Comments by "JX" (@J_X999) on "VisualPolitik EN" channel.

  1.  @Homer-OJ-Simpson  AI might not work for china, but all your "below 4 percent" ramblings don't change the fact that japan's labour is expensive and unproductive. Thus leading to long term stagnation
    1
  2.  @hcpalmer  South Korea won't be helping. China is their way of guaranteeing safety from North Korea, going to war with that assurance will be suicide.
    1
  3.  @Homer-OJ-Simpson  Fair enough, but like I said, Japan isn't using AI to achieve 2% growth. And they probably won't in the future, given their track record
    1
  4. ​ markmierzejewski9534 Cope and seethe
    1
  5. Indians are so sensitive and annoying
    1
  6. People ignore the fact that China will be able to raise their birth rate. The Chinese government is about to implement the most effective birth rate policies including: lowering the cost of having children, better childcare services and other vital societal and cultural changes. "B-b-but no other country has been able to raise their birth rate 🥺👉👈" That's because countries with very low birth rates aren't doing anything to solve the roots of the issue. Instead, they are throwing money at the problem. Whilst countries like Japan and Korea sit idly by and do nothing for their birth rate, China will strive forward and successfully raise their birth rate through the action listed above, proving twerps like Yi Fuxian and Zeihan completely wrong! Feel free to get mad, I'll give you some attention.
    1
  7.  @freeman10000  China's chip tech has been advancing and will probably catch up, due to the slowing progression of nodes going smaller than 1-2nm. It's basic Moore's Law and physics.
    1
  8.  @freeman10000  It's always the ones who have "lived in China" that are so blinded by biased yet so assure of themselves 🫵
    1
  9.  @0816M3RC  Most people underestimate China whilst saying that everyone overestimates China. Would you like that read out to you?
    1
  10. If Taiwan even tried to hit one of China's dams, I think it's safe to say that Taiwan would be bombed to pieces. Literally. The US wouldn't be able to retaliate in an effective way, so it's a losing battle for the Taiwanese.
    1
  11. China will collapse
    1
  12.  @Diatom1k  Hello to you to Adam 😂😂
    1
  13.  @neodym5809  Michael Pettis has stated that Chinese demographics and population decline isn't the issue. Fixing the housing and growth model crisis allows china to switch to a more innovative and productivity driven growth.
    1
  14.  @Homer-OJ-Simpson  Yes, demographics have caused stagnation, but Japanese workers are not as productive as the average US worker. Not even close. This must makes the whole problem worse
    1
  15.  @Homer-OJ-Simpson  Yes, but one thing no one seems to understand is that the reason for japan's slowdown in 1989 was the housing bubble crash. Demographics have certainly played a part, however the structural issues that caused the sudden decline in growth are still in place today.
    1
  16.  @Homer-OJ-Simpson  Yep, and individual worker productivity did not increase, meaning wages didn't either, making their only option unavailable
    1
  17.  @Homer-OJ-Simpson  Which is why the demographic crisis is having an effect
    1
  18.  @Homer-OJ-Simpson  In the case of China, productivity is very low, which gives it a lot of room to improve. I don't disagree with the effects of demographics but they are definitely not destiny in the 21st century
    1
  19.  @patrickt49  😂😂😂
    1
  20. Wet dream of yours
    1
  21. You are gonna get some stick for that
    1
  22.  @davidford3115  Well according to the Pentagon and White House, their military is rapidly developing and innovating. And no, that doesn't just mean copying and stealing
    1
  23.  @tsubadaikhan6332  Which is why I mentioned their quest for self sufficiency, your point is correct
    1
  24. US population won't double. don't know where you got that from. China's population will be 700 million which is half, but the US population will be 400 million. Definitely not double
    1
  25. India cannot innovate well in the military field. They ALWAYS buy Russian weapons.
    1
  26.  @Sardiatae  Correction: You want to believe it so you will tune your mind to brainlessly believing it.
    1
  27. Another angry little Indian here.
    1
  28.  @doujinflip  Still, much less poverty in China nowadays
    1
  29. As soon as someone defends China, they will immediately be accused of being a Wumao
    1
  30. Man up and stop whining kid
    1
  31.  @--Traveler--  China is probably going to make this change very soon, and we'll be sorry when they do.
    1
  32. Recent reports show that South Korea is the most expensive country to raise a child in. You don't need much more explanation other than those solid facts
    1
  33. And then you wake up in your slum, you dreamed.
    1
  34. You keep saying that. Cry harder
    1
  35. Tanks, artillery, rifles and planes weren't used. India will need American help if it doesn't want to lose the land that they have.
    1
  36. Rafale won't win a war itself. You'll probably have to replace them after a few years aswell. Keep up with modern Indian tech
    1
  37. Correct. You don't attack through the himalayas.
    1
  38.  @tevarinvagabond1192  2 years late for that one kid 🥱
    1
  39. Watch Polymatter's videos on why Japan's military build up won't work. That's if you can stomach it.
    1
  40. China was the birthplace of civilisation in Asia anyway. Most Japanese and South Korean fans hate that.
    1
  41. Demographics wouldn't be such a problem if China managed to used technology and innovation to boost worker productivity. Currently, Chinese workers are 1/5 as productive as US workers
    1
  42.  @_mde_88_  OK clear on that as well mate.
    1
  43. There are many differences between 80s Japan and modern China. It's foolish to compare the 2 only because Japan imploded
    1
  44.  @_mde_88_  That was a bit harsh of me sorry, but when it comes to Japan, people are like, oh yeah they'll figure something out. When it comes to China, people are like, no they are DOOMED and won't be able to fix ANYTHING.
    1
  45. Because you are biased.
    1
  46. Ummm, what?
    1
  47. Chinese are also innovative and plus they've got more people to start with. When we talk about Japanese demographics it's all peace, creativity and joy. When we talk about Chinese demographics it's all terror and chaos. Clear bias when they've got pretty much the same problem
    1
  48.  @captainbroady  You might be right but it still isn't ideal to have China being their largest trading partner by a considerable amount
    1
  49. China will also go extinct in the future. But the thing is, currently, they've got so many people that even if they age RAPIDLY, it'll take more than a few centuries for china to go extinct
    1
  50. China still has time to raise their birth rate and they will be able to do it. They are about to implement the most effective policies surrounding raising births including lowering the cost, providing organised childcare, and making the workforce more compatible with having children
    1