Comments by "" (@dirkardostevergreen4827) on "ABC News" channel.

  1. Looks like you’ve watched a bunch of dumb videos on YouTube and believed it without question.
    2
  2. Well you go ahead and design a rover capable of live streaming from 200 million kms away. Why not live stream in 3D? Shouldn’t be too difficult.
    2
  3. Nice. And your evidence is ...
    2
  4. Just some very small minded people who will no doubt achieve very little. I agree, this is an astounding achievement and should be celebrated!
    2
  5.  @Soli_Deo_Gloria_.  you asked "We can go to Mars but lost the knowledge and technology to go to the moon?". You understand that the Apollo missions were the combined effort of over 20,000 contractors? So post-Apollo the ability to connect all those individual pieces were scattered with no reason to retain that information. The technology itself wasn't lost, it was gradually replaced by superior technology. So your original comment is implying that if the pool of knowledge required to go the moon was "lost" then it can't be possible to go to Mars - which, as hopefully you can now see, is a rather simplistic and incorrect way for seeing it. I hope that helps.
    2
  6.  @Mrmusha53  what evidence do you have that this is fake?
    2
  7.  @davesaenz3732  I’m not the one saying this is fake, you are, so the onus is on you to provide evidence. Can I prove this is really from Mars? No, of course not, any video can be faked. But do I think a team of highly intelligent engineers who’ve spent years designing this thing wouldn’t notice if it was fake. No. Do I think they’d build this thing, stick it on top of a massive rocket and launch it and then presumably let it fall back into the ocean and hope no one notices? No. Do I think they could somehow disguise the incoming signals to make them look like they were coming from Mars when in fact they were being transmitted from here in on earth? No. Is it conceivable to send and land a craft on another planet. Yes, absolutely - it’s just a matter of timing and calculating orbital mechanics (landing safely is another thing altogether). See I can actually give you reasons why I think this is real. But you’re saying it’s fake. So what is your evidence for that? “It looks fake to me” isn’t evidence.
    2
  8.  @davesaenz3732  you’re free to express your opinion of course but you’re one of hundreds of people here claiming this is fake. I’m yet to hear anything other than opinions though. Still waiting for some actual evidence.
    2
  9.  @davesaenz3732  if you can’t prove it’s fake, and I think it’s safe to say you can’t, then there is no real reason to think that it is. Fake because “reasons” is the best all you naysayers seem to be able to do.
    2
  10. How's the last 10 years as a gullible idiot been treating you?
    2
  11. And your evidence for this is ... ?
    2
  12. Have you checked that you’re not an idiot? You probably should look into it.
    2
  13. Do you honestly think the money spent on this would solve the homeless problem in America? NASA's budget is a fraction of the US military budget - do you feel a similar sense of disgust about that?
    2
  14. Based on what evidence?
    2
  15.  @georgecooper2708  I don’t need to research it because that’s completely untrue.
    2
  16. Any evidence for that brain fart you just left here?
    2
  17. Probably has something to do with the complete lack of evidence coming from the all the conspiracy theorists
    2
  18.  @glenobrien894  oh it was a joke ... ok
    2
  19. How’s being an idiot working out for you?
    2
  20. What's your experience level with telecommunications?
    2
  21. Why?
    1
  22.  @indigameriseminalindian  But why - what purpose would that serve?
    1
  23.  @indigameriseminalindian  And you don't think that's just a wee bit self-entitled?
    1
  24. You know you can look at Mars with a telescope don’t you?
    1
  25. Nah that’s not a dumb question. The two planets closest to us are Venus and Mars. Venus has extreme temperatures and atmospheric pressure so landing a craft there comes with a tonne of engineering challenges. Mars is a much easier option relatively speaking.
    1
  26. Got any evidence for that?
    1
  27. They’ve synced this up once the vision came in.
    1
  28.  @dragonballtorture  no that’s not possible.
    1
  29.  @SK-do3um  there was a short delay but radio waves travel at the speed of light and in cosmic terms the moon isn’t that far away.
    1
  30. Lots of pea brains who think they've got it all figured out because they watched some youtube videos.
    1
  31. Why?
    1
  32. What would be the point of that?
    1
  33. Because that hasn’t been explained a hundred zillion times or anything ...
    1
  34. Evidence? Antarctica, Arizona, Canada, Egypt ... seems like none of you naysayers can make up your mind!
    1
  35. Fake because ... reasons?
    1
  36. Been there done that
    1
  37. It’s good to know that your uber-intelligence prevents you from being fooled
    1
  38.  @TheLiam85  uh huh. Good for you.
    1
  39.  @TheLiam85  because it’s entirely within the realms of possibility and there is no evidence of it being fake. Unless of course with your superior analytical mastery you’d like to point out why it’s fake with something a bit more convincing than “because I think so”.
    1
  40. ​ @TheLiam85  "how about controlling the cosmology of the human population and embedding a pseudo science religion of nihilistic atheism making money and consumption god while atvthe same time quelling all natural curiosity" Which part of that is evidence of this video footage being fake? "and if younunderstood science and natural law your statement that it's entirely possible would have never left your mouth" Would you like to explain in your own words how science and natural law prevents a craft being sent to Mars? "look what the catholic church achieved and all they had available was a book no one could read and some impressive buildings" Which part of that is evidence of this video footage being fake? "or we could mention the billions of tax dollars nasa gets?" Again, not seeing how NASA's budget proves this is fake. "go watch the old nasa footage from back in the day and tell me that looks real. Or do you think there is a Tesla floating around out there." Not seeing the relevance. Even if old NASA footage was faked, that doesn't imply that this is. Please refer specifically to this video.
    1
  41.  @TheLiam85  "2nd law of thermo dynamics, entropy law. Think on that when nasa is telling you gas pressure exists next to a vacuum" Sounds like flat earth crap to me. Is that the level of your expertise - regurgitating things you've heard on ridiculous youtube videos? I gave you the benefit of the doubt, but I'm yet to see anything resembling evidence from you, just your opinions that everything is fake. Disappointing.
    1
  42.  @TheLiam85  what am I denying? Just saying words isn’t evidence of anything other than you not actually understanding what they mean. At this stage you’ve done nothing but regurgitate nonsense ideas you’ve borrowed from idiotic flat earth videos. I’m still waiting for you to provide evidence to support your claims, something that you obviously incapable of doing.
    1
  43.  @TheLiam85  "you claim there is a pressurised system next to a vacuum" Well technically I haven't claimed anything, I'm just asking you to provide some solid evidence of fakery in this video given that it's "absolute nonsense" as you say. You're presumably implying that our atmosphere should be sucked out into the vacuum of space unless our planet is inside a container (thereby demonstrating a woeful misunderstanding of how air pressure works) so it's you who is making the claims here. Now I'm sure you've had it explained to you why this conclusion is completely wrong so I don't think I'll waste my time repeating it. However, I can only conclude that your scientific credentials are non existent and discussing these things in depth would be like trying to explain how a combustion engine works to my cat. If you'd like to discuss direct evidence of fakery in any of Perseverance's images then I'd be happy to investigate what you provide. Not really interested in your silly flat earth crap though.
    1
  44.  @TheLiam85  yawn
    1
  45. If you look into how it was designed you’ll get your answer.
    1
  46.  @davideferrari7100  so it’s fake because you think it looks fake. Great analysis. Rock solid.
    1
  47. Not that you have paranoid delusions or anything ...
    1
  48.  @ericsenecal9203  ok, give me the longitude and latitude coordinates on Google maps and we’ll cross reference the two. Sounds like fun, are you in?
    1
  49.  @ericsenecal9203  and cue the crickets ...
    1
  50. Are you serious?
    1