays society when everything is controlled by the popular vote.
1
@davidcraft4644 Well, coming from you and your infinite genders, inability to define woman, and claims that Democrats were not the party of slavery with some geographical distinction, I think that is a compliment as you clearly don't know what logic means.
1
@davidcraft4644 You probably think Dredd Scott was the wrong Judgment.
1
@davidcraft4644 What logical Fallacy? The Democrat Party Platform from day one supported Slavery? Yeah, you are so good at history.
1
@davidcraft4644 Yes, I know facts don't care about your feelings. It's cute how every fact that disrupts your Democrat Education, presumptions and feelings and narrative is a "logical Fallacy" but yeah, you are operating on fact and not your feeewings.
1
@davidcraft4644 Hey, 2 genders, you are already well beyond the rest of your Democrat Colleagues...but I guess because you realize there are 2 genders, the Current Democrat Party must not promote infinite genders right?
1
@davidcraft4644 I haven't cited a single fact? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣; That is so awesome, you don't even know what a fact is. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
1
@davidcraft4644 Whoever gave you your education needs to give me my money back.
1
@davidcraft4644 Best part is, you can't even rebut, rather than stating what is "fact" if I were wrong, you claim it's a fallacy, or wrong, or straw man... I guess your teacher's opinion you have been regurgitating is true because you FEEL it's true🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
1
@davidcraft4644 Yes I have, but nice deflection, and even if true, why would I address something from your narrative, particularly given the fact that you are inferior?
1
@davidcraft4644 3 responses, someone is triggered. I know you haven't seen it, you are functionally illiterate, that is why you continue to call your narrative fact.
1
@davidcraft4644 I love how you say am wrong, without a statement of fact to refute. You so are jobless and live with your mom.
1
@davidcraft4644 <--- "Thinks" Democrats were not the party of Slavery, 3/5 allocation of population, Spread Slavery and was done by those in support of slavery, and the FSA and Missouri Compromise stopped slavery, and did not expand slavery, and thinks slavery being outlawed meant Democrats from those states didn't support slavery, His Democrat Education is Doing Wonders.
1
@davidcraft4644 <--- Next he will tell you Lincoln was a Democrat, Democrats defend the 2nd Amendment, and Republicans are socialists.
1
@davidcraft4644 See, you can see all the comments, you just fail to comprehend. Did your mommy make you a nice dinner? Getting late, what time does she tuck you into bed?
1
@davidcraft4644 I love it, you are not just too lazy to read, you literally don't comprehend. What a wonderful Democrat Education you have, you are jobless, fatherless, codependent on government and still lack so much shame and are so inferior you strut around like you have something to offer the world as you suck on the government teet.
1
@davidcraft4644 If someone put feces in your food would you notice given all the crap you have been fed and ate with a spoon?
1
@davidcraft4644 So did your dad leave intentionally to not take credit for the worm you would become or did your mom not know which guy was your dad?
1
@davidcraft4644 How come you can't answer a question then whine and cry and lie that you haven't had your question answered?
1
@davidcraft4644 I already knew you didn't have a dad, most Democrats don't.
1
@davidcraft4644 What question would you like me to answer AGAIN so that I can rephrase and dumb down to hopefully reach your level of comprehension?
1
@davidcraft4644 Okay, what law on the books prior the FSA did I say didn't exist? Forget the fact that is off topic as the topic was whether the DEMOCRATS supported those laws... THEY DID. The FSA existed, and was supported by the Democrats North and South, the PARTY. Slaves were property, but the FSA went well beyond that, it was not just about property but about supporting slavery. Again, your claim is that Northern Democrat were somehow not pro slavery. When most of them were; including as illustrated in the FSA and it's passage so I see your rant without an actual question, so again, W-H-A-T- Q-U-E-S-T-I-O-N W-O-U-L-D Y-O-U L-I-K-E M-E T-O A-N-S-W-E-R A-G-A-I-N?
1
@davidcraft4644 It is cute how you are changing the topic and back peddling with the whole conversation was you claiming it was only Sothern Democrats that supported Slavery.
1
@davidcraft4644 Was it your off topic rant of An Act respecting Fugitives from Justice, and Persons escaping from the Service of their Masters passed in 1793? I never denied that passed. It was irrelevant to the FACT that the Democrat party, north or south, was the party of slavery. You made the comment the "law was already on the books" to support "northern" democrats as being against slavery, forget the fact that the law was 30+ years prior to Democrats even being a party.
1
@davidcraft4644 The law you referenced, all around the time of needing a Constitution and slaves being considered property, passed with like 80% of the vote, so even future would be Democrats from the north Supported that act. JUST AS THEY SUPPORTED SLAVERY AS A PARTY
1
@davidcraft4644 Again, Slaves were property, the Democrats were founded for the Very purpose of keeping slavery, primarily from a split among the "Democratic Republicans" upset about the Missouri Compromise.... the Democrats then Dominated for the next 35 years until the Republican Party was formed and the Civil War. North or south, the Democrats supported, tolerated, promoted, Slavery and did everything the could to maintain that institution. The Republicans were not innocent or saints, but they were NOT the party of slavery and NORTHERN Democrats were well aware of their parties platform and the few that dissented, were removed by the DEMOCRAT legislatures and/or voters. All precursors of Federalism, or Anti Federalist, Democratic Republicans etc. were not formed under the single issue of slavery.
1
@davidcraft4644 PS the "northerners" ignoring the earlier act, were NOT Democrats.
1
@davidcraft4644 No I didn't but make sure you focus on that, even if true, to cover up the fact you think Democrats from the North were somehow different from their southern party members on this issue. My question was geared to what law was passed to reflect your position, that wasn't it, quite the opposite really. That said, I will agree with your point that their compromises were made to pass the Constitution and that was a necessary evil; the preservation of the Union, agreed but I think a scapegoat copout given the inevitable, but in NO WAY and indication that Democrats, even in the Norther, were not a party of slavery and the precursor to collectivism while the narrative now is they were "pro individual" which is only to say they believed in individualism more then than the current party does today. The same platform rang true that invented the Democrats in 1824 - 1828 as in 2016-2020 "popular vote" for the president and all things done and federal power growing at the expense of the individual, growth of government, in the name of "Democracy".
1
@davidcraft4644 A question to clarify your off topic comment is what took us off topic?
1
@davidcraft4644 You will keep up your narrative regardless huh? Less than 25% of the south owned slaves...do you think everyone that fought for the south owned slaves? Do you think you have to have owned slaves to support slavery? And Wrong again; Hendry Dodge owned Slaves, D-Wisconsin. He even voted against the FSA
1
@davidcraft4644 Not every Democrat voted in favor of What? The 1850 FSA? Correct, I already gave you the answer and you were too lazy or ignorant to comprehend. There were 3, one from Maine two from Wisconsin one of which owned slaves, the other was voted out by the DEMOCRAT legislature for being anti-Slavery. There were no Democrats in 1793.
1
@davidcraft4644 Also Professor, the 1793 act was law on returning property, the 1850 act expanded the territory that could have slaves! Buy yeah, same law huh?
1
@davidcraft4644 The 1850 did ease the tensions, for a whopping 10 years, no deaths, no violence at harpers ferry or Kansas, no more debates, total settled issue and there were not over 600K deaths to settle the issue later.... and it doesn't change the fact that the Democrat, in the north, kansas, oregon, and SOUTH supported Slavery
1
@davidcraft4644 You do know Stephen Douglas owned slaves right?
1
@davidcraft4644 Either you can't read, you are a liar, your post is deleted, or all of the above.
1
@davidcraft4644 And a compromise to ease political tensions doesn't change the fact that democrats, north and south, supported Slavery and the very foundation of the Party was to conserve, expand, or promote slavery. the FACT you can't address and continue to illustrate your ignorance.
1
@davidcraft4644 If someone says "I am personally opposed to abortion but women had the right so let's "compromise""...that person is NOT pro life and nor against abortion... particularly if that is very stance their party takes with T shirts showing their pride that they killed their own child.
1
@davidcraft4644 I never said All Democrats, but All Democrats were aware of what the party supported and the Party Supported Slavery. Yes, you make claims like Biden, Hillary, and AOC, the comment started with YOUR claim "Democrats in the north didn't support slavery" which is 100% factually, historically, politically, W-R-O-N-G! Just as to claim their platform is significantly different today is 100% W-R-O-N-G!
1
@davidcraft4644 Oooops, you called it a fallacy it must be. And if you are correct, fine, THEY SUPPORTED SLAVERY TO PRESERVE THE UNION, THEY STILL SUPPORTED SLAVERY... many you are dumb, what a distinction without a difference, the very point of the abortion comment.
1
@davidcraft4644 Which question? you can either type the question in your crying rant or continue to make crying rants without a single question. As I stated and you were too lazy or inferior to read, you are either lying, lazy and ignorant (asked and answered), or the post was deleted, my money is now on the former.
1
@davidcraft4644 Lincoln would have kept slavery to preserve the union, he got rid of slavery and saved the union and the Democrats did neither of those things.
1