Comments by "Richard Stuczynski" (@Rjsjrjsjrjsj) on "Sandboxx" channel.

  1. Imagine this: You're entering Disney World and you hear Alex greeting you with "I'm Mickey Mouse and THIS is Disney World" in the same voice he uses to start his videos. I think it'd be a FANTASTIC draw. 🤣
    100
  2. If the Russians think they're such fantastic pilots why don't they fly over Ukraine?
    58
  3. 🤣 Nope. Sure isn't. The most impressive thing is that they actually get off the ground.
    46
  4. "America's monopoly on stealth fighters stretched to 2017" and is still a monopoly to this day.
    35
  5. Given that the US had the Phoenix back in the 70's I'm gonna go ahead and say whatever's coming out is going to DOMINATE. IMO. 👍
    5
  6. Been waiting for this. Thank you Alex. You do it so I don't have to. 😉😁
    4
  7. Where should I start?.First, your numbers are wrong. Second, as mentioned in the video, the land based ICBM's are just one arm of the triad. Third, defending America is hardly dependent on Nukes. I could go on but I doubt you can even digest what I've written. 🙄
    4
  8.  @jstriker623  Dark Mickey 😉
    4
  9. Iron Dome name rant... You miss the point. Frump is simplistic. His supporters are simplistic. THAT is why it works. "Simple" as that. See how I substituted simplistic for mind numbingly stupid? 🙄
    3
  10. That is true. They tasked a satellite to observe it.
    3
  11. That would be no. A bigly no.
    3
  12. Completely wrong. Lousy analysis.
    3
  13. Russia claims. 🙄 Watch this. I built a stealth fighter in my backyard out of scrap metal, wood and duct tape that can supercruise at mach 10. Has a range of 10,000 miles. Fires megawatt lasers at any angle and is LITERALLY invisible to ANY detection system. See? Claims are easy. It's just talk. Or typing. Stay tuned for my next creation. A death star, carrier, black hole creating super machine. I'm thinking grass clippings and old cardboard. 👍
    3
  14. 🤣 Like...? Seriously. Tell me ONE thing ANYONE would "learn" from listening to Poopin'. 🙄
    3
  15. "China and Russia closing the gap on fighter engine technology" 🤣 You're hilarious Alex. Very funny. Thanks. I'll worry about China and Russia if and when they actually demonstrate their claimed capabilities. Feel free to wake me but i have a feeling I'll be getting PLENTY of sleep. 🥱😴
    2
  16. Love the top speed comments. Given the p/w ratios and aerodynamics I'd bet that both the 22 and the 23 can go SIGNIFICANTLY faster than their published claims. Stealth coatings folks. They've gotten better but they're still fragile. Relatively speaking. Air Force veteran
    2
  17. That's lovely revisionist history there. Well done. 👍💯 🙄
    2
  18.  @vernonkuhns3561  Not interested in educating you, only calling out your BS. Take care. 😉
    2
  19. Wow. You've got way too much time on your hands if that's your nitpick. 🙄
    2
  20. "How capable Russian pilots are" 😳... 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 Sorry. I can't stop laughing. 😁 PPP. 🙄 Please. You get what you pay for. PPP is bbbb bull💩.
    2
  21. Boeing did that with the Silent Eagle. It helps but unless the plane is designed for stealth it's not that great an improvement. Look at his video on the Silent Eagle.
    2
  22. Near peer. Love that. Does anybody still think there is a viable "near peer" to the US? And if you trot out China or, heaven forbid, Russia I'll laugh right in your face. Closest effective militaries to the US are all staunch Allies. Period.
    2
  23. Like what?
    2
  24.  @milanradovanovic3693  🙄 Either you don't fully understand English or you weren't listening. Watch it again.
    2
  25.  @milanradovanovic3693  okay 🙄
    2
  26. Sure. That makes sense. No one said anything because it's NASA. 🙄
    2
  27. Electromagnetic carrier = photon. Photon (of a particular energy) strikes material designed to absorb it. What happens? Think black vs white in the sun. 🙂
    2
  28. I wonder if it will need 3 engines like China's "6th" gen J 36 recently revealed. 🤔 🙄 🤣
    2
  29. 👍 I really enjoy videos that completely debunk the hype(rsonic) Russian bull💩. 😁
    2
  30. Just about? I disagree. Everything would be more accurate. He lies like your avg person breathes
    2
  31. It's a "coping" mechanism. 🙂
    2
  32. You 🧌's REALLY need to work on your English. A toddler could pick you out. 🙄
    2
  33.  @stcredzero  Completely wrong. Have you, at the very least, even played a strategy game? Because you certainly have no military background. 🙄
    2
  34. 2 things 1: diplomacy: the profession, activity, or skill of managing international relations ergo any "kinetic" action IS diplomacy. Using kinetic is just trying to be clever. 2. Cost-exchange ratio is stupid unless it factors in the damage that was avoided by shooting down the weapon. I'd argue that that is ALWAYS cost effective. Otherwise why even develop anything to shoot down weapons? 🙄
    2
  35. 🤣 Sure. I bet the "Little Emperor's" will fight just as well as Ukrainians. 😉
    1
  36. What?
    1
  37. 🙄 That's adorable. As in naive.
    1
  38. How dangerous? Has it even flown yet? Because if it hasn't it isn't dangerous at all. Unless it falls on you I guess. Chinese quality does suck.
    1
  39. Yall? Is that someone's name? Weird. 🤔
    1
  40. What? Ever hear of armor? Tanks defeat bullets all day long.
    1
  41. What about Russia's Wave Motion Gun? That still works. Right? 😁 F'n Russia. 🙄
    1
  42. Does anything Russian work the way they claim? I'm serious. Have we actually seen anything perform well? It's just been so pathetic.
    1
  43. If you're in combat. Dimwit.
    1
  44. Do they? Do they really? Seems to me Russia in particular doesn't look at anything and believes their own propaganda and all China can do is throw temper tantrums.
    1
  45. Is the sky blue? Of course they stole it. The name Mighty Dragon is appropriate though because, like all dragons, it's a fantasy.
    1
  46. Sure they can. They just need Lockheed to design it. 😉 🤣 What's with the background music? Awful. Couldn't finish watching the whole video.
    1
  47. I'm all for putting Tom Cruise in a hypersonic missile. How do we make this happen? Start a petition? 🤔 🙂
    1
  48. Minimal Russian troops? 🤔 You're hilarious. 🤣
    1
  49. We should probably round them up and put them in internment camps like the Japanese during WWII. Just because you're of Chinese descent doesn't mean you're a spy. 🙄
    1
  50. Meh. Who cares? 🥱😴
    1
  51. 🤣 Yes. As has been demonstrated over the past 2+ yrs the Ukrainians have no idea what they're doing. 🙄 Put succinctly, you DON'T understand what Alex is saying. 😉
    1
  52. 🤣 Yeah. All those Javelins are just for show. Showing what a blown up Russian tank looks like. You're a 🤡
    1
  53. You're an ID 10 T. 🙄
    1
  54. "Hellfire" Is there any missile with a better name? That just "strikes" me (see what I did there?) as the absolutely best nom de guerre. 👍
    1
  55. Echoing others... thanks. About time. I'm so sick of "conventional" wisdom showing how far behind the US is. 🙄 Any reasonable observer would conclude that we are far and away the most potent military ever regardless of what fancy new weapon China or Russia claims to be fielding. Hell, Japan's probably ahead of them.
    1
  56. WHAT?!?! China steals things?! 😳 Yeah. No 💩. China. What a joke. 🙄
    1
  57. Let's be real.for a moment. Russia and China and to a lesser extent Iran and North Korea are all about appearances and perception. Their militaries and equipment (and rhetoric) are garbage. Plain and simple. Yes an explosive is an explosive and a projectile is a projectile. Both can harm or kill but capability is another thing entirely and not ONE of those countries has it.
    1
  58. WHAT!? Fighters don't fly themselves?! A lot depends on the pilots and their training and experience? Who knew? I did. I knew 🙄
    1
  59. Don't ask that idiot what to do. He'll say go back to propellers. Like steam catapults instead of E-MALS. He's so f'n stupid.
    1
  60. 🤔 I get "self-conscious wimp" but I suppose they're not mutually exclusive.
    1
  61. I'm still waiting for the average person to achieve sentience. Nevermind AI. 🙄
    1
  62. Good point about debris from blowing a drone out of the sky. Just look at Russia. All those Ukrainian drones they shoot down (all of them they claim 🙄) still the "debris" is destroying all kinds of things. The above is ALL sarcasm in case you missed it. 😉
    1
  63. Absolutely wrong. There certainly are people that don't know what a plane looks like. Especially "freaking" planes. 🙄
    1
  64.  @DanielPalmer-c5u  🤣 Impressive argument. ID 10 T
    1
  65. I'm (insert name here) and THIS is my comment! Half ready? That's fine. Shouldn't take more than half to totally devastate any adversary or reasonable coalition of adversaries. That's how good we are. 😉
    1
  66. 🙄 Gee. Why didn't they think of that before? 🤔 U 🥜
    1
  67. "Experience" 🤔 I really enjoy that and the implication that it breeds competence or even proficiency. I've been breathing longer than a lot of people (experience), doesn't mean I do it better. 😉
    1
  68. Just change the title "Why it's wrong to think dogfighting is dead" or "Dogfighting is not dead. Here's why" Problem solved. Carry on with your video.
    1
  69. 🤣 And literally better than anything else. Ergo all other planes are worse than rubbish. 😉
    1
  70. "Hidden line of code that could potentially grenade relations with your closest allies" 🤔 Right. Just let Frump grenade relations right out in the open. Who needs a kill switch when you've got Captain Chaos? 🙄
    1
  71. I destroyed a Death Star with a BB gun... In a training exercise. 🙄
    1
  72.  @bowencreer3922  Nope. Sure hasn't. Smarten up.
    1
  73. "Not all that capable or scary" Yep. That pretty much sums up Russia. 🙂 I'm willing to bet an F15SE is, at the very least, on par with the SU57 and the J20 and probably better. That F15 airbrake... WOW! Love it.
    1
  74. If AI is so fantastic, put it in people. The vast majority could certainly use... something. 🙄
    1
  75. @Jeff55369  Thanks for proving my point. 👍
    1
  76. Yeah? That's some kind of range on those drones if they can reach US air bases.
    1
  77. "We're talking about F22, F35..." and that's it. China and Russia couldn't make stealth to save their lives. They can certainly lie though. 🙄 "We built a plane and sprinkled a liberal amount of stealth on it!" "Stealth fighters are 'planely' visible" 🤣 No pun intended? 👍
    1
  78. ​ @giganigga9624 🤣 You're delightfully delusional. 😉
    1
  79. Okay. Complex, nuanced situation. Agreed. That doesn't mean there isn't a simple solution. Albeit ethically shaky. Flatten the Gaza Strip and rebuild it as a part of Israel. Might makes right and Israel certainly has the might relative to Hamas/Palestine.
    1
  80. So that means the US fears no one. Yep. That's right. 👍
    1
  81.  @stcredzero  The entire post. As for distance being "fundamental" the Russians have proved even that theory wrong. They're right next door and can't get it right. The Chinese would have to cross the strait which makes it even more difficult. Read whatever you like, you're still wrong. Take care now. Bye bye. 👋
    1
  82. Turns out my Freightliner is stealth. 13' tall, 8' wide, 20' long but no one can see it. Or drivers are stupid. It's one or the other. 🙄
    1
  83.  @afterthefact6708  Yes. I'm familiar. Really my post was a jab at those who like to think the US has peers. 😉
    1
  84. But G is made out of unobtanium. Effectively indestructible. It'd be a great light show though. 👍
    1
  85. China and Russia don't have any 5th gen fighters. Period. End of story.
    1
  86. Nope. We ain't "losing" 💩. It's all sensationalist, hyperbolic baloney. It just gets tiresome even talking about it let Al be debating it. Bottom line: the US is on top. No one else is even close. Near peer 🙄 if near is "can barely be seen" then sure.
    1
  87. Alex, I have a request. Using your intro voice/cadence would you please say "I'm Mickey Mouse. Welcome to Disney World" Thanks in advance. 👍 And, fyi, idling in any vehicle is zero mpg. Not 10 or any other positive number. 😉
    1
  88. "Win a fight against the US" 🤣 Thats hilarious. You're hilarious Alex. 👍💯
    1
  89. The only countries that have a snowballs chance of long range engagement with the US are China and Russia. Assuming Frump doesn't alienate every single one of our allies. Russia can't handle Ukraine. China can't handle Taiwan. Both are demographically screwed. Which ultimately affects their ability to wage war. Point is, there's no one that can touch the US now. Nevermind going forward.
    1
  90. Timmy! TIMMY TIMMY! (South Park)
    1
  91. Wouldn't have to be "too" intelligent. Just a bit of self awareness should be sufficient. Rump is so obviously full of 💩. 🙄
    1
  92. WHAT!?!? Rump isn't THE expert on something!? Clearly you didn't ask him. Otherwise you'd know that he (and Muskrat) know more about EVERY subject than anyone else. Even so called experts like yourself. 😉
    1
  93. 3M makes a ceramic coating. So if I put that on my car can I speed with impunity? 🤔
    1
  94. As usual. "Such and such fighter beat the latest American fighter!" because the latest US fighter was chained to the tarmac. Impressive! 🙄 Addendum: I can't imagine an F22 headed for combat would even enter a "merge". They'd wipe out whatever was coming before they even knew the F22's were there.
    1
  95. Good to know. Guess I'll start using mine. 😉
    1
  96. ​ @karneasada6025 🤣👍
    1
  97. Techno?
    1
  98. Just edit your post, Sparky. No need for a comment
    1
  99. So this gun fires the "large" 30mm rounds? As opposed to the 30mm guns that fite the small or medium ones? 🤔 🤣🤣😉
    1
  100. To answer your opening question, Russia DOES suck at using them. They suck at using everything. It's still Airpower though. With all those flying turrets. 😉 😁
    1
  101. Wrong. The F-22 is most definitely made for dogfighting. If it needs to.
    1
  102. Those aren't 6th gen. They're 16th gen. The Chinese are ten steps ahead of everyone. Just ask them. 🙄 🤣
    1
  103. Reminds me of when I tell folks I saw a cougar in New Hampshire. "There are no cougars in New Hampshire" 🙄 Pi$$ off. I know what I saw. 🙂
    1
  104. The short answer is no. Musk is a m0r0n. 🙄
    1
  105. 🤣 Sure. That's what they did. You're hilarious. 🙄😉
    1
  106. That's particularly telling when you make a statement that a 2M $ drone is super cheap. Certainly in relative terms but absolute? No f'n way. 🙄
    1
  107. 🤣 But "we" certainly try to. Don't "we"? 😉
    1
  108.  @MarkBarrack  Sure. Right up until Jan 6. 🙄
    1
  109. Of course "we" could (Lockheed, Northrop) but why? In fact why make so many stealth? Elite squadrons for tip of the spear then non stealth for mop up. No one else has stealth anyway. No. Russia and China do not have stealth. 🙄
    1
  110. Whattaya mean, could? They already did and now it's just a question of consistent improvement. F22! 👍
    1
  111. That's your line? Rape? Dead people don't bother you? 🤔
    1
  112. How's that anti grav system coming? How about inertial dampers for good measure?
    1