Comments by "Havana Syndrome" (@havanasyndrome3024) on "CNBC International Live" channel.

Soviets WITHDREW from Afghanistan, and Afganistani government stood for three years before falling to Taliban. The US war running away from Taliban in a literal sense, abandoning partners and $90 billion of equipment. So I'd keep it quiet if I were you. 🤣🤣🤣
5
You do realize Russians are currently outnumbered 3.5:1, right? And it's obvious that they can't move forward with those numbers, so it makes sense than they'd increase the numbers... Let's see how ukraine does once there is parity in numbers.
3
@Subject82 yo it's 2022, not 1787, so why does the US still use constitution? Just because it happened in 1960 doesn't mean it's irrelevant. It set precedence. If it's ok for the US to dictate what Cuba can or cannot have on the island explain why Russia can't dictate to Ukraine?
2
Yes, because Clinton, Bush, Obama, Trump, Biden all stood in the Frontlines, right?
2
@slimjimhero Ukraine has 700k fighting against 200k Russia/Donbass forces which ended with stalemate. If Russia goes to 500k, good luck to Ukraine scaling to to 1.75 million. And even if they did, Russia could call all reserves and then it's 3 million. Ukraine won't be able to scale up.
2
13? Try 180...
2
Idiotic logic. NATO expansion is literally the cause of the war. Basically NATI is going to protect you from war that it causes. Yeah, that's brilliant logic right there.
2
@slimshady4496 the only thing Brandon is kicking is Nurse Jill while she is wiping his soiled asss.
1
Go ahead and explain WaPo article from Nov 2022 covering Ukraine considering blowing up n the damn ... They literally admitted that there were trying to. Russia in the other hand blowing up the dam to a water reservation for Crimea makes zero sense. But you groomers love twisting facts.
1
@Nimori <- accounts with flags in the name are definitely bots.
1
@No Name and? Just because the US manager to push NATO there doesn't mean it has the right to keep expanding. Just answer ops question, went is it ok for NATO to push east but not OK for Cuba, Venezuela to host Russian missiles?
1
@FirstnameLastname-cx6go just answer the question, coward!
1
@No Name do you understand the concept of multiple potential penetration points? Just because one point exists already doesnt mean Russia should standby as more and more are opened up. Enough is enough.
1
@gio-ko7kf the US tried invading Cuba in 1961, prior to the Cuban Missile Crisis and failed miserably. Second off, Russia agreed to not place missiles in Cuba, which is not what the US is didn't right not. It literally doubling up on Ukraine joining NATO. DC will be wiped off the in a nuclear blast before ukraine joins NATO, got it? You want to keep pushing?
1
@gio-ko7kf try keeping up - Ruasia isn't the one sitting in 50 year old Minutemen missiles, they put new Yars missiles in 2010. If anything Is be worried about the US being able to launch anything strategist. Everything has mothballed for at least three decades.
1
@theremnant7497 Putin is too soft. He kept hoping for negotiations, but to the rest of us it became obvious that Zelenskyy isn't in charge in ukraine, his masters in Pentagon are, and they aren't interested in peace. So let there be war.
1
@welcometothebravenewworld9253 do you understand the difference between being invited there and being invaders, like the US is?
1
@welcometothebravenewworld9253 Donbass invited Russia there. Russian national security invited them there. The US isn't the only country that's allowed to protect its security.
1
Remind me why did the US invade Iraq and Afghanistan? Something about national security... Yeah, poor countries, with no intercontinental missiles,halfway across the globe are a "legitimate" threat to the US. But hostile Ukraine right on Russian border that's was aligning itself with Russia's enemies shouldn't be Russia's concern? I don't know who raised you clowns and why you can't use simple logical tests to understand what causes this conflict to start with.
1
Better take PedophileJoe out before he escalates this into a nuclear war.
1
@gio-ko7kf lol. You sound like the idiots on CNN talking about Russia running out of missiles back in March 🤣🤣🤣
1
@throwaway5656 the point is that maybe the US should stop shoving its nose everywhere and causing conflicts. Middle East, Latin America, Asia, Africa, Europe. Everyone is tired of this shite. Eff off already.
1
@firrespantagruel9817 Nice to have the US start confluct in Europe? No it's not nice. Get them off the government. And Brits too. Europe effed up when they opposed Napoleon's Continental System.
1
@firrespantagruel9817 🤡 remember Cuban Missile Crisis? Do you consider that the US or USSR started it?
1
@firrespantagruel9817 had to do everything with it. Because people think the US blocking Russian ships from being missiles to Cuba was justified, but Russia blocking militarization of Ukraine by NATO is not. If NATO/Ukraine have the right to have nukes there, explain to me what Russia can't in Cuba?
1
@sevengates555 the US has a habit of shoving nuclear weapons to every NATO country that is willing to host them - Italy, Belgium, Germany, Turkey etc. Can you come to a logical conclusion of whether the US would bribe the corrupt ukrainian government into hosting American nukes if Ukraine became part of NATO?
1
Zelensky is a real clown. In the middle of war they legalized gay parades and are now promoting transsexualism. Putin said - men are men, women are women, and children are a blessing. Imma roll with Putin.
1
@Edax_Royeaux WTF are babbling on about. Ukraine has been drafting from the very beginning. Videos all over telegram showing "recruiter" trying to fish for new draftees to bring in. Some are hilarious where the guys on uniforms are beating the crap out of the people they are trying to "defend" Ukraine. And your must suck at math Explain to me how 42million person ukraine can gather more soldiers that 145 million Russia.
1
@enriqueperezarce5485 when I say 200k I am counting everyone, not just Russia. But it's actually about 230k to be precise, not half a million. So ukraine has 3:1 advantage right now. That's going to change. And the is no issue with logistics right now whatsoever. Adding 300k to the mix isn't going to change much, the front isn't b changing, the routes are already established, sending more stuff on established routes take 1/10 the effort of creating new ones.
1
@slimjimhero "thousands kilometers"? I don't think you know how areas works, go back to school. If you are referring to 2000 SQUARE kilometers ukraine got back that's an equivalent of 40×50 KM square 😂😂😂😂. That's handle a win and let's see how long they'll hold on to it. In the first days of invasion Russia too was haunting TENS of thousands of sq kilometers a day! Holding on to them it's a different story.
1
And? If Americunt's puppets won PedophileJoe would have been happy.
1