Comments by "" (@krasmasov6852) on "ContraPoints" channel.

@the1maver1ck Then you're wrong. Bro, being mean has consequences. Imagine being so soft that you think you shouldn't have to face them. Your hostility is going to be met with hostility. Your choices have consequences. That's how the world works.
8
@the1maver1ck Holding racist beliefs isn't illegal, but it is illegal to call people slurs actually. It's harassment.
7
Puberty blockers aren't dangerous.
7
@the1maver1ck No, you don't have that right actually. You don't get to just harass people.
6
@the1maver1ck So it is harassment then. Thank you for proving my point yet again.
6
@the1maver1ck How would misgendering someone not be targeting?
6
@the1maver1ck Then that instance of interaction is targeted harassment. A fascist throwing slurs at a Jew doesn't get away with it because they refuse to recognize the humanity of any Jewish person. This is still the case even if they don't seek out people to piss them off.
6
@the1maver1ck Nope, an explicit threat of violence isn't necessary. Making someone feel unsafe or uncomfortable is enough if it's intentional, though given the amount of violence trans people face, the threat of violence is a pretty safe thing to assume when being harassed. You're just wrong here.
6
@the1maver1ck I actually have no problem with people telling me not to be a dick to trans people actually. Also LMAO at "I'm not saying I don't treat people with respect." and "I refuse to recognize ANY biological male as a female period." Don't be a fucking hypocrite.
6
Nah purposely misgendering someone is harassment.
5
@the1maver1ck How in the world can you possibly claim that? Does it not target the person in question during any given misgendering incident?
5
@the1maver1ck If you know something is threatening to someone, and you continue to do it, even if you don't plan to actually hurt them, that's harassment and illegal. I don't know why it's so hard for you to understand this. Like you can avoid it all if you just offer other people the most basic levels of decency.
5
You don't have to wonder. She has already voiced opposition to being misogynist against terfs in that whole mess with Vaush recently.
5
@the1maver1ck "intentionally targeting someone else with behavior that is meant to alarm, annoy, torment or terrorize them" Hey, there you go. Thanks for making my argument for me.
4
@the1maver1ck It's obviously not a petty annoyance. It's a pretty severe transgression to people struggling with dysphoria.
4
This is such a weird thing to get mad about.
4
@val2690 For someone who's protective over the concept of liberation, you certainly seem to be committed to never achieving it.
4
@val2690 No shit, but who cares? It's a powerful word to use. It's motivating to people. You can prioritize respect or you can prioritize getting as many people on your side as possible. The enemies of bipoc people and trans people are the same.
4
Lmao she said using misogyny to combat transphobia is bad, and you construe that as taking the side of transphobia? That's like saying that opposing the nuclear bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki means you support Imperial Japan. Get outta here.
4
@biologicalengineoflove6851 Again, that's not defending Rowling because of, you know, what I already said. And any opportunity to clown on Vaush should be taken. Dude sucks. Satirical trap? What? What was the satire? And Vaush being himself sucks. Why wouldn't we burn him at the stake for that? He's terrible.
4
@val2690 Miss me with that oppression olympics shit. That's just going to pit you against people who should be your allies.
3
Abolish the military.
3
@mattmccallum2007 Nah, she's hot, dude.
1
@nima16042 They delay sex organ development and the rest isn't true
1
You don't have to participate in gender. Agender people don't participate in it every day.
1
@biologicalengineoflove6851 I'll pillory them both. I just won't use bigotry for either. And yes, Vaush bad. This isn't debate club. I don't care about arguments here. I'm making fun of you for stanning a pencil dick loser. Lol in your analogy, you're suggesting that I should be wanting to nuke Japan. Except the news was focused on Rowling being a victim of misogyny rather than a perpetrator of bigotry effectively making her position look sympathetic from the perspective of the uninitiated. No charity whatsoever has been given to Rowling. Pointing out that misogyny isn't a good strategy for attacking terfs isn't taking Rowling's side, you absolute freak.
1
@biologicalengineoflove6851 I don't have to choose. I can attack both. You sound like a major dork here. ReFuSe To PrOvIdE aN aRgUmEnt bro, get outta here. Life isn't debate club. Vaush sucks and is a loser demsoc trying to white savior all over the place with a seemingly pathological hatred of any black woman who's smarter than him. I don't want to nuke anywhere actually. And you're also operating under the assumption that Vaush's misogyny towards Joanne is in any way helpful to trans people when the entire point here is that it's not actually. Lol wait so you're blaming the Vaush critical left for the media now? Bro, the media hates all of us. They simp for Joanne even when faced with actual valid critique from trans people and allies. I know as a Vaushite you don't really know what that is, but try to imagine. Lmaooooo no it's not. This is a public forum for shitposting. Debate bros are so derranged I swear. They don't live in reality. You can't debate your way to a better world, dude. The enemy doesn't care. They operate using different foundational wants and beliefs, so debates aren't fruitful.
1
@biologicalengineoflove6851 Lmao why not? Fuck Joanne. Fuck Vaush. Just did it. Easy. Lol holy shit the equivalent of the "I have a black friend" argument. Brilliant, dude. Truly the intellectual titan I'd expect from a Vaushite. Lol holy shit genocide apologeia and sexual harassment? You people don't live in reality at all. Bro, what? That makes no sense. So I must necessarily take the side of the lesser evil regardless of what the lesser evil actually does? Can I take no side? Can I condemn them both? You should probably stop saying ironic misogyny. It's just misogyny. I'm not that big of a fan of Bo Burnham but him making fun of white women (a clear demographic) cannot be compared to all women (what Vaush railed against using common misogynistic tropes that Burnham didn't). When did I simp for Joanne? What in the actual fuck are you talking about? You people are absolutely insane. This is why normal people hate debate bros, dude. Can you explain how being misogynistic is a valid critique of terfs? I don't know how my repeated statements of "fuck Joanne if she died the world would be a better place" is simping for her. Shitposts qualify as rhetoric just as much as the cringe debates you worship. I'm telling you that from a rhetorical perspective, debates don't accomplish anything. They're fueled entirely by ego. Video essays are far more effective, but even that is still marginal. The truth is that the left doesn't depend on leftist content creators at all. How many people actually organize because of them? The best thing you can do is turn your friends into communists, read theory, and join a union. The Ken Ham Bill Nye debate didn't do shit. It was a colossal waste of time. You'll have the occasional awakening, but that could also be accomplished simply by better education and access to resources. Ken Ham's mind wasn't changed, was it? And shit, creationism in its inherent absurdity already kind of filters for people who are dumb anyways. Like purposeful mispelled words in Nigerian prince email scams. I'm not stifling discourse. I don't care about discourse. I'm making fun of you for putting so much value on internet debates. But thank you for proving that it really is all about ego by declaring a win at the end there.
1
@biologicalengineoflove6851 Way too long. Stay wrong, idiot.
1
You understand women aren't a monolith, right? Like some women aren't attracted to men at all.
1
@TheFoxFromSplashMountain "you cannot bend the laws of human biology just to make you happy" Ban hair dye!
1
Can you specifically explain how trans women are a threat to cis women?
1