Comments by "Keep It Real" (@KeepItReal33) on "Sen. Schumer: "Trials have witnesses!"" video.

  1. Owen MQ Bishop , Actually the Senate Republicans should call witnesses and not allow Democrats to call any. That’s what the Democrats did in the House.
    9
  2. Casey28xxx , Luckily, in THIS Country (not sure what communist Country you are from), there must be actual evidence to convict someone of a crime. Opinions and feelings/hearsay is NEVER used.
    6
  3. The Republicans in the Senate should do what the Democrats did in the House: Senate Republicans can call witnesses. Democrats cannot.
    2
  4. Psistorm Ikura , I have Sondland’s testimony on my channel. It’s only a 5 minute video, but has ALL of the pertinent information. You should actually watch it, because from what you are saying, I KNOW you haven’t watched his testimony. Sondland clearly states that it was his assumption that there was a Quid Pro Quo, but the President told him on the telephone “No Quid Pro Quo”. The 5 minute video on my channel can’t make it any clearer. A 5 year old would understand it.
    2
  5. Eli Dames , No. The Republicans set the Rules, because they hold the majority....just like the House did.
    2
  6. Douglas Barton , Actually, you may not know, the Watergate scandal was about an administration that spied on their political opponent..... Obama WAS Watergate times 100.
    2
  7. Frank 129 , In President Trump’s case, there is ZERO evidence of a crime. Hillary’s crimes have been proven beyond a doubt.....
    1
  8. Tree yt , There have already been first hand witnesses and they had no evidence of any wrongdoing. In fact, one witness even testified that the President told him “I want nothing from Ukraine. No Quid Pro Quo “. Personally, I think the Senate Republicans should do what the House Democrats did. Senate Republicans can call witnesses and the Democrats cannot.
    1