General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Jubilee
comments

Comments by "" (@krasmasov6852) on "Pro-Choice vs Pro-Life: Can They See Eye To Eye? | Middle Ground" video.

Absolutely correct.
6
I don't think that comparison works because you're comparing drunk driving to sex, not pregnancy.
5
@jakamsoohia7492 Getting an abortion is dealing with the consequences
4
Your parents are correct.
4
@blackblackblack7773 Forcing someone to stay pregnant when they don't want to is forcing someone to do something.
4
Why? Who cares?
4
@Humanity Galatica Heretics are cool.
3
This is the worst way to be pro-choice. You sound like an ecofascist.
3
@skuastone9698 Yes.
3
@whitewhitewhite2446 That's barbaric. You have an extremely warped and evil sense of justice.
3
@whitewhitewhite2446 Oh, I get it. You're doing a bit. This is a parody account. Nice.
3
@whitewhitewhite2446 Why? Who cares? Painting your nails affects no one.
3
@whitewhitewhite2446 What's the deeper issue? Letting men dress how they want is bad or something?
3
I'm sure that does a lot to help people who are already pregnant.
2
Nope, but it's not up to me. My mother chose, and she chose to carry her pregnancy to term. See, that's the thing about the pro-choice position. It favors choice whether it's abortion or not.
2
No, it should be entirely publicly funded just like all healthcare.
2
@whitewhitewhite2446 No, that's not it.
2
@giraffewhiskers2045 The pregnant person gets a say and the fetus doesn't because the pregnant person is an adult who can choose for themself what goes on in their own body.
2
@nicholasbourcier The fetus is alive. 100% alive. 100% human. Abortion is still okay.
2
@issuesthatmatter2825 No, giving birth is just as dangerous as getting an abortion. Your'e also inventing studies that don't exist. You don't even have to consider how the pregnancy occurred. There's only one justification any pregnancy person needs to get an abortion. They want one.
2
@issuesthatmatter2825 Nope, you're making them up. And I'm aware of the law. I'm talking about what's actually justifiable, not what's legal.
2
@issuesthatmatter2825 Not even. It's justifiable if she wants one regardless of health.
2
@yes-ei2yo Axlotls are more valuable than Humanity Galatica.
2
No, they couldn't. A coma patient existing isn't a matter of bodily autonomy.
2
Pro choice is actually one of the easiest positions to defend.
2
@legentilmuyombo4533 Yes. Like I said, no one has the right to live at the expense of someone else's bodily autonomy.
2
@hello-sz7hp I'm pro choice, and I genuinely look down on people who aren't.
2
@Humanity Galatica You're anti human when you deny people the most important aspect of their humanity.
2
Pro choice for abortion. Pro vaccine mandate for covid
2
@skuastone9698 Yes. If there's a way to remove it without killing it, we can do that instead. Until then, oh well.
2
You really love life, huh?
2
Only the second one is valid.
2
@tacoexpressSEEDEEholeeveryones This comment just added another to the list. That one's on you.
2
@Humanity Galatica .......what? Rights as a concept isn't measurable by science.
2
Lmao brilliant plan. People will totally just stop having sex. Because, you know, having sex for fun and not for reproduction totally isn't one of the most normal human things there is.
1
@Humanity Galatica The vast majority of sex that happens is not for reproduction.
1
@Humanity Galatica Yeah, you already said that. Reread my previous comment.
1
@Humanity Galatica No, it's a fact. How many times does the average person have sex? How many times do they do it to reproduce? Those numbers aren't even close.
1
@Humanity Galatica Who cares about that?
1
@Humanity Galatica Why? I mean you're just basically admitting to the appeal to nature fallacy.
1
@Humanity Galatica Because you have to consider possible consequences of things when you're determining right from wrong obviously.
1
@Humanity Galatica If there's no other way to protect someone's right to bodily autonomy, then it's what you gotta do.
1
@Humanity Galatica It is though....
1
@Humanity Galatica Because there's no way to end the pregnancy without killing the fetus if the fetus cannot survive on its own outside of the womb.
1
@Humanity Galatica Bro, your every response is cringe. But anyways, there are some people who need a kidney transplant. We're going to be taking one of yours. Your consent isn't required.
1
@Humanity Galatica Did you miss the point entirely, or do you genuinely think people should have their spare kidneys forcibly removed without their consent for the sake of those on the transplant list?
1
@Humanity Galatica At least you're consistent. Evil, but consistent.
1
@Humanity Galatica You say heretic like it's a bad thing.
1
@Humanity Galatica Oh you're still larping as a sci fi villain. Got it.
1
That's irrelevant. If the fetus can't survive outside of the womb, then the owner of the womb has full control over it.
1
@Humanity Galatica You're irrelevant.
1
@nicoleclevenger1562 Unrelated facts that have no impact on the issue in question are irrelevant, yes. That's a matter of basic logic. I'm not tolerant of intolerance like bigotry, and I'm not tolerant of people who perpetuate the spread of a deadly pandemic. I would never advocate forcing you to get the vaccine, but don't be surprised if people don't want to be around you when they see you're not taking a global pandemic seriously.
1
@nicoleclevenger1562 Lmao didn't address anything I said. How embarrassing
1
@nicoleclevenger1562 And what you said is wrong, as I explained. I get that you're too afraid to actually engage with the argument here. It would show just how weak and absolutely pathetic your position and your measely justification for it is.
1
@Humanity Galatica It's they're, Mr. 117 IQ.
1
@Humanity Galatica Because present personhood is all that matters, but it's actually irrelevant here. Even if we grant a fetus personhood, it still doesn't have the right to live at the expense of someone else's bodily autonomy.
1
Correct, that's not abuse at all. This but unironically.
1
No, you don't. What are you talking about?
1
Lmao we know for a fact that teaching that doesn't work.
1
@bellaschwartz352 Lol yes they are.
1
@fadlya.rahman4113 Nope. A baby you can dump in the river is a being that can live independent of someone else's womb. A fetus is not. No one's right to life overrides someone else's bodily autonomy. If you can find a way to remove a fetus without killing it, we'll do that. Until then, abortion is fine.
1
No, it's pro choice and anti choice.
1
Lol you hear that poor people? You're not allowed to have sex.
1
@conor.3875 Yes.
1
Exactly this. This is the only argument necessary. It's unbeatable.
1
@matt1325 Your opinion is incorrect. Getting an abortion IS taking responsibility. And our own organs are for whatever we want them to be for. Direct or indirect is irrelevant when it comes to murder. The argument is unbeatable. You've certainly failed.
1
@matt1325 That's not always the case for a pregnant person, but again, this is irrelevant. Our organs are for whatever we want them to be for. Obviously within the realm of possibility. That means we can use a uterus for children or for nothing at all. We can keep our 2nd kidney or donate it. I'm free to get a vasectomy or not. Taking your former kidney back after the transplant is wrong. Changing your mind before the transplant is okay. Just like how killing a birthed child is obviously wrong but terminating a pregnancy is not. Pretty simple. You still haven't beaten my argument.
1
@matt1325 1. I'm saying it. Who cares who originated it? 2. A rebuttal to what? Your misunderstanding of what I said? 3. Yes. 4. I reject your comparison of property and bodies. You really shouldn't go for the property rights approach when talking to a communist. 5. No. Feel free to present their arguments yourself.
1
@matt1325 You haven't shown a single flaw. What in the world are you talking about? You need to justify that it's okay to compare property to bodies. Your comparison relies on that foundation, and you haven't convinced me that's a valid comparison yet. I don't see the two as equal. Look, I get that you're bad at this and want to keep offloading your side of the argument to some braindead anti choice losers, but you actually have to make the arguments yourself. Otherwise, you lose.
1
@Humanity Galatica Yeah, we get it. You're like a movie villain.
1
@Humanity Galatica How's that imperium coming along?
1
@kingorange7739 It is entirely okay if the pregnant person wants one.
1
@shawnboahene5231 So what?
1
@darcymr353 Yup
1
@legentilmuyombo4533 No one has the right to live at the expense of someone else's bodily autonomy, dude.
1
lmao nothowgirlswork
1
Well, you're half right. I'm not so sure we're doing well.
1
@Henry-gv3cy Telling people not to have sex doesn't do much to solve the problem for people who are already pregnant.
1
@Henry-gv3cy But people already are in that situation. How does it help them?
1
@Henry-gv3cy Lmao what? The entire demand for abortion is because there are people in that situation. And I'm bringing it up because your "you shouldn't have done that" approach doesn't solve anything.
1
@grimftl Bro, that's just pro choice.
1
@Humanity Galatica You sound like a villain from a dystopian sci fi story.
1
This but unironically
1
Steve Jobs? Excellent argument for abortion.
1
If the baby can live outside of the womb, they just force an early birth, not an abortion.
1
@whitewhitewhite2446 Yes.
1
@whitewhitewhite2446 Lol hell yeah.
1
@whitewhitewhite2446 I do. I'm a leftist, not a liberal. I'm literally a member of the SRA.
1
@skuastone9698 Yeah it. I'll use they if it makes you feel better. Will you address what I said now?
1
@skuastone9698 They're not nothing. What are you talking about?
1
@skuastone9698 Again, I never said they were nothing.
1
@skuastone9698 If there's a way to remove the fetus without killing them, we can do that instead. Until then, oh well.
1
You heard it here, folks. Don't have sex if you're poor.
1
@yellowyellowyellow7894 Lmao imagine telling people it's shameful to have fun.
1
@yellowyellowyellow7894 What's immoral in this case?
1
@yellowyellowyellow7894 Restricting bodily autonomy is immoral
1
@billsmith04 Why not? I mean there are clearly some systemic issues going on if someone can't get condoms, but abortion should always be an option.
1
Getting an abortion when you have an unwanted pregnancy is taking accountability.
1
You get to choose what you use your womb for.
1
Fetuses are definitely human. Abortion is still okay.
1
@flowersmakemehappy834 If you value human life so much and bodily autonomy so little, how many kidneys do you have? I'm sure someone on the transplant list could sure use one.
1
@Readersrun777 The vast majority of sex that happens is not for the purpose of reproduction.
1
Suptumber lumber tumber lumber 9 I've gotten abortions solely to spite people who say things like that.
1
@mrstilton2654 No, the pro choice side is the correct side. Abortion is justified when the pregnant person wants to get one.
1
@mrstilton2654 The debate is over. Has been for a long time. It comes down to different values. You think people with a uterus don't deserve the right to control their own body. I do.
1
@Humanity Galatica Because abortion is a basic human right.
1
@Humanity Galatica Again, the concept of human rights isn't a matter of science. What in the world are you even talking about?
1
Where's the contradiction? Women can be misogynist.
1
@nickstojic6995 YES
1
The virgin conservative: LeTs Go BrAnDoN The chad communist: Fuck Joe Biden
1