Comments by "Faramund" (@faramund9865) on "Overly Sarcastic Productions" channel.

  1. 2
  2. 1
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1. Well, not worshipped on Wednesday. Wednesday is just a 'calque' of Latin 'Mercuriī diēs' which we can see in French 'mercredi'. Aka Germanic peoples did not have weeks, just months and years. So they took the weekdays from the Romans and made it their own. 2. And Wen's sacrifice is just a describal of rebirth or birth (same thing to Germanic peoples, every birth is a rebirth). 'nam ek upp runar' "I took up the runes" just means he learns to speak/read/write/wisdom. 3. The unification trope sounds a little thin. He was actually interested in preserving the old way of writing poetry as he wrote himself in his work (the book is an educational book teaching the ways of old poetry related to paganism). And given the fact that the only purpose of this poetry was to pass down pagan stories I'd say he was more than a little interested in the subject. His intro story about Troy is just a distraction meant to convince xtians he wasn't actually a pagan. 4. Ragnarök is also a rebirth. A rebirth of the world. If you actually read Völuspá you'll find that at the end a lot of gods 'come back' and everything is nice again. 5. There's a lot of good theories you mentioned I hadn't thought of myself. 6. None of these myths should be taken at face value. Read and understand them at face value first. And once you know them and start learning more about Northern Europe before the desert cultists came along, the more you'll find that they're just riddles. 7. Like you said at the beginning, gods change over time and to add to that, many seemingly contradictory things are often not when viewed from the original perspective in which the god took shape.
    1
  20. 1
  21. 1