General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
N Velsen
Anders Puck Nielsen
comments
Comments by "N Velsen" (@nvelsen1975) on "How to spot a Russian false flag operation" video.
@miriamweller812 It struck a symbolic part of a symbolic target while doing no damage, exactly like Russia would want for a message of "We are under threat, support Putin and enlist today!". Also like Eddy said, it was remote-detonated on command. Contact detonation against a thin target is nearly undoable; you'd see the drone smash into the flagpole first, disintegrate, and only then would anything touch a contact detonator. Also Ukraine has been complaining about lacking heightmaps for Russia, so they can't make drones fly low (beneath detection) without them flying into trees, random buildings and powerlines. How would Ukraine go from "We can't, at all", to "Perfect strike at the central symbol of the Kremlin"
8
@KasumiRINA Except that wasn't the SBU, it was a local partisan. And the charge failed to detonate. They came back next night and the Russian radar plane went kaboom.
2
It's a good perspective, but I still think it's false flag. Because at 4:15 in my opinion you misinterpret. Yes 'Ukrainian drone through our air defenses' says the Russian army is weak. BUT, that message is already omni-present from all Russia's defeats. So no extra damage from this event. The message is "Russia is under threat, enlist now and go die for Putin!". Just like with Putin blowing up Moscow appartment blocks while claiming it was Chechens.
2