Comments by "" (@dirkardostevergreen4827) on "LegalEagle" channel.

  1. Given that she was never charged with armed robbery, no it wouldn’t matter
    5
  2. Yes it is super biased. This guy has made his anti-Trump sentiments very clear
    4
  3. Sorry but you've made your biases abundantly clear on your channel, enough to make me think this is just fear mongering. The American people have spoken, you have a right to express your opinions but you all need to accept the will of the majority.
    4
  4. Some people live in fear of missiles landing on their house. This guy gets an Uber eats delivery. That sounds to me like a first world problem.
    4
  5.  @DamianKnox11  Seems to me like most of the crying is from people who can't accept the result of a democratic election.
    3
  6.  @joedav67  yes I agree with you, harassment is harassment regardless of severity. However it seems as though you’re unwilling to accept that the harassment went both ways. 40 videos in the two months, including making a channel about her - I mean come on, that’s clearly harassment.
    3
  7. I'm not sure it's people liking him because he's a "bad boy" - it's more likely they saw through the obvious political witch hunt.
    2
  8. I'm not a Trump supporter, I consider myself impartial, but it seems pretty clear to me that this is a political witch hunt. This ruling has probably handed him the election, you all realise that don't you?
    2
  9.  @Killua2001  do I have to provide reasoning? Sorry I didn’t know that was the rules. I’d say it’s pretty obvious but if you can’t see it … 🤷
    2
  10.  @joedav67  you make a fair comparison I suppose although i think there is a reasonable expectation that someone who continually makes very unfunny comedy movies is going to cop some flack. Apparently Adam Sandler is a super nice guy but personally I find him about as funny as a fart in an elevator. I’m not actually a fan of SSSniperwolf by the way but I’m also not a fan of witch hunts. Putting aside what she might be like as a person, as far as how she makes money, I don’t see her really doing any harm. Whether it’s “stealing” is a bit of a gray area when it comes to reaction videos. The line between what is a meaningful and substantive reaction is blurry. Her reactions might be lazy and ethically she probably should credit the videos (although I don’t believe that’s an obligation) but at the end of the day she’s popular with kids for whatever reason. If she can make a tonne of money doing that then good on her. That’s not to say she should be immune from criticism but the way I see it, Jacks films was very intentionally targeting, bullying and harassing her. Now if he came out and said “you know what, I probably took that too far, my bad” then he’d have my sympathy. Everyone stuffs up, that’s human nature. But to cry to YouTube to try and have her deplatformed and make himself out to be a victim, I’m sorry but that just screams “I’m a massive p*ssy”.
    2
  11.  @proudtranslesbian2112  Oh come on. The whole "you're a Nazi" line is getting ridiculous - to the point that it's becoming a meaningless slur. The whole trans thing has gotten way out of control, especially when it comes to little kids being brainwashed by their education system, and people are sick to death of it.
    2
  12.  @efil4zaggin743  Pretty sure she did that - or at least had enough interactions for him to know it was bothering her. I look at this from a neutral point of view - I'm not a fan of either Youtuber but I'm not the only one to point out that he was clearly harassing her. It wasn't just critique, it was quite a bit more than that. So I don't think she should have turned up to his house - that was weird - but I don't think we should turn a blind eye to the fact that he was cyber bullying her either.
    2
  13. @ political witch hunts have a tendency to go that way. When you compare, let’s say, invading another country leading to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of civilians and destabilizing an entire region for example, what he was charged with was on the more trivial side. Fact is, they threw everything they could at him, as well as being shot, shot at, demonised by the media for years and he still soldiered on and he still won - convincingly. Whether you like him or not, I think the will of the majority should be respected and he should be given a chance to do his job.
    1
  14.  @nou2769  Yes well political witch hunts have a way of turning out that way. Guilty or not, if you compare his charges to, oh I don't know, let's say invading another country based on a lie, leading to hundreds of thousands of civilian casualties and destabilizing an entire region, I'd say they're on a more trivial side of things. Whether you like him not, he's incredibly resilient. Despite his political opponents trying to put him jail, being shot, shot at, and being demonized in the mainstream media for years, he still kept soldiering on and he still won - convincingly. So I think the will of the majority should respect their democratically elected leader, or at least respect the position he's been granted, and just let the guy do his job.
    1
  15.  @nou2769  Whether he was found guilty or not, it was very obviously orchestrated by his political opponents in an attempt to bring him down. The fact that despite his opponents trying to jail him, being shot, being shot at, and being demonized in the media, he still soldiered on and that show of defiance and strength is probably what resonated with so many Americans.
    1
  16.  @jasepoag8930  He said himself at the start that it's his opinion. And his opinion is very biased so make what you will of that. I'm not particularly a fan of Donald but there's so much rhetoric and hatred from the left, I think it's wise to take it with a grain of salt. They were saying all the same things last time and the sky didn't fall in then, I doubt it will this time around either.
    1
  17. Seems to me that the harassment came from him well before she turned up at his house. He made 40 videos in two months targeting her with the aim of ruining her reputation. His fans call it "criticism" but the sheer volume of content, not to mention creating an entire channel dedicated to making fun of her, makes his actions harassment, surely? If he was so worried about the safety of his family, maybe he should've thought about that before cyber bullying a famous youtuber! Can't say I have much sympathy for him.
    1
  18.  @KGKSkull  lol I could say exactly the same thing to you. What’s even more embarrassing is you going on to a legal channel to spread lies about someone committing a crime when that person doesn’t have a criminal record.
    1
  19.  @wajmgirl  On his JJJacksfilms channel, there are 40 videos made over a span of about two months. Regardless of how they might have been made, fact remains he uploaded a video about her every couple of days. That's obsessive at the very least.
    1
  20.  @davidaugustofc2574  I’m pretty sure that most people who found a way of making loads of money with minimal effort would keep doing it, don’t you? It’s fair to say it’s lazy and I don’t think she’s above criticism but I don’t think she’s really hurting anyone and you can’t really blame her for exploiting a loop hole in fair use if she’s got millions of fans who enjoy her videos. It’s really up to tech platforms to crack down on this stuff if its illegal.
    1
  21.  @DimentiosLoyalest  watchoo talkin bout Willis?
    1
  22.  @proudtranslesbian2112  It's a part of living in a democracy. You don't have to agree or like that the pendulum of public opinion has swung in a direction you don't like but you do have to accept it.
    1
  23. @ Someone saying the word "problem" doesn't align them with Nazis and suggesting that is ridiculous.
    1
  24. @ The overuse of this term as a slur as a tactic used by left-wing idealogues to describe anyone who doesn't agree with them has degraded it to the point that it has no meaning anymore.
    1
  25.  @ScarlettCatte  They totally are being brainwashed - not just in the US, it's all over the Western world. It's especially affecting autistic kids. If you can't see that then I don't know what to say to you.
    1
  26.  @haxie4516  I'm around a lot of autistic kids with my work and I've seen this with my own eyes. I don't need you to tell me it's been debunked and I'm embarrassing myself. I'd say you need to pull your head of the sand.
    1
  27. @ Ok whatever
    1
  28.  @proudtranslesbian2112  I just have better things to do with my time than talk to someone talking complete bollocks. You're literally proving my point.
    1
  29.  @proudtranslesbian2112  Is that what I said? Pretty sure it wasn't. When you have a comment that makes sense, feel free to chime back in. Until then, bye bye now.
    1
  30.  @proudtranslesbian2112  yawn
    1
  31. @dashieprodx oh ok well case closed then. Thanks for setting me straight
    1
  32.  @proudtranslesbian2112  you seem to have me confused with someone who cares what you think
    1
  33. I'm detecting a certain amount of bias. Maybe it was the witch thing ...
    1
  34.  @haxie4516 his address was publicly available already. How do you think she found out where he lived?
    1
  35.  @haxie4516  I don't know about that but regardless, his address was publicly listed. If one of her murderous eight year old fans wanted to go to his house, they only needed to google it. Of course they probably would've needed mummy or daddy to drive them there first.
    1
  36.  @haxie4516  many people looked it up and confirmed it was publicly available. I guess they might've all been lying? ...
    1
  37.  @efil4zaggin743  imagine someone made a channel about you with the sole purpose of making fun of you and damaging your reputation and had uploaded 40 videos in 2 months and showed no sign of stopping. What would you do?
    1
  38. She does reaction videos so it’s not really stealing. It might be lazy but stealing? No.
    1
  39.  @haxie4516  not under fair use rules. Whether or not you think reaction videos are valid, provided they are transformative in some way, then you can use other people’s content.
    1
  40.  @thebearer8904  yeah I’m not saying her content isn’t lazy however the rules around what constitutes as transformative is subjective and kind of vague.
    1
  41.  @haxie4516  well … fair use certainly does apply here and technically what she does is within the bounds of fair use rules. You may not like it but she didn’t make those rules or create the genre. If she’s a thief then so is every other YouTuber doing reaction videos. So what do you do, ban them all? Rewrite the rules? At that point it’s not so much about what Lia Shelesh is doing, it’s a much wider problem - which is why I think this little witch hunt that’s going on with this woman is a little unfair, regardless of what she might be like as a person. The way I see it, she has jumped on a band wagon and found an easy way to make money. I personally think it’s drivel and not worth watching but for whatever reason millions of people find it entertaining. Go figure. But she’s not really hurting anyone and technically not doing anything wrong. And then you get this Jack character who is basically jealous of her because he creates original content and thinks it’s unfair so he appoints himself as the content police and basically starts harassing her. His beef should be with the regulations around fair use - which would be a noble cause but he never should’ve targeted an individual YouTuber like that.
    1
  42.  @haxie4516  lol ok. I hope always being right works out for you. Bye
    1
  43.  @haxie4516  I’m sorry I don’t read replies that are more than three sentences. It’s a waste of my time. Bye
    1
  44.  @haxie4516  are you liking your own comments?? Anyway thanks for keep your reply under three sentences. Fifteen words or less is preferable. Fair use laws are complicated and nebulous so I don’t see how I can be “objectively incorrect”. But I’m happy to be proven wrong - but just saying “you’re wrong” makes me think that you don’t actually have an argument. In Lia Shelesh’s instance I would say she skirts dangerously close to theft but is within the bounds of fair use. Explain to me why it’s theft (in 15 words or less otherwise I won’t read it).
    1
  45.  @haxie4516  thanks for your succinct answer however I think you’re grossly simplifying what fair use entails.
    1
  46.  @haxie4516  are you sure you’re not liking your own comments?
    1
  47.  @haxie4516  Fair use laws are most definitely vague and amorphic, wouldn't you agree?
    1
  48.  @haxie4516  Also I think you are liking your own comments.
    1
  49.  @haxie4516  I don't think you have an argument. Also, that was more than fifteen words although I'm letting it go because it was under three sentences and I appreciate your use of punctuation. It's a rare thing to see.
    1
  50.  @haxie4516  your debating style has all the sophistication of “I know you are but what am I?” You can do better.
    1