Comments by "Trevor Sutherland" (@trevorsutherland5263) on "Daniel Davis / Deep Dive" channel.

  1. Big fan of HL, but Military Summary also kept saying for weeks "Zelensky wants to do one more offensive". Keep up the good (and hilarious) work."
    35
  2. Antony Blinken was saying out loud two years ago: "F-16s may help control limited airspace but won't change the outcome at all". This the #1 guy supporting US using Ukraine as a proxy to fight Russia and even he spoke the truth. Saw an article today AFU identifying and preparing highways that can be used for takeoff and landing as they admit F-16s will never be safe at any airbase. Again as we all said would happen a year ago ...."
    11
  3. 18 months ago, whenever I said "the Russian steamroller is coming"; YouTube would delete it. 😂 One time I got a warning that I was posting "misinformation" and I responded "how can historically accurate precedent be misinformation???" 😂😂
    7
  4. A stupid end to a stupid war. I've gone through at least three historical references to what this appeared to be from its beginning, over the days it matured, and until now when Zelensky finally began speaking, giving hints to this operation's real purpose. At the start it looked like the Battle of the Bulge, then as more AFU were poured into the salient, maybe the Battle of Kursk was more appropriate as there didn't seem to be a realistic destination like in the Battle of the Bulge (Antwerp). For a time I thought maybe Operation Barbarossa since there was so much NATO equipment; possibly NATO itself was going for the knockout blow using AFU as it's "little green men". Now, based on what we've seen and Zelensky's own words, I think Operation Ten Go is the correct historical reference...."
    4
  5. Given enough time, yes almost 100% of the time. However, the situation can vary greatly depending on the circumstances. If it is US vs RU in an overseas locale where both have to bring everything with them, US wins that more easily as logistically the US is far superior to Russia in terms of naval and airlift capacity. If the US Army has to push 50K RU soldiers out of Bakhmut??? I believe the US will win, but the casualties will be almost even.
    1
  6. Unless drones are suddenly capable of high-subsonic/supersonic speeds and have concrete-piercing capabilities.....no "drone" did that. RU has Biden's answer....
    1
  7. I think Putin just arranged for some number of Chechens to be the "counter-attack" in Kursk. Hard to find any estimate of how many are going to Kursk, but they appear to have been uncommitted anywhere else. To me that is smart if that is the case; using a heretofore uncommitted force means you don't have to let up anywhere else where you have the initiative...."
    1