General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Richard Stuczynski
The Wall Street Journal
comments
Comments by "Richard Stuczynski" (@Rjsjrjsjrjsj) on "The Wall Street Journal" channel.
Previous
1
Next
...
All
🤣 There are literally brand new buildings collapsing in China. Do you make up these comments yourself or are they dictated by Beijing?
11
Boo hoo! A defensive alliance is on my border. 🙄 What a juvenile, ridiculous argument. Grow up.
11
And Chinese for some reason. Talk about desperate.
9
And yet China is building carriers. Clearly they don't agree with you.
2
Here's the difference: The US has a long and successful history of constructing, launching and operating space telescopes and China copies 💩 and overinflates it's capabilities in a bid to be relevant. Ergo, there is no comparison.
2
Wow. Remarkably well said. 👍
1
You're wrong. I don't even know where to start. 🙄
1
Oh look! Chicken little is threatening to make the sky fall. Why does anyone even bother giving him airtime? It's just lies and misrepresentation every time.
1
That background beat sounds like (Put the lime in the) Coconut. Now I can't get it out of my head. BTW: You can't give the soldiers names but a nice clear shot of one of their faces is good? 🙄
1
It reveals they don't have one. Throwing a temper tantrum does nothing. If they could do anything they'd do it. All this shows is weakness and desperation.
1
Wow. Russia and China don't like something. How new. 🙄 Bunch of f'n crybabies.
1
Grain of salt on this one. Russians have a LONG history of lying and deception. Horrible regime.
1
All the Fujian has demonstrated is its ability to float. Talk is cheap. That's why the Chinese and Russians do a LOT of talking. Let's see some action. We all know what a US carrier can do.
1
🤣 No way. It'll NEVER happen.
1
Like it's tanking now? Excellent!!
1
@khrapov Did that offend you? You should use nukes! Troll. Is that better? Troll more accurate than bot? 🤣
1
"Why the WSJ is sensationalist" Every single WSJ video I've seen (and, granted, it's not many) has been chock full of holes in its analysis. China has never demonstrated any capability other than man power. Just like Russia. Look how well that's going. And they could walk to Ukraine as opposed to swimming to Taiwan. 🙄
1
@ltsahagian You're a m0r0n. How about rattling off all the innocent lives Russia has taken, including their own citizens, since WWII? Hypocrite. 🙄
1
@josephmontezuma5089 🙄 If you're gonna just throw ridiculous statements out there why not say Mexico's alliance with Asgard or Mexico's alliance with The Galactic Empire. Mexico would never ally with Russia because there's literally no benefit. Do you even have a point? U 🤡
1
What? WHAT?! That is utterly simplistic. By your definition I can collect dark energy in my backyard with a jar. 🙄
1
@rh1960 Do you even know what dark energy is?
1
@rh1960 Not really. It's a hypothetical energy that has strong experimental backing based on our current understanding of physics. Specifically why expansion seems to be accelerating. All this info is available online. Did you even bother looking into it before posting?
1
@rh1960 Sure. Whatever makes you feel better. You seem to have trouble admitting that you have no clue what dark energy is.
1
@rh1960 🙄 It's not a fact. Go back and read the conversation. I'm versed in physics if that's what you're asking. Anyway, this was mildly entertaining but no longer. Take care. If you're really interested it would behoove you to do some research and not "educate" yourself via YouTube. 👋
1
@rh1960 Hurt by your opinion. That's funny. Honestly, do some research. Just about everything you wrote is wrong. Even from a logical consistency pov.
1
@rh1960 🙄 Dark energy is not electricity. We can detect electricity. Please stop. Again, everything you just wrote is wrong. Open a book.
1
@danielhutchinson6604 🙄 Sure. 🤡 Absolutely everything you've written is wrong.
1
Previous
1
Next
...
All