Comments by "N Velsen" (@nvelsen1975) on "Why is the West not reacting to Russian attacks?" video.

Yes we have ignored it. And I've had my nose rubbed in it. Ex-customer of my company used to be broke to the point that he was on benefits in 2013. I know this since he had to hand over his full financial records as part of a government background check. He made news headlines in 2014 when he campaigned against the Association Treaty with Ukraine, specifically using toiletpaper rolls with slogans on it. He collaborated with the pro-Russian gossipblogger and alround POS human being Jan Roos. Now since 2013 he has acquired real estate totaling 38 properties and is making a comfortable living ruthlessly exploiting tenants. My jobs was to clean that up and make it according to regulations, something he kept going back on. Not an easy enforcement. Then after the 2022 'official invasion' he's back to Russian campaigning and came to our office to talk about what we could do 'about government corruption' (destabilisation through undermining trust in the democratic government). By then I was aware of his pro-Russian involvement. I volunteered back in early march, but Ukrainians rejected my application, so that's where I stand. Let's just say things got a bit heated, police attended and he's now very squarely an ex-customer, his records were handed over to the intelligence agencies as I can't abide traitors. Not they're going to do a damn thing about Russia's infiltration, but at least they have records to prove you can make millions being a Russian infiltrator.
9
@petermagnus9919 Uhm, you're aware India, which invaded China six times, does have nuclear weapons? Wth would China have against South Korea and Japan? No trade routes go in that direction, unlike in the southern direction where the Philipines and Indonesia (a country that perpetrated multiple genocides against Chinese) can threaten trade routes. As for China's position, China is in camp China. China's position is "Don't invade other countries" and it always has been. Putin recruiting Trump was a masterstroke that brought Beijing much closer to Moscow, but still, Russia invaded China numerous times last time being 1969. Russia is the agressive and unreliable neighbour where there are economic opportunities to be had, nothing more. Putin asked for Chinese weapons. He didn't get any. Yet pretty early on China sent a couple million of civilian aid to Ukraine. The famous 'Wolf warrior tweet' further shows that Beijing feels Putin made them lose face (a huge deal in Chinese culture) and that's not something that's forgiven easily.
6
@kjensen7819 Non-Russian or non-Russian-sponsored source of this is found.... where exactly?
2
@gorillaguerillaDK The Netherlands, Germany and Denmark found another 100 MBTs though, the Leopard 1A5, a hundred of them in industry storage. Going to get revisioned and sent to Ukraine, 20-25 of them this year, the rest in 2024. This comes on top of existing pledges. Doesn't surprise me that Musk is trying to profiteer even more. The initial Starlink was already a US government purchase rather than a donation, something Musk lied about. Then he started charging 3 million a month, now this.... Maybe the US should consider investigating Musk, as war profiteering is in fact a crime if it's a war that involves US interests (and the lend lease act has been activated).
2
@highdefinist9697 It's not about that. Putin hopes to win conquest through promoting a dual agenda of everybody only looking after themselves AND everybody hating on China to draw attention away from Russia. It's about shifting political focus. Where do you think Putin-Trump's 'America first' and his senseless hate against China came from? That's his FSB handler telling him he's supposed to think and say that, or otherwise they're going to broadcast what Trump did in various Russian hotels involving prostitutes, and I imagine underage prostitutes (being a 24 year long personal friend of Epstein) and other illicit activities, because there's no way Trump would turn traitor like he did over some videos of him banging hookers in Moscow.
1
@seancidy6008 Sergei, when you lie, make sure your target has at least said what you alledge. Also no Sergei, your beloved Putler isn't nuking Washington as an endgame, not unless he wants to go down in history as the guy who ended Russia and ended Russians by getting Russia turned into one giant radioactive parking lot.
1
@petermagnus9919 Uhm, are you aware of the background of those conflicts? Yes, by now Indian invaders are stuck having to fight through jungles, plateaus and mountains. That's because in China's last war of conquest in 1952, they seized the Indian vassal state of Tibet, whose existance put Indian troops right on the border of Sichuan and China's economic core in the south (even more back then, than nowadays). The Moscow-loyal Vietnamese regime attacked and invaded the Beijing-loyal Red Khmer regime. Thus China intervened. Vietnam's loyalty to Moscow has been a constant annoyance as the Sino-Soviet Split meant that Vietnam arse-kissing the Russians was unacceptable, yet they did. Could've been neutral, but they choose not to. North Korea was being invaded by US troops, thus prompting China to intervene to keep US troops off their doorstep and maintain their buffer zone. Note how China didn't join the war until it became clear North Korea would lose and a unified Korea would soon be under the (extremely agressive) US-sponsored ruler Ree. (so I guess it's fair to say Beijing went Reeeeeeeeee) The South China Sea is kinda like the name implies. That's about oil and other resources as well as protecting China's trade routes. Where's the imperialism? What territory are they trying to gain merely for territory? If your view had been correct, China would've invaded Russia by now. It's tons of land, easy to get now with Ukraine slaughtering the Russians. Same for Mongolia, Bhutan, Nepal, why would China not invade if it was an imperialist country?
1
It doesn't matter either way: The reason that missile fell there, is because Russian agression ended up going even inside Poland's borders in the form of terror-bombing civilian targets of which the debris ends up in Poland. That missile was fired at an illegal Russian strike against a civilian target right on the border. Russia is to blame. Not a single person other than paid pro-Russian traitors was going to go "oooh, it was a Ukrainian AA missile, let's blame Ukraine". This kind of goes into the hybrid warfare point though: NATO just went "Ukraine isn't to blame, say it's a Ukrainian missile", ignoring how Russia's lies will try to spin it into a huge thing in their information warfare.
1
Yes, but the Russian campaign of bombings in Spain has escalated to overt terrorism. Also you're not entirely right. Dutch AIVD broke into and monitored the Russian 'web brigades' for months using their own surveillance cameras, you could see Sergei and Dmitri discussing things before logging in and screaming that Biden is evil, Trump will win and yadda yadda. The Dutch further dismantled three Russian espionage rings around 2018. Now this is good, but gives Russia an idea of what we can do in terms of countersurveillance. Although I'm actually shocked Russia doesn't know that if you use directional microphones etc, there's monitoring devices that will instantly show you're being probed. In my therapy group there was a Yugoslavia vet who explained he had to haul a suitcase of that sort of stuff around that was on loan from the CIA, except they had to destroy it when the Serbo-Russian genocide squads rolled in. That was 1995. I'm aware of that, while in intel terms my work was kinda low-as-it-goes, they didn't tell me a damn thing yet I know such systems exist. (and it's not in my contract as opsec even) It's a bit weird how Russia apparently doesn't know.
1