Comments by "Tat2Dragons" (@Tat2Dragons) on "ABC7" channel.

  1.  @janet5135 So you’re cool with your God allowing these things to happen?
    2
  2. Yeah, punish everyone else for the acts of others, that makes sense. WTF!
    2
  3. Well, because he would have to first exist for that to even be a possibility.
    2
  4.  @universaleducationsystems2722  Well due to a lack of evidence of the existence of any God, people should be comfortable with believing there’s no God.
    2
  5. Oh you have proof that she was involved in that lifestyle?
    2
  6. Of course not, because God/Gods would have to actually exist for that to even be a possibility.
    2
  7.  @flyingjew2994 No, actually they’re not.
    2
  8.  @flyingjew2994  Nope, absolutely not. Residential streets are not designed for going that fast.
    2
  9.  @flyingjew2994  They’re certainly not. You clearly have no idea what you’re talking about.
    2
  10.  @flyingjew2994  What does that have to do with stating that residential streets are not designed for going that fast?
    2
  11. Sleeve tats? Not even close to being considered a sleeve. She appeared to only have two tattoos visible, one on her upper chest by her shoulder and one on her shoulder. So without knowing her you assume she was emotional damaged and was affiliated with a gang. Nice! WTF!
    2
  12. Karma? There’s no evidence that karma exists.
    2
  13.  @cl6962 Oh get real! You actually believe that nonsense?
    2
  14. Prove it!
    2
  15. Prove it!
    1
  16. May have heard about it, but clearly don’t understand it.
    1
  17. Yeah, sure.
    1
  18. Hello! How do you know how much that driver gets paid? Some of those drivers can make a pretty decent living for themselves. The driver didn’t have to touch the man to help, he could have easy taken an extra minute, or two and done the right thing and called 911 to have them come out and help the man. Also, why would you assume that they are too cheap to hire someone to look after him? He may still be able to take care of himself and not want someone to look after him.
    1
  19. Jager Gerg How do you know that anything you’ve said is true? You are only making assumptions.
    1
  20. As if that will actually make a difference.
    1
  21. Rice Farmer YES! Calling for help would have crossed pretty much everyones mind.
    1
  22. GTFO of here with that nonsensical, ridiculous story.
    1
  23. Marc S Irrelevant. He still could have used his phone to call someone to help the man.
    1
  24. Yeah, but that costs time and money to have done, and she shouldn’t have to spend either of those things on this situation.
    1
  25.  @Siren0X0 Only God knows the reason? Get real!
    1
  26.  @2000YearsOfTradition  Get real!
    1
  27.  @2000YearsOfTradition  Yet there’s no evidence.
    1
  28. Get real!
    1
  29.  @aliciao3581  Get real!
    1
  30.  @Odin33356  What? 😆
    1
  31.  @Odin33356  You’re a strange individual.
    1
  32. Assume much?
    1
  33.  @1990758  What does one thing have to do with the other?
    1
  34.  @1990758  So you can’t answer the question… got it. Thanks. 😆
    1
  35. You wonder why? Hmm… had you been paying attention you wouldn’t be wondering why they won’t show pictures of the perp.
    1
  36.  @stinkypete891  Yeah, sure you were. 😆
    1
  37.  @stinkypete891  Absolutely
    1
  38.  @dacoby  What? Did you even read their comment?
    1
  39.  @dacoby  Well you may have read it, but by your first response you apparently didn’t comprehend what you read. Where did you get that she would be immediately arrested for brandishing a weapon and possibly terroristic threats? That had nothing to do with their comment.
    1
  40.  @dacoby  I’m aware that you live in California, as you’ve previously mentioned it. I don’t care what you supposedly have seen cops do to people who defend themselves, because obviously those people weren’t very smart, or they were probably in the wrong. Their first mistake was actually talking to the police. Unless you’re an ignorant fool that doesn’t know their rights, they can’t use your words against you. California law follows Castle Doctrine. You’re either not comprehending what I’ve mentioned to you prior about your first comment, or you’re just ignoring what I’ve mentioned.
    1
  41. What? Try again.
    1
  42.  @TheAaronExperience  Prove it!
    1
  43.  @TheAaronExperience  Why should I? Perhaps you should understand that unless given clues, people don’t really know you’re being sarcastic.
    1
  44. Nope, for that to be true they would have to actually exist. 🤣
    1
  45. You clearly don’t have any idea what you’re talking about when it comes to the Freedom To Walk Act.
    1
  46. Impossible, because a God would have to actually exist for that to even be a possibility.
    1
  47.  @crystalgarcia214 Yet it never happens.
    1
  48. As if was intentionally done.
    1
  49.  @rowredround7206 Exactly!
    1
  50. Was she though, or are you just another person making an assumption?
    1