Comments by "Havana Syndrome" (@havanasyndrome3024) on "Putin: West Is Trying to Escalate Conflict in Ukraine" video.

If only Ukraine's bosses in the Pentagon allowed Ukraine to stay neutral instead of being turned into an anti-Russia battle field.
5
Explain why Russia is in the wrong. Either 1. Cuba had the right to host Russian nukes, Ukraine has the right to host American nukes. 2. It's unacceptable for Cuba to host Russian nukes, it's unacceptable for ukrane to host American nukes. If you have a third option explain it without sounding like a hypocrite.
4
@enjoyesk8978 Russia invaded in 2014? Care to point me to a single UN Special Monitoring Mission report on Ukrane which observed Russian troops there? Your country decided to get in the middle of Russia -NATO standoff and and volunteered to be canon fodder for NATO, so why are you crying about having to fight now?
4
Yes, how dare Russia not want NATO missiles on its borders, why can't it be like the US which allows Russian, Chinese, North Korean, and Iranian missiles in Cuba. Right?
4
@enjoyesk8978 Crimeans made their decision, they didn't want nothing to do with the Nazi tyrants in Kiev that were glorifying WW2 Nazi collaborators and dictating to them what language to speak.
2
@enjoyesk8978 NATO terrorists don't equal majority of the world. Stop with your fake propaganda. Explain why Russia should be willing to tolerate American forces on its borders if the US wouldn't accept Russian forces in their? Explain without sounding like a hypocrite.
2
@enjoyesk8978 and I can imagine being bullied, that's why I'm glad Russia is standing up to the global bully/thug/terrorist. Hopefully China and others will rise too.
2
What did he say that's a lie?
1
@BoltRM <<< username checks out. Way to not understand theoretical questions. Zelenskyy was seeking to host American forces including nukes in the ukrane. So stop deflecting and answer the question. If the US can host nukes in the ukrane, explain why Russia shouldn't be allowed to host theirs in Cuba.
1
@greenarthur6602 no need to go into the past - is the US ok with Russia having nukes in Cuba now? What do you think would happen if they started putting them there? Why did it OK for the US to have nukes in Germany, Belgium, Italy, but the US wouldn't tolerate it in Latin America?
1
@Rigbabes of course there isn't, because Russia isn't allowing in, that's what this war is about on large part. If Russia allows Ukraine to join NATO the US works bring nukes there just like they brought them to Germany, Italy, Belgium, Turkey and other countries. So just answer my question on what gives the US to have nukes in Europe if the US wouldn't tolerate them in Latin America.
1
@greenarthur6602 and what part of Russia proposing European security framework did you miss? Russia tried diplomacy, before and after the invasion, but the terrorists in Washington DC are never willing to take other countries' security concern into account. Look at 2000- 2013 era - Russia and Europe were collaborating on an unprecedented levels, and that concerned the US that they started using Ukraine to sabotage Russian gas and strain relationship with Europe. Now the US has degraded to committing acts of international terrorism blowing up gas pipelines. Who can negotiate with a terrorist state like the US? If Europeans had a spine they would be sanctioning the US right now, yet they are too scared to stand up to the global bully/terrorist.
1
@josefranco3155 ICBMs already existed during Cuban Missile Crisis. So again the question to you is yes there are subs, there are ICBMs, so what's the problem with Russia having nukes in Cuba now?
1
@josefranco3155 I know Putin isn't tryin to. My point was - would the US tolerate Russian nukes in Cuba, if not, why should Russia tolerate NATO AKA America's expansion to its borders.
1
@greenarthur6602 negotiate with what Ukraine? Ukrane is not a sovereign state, they do what's dictated to them from the Pentagon. In case you missed it Russia has been trying diplomacy for ages only to have ukrane turn more hostile.
1
@greenarthur6602 1. Because ukrane was actively building military/navy bases for the US and the UK. Was Russia supposed to wait until foreign boots were on the ground? What could they negotiate at that point, the only option would have been to go in n direct confrontation with NATO. 2. The gas pipelines blown up in the terrorist attracts weren't going there Ukraine. They were an alternative route to ukrane. Blowc up the pipelines and now Ukraine can sabotage Europe and demands military aid else "the Russian blew up our pipeline". 3. War was the last option, because you can't negotiate with NATO terrorists, and don't let the western media fool you - most of Latin America, Asia, Africa, the Middle East and even a lot of East Europeans are rooting for Russia and consider the US to be a thug and a bully. Which it is.
1
@Rigbabes remind me when did the US pay out reparations to ask the countries in the middle east it destroye, genociding six million civilians in the process, in the last 21 years? You want to hold Russia accountable but choose to ignore the world's largest terrorist state and all the damage it has done? Try to explain yourself without soundingb like a total hypocrite.
1
@greenarthur6602 where did I say that the ukrane wasnt a sovereign state. They are as is Cuba. Still waiting for explanation why something is allowed for ukrane that's not allowed for Cuba.
1
@Turdaliev13 yes, let's ignore the US government overthrowing Ukrainian government and installing puppet regime which banned Russian language as the trigger for Crimean declaration of independence from the ukrane.
1
@Spledge another clown that doesn't know what whataboutism is.
1
By real democracy you mean a regime subservient to the Pentagon which bans opposition parties and assassinates and imprisons opposition politicians and journalists like ukrane?
1
@05KAR I don't need you to keep repeating ukrainian propaganda. Where are UN SMM reports starting so?
1
@05KAR yes ukrane is so "neutral" they actually wrote membership in NATO into their constitution.
1
@05KAR again with deflections. You are talking about some Russian being there. How does this equal a military? Where Russian troops there? Tanks, jets, artillery? No! But if you have an evidence to the contrary point me to a UN SMM report, else it's nothing but ukraipian propaganda.
1
@ColinPoole you right, where was Europe when the US was invading and genociding millions on the middle east. They should have stepped in to fight the US, right? Or does the world's largest terrorist state gets a pass to do whatever it wants?
1
@miketoni3538 why are you cowards so afraid of someone hearing what Putin is actually saying instead of relying on CNN to twist his words?
1