Comments by "Keep It Real" (@KeepItReal33) on "Erick Erickson: It's Paul Manafort's indictment, not Trump's" video.

  1. jim spotswood , Wanna bet some money on that? 😂😂😂
    3
  2. daUser666 , Lol. It’s already been proven the no one, including the Russians, hacked the DNC emails....you’re about 2 months behind current news. 😂😂😂
    3
  3. M A , No evidence of “Russian collusion” other than the DNC and Hillary. And it’s been proven that no one, including the Russians, hacked the DNC emails. Do a little research, cupcake. This has been proven months ago.
    3
  4. M A , Lol. Dude, do some research. That was a lawyer that was a citizen of Russia. It wasn’t the “Russian ambassador”. You guys who know nothing crack me up! Hahahaha Anyway, there was no collusion there. No information was exchanged and the lawyer was only trying to lobby for an adoption issue that had been banned by Congress as part of sanctions against Russia.
    3
  5. Jodie Holmes , lol. You really are behind the news! Hahaha It has been admitted that it was only 4 agencies and they never had any evidence to make such a claim. All of them have dialed back their original claims and again, the emails were NOT hacked, not over the Internet. That's a fact, also. The file transfer rate exceeded the capabilities of the internet and could only have occurred with a local copy. Again, do some research, cupcake. SMH
    3
  6. Jodie Holmes , Do some research. I'll explain some simple computer science to you, cupcake. But seriously, do your own research! You can only copy files at a certain speed, even locally. It's not instantaneous. When you copy a file, the header information (information that tells the computer what type of file it is and how to display that file) also contains a date/time stamp. The "date/time" stamp on the files in question are too close together to have been copied over the Internet. The corasponding transfer rate could have only been obtained from a "local" copy. You can do a google search on the subject to verify. Any link I provide, you'll just say is fake. "IF" you are actually interested in the truth, do your own research. I doubt you will because it will debunk your false talking point.
    3
  7. Jodie Holmes , “Mother jones”? Lmfao. That’s exactly what I thought. You won’t do a google search, because you’re afraid of what you’ll find. Hahahaha I’ve got no time to educate you further. I’m at work. Like I’ve already said, “IF” your interested in the truth, do some research. I even have some most of the information on my channel. SMH P.S. in your article “june 15th”, Guthefer 2.0 has made a statement publicly. I have the video on my channel. Your “Mother Jones” is incorrect.
    3
  8. Jodie Holmes , It would take me a half hour to cite them all. Honestly, I don’t really care if you are basing your opinions on 6 month old data. It actually helps our cause, because anyone who’s up on the current information will just laugh at your rantings. Here is just 1 of hundreds. https://disobedientmedia.com/2017/07/new-research-shows-guccifer-2-0-files-were-copied-locally-not-hacked/
    3
  9. Jodie Holmes , Lol. I just cited one, cupcake. You have some serious delusions there.... Have you been taking your anti-psychic medication? Because you are seriously starting to make me fear for the life of those around you....
    3
  10. OMorningStar , ....Hillary’s campaign manager was just convicted of child molestation....
    2
  11. Joe Smith , Evidence?
    2
  12. Jodie Holmes , Like I’ve previously stated. That’s just one of hundreds. Julian Assange has already made many statements on who he did or did not get his email data from. You’ve already done a 180 degree turn on your original statements.... Stay stupid, cupcake. It’s of no concern of mine.
    1
  13. Jodie Holmes , My mistake. That was one of the other trolls.
    1