Comments by "wheelmanstan" (@wheelmanstan) on "Depressed Ginger" channel.

  1. 3
  2. 3
  3. 3
  4. 2
  5. 2
  6. 2
  7. 2
  8. 2
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. man I wish Lake could finally get her win the polls keep shifting from trump to harris by the smallest of margins but trump won 2016 by TRAILING with HUGE margins and very nearly won 2020 while trailing with EPICALLY HUGE margins..imagine he lost by only 12K in AZ, 20K in WI, 12K in GA...44k votes, that's all! So when the media says it's a tight race, well either their polling has suddenly been MIRACULOUSLY REPAIRED or they're just trying to get you to tune in to their silly polling Superbowl for views OR they know something we all don't AKA it's rigged, are they possibly just trying to energize Harris supporters to vote? I doubt it. It's a double-edged sword because if they say it's a tight race then that's also energizing Trump supporters to vote. Remember that Hillary lost in 2016, so they can't always rig..they can't always successfully steal an election. They went full bore last time and you can't do that 2 elections in a row. You can't have 26 million voters crawl out from under a rock 2 years in a row. You can't just tack on votes until you have enough to surpass Trump in the battleground states, which appears to be what happened last time. Trump will get far more votes than last time, so they'll need far more than 81mil to defeat Trump. A 200 million vote turnout would raise suspicion, me thinks. haha I think it'll be like 2008, just a slightly larger turnout than the crazy massive 2004 turnout, but with the Republicans flipping it this time. Well let's hope. CA lets illegals vote.. Good God.
    1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. it has to happen, greenland is like that empty lot off woods that you love to look at and explore that creates a buffer between you and the encroaching city, either buy the lot and preserve it or it's getting bulldozed and "developed", it's not just going to remain there, it's going to be used, the u.s. will best use greenland, it'll get the minerals and share the wealth, it'll protect it, it'll give the people a future, the people will be free on danish rule, we''ll do it environmentally sound, they'll get tourism like never before, russia and china will just keep chipping away at it, they'll bully greenland, they'll dirty up and buy up the land and grow more powerful, strategically it helps us or potentially kills us if there were a ww3 and the axis get it greenland can't survive by themselves, they can't mine it well enough or protect it worth a damn, 56k people with little money, 1 air port, a small military base on an island the size of alaska and california combined with enough coastline to wrap around the equator.. imagine, I want it to remain as pure and original as possible, but changes have to be made, you can "live off the land" but eventually you're building a home, outhouse and barn and greenhouse and smoke house and putting up wire and removing some trees and digging a tank etc etc honestly you'd think you could just wait for greenland to separate from denmark and then just offer the greenlanders 2mil each and buy that place up, but there's no way denmark actually gives it up, you don't want greenland bobbing around without immediate nato protection, and you want to win the hearts and minds rather than buy them out, Trump should visit Greenland right now, that's my advice, he needs to be there in person a few days! But yeah, still, the deal sells itself, protection, jobs, money, freedom from Denmark.. They'd have zero unemployment. Tons of jobs.. And they'd damn sure vote red like Alaska if made a state..albeit 1 electoral vote. haha
    1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1