Comments by "Robert Mclellan" (@robertmclellan3658) on "'Future of Premier League at stake' | Man City 'launch legal action' against EPL" video.

  1. This isn’t North Korea or Russia you know.
    18
  2. Utter nonsense
    12
  3. Because they exist to protect a cartel of clubs.
    10
  4. Any proof or evidence?
    10
  5. Because clearly the hapless Premier League has no evidence.
    7
  6. Any proof or evidence? Because the Premier League hasn’t any.
    7
  7.  @multiyumz  I’m not really bothered what you think as obviously you are consumed with bitterness and jealousy.
    6
  8. They will win because you don’t need the brains of an Archbishop to see they are innocent.
    6
  9. Don’t be silly
    6
  10. Are you talking about the hapless Premier League who are unable to prove their bogus allegations?
    5
  11.  @petaflop3606 Isn’t the delay because the hapless Premier League has no evidence?
    4
  12.  @lezoold9004 Corruption and cheating? What like Liverpool, Arsenal and Man Utd have all been convicted for?
    3
  13.  @lezoold9004 Liverpool and Man Utd both convicted of match fixing and Arsenal and the magic pills ring any bells? And let’s not forget George Graham.
    3
  14. The rules demanded by a cartel of clubs to stifle competition and investment?
    3
  15.  @Redballoon_Cartoons Utter nonsense.
    3
  16. Don’t be silly
    2
  17.  @TitusDafox  Stop being silly
    2
  18.  @TitusDafox  So why then is the Premier League desperately seeking to find a way out of the mess that they have created for themselves? City are wiping the floor with them.
    2
  19. The Champions are owned by an individual.
    2
  20. What has “ Saudi “ got to do with the Champions?
    2
  21. With well over 140,000,000 people who identify as supporters on social media.
    2
  22.  @thanekrios3211  City are owned by His Highness Sheikh Mansour ( Your Highness football and Manchester salutes you )
    2
  23.  @thanekrios3211  Why weren’t these “ rules “ required previously?
    2
  24.  @thanekrios3211  You need to stop being bitter and jealous and get your own club to improve instead of pitifully whining.
    2
  25.  @thanekrios3211  You need to grow up. You will be in floods of tears when these bogus allegations are thrown out Again .
    2
  26.  @thanekrios3211  And I’m still waiting for you to tell me why these “ rules “ weren’t required previously.
    2
  27. 4 in a row stand up.
    2
  28.  @TPCDAZ Don’t be silly
    2
  29.  @stevej820 Utter nonsense.
    2
  30. Champions of the world.
    2
  31. It’s absolutely nothing to do with the FA.
    1
  32. Utter rubbish
    1
  33. Stop being bitter and jealous
    1
  34. Utter nonsense
    1
  35.  @lilbaz8073 That’s completely untrue, CAS completely exonerated the Champions.
    1
  36. What does “ jusy “ mean?
    1
  37. Don’t be silly
    1
  38. Proof, evidence?
    1
  39. They probably tried and failed to do that meanwhile proper football fans salute His Highness Sheikh Mansour.
    1
  40. No City were never going to deal with corrupt EUFA and a proper court of law CAS threw the bogus allegations out.
    1
  41. And who is “ uafa “?
    1
  42. Utter nonsense.
    1
  43. And of course all these other clubs had the opportunity to buy the players City bought so why didn’t they?
    1
  44. Any proof or evidence?
    1
  45.  @shuraamano  Stick to cricket soft lad.
    1
  46. Because they have no evidence
    1
  47.  @Whooooooaaamaaan Arsenal, Liverpool and Manchester United are all convicted of cheating.
    1
  48. Champions of the world.
    1
  49. Dreary people have been saying that for 16 years.
    1
  50.  @Robert-i4g Clearly you don’t understand what the issue is here and it’s obviously going over your head.
    1
  51.  @Lfc517  4 in a row
    1
  52.  @Lfc517  4 in a row.
    1
  53.  @Lfc517  This time next year 5 in a row.
    1
  54. Rules designed to protect a cartel of clubs.
    1
  55. Any proof or evidence of cheating?
    1
  56.  @indochinaconnex4308 Charges previously thrown out by a proper court of law.
    1
  57.  @dstewusa7054 You any proof or evidence because the Premier League hasn’t.
    1
  58.  @slashssnakepit4444 It’s for the accusers to prove guilt and not for the accused to prove their innocence.
    1
  59.  @muhdfazli7409 Stick to cricket
    1
  60.  @Redballoon_Cartoons This is to be conducted using English law which sets a limit of six years in civil cases so everything prior to 2017 could be thrown out but the Champions know they can prove their innocence.
    1
  61. It also helps that they are completely innocent.
    1
  62.  @stevej820 City voted against the corrupt “ rules “
    1
  63. Total joke of a club voted the best in the world two years running.
    1
  64. This is not Russia or North Korea you know.
    1
  65. No by a football club owned by an individual.
    1
  66. What like Russia or North Korea?
    1
  67. What they are due and will get is a shed load of damages from the Premier League.
    1