General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Keep It Real
Fox News
comments
Comments by "Keep It Real" (@KeepItReal33) on "‘The Five’ reacts to Bolton’s bombshell book claims" video.
Rob Ball , Bolton was furious when President Trump wouldn’t retaliate against Iran (killing hundreds of Iranians) for downing a drone and was even more furious when he was fired. He doesn’t make a very credible witness.
5
Craig Campbell , Your wrong, Cupcake. The Senate does NOT have to call witnesses. The Democrats should have done their job, but they knew they could not call the people closest to the President because of Executive Privilege. The Courts would have ruled in his favor, because there is precedent in doing so. Furthermore, almost every President has used it and it’s been ruled legal and Constitutional. In This Country, a person is innocent until proven guilty. That means it’s the Democrat’s job to prove guilt. NOT the President’s job to prove he is innocent. Go back to North Korea if you want “Guilty until proven innocent”.
3
Craig Campbell , Lmao. You act like a Cupcake. A real trial would have thrown that case out for lack of evidence. The Democrats have provided ZERO evidence of wrongdoing after testimony by 18 witnesses. Bolton wouldn’t make a very credible witness, since he was furious about being fired. Then the Democrats will want another witness or two. Then when those turn out to have nothing, it will be a few more....until this this finally wraps up 3 years into President Trump’s 2nd term. The Senate should vote no new witness, take a week to review the transcripts and then vote.
2
Craig Campbell , LMFAO!!! YOU came to a known Conservative channel to troll and you call US children!!!??? Hahahahaha That’s hilarious and you don’t even realize your own stupidity! Hahahahaha Thanks for the laugh! Hahahahaha
2
Craig Campbell , The only responsibility the Senate has is to evaluate what the House gave them and make a determination of removal or not. If the Democrats felt that their evidence was so strong to actually impeach a sitting President, then they should be good with no witnesses in the Senate.
1