Comments by "Richard Stuczynski" (@Rjsjrjsjrjsj) on "Binkov's Battlegrounds" channel.

  1. This isn't a mystery wrapped in a riddle smothered by secret sauce. The Russians suck. Their equipment, their training, their tactics, all abysmal. Even historically they're a joke. Brute force and overwhelming numbers are the only way they accomplish anything. Just like their buddies the Chinese.
    33
  2. No. An emphatic no. Nothing even comes close.
    19
  3.  @Hayabusa-lo6bc  nope
    16
  4.  @umthefunjoker  that's flat out wrong.
    15
  5. Nothing without NATO 's recon? Well then I guess it's a good thing they got it. $uck it Russia. 🖕
    15
  6. Better check history. China's had it's @$$ handed to it time and time again.
    12
  7. All the US has to do is shut down seaborne trade to China. After several months China will just shut down. Then we stomp them. It's ridiculous to think we need to go toe to toe with them. 🙄
    12
  8. Yep. Otherwise the entire world wouldn't be pursuing it. U 🤡
    10
  9. Neither can Russia or China. The difference is US weapons hit what they aim for. Russians can only hit playgrounds and come close to pedestrian bridges. China has only shown the ability to hit mockups in their desert. So go ahead, throw a hypersonic at the US then say bye bye to your entire offensive capability. 👍
    10
  10. Problem? Same as the rest of their equipment. It's Russian. They should ask the US if they can buy some weapons. Like the Chinese. Buy foreign military equipment and then produce a domestic copy that sucks. 👍
    10
  11.  @umthefunjoker  Tell yourself whatever you need to. 👍
    9
  12. Building more garbage just means you have a bigger pile. Chinese "quality" is well documented. If China's so powerful, take Taiwan. What are they waiting for? Not scared of the US? Then help Russia. Honestly, they're not even a paper tiger, they're wet toilet paper.
    9
  13. No. It's not. China's a joke. So are you. Puppet.
    9
  14. Because the French are aggressively selling them to make up for the loss of that submarine contract with Aus. 🤣
    8
  15. You mean the ones they mock up in the desert? Because they've never hit a US carrier. Or ANY carrier for that matter. It's easy to say you can do something... until you actually have to do it.
    8
  16. The PRC doesn't have much time. They're aging out of existence and their economy is collapsing. Time to 💩 or get off the pot. Besides, I REALLY want to see them get demolished. Please, PLEASE invade. 🤞
    7
  17. You're funny. Like a 🤡. Are you a 🤡? 🤔
    6
  18.  @poling1990  "That word you keep using, I do not think it means what you think it means." 😁
    5
  19. We got plenty of money. But thanks for your concern. 😎
    5
  20. This reminds me of the chipmunks mobilizing in my back yard. They're cute and fun to watch too. 😁
    5
  21. China better hurry up and invade Taiwan before these hit the skies in numbers. The US will only need about 20 to flatten China. 🙂
    5
  22. Turns out your conclusions are completely wrong. Nice job. 👍
    5
  23.  @baptiste9017  🙄 okay. Tell you what. Hold your breath! I love watching people turn blue. 😁
    4
  24.  @paulwilson8061  That's some twisted logic there but you be you. Just ignore the fact that they were pushed back from Kyiv and had to regroup in the east. Not to mention the fact that this isn't even remotely over so taking a snapshot of the situation proves exactly nothing. Honestly. Get a grip.
    4
  25. Pretty obvious that this is about Russia. If Putzin ever gets Ukraine he'll be coming for Romania and Poland next. By that time Poland will be able to beat the 💩 out of him themselves. 👍
    4
  26. What? That entire post is illegible. 🤷
    4
  27.  @emmanuelreyes2380  Wow. Ad hominem attack with no facts to back up your assertion. You must be fun at parties. 🙄
    4
  28.  @drzavnalutrija  🙄 So Russia, China and even Iran aren't pursuing stealth? U m0r0n.
    3
  29. Consensus seems to be against you. U 🤡 🤣
    3
  30. "waist" 🤣 You're hilarious
    3
  31.  @hughmungus2760  🙄 Sure. Keep telling yourself that.
    3
  32. No. Not as big as Nimitz and all it does is float. It's a joke. Just like the rest of China
    3
  33.  @buddy1155  Syria? What are you smoking?
    3
  34. You just named 3 🤡's. Congratulations. All of them have been proven wrong time and time again.
    3
  35. That's easy. First minute: Belarus enters war. Second minute: Belarus defeated. You're welcome.
    2
  36. Because the Russians don't have any decent tanks for a mass offensive. Why are you a puppet?
    2
  37.  @paulwilson8061  Sure. The Russian population of 140 million has less manpower than the Ukrainian population of 40+ million. Where'd you go to school?
    2
  38.  @theengineeringscience  in any war there are going to be casualties on both sides. Are you trying to argue that because Americans died then the US somehow lost. That's true in literally EVERY conflict. What the numbers clearly show is that the US is dominant in every war for over a century. As for today, our Navy alone can flatten anyone. Or any viable coalition. Keep telling yourself how ineffectual we are and then ask yourself why no one has stepped up to challenge us. And, honestly, you have no idea what I think. Your accusations are just to make you feel better. 🙄
    2
  39.  @theengineeringscience  You miss the point. I posted that the Russians suck and you responded with some alternative reality about the US. It's mildly entertaining telling you you're wrong but it has nothing to do with the original comment. If you want to tell everyone how awful the US is then go start a YouTube channel. Just what do you think you're accomplishing here? Are you trying to convince me or yourself?
    2
  40.  @snslifestyleorg  They already are. Where've you been? And I wrote "wet toilet paper". They don't rise to paper tiger.
    2
  41.  @ub3rfr3nzy94  China's a joke. Their last war was against Vietnam. Right next door. And look! Vietnam's still there.
    2
  42.  @foxshoot3138  It's gibberish. 🙄
    2
  43.  @charlessmith8679  And they're still waiting for it to drop.
    2
  44. Wow. You're completely wrong. All China does is assemble. Their quality is 💩. Microchips for instance. The only ones they can build are the low end garbage. All the medium and high end come from other countries.
    2
  45. Uncle Sam is absolutely right. US Navy tonnage exceeds the next 13 Navies combined. That includes China
    2
  46.  @computernerd8157  For a "computer nerd" you have no idea what your talking about. Who is "our"? The US? We don't owe China anything. As for electronics, you're wrong about that too. But this is hardly the place to educate you. Go do your own research.
    2
  47. At least this post is legible. You're still a 🤡. Red bear brave... 🙄 Red bear red from bleeding all over the place. 😁
    1
  48.  @benjaminmathon7417  Are they? You'd think they'd be used to waiting after that debacle of a deal with the French. Plus the Aussies got more than Subs and they know the US would be there in any conflict. The French certainly wouldn't.
    1
  49.  @labechamel75  Sure. Quick! Go tell 'em! 🙄 U R A 🥜
    1
  50. Lucky us (US) there's no such thing as a near peer.
    1
  51.  @josephahner3031  No. They're not. They're a joke. We don't have to engage the Chinese at all. We'd just have to shut down their imports and that would be the end. That assessment is based on their claimed capabilities. Now if we're talking actual capabilities it's an even bleaker story. We'd walk over them like we walked over Iraq. How do I know this? Because they can't even take Taiwan. If they could they would.
    1
  52. 🤣 Yeah. Just like Russia is "saving" its best weapons. You're a 🤡
    1
  53. Gimlers? 🙄
    1
  54.  @taeminlee8992  Not me. I just took 5.5 months off. I'm sure someone is though. But, honestly, if there was money falling out of trees there'd be plenty of people that would still be bankrupt. You can't fix $tupid. You must know. You LIVE it. 😉
    1
  55.  @paulwilson8061  Your point?
    1
  56.  @theengineeringscience  News flash! Everyone IS weaker than the US. 🙄
    1
  57.  @theengineeringscience  No. I wouldn't. You would. Here's a question: If I beat the crap out of you, stand on your chest for an hour and then leave, did you win? I know it's fashionable to use those examples as US losses but it's just not the case. Is it? In a total war that the whole US is committed to absolutely no one can stand against us. That's just reality. Tell yourself whatever you need to though. Doesn't change anything. 🙂
    1
  58.  @theengineeringscience  🙄 Casualty figures alone prove you're wrong. The US travels halfway around the world, thrashes their opponents, stays as long as it wants and leaves when it feels like it. That's how it's always been. That's how it will continue to be. The only way you'd have my wallet or anything else is if there were some sort of enforcing entity available. That doesn't exist in an international setting. Your analogy is flawed. 🤡 Save your twisted narrative for someone who cares.
    1
  59.  @theengineeringscience  Clearly you just want to fight. So tell you what, stick your head in a bag and fight for air. 🙄
    1
  60. Wow. You're an ID 10 T. 🙄
    1
  61. Oh c'mon. Because they're garbage. 🙄
    1
  62.  @hughmungus2760  The rock that dropped on your head if you think China's ever going to surpass the US. Once again, if they got the juice then let's see them help Russia. Even when Nancy visited Taiwan all they could do was throw a temper tantrum.
    1
  63.  @paniniman6524  That's relevant how?
    1
  64.  @snslifestyleorg  That's irrelevant. The very fact that China says they're going to "reunite" with Taiwan shows Taiwan is independent. If Taiwan is part of China why don't they do what Beijing says? Saying something doesn't make it true. Cling to semantics if you like, the reality is plain for everyone to see. You 🤡
    1
  65.  @hughmungus2760  While the Chinese literally kill their own citizens. Sure. Whatever makes you feel better. Just go ahead and make 💩 up. 🙄
    1
  66.  @vlhc4642  Because you have to transport men to occupy the nation. Are you intellectually deficient? Your comment indicates you are.
    1
  67.  @stranger6797  One more time. If China's so powerful why don't they take Taiwan? If Russia's so tough why is Ukraine beating them? Twist the conversation any way you like. Make up whatever you need to. Doesn't change reality. China and Russia are losers. Plain to see for all. 🙂
    1
  68.  @vlhc4642  🤣 Take a look at Chinese losses in those two wars you mentioned. Twist it any way you like. China got mauled. The Chinese can't even handle Vietnam right on their doorstep. Nor Japan, nor Taiwan, nor India.
    1
  69.  @ChoongaLoonga  No. They didn't. M0r0n. 🙄 You're a 🤡
    1
  70.  @vlhc4642  Funny enough that anyone believes anything that comes out of China. Especially their numbers because all they do is lie. Even if what you say is true (it isn't), who cares? What does it have to do with anything now? China's currently in a state of collapse.
    1
  71.  @gerryyan3372  🤣 And a glibbity globbity to you as well. 👍
    1
  72. What? Are you off your meds?
    1
  73.  @hircine92h  Simply put, you're wrong. And educating you would be an exercise in futility. Watch. China is collapsing right now.
    1
  74.  @hircine92h  keep watching. It'll unfold over the next few years. It's a burden being right all the time. 🙂
    1
  75.  @Qwertyuiop-bj8ry  You haven't heard it from me for 2 decades. Regardless, China's currently collapsing. Believe whatever you like. That doesn't change reality. 👍
    1
  76.  @Qwertyuiop-bj8ry  Nope. Quite embedded in the present. Thanks for your concern though. 🙂
    1
  77.  @lhoman8426  Sure. Why not? Wanna go over the numbers?
    1
  78.  @lhoman8426  Then by the same logic Vietnam 1 - 0 China. Thanks for agreeing. 👍
    1
  79.  @faridghiles2472  No. It won't. It NEVER will. Sorry. 🤷
    1
  80.  @AAAAAA-tj1nq  Nope it isn't. Glad you can read a calendar. China may be 2nd most powerful but they're a distant, DISTANT 2nd. Barely visible. Chinese military is pathetic. Just ask the Vietnamese. And if you call flattening Afghanistan, occupying it for yrs and then leaving when we felt like it losing then yeah, we lost. But that's a really weird definition. It's like me beating you to a pulp and then walking away. Did I lose? 🤔
    1
  81.  @lhoman8426  I speak English not Vietnamese. YOU at least write in English. US has the largest economy and most effective military. But if it makes you feel better to cast aspersions, knock yourself out. Doesn't change anything. 🙂
    1
  82.  Scofield Gao  Yep. That's why we're all posting in English. Because the Taliban is awesome and the US sucks. 🙄 Do you clowns even believe the stuff you write?
    1
  83. Yep. And giggling their @$$3$ off. China's a joke.
    1
  84. 🤣 No one cares. U 🤡
    1
  85.  @thedoomisnear4032  Yes. By China I mean CCP. 🙂
    1
  86.  @andyxu1184  🙄 To be my enemy you need to be at least semi-competent. They aren't even that. U 🤡
    1
  87.  @MeWhne  Chinese facts. So, no, not facts at all. Stop for a minute and consider how much power they can generate with diesels as opposed to nuclear reactors. A little critical thinking goes a long way. For some people anyway. 🙄
    1
  88.  @piscessoedroen  You're an ID 10 T. Congratulations. 🙄
    1
  89. What? That doesn't even make sense. The USA can't defend China without help? Did you hit your head?
    1
  90.  @AAAAAA-tj1nq  sure man. Whatever gets you to sleep at night? 👍 🙂
    1
  91.  @AAAAAA-tj1nq  What's the big deal? You claim we get beaten everywhere we go. So no problem! Right? 😁
    1
  92.  rishi westminister  🥱 That's the best you got? 🙄
    1
  93.  @evilbred974  Better go check Chinese demographics. If you need some help deciphering the graph let me know. 👍
    1
  94.  @libertinarey  I'm really impressed by how uninformed you folks are. Very entertaining. Whatever gets you guys and gals to sleep at night. 🙂
    1
  95.  @emmanuelreyes2380  Of course you do. 🥱
    1
  96.  @evilbred974  Sure. Keep telling yourself that. 👍
    1
  97.  @nicholasthebloody163  More specifically the don't have a lot of blue water ships. Not to mention ZERO experience in naval warfare.
    1
  98.  @coocoo112  wow. What an incredible argument. 🙄
    1
  99.  @kenzozo34  yes but completely inadequate for the amounts needed.
    1
  100.  @AAAAAA-tj1nq  oh wow! What a great point. Why do they even bother with seaborne? 🙄 You folks have no idea. So poorly informed.
    1
  101.  @AAAAAA-tj1nq  There ya go! You're not so dumb after all. Congratulations!
    1
  102.  @AAAAAA-tj1nq  🥱 Your story has become tiresome. I'm right, you're wrong. Simple as that. 👍
    1
  103. @awesomeguy2689 Dope 🙄
    1
  104.  @charlessmith8679  what? Do you agree with those 3? They're self loathing Americans.
    1
  105.  @charlessmith8679  I know. It's a welcome addition. Are you familiar with those 3 guys he mentioned?
    1
  106. "How Israel helped the Chinese military become what it is today" You mean a joke? Nah. China did that all by themselves. 👍
    1
  107.  @miraphycs7377  Goody. Their navy is still a joke.
    1
  108. "Russian command made a strategically sensible decision to withdraw completely." Wow. That's some revisionist history. Take a look at all the equipment they left behind. This wasn't a "decision" this was a rout. Sugar coat it all you like it was a debacle.
    1
  109.  @indigard2747  Agreed.
    1
  110.  @jetli740  They retasked a satellite to observe it. You m0r0n
    1