Comments by "Havana Syndrome" (@havanasyndrome3024) on "Military finds debris from missing fighter jet" video.

Don't confuse incompetence and hi-tech. NORAD also couldn't figure out after the "missing" 747s were on 9/11, yelling at civilian traffic control to tell them where the went. 😂
13
@boxingsense3459 ding ding ding! This man gets it. F35 has "a good track record" because they are useless and basically sit on the ground 99% of the time. Too slow to be an interceptor Too clumsy to be a fighter jet. Too expensive for surveillance. Are only suitable to be a ground support aircraft in uncontested airspace in place of A10 Warthog at 6x the cost.
12
@Anarcho-harambeism goofy - what theaters have F35 been used and in n what function? The piece of junk has only been used as a replacement for A10s... but feel free to prove me wrong.
1
@jackjones9460 it's not a good plane. It's a subsonic piece of junk with million problems. The tail flutter, corrosion, crappy maneuverability, inability to work in inclement weather. 60% uptime at most. 143 man hours of maintenance per hour of flight.
1
@@madlink1214 remind me what's the kill score is for F35? 😂😂
1
@stevebusfield199 where and where has F35 been used in contested airspace ever? It was attempted once, by Israel, taken out by an S200 which wasn't told that the F35 is strealthy (but Israel still claims birdstrike 😂). Since then they have only used it to launch missiles from stand off distance, and the US uses it as a ground support... Basically a crappy version of A10. So instead of claiming someone is clueless, why don't you prove me wrong goofy?
1
@Watermalone119 $60 million for an F35? Put down Hunter's Crack pipe down. Go look at the actual budget for dev+ manufacturing $130 million is more like it. And again, what functions has the F35 being used in besides CAS? Air superiority in a subsonic jet? 😂😂😂. Maybe you could dust off some of those WW2 Mustangs and use them as interceptors....
1
@altf5326 I've never shot down Chinese anything, but shot few shots into your mom after she had few shots. 😁. Say hello to her for me.
1
@stevebusfield199 they didn't shoot it down over Syria - the jet briefly entered Syrian airspace, fired missile and scammed back. But Syrian missile hit it when it was back over Israel. Israel still claims it was a bird strike... So you pick - a $130 million piece of "stealth" junk was either downed by a 1960s soviet air defenses, or was taken out by a birdie. 😂😂😂 which one is less v embarrassing?
1
@Watermalone119 lol. You are adorable. Yes, cheaper and that's why MIC is making record profits.. You are confusing obfuscating costs vs being cheaper.
1
@cmxpotato and why do you think the S200 has 500 lb warhead? Because it's 1960 technology with millimeter wave precision radars not being a thing (which don't with against stealth that well anyways) so it probably blasts off hundreds of feet away from a target, and makes up for lack of precision by power. Given the publicity surrounding Syrian claim in Israel you'd think Israel would release some pix, but they never did. Again, the other option is that the piece of junk was downed by a bird.... I don't know which one is more embarrassing.
1
@cmxpotato Strealthy jets are good at minimizing mmWave reflection, but can't hide from UHF or VHF radar, which can detect strealthy jets at even at long distances, but have crappy resolution. S200 uses semi active homing, so it has to rely on main radar, which probably used VHF or UHF to track the jet. But since it never kicked up to higher frequency for more accurate tracks the missile would only know that the jet is say 500 feet away but without knowing the exact direction, so it would just blast and hope the shrapnel hits it and it did. And yes the F35 is designed to survive bird strikes. Or that's the way they are marketed. And finally that was the first and last time Israeli F35 violated Syrian airspace, why would israel stop if it was a bird strike? And in general, if the F22s and F35s were as strealthy as claimed the US would be busy violating everyone's airspace like they used to with U2s.
1
@HeyYoFabels try living in n reality clown - it's a SUBSONIC piece of crap. Go read the reports - Pentagon has limited top speed for F35 to MACH 0.8 for normal operation due to tail flutter😂😂😂. The piece of junk loses stealth after less than an hour in rain or even fog. It cannot do anything It's was originality intended for. It's basically an A10 Warthog replacement at this point.
1
@Watermalone119 why does it matter that it's 22 years ago? Wasn't NORADs job to monitor airspace? So how the eff was it not able to track jumbo jets with their ADS-B transponders running? And this incident with F35 just proves that nothing has changed in 22 years. NORAD is just as incompetent as ever.
1