Comments by "N Velsen" (@nvelsen1975) on "Whatever Happened to Millimeter-Wave 5G?" video.

  1. 14:03 From my work (urban planning) I have to understand wave field strengths and potential harm. For the Netherlands (most restrictive on this topic, best I know) Based on 2005 precautionary norms updated in 2023, prolonged exposure to wavestrengths over 0.4 microtesla can potentially by harmful to little children, but not to adults. Prolonged means 'You live there', basically. A couple weeks or months of exposure doesn't do anyting. Can potentially, because nobody will get ethical clearance to research this, stuff a couple hundred babies right underneath a 380 Kv powerline, raise them there and see how many develop medical conditions. I mentioned a super strong powerline? That's because you need that level of power to generate a potentially-harmful strengths. For a 110 KV mast we know the field's only harmful for 30 meters in each direction with the worst being a 380 kv 'Donau' style mast with a zone of 75 meters. Compared to that, the concept of a transmitter that's way, way less powerful (case in point: power lines power transmitters and entire towns) generating a wave strength enough to cause even potential hypothetical harm, is laughable. Of course we knew the conspiracy nuts were wrong, but they are wrong by orders of magnitude into the thousands.
    7