Comments by "Richard Stuczynski" (@Rjsjrjsjrjsj) on "Zeihan on Geopolitics" channel.

  1. 🤣 Well that's just awful. These poor folks have to actually DO something? So unfair. 🙄
    315
  2. My money's on the Ukrainians. Everyone likes to talk about Russia being saved by the winter and that's true. When THEY are being invaded. Not when they're invading. That strategic depth is useless when their opponent doesn't have to go that far.
    239
  3. Watch more of his stuff. He gloats. 🙂
    35
  4.  @ChucksSEADnDEAD  Doubtful
    32
  5. The thing about this conflict is... there are bad people on both sides. Short sighted, ignorant, self involved, bad people. And there will always be bad people.
    26
  6. 🙄 I'm assuming you were all concerned about Trump's age as well. McConnell and Pelosi are both older than Biden.
    18
  7. Define large chunk. Is it more than, say, 1% of total farmland? For instance people make a big deal of all the farmland foreigners own. Turns out it's 3.1% total. Ambiguous terms make reasoned assessment difficult.
    18
  8. 🤣 Yep. Going on several.thousand yrs now waiting for THAT to happen.
    14
  9. Yeah. Just watch any of the videos of a Tesla driving into something. 👍
    13
  10. It's nice that Peter has something of a following now. So when he says something obvious (Russia/China partnership = essentially bull💩) people take it to heart and repeat it. I've been finding quite a few comments on YouTube echoing his views. That's a good thing. 👍🙂
    13
  11. I don't know why anyone would be surprised by this. Frump is all about optics, not substance. To quote De Niro, "He's so f'n $tup1d" 🙄
    13
  12. I can't find one positive comment. 🤔🤷
    11
  13. 🤣 You just throw this in the comments of every Zeihan video? Hilarious! I wonder if it actually works. 🤔
    10
  14. WTF is that supposed to mean?
    9
  15. They do? Where've they been the last 30 yrs?
    8
  16. Liked the Hummingbird. Nice touch. 👍
    8
  17. 🤣 This bot joined 9 hrs ago. THAT is hilarious!! 😉
    8
  18. ​ @baltasarnoreno5973 Of course that assumes you keep them intact. They can be disassembled and repurposed. 😉
    8
  19. Yes! Afghanistan is easily exploited for minerals. That's why the Soviets did it way back in the 80's! 🙄
    7
  20. So what's scary? This all sounds great. 👍😉🤣
    7
  21. Depressing? Where do you get that? Looks real good to me. Oh, just noticed, you're Australian. Even so it shouldn't be too bad at all.
    7
  22. Natasha! We must get Moose and Squirrel! Putin Badenov. 🤣
    6
  23. As an AT veteran I can wholeheartedly say, lucky you to be able to change after 4 days.
    6
  24. As if we needed another example of Putin alternative facts. Exhausting. Just noticed my underwear is blue and yellow so, yeah, I'm with Ukraine too (Peter's tie) 👍
    5
  25.  @Timo-qb1gf  Corey said it succinctly and I alluded to it, if the Chinese could do it they would've done it by now. So, empirically, not clever at all. Which sort of blows up the whole "educated" argument. 🙂
    5
  26. Moldova? Yeah. Right next to Trasnistria. Speed bump on the way to Romania. 🙂
    5
  27.  @trimetrodon  How do you get to sleep at night? Are you a sociopath?
    5
  28. Need the plumbing to make transactions. Yes! I'm picturing pallets of gold (or rubles) showing up on the loaners step. 🙂
    5
  29. I was mildly concerned that Peter might jump on the bandwagon. Concern averted. Spot on. 👍💯
    5
  30. Then we're lucky you have no authority anywhere. 😉
    5
  31. Get on his mailing list. He does these all over the place. Inside and outside.
    4
  32.  @willywonka4340  He is a showman. Actually the one thing I don't like about him.
    4
  33. Yes. Because NONE of us (besides yourself possibly) were confused by his terminology. 🙄
    4
  34. If Germany caves to Russian blackmail that would say it all right there. Feckless. Zero credibility. I honestly can't say which way I think they'll go. Peter. Just get a haircut already. 🙄
    4
  35.  @BW022  So, you have a lot of experience blowing up gas lines?
    4
  36.  @zopEnglandzip  $H!T!! You beat me to it. 👍
    3
  37. Love it when Peter rains on a parade. I don't feel like I'm the only one out here. 👍
    3
  38. 🤣 Sure. Cling to that. 😉
    3
  39.  @listener523  You could say the same about the statement "Smarter than Trump" I get it. You don't like Biden. I don't care. I don't like either of them
    3
  40.  @listener523  Your response to Adam is completely wrong and clearly biased. You're assuming you know what Peter's intent is when, if you actually watch the whole video, it is quite the contrary. He says specifically that Biden knows what he doesn't know. A clear sign of intelligence and adulthood.
    3
  41. He's used the phrase for a bit now. Just FYI.
    3
  42. Ha! AGREED! My comment is similar. This is a win. 👍💯😁
    3
  43.  @BADAB0O0O0O0O0M  🤣 Yeah. They are. 😉
    3
  44.  @Defective1313  But the Japanese were already at war and knew they could fight. Even then there were plenty that thought Pearl Harbor was a bad idea. My point is the Chinese would have to be suicidal to hit an American base. Much more practical and more in line with Xi's rhetoric is taking Taiwan and even he knows that's a losing proposition.
    3
  45. It's a euphemism folks. I'm not actually betting. 🙄
    3
  46.  @boykaunlimitted4514  Care to bet? 🤣
    3
  47.  @BigSmartArmed  There we go! Judging by the comments you're a Russian troll. Now you just confirmed it. 👍
    3
  48.  @JohnHenrySMH  Tell me who's side you're on without telling me who's side you're on. 🙄
    3
  49. Source? That doesn't sound right at all. Empirically speaking it's just wrong.
    3
  50. The Soviets actually pointed nukes at us and had enough to really do something. Germany may have been in a race but they never made one. Do you not like Germans?
    2